Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)

Filed by the Registrant  X
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  
Check the appropriate box:
Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

ýX


Preliminary Proxy Statement

o


Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

o


Definitive Proxy Statement

o


Definitive Additional Materials

o


Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12


DAVITA INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ýX


No fee required.

o


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.



(1)


Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:

o


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o


Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



(1)


Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:



Table of Contents

LOGO




Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement



Table of Contents





PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED APRIL 29, 2016

LOGO

May 13, 2023

















davitaa13.jpg



















Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement



dvalogoa01.jpg

[            ], 2016

_______], 2023



Dear Fellow Stockholder:

Stockholders:


Over the past year, DaVita once again demonstrated its resilience and commitment to making a lasting, positive impact on health care and the lives we touch along the way. The COVID pandemic continued to be difficult for our caregivers and vulnerable patients. Amidst that challenge and intense cost pressure, DaVita made strides in innovation and clinical excellence while uplifting the communities it serves.

We achieved best-ever results in 2022 on several measures that improve the lives of our patients, including the highest number of annual kidney transplants and the highest participation in our chronic kidney disease ("CKD") education program.

Understanding the importance of our team, we made investments to demonstrate our appreciation for the passion and dedication of our caregiving teammates. For our front-line teammates, we:

increased starting wages, merit increases and promotion raises, while further advancing our commitment to pay equity,
decreased medical premiums, out of pocket medical costs and mental health co-pay costs, while enhancing certain benefits, and
provided funding for teammates to pursue their nursing degree as part of our Bridge to Your Dreams program.

We also continued our progress on increasing diverse representation at every level of the organization, along with maintaining an environment where more than 80% of all teammates feel like they belong based on 2022 teammate surveys.

At the same time, we needed to address the real-time challenges of rising costs and implications of the global health pandemic. We maintained a disciplined cost approach by implementing supply chain efficiencies and certain corporate cost reductions, as well as consolidating our facility footprint. These decisions allowed us to make strategic investments to fuel future growth and profitability. Highlights from 2022 include:

DaVita Integrated Kidney Care extending the benefits of integrated care to over 34,000 new patients, including those with CKD and end-stage kidney disease, through the Comprehensive Kidney Care Contracting program and expansion of our health plan partnerships,

announcing a collaboration with Medtronic to create an independent kidney care-focused medical device company to improve the lives of patients with kidney failure,

continuing to scale our international operations,

advancing our digital modernization plan with the launch of our next generation IT platform, designed to enhance clinical care for our patients, and

continued investment to promote patients’ choice of home dialysis modalities.(1)

We remain committed to the essential role DaVita plays in delivering life-sustaining care to patients in communities across the United States and around the world. In a clinical and operating environment full of persisting challenges, we are proud of the strength and perseverance of our patients, physician partners and approximately 70,000 teammates.(2)


(1) Our policy is that modality selection (i.e., Home vs. In-Center) and other decisions related to a patient’s care are always made by the attending nephrologist and patient, and provided pursuant to a physician’s order.

(2) As of December 31, 2022.





Board Composition Reflecting a Demonstrated Commitment to Refreshment and Diversity

Your Board remains committed to maintaining a balance of tenure, skills, experience and a diversity of backgrounds and viewpoints. Towards this goal, in 2022 we appointed two new independent directors to the Board. In May 2022, we appointed Jason Hollar, who is the current CEO of Cardinal Health Inc., a global integrated healthcare services and products company. Mr. Hollar brings to our Board over 25 years of financial and operational experience spanning the healthcare, transportation, and manufacturing industries. Additionally, in September 2022, we appointed Adam Schechter, who serves as President, CEO and Chairman of the Board for Labcorp. Mr. Schechter brings to our Board over 15 years of public company and healthcare experience. Mr. Schechter also has obtained a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight, a credential that demonstrates a commitment to advanced cyber-risk oversight.

As a Company and a Board, we believe that a diversity of background, thought and experience enhances our effectiveness. We are proud of the fact that as of December 31, 2022, 80% of our Board leadership was diverse.

Robust Engagement with Stockholders that Includes Independent Directors

We continue to proactively engage with our stockholders to enhance our understanding of and allow us to be responsive to your perspectives and needs. Since our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we reached out to stockholders representing approximately 80% of shares outstanding and through some combination of management, the Chair of our Board, and the Chair of our Compensation Committee we met with stockholders representing approximately 60% of DaVita's outstanding shares.(3) In recent years, these discussions have helped inform changes to our compensation practices such as the requirement for above-median TSR performance for executives to receive target level PSU vesting and to further link DaVita’s ESG performance to executive pay, among other things. In addition, after consideration of feedback from stockholders, we have further enhanced our political and lobbying spending disclosures to include in our semi-annual reports itemized lists of the non-deductible portion of dues and payments to trade associations in excess of $50,000 and itemized tabular disclosure of certain contributions to political parties, candidates and committees.

Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility

The Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee oversees DaVita’s policies and programs related to corporate governance, and environmental and social responsibility. Being a responsible corporate citizen has long been a priority at DaVita, and we are pleased to invite yoube included in the Dow Jones Sustainability World Indices for the fifth year in a row in recognition of our corporate responsibility initiatives and performance in regards to attendESG practices. For the past 15 years we have published an annual social responsibility report we call Community Care, highlighting DaVita’s and our teammates’ contributions and support of the communities in which we live and operate.

Some social responsibility highlights from this past year include:

– Our virtual power purchase agreements now produce enough renewable energy to power 100% of our U.S. operations.

– The DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. annual meetingGiving Foundation supported the Food is Medicine Coalition with a grant to provide medically tailored meals to end-stage kidney disease patients.

– We committed to net zero by 2050 as part of the White House and HHS Climate Sector Pledge.

While caring for our patients and teammates, and supporting our community, we have maintained our focus on stewarding resources responsibly to deliver financial results for our stockholders. The annual meeting

(3) Calculations relating to all stockholder outreach statistics were performed using stockholders of DaVita shares outstanding as of September 30, 2022.






Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") will be held on Monday,Tuesday, June 20, 2016,6, 2023, at 5:30 p.m.,10:00 AM Mountain Time at DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc., 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202.. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement will serve as your guide to the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting and provide details on attending the virtual meeting.

Among other items,


To our stockholders, thank you for the trust, confidence and investment you have placed in us. We greatly appreciate your feedback and support, as we continue to work to meet the needs of our patients at every step along their kidney health journey.

Very truly yours,
Javier J. RodriguezPamela M. Arway
Director and Chief Executive OfficerChair of the Board




































This letter, and the accompanying Proxy Statement, contain or refer to certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Please see the section of the Proxy Statement includestitled “General Information — Forward-Looking Statements” below for more information about the qualifications of our director nominees and the compensation of our executive officers that is relevant to matters that will be presented at the annual meeting. During the meeting, we will also report to you on the Company and provide an opportunity for stockholders to engage in a dialogue with management.

We hope that you will participate in the annual meeting, either by attending and voting in person or voting by other available methods as promptly as possible. Voting by anyregarding these forward-looking statements.





Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The 2023 Annual Meeting of the available methods will ensure that you are represented at the annual meeting, even if you are not present. You may vote your proxy via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail. Please follow the instructions on the NoticeStockholders (the "Annual Meeting") of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that you receive in the mail and/or your proxy card.

Your vote is very important to us and to our business. Please take the first opportunity to ensure that your shares are represented at the annual meeting.

Thank you very much for your continued interest in our business.

Sincerely,

SIGNATURE

Kent J. Thiry
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc., and
Chief Executive Officer, HealthCare Partners


Table of Contents

  Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting
  of Stockholders

Monday, June 20, 2016
5:30 p.m., Mountain Time
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc.
2000 16th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202

The 2016 annual meeting of the stockholders of DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be a virtual-only meeting to be held as a live audio webcastover the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2023on Monday,Tuesday, June 20, 20166, 2023 at 5:30 p.m.,10:00 AM Mountain Time, at DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc., 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, forTime.


Meeting Agenda and Voting Matters
Stockholders will be asked to vote on the following purposes, whichmatters at the DaVita Inc. (the "Company" or "DaVita")2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting"):
Items of BusinessBoard RecommendationWhere to Find More Information in the Proxy Statement
To vote upon the election of the nine director nominees, identified in the accompanying Proxy Statement, to the Board of Directors, each to serve until the Company's 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;"FOR" all nomineesPages [__]
To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023;"FOR"Page [__]
To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers;"FOR"Page [__]
To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation; and"1 YEAR"Page [__]
To approve an amendment and restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to provide for the exculpation of officers as permitted by Delaware law."FOR"Pages [__]
We also intend to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Your vote is important. Please vote promptly. Information on voting deadlines and available voting methods are further describedset out in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

To vote uponStatement under the electionheading "How to Vote."
Stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 14, 2023 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. During the ten director nominees identified indays prior to the attachedAnnual Meeting, you may contact Investor Relations at 1-888-484-7505 to request the list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO
BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2023:

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement toand Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Samantha A. Caldwell
Corporate Secretary
[_______], 2023



Table of Contents
Insider Trading Policy



Table of Contents



Corporate Governance
The general corporate governance framework for DaVita Inc. (the "Company") is set by its Amended and Restated Bylaws (the "Bylaws"), Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters for each of the Committees of our Board of Directors (the "Board"), the Code of Ethics and the Code of Conduct. Each of these governance documents is available under the Corporate Governance section of our website, located atwww.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
At the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting"), stockholders will elect nine directors each to serve until the 2017 annual meetingCompany's 2024 Annual Meeting of stockholders of the CompanyStockholders (the "2024 Annual Meeting") or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
To ratifyqualified, subject to such director’s earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal.
Voting Standard for Director Elections
The Bylaws require that, in uncontested elections, each director be elected by the appointmentmajority of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016;
To hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation;
To adopt and approve proposed amendments to our Amended and Restated Bylaws to adopt proxy access;
To adopt and approve an amendment to increasevotes cast by the numberholders of shares available under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan by 7,500,000 shares;
To consider and vote upon a stockholder proposal regarding action by written consent, if properly presented at the annual meeting; and
To transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof.

We will mail, on or about May [            ], 2016, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to stockholders of record and beneficial owners as of the close of business on April 22, 2016. On the date of mailing of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, the proxy materials will be accessible on a website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. These proxy materials will be available free of charge.

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will also identify the date, time, and location of the annual meeting; the matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting and the Board of Directors' recommendation with regard to each matter; a toll-free telephone number, an e-mail address, and a website where stockholders can request a paper or e-mail copy of the Proxy Statement, our Annual Report to Stockholders, and a form of proxy relating to the annual meeting; information on how to access the form of proxy over the Internet and how to vote over the Internet; and information on how to obtain directions to attend the annual meeting and vote in person. If you attend the annual meeting and previously used the telephone or Internet voting systems, or mailed your completed proxy card, you may vote in person at the meeting if you wish to change your vote in any way.

Please note that all votes cast via telephone or the Internet must be cast prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on Sunday, June 19, 2016.

By order of the Board of Directors,

SIGNATURE

Martha Ha
Corporate Secretary
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc.

May [            ], 2016


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Proxy Statement

1

General Information

1

Voting Information

2

Votes Required for Proposals

2

Proxy Solicitation Costs

2

Delivery of Proxy Statement and Annual Report

3

Admission to Annual Meeting

3

Electronic Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2016 Annual Meeting

4

Proposal 1 Election of Directors

5

Information Concerning Members of the Board Standing for Election

6

Corporate Governance


10

Selection of Directors

10

Director Independence

10

Leadership Structure and Meetings of Independent Directors

11

Communications with the Board

12

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

12

Information Regarding the Board and its Committees

12

Committees of the Board

13

Overview of Committee Membership Qualifications

15

Risk Oversight

15

Board Share Ownership Policy

15

Code of Ethics and Codes of Conduct

16

Insider Trading Policy

16

Proposal 2 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

17

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

17

Proposal 3 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

18

Proposal 4 Stockholder Approval of Proposed Amendments to our Amended and Related Bylaws to Adopt Proxy Access

20

Proposal 5 Amendment to Increase the Number of Shares Available Under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan by 7,500,000 Shares

24

Proposal 6 Stockholder Proposal Regarding Action by Written Consent

28

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management


30

Information Concerning Our Executive Officers

32

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

33

Compensation Discussion and Analysis


34

Table of Contents

34

Compensation Discussion and Analysis Information

35

Compensation Committee Report


53

Executive Compensation


54

2015 Summary Compensation Table

54

2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

56

2015 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

57

2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

59

No Pension Benefits

59

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

59

2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

59

Voluntary Deferral Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan

60

Executive Retirement Plan

60

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

61

Compensation of Directors


67

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation


70

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions


71

Audit Committee Report


72

Stockholder Proposals for 2017 Annual Meeting

73

Other Matters


74

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

  Proxy Statement

General Information

We are delivering this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (the "Board"), for use at our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders, which we will hold on Monday, June 20, 2016 at 5:30 p.m., Mountain Time, at DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. (the "Company"), 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. The proxies will remain valid for use at any meetings held upon adjournment of that meeting. The record date for the annual meeting is the close of business on April 22, 2016. All holders of record of our common stock on the record date are entitled to notice of the annual meeting and to vote at the annual meeting and any meetings held upon adjournment of that meeting. Our principal executive offices are located at 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202, and our telephone number is (303) 405-2100. To obtain directions to our annual meeting, visit our website, located athttp://www.davita.com.

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each stockholder of record or beneficial owner, we are furnishing the proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet, which include this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of Meeting, Proxy Card, and Annual Report to Stockholders. Because you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, unless you have previously made a permanent election to receive these materials in paper copy. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instructs you as to how you may access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials, and how you may submit your vote by proxy on the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be first mailed on or about May [    ], 2016 to all stockholders of record as of April 22, 2016.

Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, please vote by telephone, Internet, or request a

Proxy Card to complete, sign, date and return by mail to ensure that your shares will be voted at the annual meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to its use by filing with our secretary an instrument revoking it or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the annual meeting and voting in person.

If you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, please so indicate when you submit your proxy by mail, by telephone or via the Internet and bring with you the items that are required pursuant to the Company's admission process for the 2016 Annual Meeting. A description of the admission process can be found below in this Proxy Statement under the heading "General Information — Admission to Annual Meeting."

Unless you instruct otherwise in the proxy, any proxy that is given and not revoked will be voted at the annual meeting:

    For the election of the ten director nominees identified in this proxy statement to serve until the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders of the Company or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
    For the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016;
    For the approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation;
    For the adoption and approval of the proposed amendments to our Amended and Restated Bylaws to adopt proxy access;
    For the adoption and approval of an amendment to increase the number of shares available under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan by 7,500,000 shares;
    Against the stockholder proposal regarding action by written consent, if properly presented at the annual meeting; and
    As determined by the proxy holders named in the Proxy Card in their discretion, with regard to all other matters as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      1


Table of Contents





Voting Information

Our only voting securities are the outstanding shares of our common stock. At the record date, we had approximately 206,518,830 shares of common stock outstanding. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote per share on each matter that we will consider at this meeting. Stockholders are not entitled to cumulate votes. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, your bank, broker, or other nominee may not vote your uninstructed shares in the election of directors and certain other matters on a discretionary basis. Accordingly, brokers holding shares of record for their customers generally are not entitled to vote on these matters unless their customers give them specific voting instructions. If the broker does not receive specific instructions, the broker will note this on the proxy form or otherwise advise us that it lacks voting authority. Thus, if you hold your shares in "street name," meaning that your shares are registered in the name of your bank,

broker, or other nominee, and you do not instruct your bank, broker, or other nominee how to vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any proposal other than the proposal for the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016. The votes that the brokers would have cast if their customers had given them specific instructions are commonly called "broker non-votes." If the stockholders of record present in personvirtually or represented by their proxiesproxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting hold at leastthereon. In a majority of our shares of common stock outstanding as of the record date, a quorum will exist for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. Stockholders attending the annual meeting in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting who abstain from voting and broker non-votescontested election, directors are counted as present for quorum purposes.

Votes Required for Proposals

Directors are elected by a majority of votes cast, which means that the number of shares voted "for" each of the ten nominees for election to the Board must exceed 50% of the number of votes cast with respect to each nominee's election. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the election of directors. In the event that the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, which is a situation that we do not anticipate, directors will be elected by a plurality of the shares represented in personvirtually or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors.

The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016, the approval of the proposal regarding the advisory vote on executive compensation, the approval of the proxy amendments to our Bylaws, the approval of the amendment to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the stockholder proposal, if properly brought before

the annual meeting, each require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present at the annual meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. Because your vote on executive compensation and the stockholder proposal is advisory, the results of those votes will not be binding on the Company or the Board. However, the Board and any applicable Board committee will consider the voting results as appropriate when making future decisions regarding executive compensation and matters related to the subject of the stockholder proposal. Abstentions are considered present and entitled to vote with respect to each of these proposals and will, therefore, have the same effect as votes against these proposals. Except for the proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016, broker non-votes will not be considered as present and entitled to vote on these proposals, and will therefore have no effect on the number of affirmative votes needed to approve these proposals.

Proxy Solicitation Costs

We will pay for the cost of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of Meeting, Proxy Card, and Annual Report to Stockholders to our stockholders, as well as the cost of our solicitation of proxies relating to

the annual meeting. We may request banks and brokers to solicit their customers who beneficially own our common stock listed of record in names of nominees. We will reimburse these banks and brokers for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses regarding these solicitations. We have also retained MacKenzie

2


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement



Partners, Inc. ("MacKenzie") to assist in the distribution and solicitation of proxies and to verify records related to the solicitation at a fee of $15,000 plus reimbursement for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred during the solicitation. MacKenzie and our officers, directors and employees may supplement the original solicitation by mail of proxies, by telephone,

facsimile, e-mail and personal solicitation. We will pay no additional compensation to our officers, directors and employees for these activities. We have agreed to indemnify MacKenzie against liabilities and expenses arising in connection with the proxy solicitation unless caused by MacKenzie's negligence or intentional misconduct.

Delivery of Proxy Statement and Annual Report

Beneficial owners, but not record holders, of our common stock who share a single address may receive only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and, as applicable, an Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, unless their broker has received contrary instructions from any beneficial owner at that address. This practice, known as "householding," is designed to reduce printing and mailing costs. If any beneficial owner at such an address wishes to discontinue householding and receive a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and, if applicable, an Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, they should notify their broker. Beneficial owners sharing an address to which a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability

of Proxy Materials and, if applicable, an Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement was delivered can also request prompt delivery of a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and, if applicable, an Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement by contacting Investor Relations at the following address or phone number: Attn: Investor Relations, DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc., 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, (888) 484-7505. Additionally, stockholders who share the same address and receive multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and, if applicable, an Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement, can request a single copy by contacting us at the address or phone number above.

Admission to Annual Meeting

Admission to the annual meeting will be limited to holders of the Company's common stock, family members accompanying holders of the Company's common stock, persons holding executed proxies from stockholders who held the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016 and such other persons as the chair of the annual meeting shall determine.

If you are a holder of the Company's common stock, you must bring certain documents with you in order to be admitted to the annual meeting and in order to bring family members with you. The purpose of this requirement is to help us verify that you are actually a holder of the Company's common stock. Please read the following procedures carefully, because they specify the documents that you must bring with you to the annual meeting in order to be admitted. The items that you must bring with you differ depending upon whether or not you were a record holder of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016. A "record holder" of stock is someone whose shares of stock are registered in his or her name in the records of the Company's transfer agent. Many stockholders are not record holders because their shares of stock are held in "street name," meaning that the shares are registered in the name of their broker, bank or other nominee, and the broker, bank or other nominee is the record holder

instead. If you are unsure as to whether you were a record holder of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016, please call the Company's transfer agent, Computershare, at (877) 889-2012.

If you were a record holder of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016, then you must bring a valid personal photo identification (such as a driver's license or passport).

At the annual meeting, we will check your name for verification purposes against our list of record holders as of the close of business on April 22, 2016.

If a broker, bank or other nominee was the record holder of your shares of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016, then you must bring:

    valid personal photo identification (such as a driver's license or passport); and
    proof that you owned shares of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      3


Table of Contents





Examples of proof of ownership include the following: (i) an original or a copy of the voting instruction from your bank or broker with your name on it, (ii) a letter from your bank or broker stating that you owned the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016, or (iii) a brokerage account statement indicating that you owned the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016.

If you acquired your shares of the Company's common stock at any time after the close of business on April 22, 2016, you do not have the right to vote at the annual meeting, but you may attend the meeting if you bring with you:

    valid personal photo identification (such as a driver's license or passport); and
    proof that you own shares of the Company's common stock.

Examples of proof of ownership include the following:

    if a broker, bank or other nominee is the record holder of your shares of the Company's common stock: (i) a letter from your bank or broker stating that you acquired the Company's common stock after April 22, 2016, or (ii) a brokerage account statement as of a date after April 22, 2016 indicating that you own the Company's common stock; or
    if you are the record holder of your shares of the Company's common stock, a copy of your stock certificate or a confirmation acceptable to the Company that you bought the stock after April 22, 2016.

If you are a proxy holder for a stockholder of the Company who owned shares of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016, then you must bring:

    the executed proxy naming you as the proxy holder, signed by a stockholder of the Company who owned shares of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016;
    valid personal photo identification (such as a driver's license or passport); and
    if the stockholder whose proxy you hold was not a record holder of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016, proof of the stockholder's ownership of shares of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016, in the form of (i) an original or a copy of the voting instruction form from the stockholder's bank or broker with the stockholder's name on it, or (ii) a letter or statement from a bank, broker or other nominee indicating that the stockholder owned the Company's common stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2016.

No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted at the annual meeting. Shares may be voted in person at the annual meeting only by (a) the record holder as of the close of business on April 22, 2016 or (b) a person holding a valid proxy executed by such record holder.

Electronic Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2016 Annual Meeting

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on June 20, 2016. This Proxy Statement and the Annual

Report to Stockholders and Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015 are available electronically atwww.proxyvote.com.

4


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement



Proposal 1 Election of Directors

At the annual meeting, you will elect ten directors to serve until the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified, subject to such director's earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal.

Our bylaws require that each director be elected by the majority of votes cast with respect to such director in uncontested elections. In a contested election, where the number of nominees for director exceeds the number of directors to be elected, directors are elected by a plurality of shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. If a nominee for director who was in officeserved as a director prior to the electionAnnual Meeting is not elected by a majority of votes cast,the requisite vote, the director must promptly tender his or her resignation from the Board, and the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board will make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action.resignation. The Board, excluding the director in question, will act on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee and publicly disclose its decision and its rationale within 90 days (or, if so extended by the Board in certain circumstances, within 180 days) from the date the election results are certified. If a nominee for director who was not already serving as a director does not receive a majority of votes cast in an uncontested electionthe requisite vote at the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, the nominee is not elected to the Board. All 20162023 director nominees are currently serving on the Board.

Director Nominees
After a thorough evaluation, and in alignment with the Nominating and Governance Committee's recommendation, the Board has nominated Pamela M. Arway, Charles G. Berg, Barbara J. Desoer, Jason M. Hollar, Gregory J. Moore, M.D., Ph.D., John M. Nehra, Javier J. Rodriguez, Adam H. Schechter, and Phyllis R. Yale for election as directors. Paul J. Diaz is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting and will step down as a member of the Board effective as of June 6, 2023. We thank Mr. Diaz for his service and his many valuable contributions to our Board. Mr. Schechter, who was appointed as a member of the Board in September 2022, was recommended to the Nominating and Governance Committee by a third-party executive search firm. Please see the section titled “Corporate Governance — Selection of Directors” below for more information about the nomination process.
None of the director nominees has any family relationship with any other nominee or with any of our executive officers and no arrangement or understanding exists between any nominee and any other person or persons pursuant

to which a nominee was or is to be selected as a director or nominee.

After a thorough evaluation and assessment, the Nominating and Governance Committee has recommended, and the Board has re-nominated, Pamela M. Arway, Charles G. Berg, Carol Anthony ("John") Davidson, Barbara J. Desoer, Paul J. Diaz, Peter T. Grauer, John M. Nehra, William L. Roper, Kent J. Thiry and Roger J. Valine for election as directors. Please see the section titled "Corporate Governance — Selection of Directors" below for more information about the re-nomination process.

Nine Eight of the tennine director nominees for director have been determined to beare independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") listing standards (the "NYSE Independence Standards"). Please see the section titled "Corporate“Corporate Governance — Director Independence"Independence” below for more information. Each director nominee has consented to being named as a nominee in this Proxy Statement as a nominee and has agreed to serve as a director, if elected.

Proxies
Unless a stockholder has made a contrary direction via its proxy, the proxy indicates otherwise, the personsholders named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card (the “Company Proxies”) have advised us that at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting they intend to vote the shares covered by the proxies for"for" the election of each of the director nominees named above.in this Proxy Statement. If one or more of the nominees areany director nominee is unable or not willingunwilling to serve, the persons named as proxiesCompany Proxies may vote for the election of the substitute nomineesnominee that the Board may propose. The accompanying proxy contains a discretionary grant of authority with respect to this matter. The persons named as proxiesProxies may not votebe voted for a greater number of personsmore than the number of nominees named above.

nine director nominees.
1

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      5


Table of Contents






Information Concerning Members of the Board Standing for Election

Biographies of our Director Nominees

A biography of each director nominee, current as of March 31, 2016,[_______], 2023, setting forth his or her age, and describing his or her business experience during the past five years, including other prior relevant business experience, is presented below.

photo_Pamarway1.jpg
Former President of the Japan, Asia-Pacific, Australia Region, American Express International, Inc.
Independent Director Since: 2009
Board Chair Since: 2020
Committee Service: Compensation Committee; Nominating and Governance Committee
Other Public Company Boards:
The Hershey Company (NYSE: HSY)
Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM)
GRAPHIC
Pamela M. Arway, 62, has been one of our directors since May 2009. From 2005 to 2007, Ms. Arway69, served as the presidentPresident of the Japan, Asia-Pacific, Australia region for American Express International, Japan, Asia-Pacific, Australia region,Inc., a global payment services and travel company.company, from 2005 to 2008. Ms. Arway joined the American Express Company in 1987, after which sheand subsequently served in various capacities, including as chief executive officerChief Executive Officer ("CEO") of American Express Australia Limited from 2004 to 2005 and as executive vice presidentExecutive Vice President of Corporate Travel, North America from 2000 to 2004. Prior to her retirement in October 2008, she also served as advisor to the American Express Company's chairmanCompany’s Chairman and chief executive officer.CEO. Since May 2010, Ms. Arway has also been a member of the boardBoard of theDirectors of The Hershey Company, a chocolate and confectionaryconfectionery company, and since May 2010. She currently serves as the Chair of the Governance Committee and asMarch 2014, Ms. Arway has been a member of the Audit and Executive CommitteesBoard of Hershey Company's board. She joined the boardDirectors of Iron Mountain Incorporated, an enterprise information management services company, in March 2014 and serves as chair of its Compensation Committee.company. Ms. Arway brings significant leadership experience as a global executive, with extensive management experience in the areas of marketing, international business, finance and government affairs. With her service as a director on the boards of other large public companies, Ms. Arway also brings significant experience in corporate governance and executive compensation-related matters.
charlesgberga01.jpg
Senior Advisor, The Cigna Group
Independent Director Since: 2022
Director Since: 2007
Committee Service: Compliance and Quality Committee



GRAPHIC
Charles G. Berg, 58,65, has been oneserved as a Senior Advisor for The Cigna Group (“Cigna”), a global health service company, since January 2023, and served as President of our directors since March 2007.U.S. Government Business and Senior Advisor for Cigna from January 2022 to January 2023. Mr. Berg served as executive chairman andExecutive Chair of DaVita Medical Group ("DMG"), DaVita's former integrated healthcare business, from November 2016 until December 2017. From 2008 to 2013, Mr. Berg served as a member of the board of directorsExecutive Chair of WellCare Health Plans, Inc. ("WellCare"(“WellCare”), a provider of managed care services for government-sponsored healthcare programs from January 2008 to December 2010.programs. Mr. Berg served as non-executive chairmanNon-Executive Chair of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of WellCare from January 2011 until his retirement in May 2013. From January 2007 to April 2009, Mr. Berg was a senior advisorSenior Advisor to Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, a private equity firm. From April 1998 to July 2004, Mr. Berg held various executive positions, including Executive Vice President - Medical Delivery, President and Chief Operating Officer ("COO") with Oxford Health Plans, Inc. ("Oxford"(“Oxford”), a health benefit plan provider, which included chief executive officer from November 2002 to July 2004provider. He was the CEO when Oxford was acquired by UnitedHealth Group, president and chief operating officer from March 2001 to November 2002 and executive vice president, medical delivery from April 1998 to March 2001. From July 2004 to September 2006, Mr. Berg served asGroup. He then became an executive of UnitedHealth Group and was primarily responsible for integrating the Oxford business. Mr. Berg also currently serves onas a member of the Operating Council & Senior Advisory Board of Consonance Capital Partners, a private equity firm, and the board of directors of Justworks, Inc., a private human resources and payment company.firm. Mr. Berg is an experienced business leader with significant experience in the healthcare industry and brings an understanding of the operational, financial and regulatory aspects of our industry and business.

6


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement



dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
2


Photo_DesoerB.jpg
Former Chief Executive Officer, Citibank, N.A.
Independent Director Since: 2015
Committee Service: Compensation Committee, Chair; Audit Committee
Other Public Company Boards:
Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C)
GRAPHICCarol Anthony ("John") Davidson
Barbara J. Desoer, 60, has been one of our directors since December 2010. From January 2004 until his retirement in September 2012, Mr. Davidson70, served as the senior vice president, controllerCEO and chief accounting officer of Tyco International Ltd. ("Tyco"), a provider of diversified industrial products and services. Prior to joining Tyco in January 2004, he spent six years at Dell Inc., a computer and technology services company, where he held various leadership roles, including vice president, audit, risk and compliance, and vice president, corporate controller. In addition, he previously spent 16 years at Eastman Kodak Company, a provider of imaging technology products and services, in a variety of accounting and financial leadership roles. Mr. Davidson is a director of Pentair Plc., a provider of products and solutions in water, fluids, thermal management and equipment protection, Legg Mason Inc., a global asset management firm, and TE Connectivity Ltd., a technology company that was spun off by Tyco. From 2010 to 2015, Mr. Davidson was a member of the Board of Trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation which oversees financial accounting and reporting standards setting processes for the United States. Mr. Davidson also serves on the Board of Governors of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Mr. Davidson is a CPA with more than 30 years of leadership experience across multiple industries and brings a strong track record of building and leading global teams and implementing governance and controls processes.
GRAPHICBarbara J. Desoer, 63, has been one of our directors since October 2015. Ms. Desoer currently serves as the chief executive officer and a member of the board of directorsDirectors of Citibank, N.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc. and, a diversified global financial services company, sinceboth positions she held from April 2014. Ms. Desoer previously served as the chief operating officer2014 through April 2019, and COO of Citibank, N.A. from October 2013 to April 2014. In addition to her chief executive officer responsibilities, Ms. Desoer leads Citigroup's comprehensive capital analysis and review process. Prior to Citibank, N.A., Ms. Desoer spent 35 years at Bank of America, a diversified global financial services company, most recently as president,President, Bank of America Home Loans, where she led the integration of Countrywide, the largest mortgage originator and servicer in the United States. In previous Bank of America roles, Ms. Desoer wasserved as a Global Technology & Operations executive, an international market-focused position leading teams in the United Kingdom, Asia and Latin America. She alsoAmerica, and President, Consumer Products. Since April 2019, Ms. Desoer has served as president, Consumer Products.Chair of Citibank, N.A. and as a director of Citigroup, Inc. She serves on the boardAdvisory Board of visitors at the University of California at Berkeley.InStride. Ms. Desoer also has served on the board of directors of various non-profit and privately held corporations. Ms. Desoer is an experienced business leader with extensive management and international experience, and brings a deep understanding of regulated businesses.
jason_hollar.jpg
Chief Executive Officer, Cardinal Health, Inc.
Independent Director Since: 2022
Committee Service: Audit Committee, Chair*
Other Public Company Boards:
Cardinal Health, Inc.(NYSE: CAH)
GRAPHICPaul J. Diaz
Jason M. Hollar, 54, has been one of our directors since July 2007. Mr. Diaz serves as the executive vice chairman of Kindred Healthcare, Inc. ("Kindred"), a provider of long-term healthcare services in the United States, a position he has held since March 2015. Since August 2014, Mr. Diaz50, has served as the CEO and a partner at Guidon Partners LP, an investment strategy partnership. Hemember of the Board of Directors of Cardinal Health, Inc. ("Cardinal"), a global integrated healthcare services and products company, since September 2022. Prior to his appointment as CEO, Mr. Hollar served as chief executive officerChief Financial Officer for Cardinal from May 2020 to September 2022, where he led financial activities across the enterprise including financial strategy, capital deployment, treasury, tax, investor relations, accounting and reporting. Prior to Cardinal, from June 2018 until April 2020, Mr. Hollar served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KindredTenneco Inc. ("Tenneco"), a global automotive products and services company, where he was responsible for financial planning and analysis, accounting and reporting, tax, treasury and investor relations for the company. At Tenneco, Mr. Hollar also served as Senior Vice President, Finance from January 2004June 2017 to March 2015,June 2018. From October 2016 to June 2017, Mr. Hollar served as well as president from January 2002 to May 2012the Chief Financial Officer of Sears Holding Corporation ("Sears"), a holding company for large consumer retailers across the U.S., and as chief operating officerSenior Vice President, Finance from January 2002October 2014 to December 2003.October 2016. Sears filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October 2018. Mr. Hollar is an experienced finance leader who brings to the Board more than 25 years of financial and operational experience spanning the healthcare, transportation, manufacturing and retail sectors.
GregMoore-bio-rev.jpg
Former Corporate Vice President, Microsoft Health and Life Sciences
Independent Director Since: 2021
Committee Service: Compliance and Quality Committee; Nominating and Governance Committee
Gregory J. Moore, M.D., Ph.D., 58, served as Corporate Vice President for Microsoft Health and Life Sciences, a division of Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft"), a multinational technology company that produces computer software, cloud computing services, personal computers and electronics, and other related services, from 2019 to April 2023, where he led Microsoft's health and life sciences research and product development portfolio. Prior to joining Kindred, Mr. DiazMicrosoft, Dr. Moore served as Vice President of Google Inc. ("Google"), a multinational technology company that specializes in Internet-related products and services, from 2016 to 2019, and was the managingfounder and leader of Google Cloud Healthcare and Life Sciences globally. Dr. Moore is an engineer, practicing physician, and experienced educator. He is board certified in Diagnostic Radiology, Neuroradiology and Clinical Informatics. Prior to his leadership roles at Microsoft and Google, Dr. Moore served as the Chief Emerging Technology and Informatics Officer at Geisinger Health System, a regional healthcare provider, where he was also Director of the Institute of Advanced Application. His prior academic and clinical appointments include Stanford University School of Medicine, Penn State University College of Medicine, and Wayne State University School of Medicine. From 2019 until its merger with Baxter International Inc. in 2021, Dr. Moore was a member of Falcon Capital Partners, LLC, a private investment and consulting firm, and from 1996 to July 1998, Mr. Diaz served in various executive capacities with Mariner Health Group, Inc., a health care facility operator, including as executive vice president and chief operating officer. Mr. Diaz serves on the boardsBoard of Kindred and Patterson MedicalDirectors of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., a private medical supply distribution company, andtechnology provider. Dr. Moore brings to the board of visitors of Georgetown University Law Center and previously served on the board of PharMerica Corporation. Mr. Diaz is an experienced business leader with significantBoard substantial experience in the healthcare industrymedical field as a practitioner and brings an understanding ofhas a unique perspective, having also worked in the operational, financial and regulatory aspects of our industry and business.high technology sector for the last several years.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      7

3

Table of Contents






johnmnehraa01.jpg
Former General Partner, New Enterprise Associates
Independent Director Since: 2000
Committee Service: Audit Committee; Compensation Committee; Nominating and Governance Committee
Other Public Company Boards:
CVRx, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVRX)
GRAPHICPeter T. Grauer, 70, has been one of our directors since August 1994 and our lead independent director since 2003. Mr. Grauer has been chairman of the board of Bloomberg,  Inc., a business and financial information company, since April 2001, treasurer since March 2001 and was its chief executive officer from March 2002 until July 2011. Mr. Grauer has also served as a non-executive director of Glencore plc, a global mining and commodities firm listed on the London Stock Exchange, since June 2013. From November 2000 until March 2002, Mr. Grauer was a managing director of Credit Suisse First Boston, a financial services firm. From September 1992 until November 2000, upon the merger of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette ("DLJ"), a financial services firm, into Credit Suisse First Boston, Mr. Grauer was a managing director and founding partner of DLJ Merchant Banking Partners. Mr. Grauer serves as a director of Blackstone Group, L.P., a publicly traded global investment and advisory firm. Mr. Grauer has significant experience as a business leader and brings a deep understanding of our business and industry through his over 20 years of service as a member of the Board.
GRAPHIC
John M. Nehra, 67, has been one of our directors since November 2000. From74, was, from 1989 until his retirement in August 2014, Mr. Nehra was affiliated with New Enterprise Associates ("NEA"(“NEA”), a venture capital firm, including, from 1993 until his retirement, as general partnerGeneral Partner of several of its affiliated venture capital limited partnerships. After his retirement in August 2014, Mr. Nehra remained a retired Special Partner with NEA and continued serving on the board of directors of a number of NEA’s portfolio companies. Mr. Nehra also served as managing general partnerManaging General Partner of Catalyst Ventures, a venture capital firm,an affiliate of NEA, from 1989 to 2013. Since 2021, Mr. Nehra has served onas a member of the boardsBoard of CVRx, Inc., a number of NEA's portfolio companies until his retirement in August 2014 and remains a retired special partner of NEA.commercial-stage medical device company. Mr. Nehra is an experienced business leader with approximately 4445 years of experience in investment banking, research and capital markets and he brings a deep understanding of our business and industry through his nearly 1523 years of service as a member of the Board as well as significant experience in the healthcare industry through his involvement with NEA'sNEA’s healthcare-related portfolio companies.
javierrodrigueza01.jpg
Chief Executive Officer, DaVita Inc.
Director Since: 2019
Other Public Company Boards:
Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: GILD)
Javier J. Rodriguez,52, has served as our CEO since June 2019. From March 2014 until June 2019, he served as the CEO of DaVita Kidney Care. Since joining the Company in 1998, Mr. Rodriguez has served in a number of different capacities. From February 2012 to March 2014, he served as our President. From April 2006 through February 2012, he served as our Senior Vice President. Before that, from 2000 to 2006 he served as a Vice President of Operations and Payor Contracting. Mr. Rodriguez joined the Company in 1998 as a Director of Value Management. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Rodriguez worked for Baxter Healthcare Corporation in Finance from 1995 to 1996. He also previously served as Director of Operations for CBS Marketing Inc. in Mexico City. Since June 2020, Mr. Rodriguez has been a member of the Board of Directors of Gilead Sciences, Inc., a research-based pharmaceutical company. Mr. Rodriguez provides extensive knowledge of our industry, business, regulatory environment and operations as well as significant executive leadership and management experience.
Adam Schechter (8.2022).jpg
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, Labcorp
Independent Director Since: 2022

Committee Service: Audit Committee; Compliance and Quality Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
Labcorp (NYSE: LH)
GRAPHICDr. William L. Roper
Adam H. Schechter, 67,58, has been oneserved as Chairman of our directorsthe Board of Labcorp, a leading global life sciences company, since May 2001. Dr. Roper has been chief executive officer of the University of North Carolina ("UNC") Health Care System, dean of the UNC School of Medicine and vice chancellor for medical affairs of UNC since March 2004. Dr. Roper also continues to serve2020, as a professordirector of health policyLabcorp since April 2013, and administration in the UNC School of Public HealthPresident and a professor of pediatrics and of social medicine in the UNC School of Medicine. From 1997 until March 2004, he was dean of the UNC School of Public Health. Before joining UNC in 1997, Dr. RoperChief Executive Officer since November 2019. Mr. Schechter previously served as senior vice presidentspecial advisor to the CEO of Prudential Health Care. He also served as directorMerck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”), a multinational pharmaceutical company, from January 2019 to July 2019. From 2010 to 2018, Mr. Schechter was an Executive Vice President of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 1990 to 1993, on the senior White House staff in 1989 and 1990 and as the administrator of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from 1986 to 1989. Dr. RoperMerck, where he was a member of Merck’s executive committee, pharmaceutical and isvaccines operating committee, and President of Merck’s Global Human Health Division, which included Merck’s worldwide pharmaceutical and vaccine businesses. Prior to becoming President, Global Human Health, Mr. Schechter served as President, Global Pharmaceutical Business of Merck from 2007 to 2010. In 2022, Mr. Schechter earned the immediate past chairmanCERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight. Mr. Schechter brings to the Board extensive knowledge of the boardhealthcare industry, operations and regulatory environment, significant executive leadership and management experience. In addition, his CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight strengthens this valuable expertise of the National Quality Forum, a non-profit organization that aims to improve the quality of healthcare. From December 2007 to November 2011, Dr. Roper served on the board of Medco Health Solutions, Inc., a pharmacy benefits management company, and since November 2011 has served on the board of its successor company, Express Scripts Holding Company. Dr. Roper brings substantial expertise in the medical field, an in-depth understanding of the regulatory aspects of our business as well as clinical, financial and operational experience.
Board.

8


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement



dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
4


GRAPHIC
Phyllis.jpg
Advisory Partner, Bain & Company, Inc.

Independent Director Since: 2016

Committee Service: Nominating and Governance Committee, Chair; Compliance and Quality Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY)
Kent J. Thiry
Phyllis R. Yale, 60,65, has been our chairman of the Board since June 2015 and from October 1999 until November 2012, and our chief executive officer since October 1999. In October 2014, Mr. Thiry also became chief executive officer of our integrated care business, HealthCare Partners ("HCP"). From November 2012 until June 2015, Mr. Thiry served as our co-chairman of the Board. From June 1997 until he joined us in October 1999, Mr. Thiry was chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Vivra Holdings, Inc., which was formed to operate the non-dialysis business of Vivra Incorporated ("Vivra") after Gambro AB acquired the dialysis services business of Vivra in June 1997. From September 1992 to June 1997, Mr. Thiry was the president and chief executive officer of Vivra, a provider of renal dialysis and other healthcare services. From April 1992 to August 1992, Mr. Thiry was president and co-chief executive officer of Vivra, and from September 1991 to March 1992, he was president and chief operating officer of Vivra. From 1983 to 1991, Mr. Thiry was associatedan Advisory Partner with Bain & Company, firstInc. (“Bain”), a global management consulting firm, since July 2010. Ms. Yale was a Partner with Bain from 1987 to July 2010, and was a leader in building Bain’s healthcare practice. In her role at Bain, Ms. Yale works with healthcare payors, providers, and medical device companies, and frequently advises the world’s leading private equity firms on their investments in the healthcare sector. She has served as a consultant, and then as vice president. Mr. Thiry previously served onmember of the board of Varian Medical Systems, Inc. from August 2005 to February 2009directors of several public and private companies in the healthcare sector, and since November 2019 has served as the non-executive chairman of Oxford Health Plans, Inc. until it was sold to UnitedHealth Group in July 2004. As a member of management, Mr. Thiry provides significantthe Board of Directors of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a global biopharmaceutical company, and since 2014 has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts ("BCBS MA"). Ms. Yale previously served as Chair of the BCBS MA Board of Directors from 2014 to 2019 and Chair of the Board of Directors of Kindred Healthcare, Inc. from 2010 to 2018. Ms. Yale has a deep knowledge base in the U.S. healthcare sector and has experience in many aspects of the healthcare industry, experienceincluding corporate strategies, marketing and unique expertise regarding the Company's businesscost and operationsquality management, as well as executive leadershipmergers and management experience.
GRAPHICRoger J. Valine, 67, has been one of our directors since June 2006. From January 1992 to his retirement in June 2006, Mr. Valine served as both the president and chief executive officer of Vision Service Plan ("VSP"), the nation's largest provider of eyecare wellness benefits. Upon his retirement, Mr. Valine had worked for VSP for 33 years and provided consulting services to VSP through December 2008. Mr. Valine previously served on the boards of American Specialty Health Incorporated and SureWest Communications. Mr. Valine is an experienced business leader with significant experience in the healthcare industry and brings an understanding of the operational, financial and regulatory aspects of our business as well as extensive management experience.acquisitions.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the
named nominees as directors.

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      9

director nominees.
5

Table of Contents

  Corporate Governance


Corporate Governance Highlights
The general governance framework for the Company is provided by its bylaws,Board believes that a strong corporate governance guidelines, the charters for eachprogram supports long-term stockholder interests. The Board monitors evolving governance standards and regularly seeks stockholder feedback on many of these topics. Some key features of the Board's committees, theCompany’s corporate governance codeprogram include:
ü
Annual election of all directors and ongoing commitment to Board refreshment.The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines require that the Board maintain an average tenure for all independent directors of no more than 12 years. Our Board appointed two new members to the Board in 2022, each providing expertise and background in the healthcare industry.
ü
Proxy access. Our Bylaws permit qualifying stockholders or groups of qualifying stockholders who have continuously owned at least 3% of the Company’s common stock ("Common Stock") for at least three consecutive years to use management’s proxy materials to nominate a number of director candidates not to exceed the greater of two or 20% of the number of directors then in office, subject to reduction in certain circumstances.
ü
Robustyear-round stockholder engagement, including regular engagement with independent directors.We maintain a practice of routinely meeting with our stockholders in a number of forums to encourage an ongoing, meaningful dialogue on topics including Board refreshment and other corporate governance topics, executive compensation and social responsibility matters, as well as other items of interest to our stockholders. Since our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, management (and in some cases, certain independent members of the Board) reached out to stockholders representing approximately 80% of the Company's outstanding shares and met with stockholders representing approximately 60% of the Company's outstanding shares.1
üStockholder right to call special meetings of stockholders at 10% ownership threshold.
üNo stockholder rights plan/poison pill.
ü
Robust Code of Conduct.DaVita is committed to operating its business with honesty and integrity and maintaining the highest level of ethical conduct.
ü
Independent non-executive chair.Pamela Arway has served as the Company’s independent Board Chair since June 1, 2020, putting DaVita among 14% of S&P 500 companies with a female, independent director serving in such a role.2
ü
Independent advisors. Each Board Committee has the authority to retain independent advisors.
üMajority vote standard in uncontested elections.
üRobust stock ownership guidelines for senior executives and directors that link the interests of management and the Board with those of stockholders.
ü
Commitment to corporate social responsibility practices. The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees DaVita’s activities, policies and programs related to corporate environmental and social responsibility. Our management ESG Steering Committee is responsible for aligning ESG strategy across the Company, and reports to the Nominating and Governance Committee on a regular basis as well as to the full Board at least annually.
ü
Significant risk oversight practices.The Board regularly receives reports from each of its Committees, which provide detail on risk management issues and management's response. The Board regularly discusses the risk exposures, if any, involved in the reports and recommendations of the Committees, as necessary.
ü
Robust Board oversight over the Company's political and lobbying expenditures and related public reporting.In 2022, the Company further enhanced its disclosure of political and lobbying expenditures in its semi-annual disclosure reports. The Company's semi-annual reports now include itemized lists of the non-deductible portion of dues and payments to trade associations where total payments made in the preceding twelve months equal or exceed $50,000 and itemized tabular disclosure of contributions to certain political parties, candidates and political committees.
1Calculations relating to all stockholder outreach statistics were performed using stockholders of ethics and corporate codeDaVita shares outstanding as of conduct. These governance documents are available under the Corporate

September 30, 2022.

Governance section of our website, located athttp://www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance. The22022 Spencer Stuart U.S. Board adopted the corporate governance guidelines to assist the Board and its committees in performing their duties and serving the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Index







Selection

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of Directors

2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statemen
t
6

In making recommendation



33%
of director nominees added in last 3 years
~99%
average overall attendance by incumbent directors at Board and Committee meetings in 2022
27
total Board and Committee meetings in 2022
8 out of 9
director nominees are independent*
*Under NYSE Independence Standards; as of [_______], 2023

Selection of Directors
The Nominating and Governance Committee, in coordination with the Board, identifies, evaluates and recommends candidates to fill Board vacancies or to stand for election or re-election to the Board by the Company’s stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers a number of factors, and assesses the overall mix of qualifications, individual characteristics, experience level, and diverse perspectives and skills that are most beneficial to our Company. The committeeNominating and Governance Committee also considers theseeks to ensure an appropriate mix of different tenures of the directors, taking into account the benefits of having longer-tenured directors with longer tenures, includingin providing valuable historical knowledge and greater boardBoard stability and ensuring continuity, of organizational knowledge, andas well as the benefits of having newer directors with shorter tenures,who can provide fresh perspectives and takes steps as may be appropriate to ensure that the Board maintains an openness to new ideasviewpoints. Management and a willingness to re-examine the status quo. In connection with the re-nominationindependent members of current directors, it is the committee's responsibility to determine in each case whether re-nomination is appropriate. The committee assesses each director's performance and contributions to the Board, as well as his or her skills, experience and qualifications, including the continued value to the Company in lightpart of current and future needs, including whether the Company's needs foryear-round engagement program, regularly seek input from stockholders regarding the director's experience and background have changed. If the incumbent director has not performed or contributed in a meaningful way, the committee should consider whether re-nomination is

appropriate in light of any other relevant facts and circumstances. Another integral part of this process is the individual director evaluations by the Board members. The Company does not have a specific diversity policy. However, as noted in our corporate governance guidelines, when selecting nominees the committee considers diversityBoard's mix of skills, experience, perspectiveexpertise and background. tenure to further support Board refreshment and the Board's independent oversight of the Company.

Board Diversity
Our Board values diversity, taking into consideration not only racial, ethnic and gender diversity, but also the mix of tenure, experience levels and types of experience, including both industry and subject matter expertise. We believe that a Board that collectively reflects a diversity of background, thought and experience enhances the Board's effectiveness.

The Board has codified a formal Board diversity policy (“Diversity Policy”) within the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines that supports its endeavors to maintain a diverse Board representing a range of experiences in areas that are relevant to the Company’s strategy and business. Consistent with the Diversity Policy, and in conjunction with the Board selection and nomination process, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the overall mix of qualifications, individual characteristics, experience levels, types of experience, including both industry and subject matter expertise, and diversity of gender, race and ethnicity, nationality, country of origin or cultural background as well as perspectives and skills that it believes would be most beneficial to the Company. Pursuant to the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, if, at any point, the combined gender and ethnic/racial diversity of the Board falls below 50%, then at least two of the director nominee candidates considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee to fill any newly-created director position or director vacancy shall be members of an under-represented group.

The Nominating and Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of the Diversity Policy annually by, among other things, evaluating the diversity of the candidates presented as a percentage of the total candidates presented, as well as whether an open Board position is in fact filled by a diverse candidate.

7




Independent, Female Board ChairThree Out of Four of Our Current Committee Chairs are Diverse*
Pamela Arway
Independent Board Chair
Barbara Desoer
Chair, Compensation Committee
Paul Diaz**
Chair, Compliance & Quality Committee
Jason M. Hollar
Chair, Audit Committee
Phyllis Yale
Chair, Nominating & Governance Committee
photo_Pamarway1.jpg
photo_D_DesoerBarbara.jpg
pauldiaza01.jpg
2022 BOD - Hollar, Jason.jpg
Phyllis.jpg
*As of [_______], 2023
** Effective as of the Annual Meeting date, Mr. Diaz will step down as a director and as the Chair and a member of the Compliance and Quality Committee. Dr. Gregory Moore will assume the role of Compliance and Quality Committee Chair effective as of the Annual Meeting date, subject to his re-election at the Annual Meeting.

The slate of director nominees includes three female directors and one Hispanic director, making 44% of our director nominees diverse based on gender and/or race/ethnicity.

piechart_Racial (003).jpg
Piechart_Gender_Diversity.jpg
piechart_Tenure (003).jpg
*Director Nominees Diversity and Tenure calculations are as of [_______], 2023.
Stockholder Director Recommendations
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider nominees for director candidates recommended by stockholders upon submission in writing to our Corporate Secretary of the names and qualifications of such nomineescandidates at the following address, within the timeframe and subject to the other requirements set forth in our bylaws:address: Corporate Secretary, DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc., 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. The committeeNominating and Governance Committee will evaluate candidates based on the same criteria described above, regardless of whether the candidate was recommended by the Company or a stockholder.

In March 2016,

Director Nominees Skills
We believe that our director nominees collectively possess a deep and broad set of skills and experiences that facilitate strong oversight and strategic direction. The following skills matrix summarizes some of the Nominatingkey skills and Governance Committee recommendedexperience represented by the candidates standing for election atdirector nominees as of [_______], 2023. The details of each director nominee's competencies are included in each director's profile under the 2016 annual meetingsection titled "— Biographies of stockholders.

our Director Nominees."




Director Independence

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
8


Corporate Governance
DIRECTOR NOMINEE SKILLS MATRIX
SKILLS AND EXPERIENCEArwayBergDesoerHollarMooreNehraRodriguezSchechterYale
Strategic Initiatives /
 M&A
8
Risk Management7
Finance / Capital
 Allocation / Accounting
7
Tech / Digital
 Transformation /
 Cybersecurity
3
Gov't / Regulatory /
 Public Policy
5
Public Co. CEO3
Human Capital
Mgmt / Compensation
8
Healthcare Provider /
Payor / Investing / VC
7
Public Co. Corporate
 Governance
9















9




Annual Board and Committee Evaluations
The Board is committed to continuous improvement and annual self-evaluations are an important tool to that end. Our Board and Committee evaluation process includes both written questionnaires and live interviews with directors on a rotating cycle, an overview of which is set forth below.

Overview.jpg
Rotating cycle with anonymous written evaluations each year and live interviews with each director every other year, which includes individual director evaluations.
 
Process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee.
Evaluate and Assess.jpg
Directors provide feedback regarding performance and effectiveness of the Board and its Committees, the Chair and, every other year, individual director performance.
REview.jpg
The Board reviews the results of these evaluations in executive session.
 
The Chair of the Board speaks with each director for one-on-one discussion, as appropriate.
Incorporate.jpg
Follow-up items are addressed at subsequent Board or Committee meetings, as appropriate, and Committee actions are reported back to the full Board.

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers the effectiveness of the self-evaluation process on an annual basis.

Director Independence
Under the listing standards of the NYSE, a majority of the members of the Board must satisfy the NYSE criteria for "independence." No director qualifies as independent under the NYSE listing standards unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company).Independence Standards. In addition, the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines require that at least two-thirds of the members of the Board has adopted a formal set of standards used to determine director independence. The full text of our directorsatisfy the NYSE Independence Standards and certain additional independence standards is available underdiscussed in detail below and included in the Company's Corporate Governance sectionGuidelines (the "Additional Independence Standards").

Under our Additional Independence Standards, a director is deemed not independent if (i) within the last four calendar years, (a) the director was an employee of our website, located athttp://www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.

the Company or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries or (b) an immediate family member of the director was an executive officer of the Company, (ii) the director, during the current calendar year or any of the three immediately preceding years, has been paid by the Company more than $120,000 in compensation for services, other than for services rendered as a director, or (iii) the director is employed as an executive officer of another public company on whose board of directors any of the Company’s current executive officers serve.

The Board evaluates the independence of our directors annually and will review the independence of individual directors on an interim basis, as needed, to consider changes in employment, relationships and other factors. The Board has determined that all of the individuals currently serving, or who served at any time during 2015, as members of the Board, other than Mr. Thiry, are independent under the NYSE listing standards and the Company's independence standards. In evaluating each director's independence, the Board consideredevaluates the nature of any executive officer'sofficer’s or director’s personal investment interest in director affiliated director-affiliated

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
10


Corporate Governance
entities (active or passive), the level of involvement by the director or executive officer as a partner in any such director affiliateddirector-affiliated entities, any special arrangements or relationships between the

10


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



parties whichthat would lead to a personal benefit, any personal benefits derived as a result of business relationships with the Company, any other personal benefit derived by any director or executive officer as a result of the disclosed relationships or any other relevant factors.

The Board has determined that all of the director nominees, other than Mr. Rodriguez, as well as each other individual who served as a director at any time during 2022, are independent under the NYSE Independence Standards and under our Additional Independence Standards.
In assessing director independence,making its determination, the Board considered investments madeMr. Berg's prior employment with the Company from November 1, 2016 through December 15, 2017, as well as his receipt in 2019 of a one-time cash payment upon the past by some Board members and executive officersclosing of the Company in certain fundssale of a venture capital firmthe Company's DMG business (the "DMG Payment"), both of which Mr. Nehra is a retired special partner or that are managed directly or indirectly by the firm of which Mr. Nehra is a retired special partner. The Board also considered transactions in which WellCare has made payments to us for services rendered in the ordinary course of business in the lastoccurred more than three years which did not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of WellCare's consolidated gross revenue in each such year. Mr. Berg was a director and non-executive chairman of WellCare until May 2013 and holds less than a 10% beneficial interest in WellCare.ago. The Board also considered the $465,000Company's commercial relationship with Cigna, where Mr. Berg serves as Senior Advisor. After consideration of additional feesall relevant factors, including, among other things, that the Company's business with Cigna was conducted in the aggregate paidordinary course pursuant to arms length negotiations that did not involve Mr. Berg in his role as a member ofand that the Board's Compliance Committee in 2013 and 2014, in overseeing the 2010 U.S. Attorney physicianCompany's relationship investigation and the 2011 U.S. Attorney physician relationship investigation ("PRI"), at the request ofwith Cigna predated Mr. Berg's employment with Cigna, the Board as well asdetermined that none of Mr. Berg's prior employment with Company, the $59,000 additional fees paid toDMG Payment, or the Company’s commercial relationship with Cigna presented a conflict of interest, nor did they compromise the independence of Mr. Berg in 2015 in his role as the chairman of the Board's Compliance Committee, in overseeing matters related to the subpoenas received by HCP and the five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement

Berg.

entered into between the Company and the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, in connection with the resolution of PRI (the "Corporate Integrity Agreement"). In addition, the Board considered the transactions in which Kindred has made payments to us for services renderedCompany’s commercial relationship with Cardinal, where Mr. Hollar serves as Chief Executive Officer and director, and the Company's commercial relationship with Labcorp, where Mr. Schechter serves as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. After consideration of all relevant factors, including, among other things, that the Company's business with Cardinal and Labcorp was each conducted in the ordinary course of business in the last three years whichpursuant to arms length negotiations that did not exceedinvolve Messrs. Hollar and Schechter, respectively, and that the greaterCompany's relationship with each of $1 million or 2% of Kindred's consolidated gross revenue in each such year. Mr. Diaz is Kindred's executive vice chairmanCardinal and director,Labcorp predated Messrs. Hollar's and has less than a 10% beneficial interest in Kindred.

The Board maintains a policy wherebySchechter's respective consideration for service on the Board, willthe Board determined that the Company’s commercial relationships with each of Cardinal and Labcorp did not present a conflict of interest and did not compromise the respective independence of Messrs. Hollar and Schechter.

Mr. Rodriguez is not deemed independent under the NYSE Independence Standards or the Additional Independence Standards because he is employed as the Company's CEO.
Change in Status
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the Board to evaluate the appropriateness of the director'sa director’s continued service on the Board in the event that the director retires from his or her principal job, changes his or her principal job responsibility or experiences a significant event that could negatively affect his or her service to the Board. In such event, the policy providesCorporate Governance Guidelines provide that the affectedimpacted director shall promptly submittender his or her offer of resignation to the chairmanBoard Chair for consideration by the other members of the Board and the lead independent director.Board. The members of the Board, excluding the affectedimpacted director, will determine whether the affected director'ssuch director’s continued service on the Board is in the best interests of our stockholders and will decide whether or not to accept the resignation of the director. The determination of whether a change in status has occurred is in the sole discretion of the Board. In addition, the policy providesCorporate Governance Guidelines provide that prior to accepting an invitation to serve on the board of directors of another public company or other significant commitments involving affiliation with other for-profit businesses, non-profit entities or governmental units, a director mustshould advise the chairman ofCorporate Secretary or the Board and the lead independent directorChair so that the remaining members of the Board may evaluate any potential conflicts of interest.

11





Leadership Structure and Meetings of Independent Directors

Mr. Thiry isLeadership Structure and Meetings of Independent Directors

Pamela M. Arway, an independent director and member of the chairmanBoard since May 2009, has served as the independent Board Chair since June 2020. The Board believes that Ms. Arway’s breadth of experience and depth of knowledge gained during her career and her tenure on our Board and the chief executive officer of the Company. Since October 2014, Mr. Thiry has also served as chief executive officer of HCP. Mr. Thiry brings over 15 years of experience with our Company and deep institutional knowledge and experienceare highly beneficial to the combinedBoard Chair role.

We believe that Mr. Thiry's experience and knowledge

As the Board Chair, Ms. Arway:
Serves as CEO and chairman are essential to the chairman role and are counterbalanced appropriately by the significant role of the lead independent director. Our lead independent director, Mr. Grauer, who was elected by and from the independent board members, plays a significant role in Board leadership and meetings of the independent directors. Mr. Grauer also chairs our Nominating and Governance Committee, and as chairman of the Nominating and Governance

Committee, Mr. Grauer has the authority to call meetings of the committee, whose primary purpose, as outlined in its charter, includes overseeing the evaluation of the Company's management, including the CEO.

As lead independent director, Mr. Grauer serves as liaison between the chairmanmanagement and the independent directors approves information sent to the Board, confers with the CEO/chairman in setting and thereafter approving

Approves meeting agendas and schedules for the Board, approves meeting schedules to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items, and presidesBoard.
Presides at all meetings of the Board, at which the chairman is not present, including executive sessions of independent directors. Additionally, Mr. Grauer facilitates
Facilitates discussions outside of scheduled Board meetings among the independent directors on key issues, as required, and

appropriate

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      11


Table of Contents





decides when to engage independent advisors for the Board or a Board committee. Mr. Grauer, in his capacity as lead independent director, also has the authority toMay call meetings of the Board and the independent directors and, if requested by major stockholders, makes himselfherself available for consultation and direct communication with them.

them, as appropriate

IndependentOversees the function of our Board Committees, each of which has an independent Chair

The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for the Company at this time because it allows for independent oversight of management, increases management accountability, and facilitates an objective evaluation of management’s performance relative to compensation. The independent directors meet regularlyevaluate the Board’s leadership structure, typically on an annual basis.
Succession Planning
Management
The Board oversees management succession planning and the development of executive talent. The Board believes that management succession planning should be done in executive sessions without management. Executive sessions are held in conjunctionconsultation with each regularly scheduled meetingthe CEO and that the full Board should have oversight of the Board.

succession planning process.
As part of this process, the CEO provides the Board with recommendations for potential successors for the position of CEO and other key senior management positions, and reviews development plans for such candidates with the Board. The Board engages directly with potential successor candidates and regularly reviews short- and long-term as well as emergency succession plans for the CEO and other senior management positions.

Board
The Board also regularly considers its own composition, succession plans and refreshment efforts as part of the annual Board evaluation process described above. When considering director succession planning, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board take into account, among other things, stockholder feedback and the current and expected needs of the Board and the Company in light of the overall composition of the Board towards achieving a balance of the skills, experience, diversity and tenure that are viewed to be essential to the Board’s oversight role.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a mandatory retirement age whereby a director who has reached the age of 75 shall not be nominated for re-election to our Board at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders; however, the Nominating and Governance Committee may recommend, and the Board may approve, the nomination for re-election of a director at or after the age of 75, if, in light of all the circumstances, the Board determines it to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines also support Board refreshment, and require that the average tenure of independent directors, as determined in accordance with the NYSE Independence Standards, shall be no longer than 12 years.

Communications with the Board

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
12



Corporate Governance
Environmental, Social and Governance Approach
We strive to be a community first and a company second, which is underscored by our deep rooted commitment to our ESG practices and our Trilogy of Care - Caring for Our Patients, Caring for Each Other and Caring for Our World. Our ESG focus areas include how we care for our patients; how we support our teammates to grow and thrive in a workplace where everyone belongs; and how we engage with our local communities and promote environmental stewardship.
ESG Governance:The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees DaVita’s activities, policies and programs related to corporate, environmental and social responsibility. Our management ESG Steering Committee regularly reports to the Nominating and Governance Committee and also gives the full Board an ESG report on no less than an annual basis. Management periodically reports to the Audit Committee on the process for ESG-related public reporting, including reporting controls.
ESG Issues and Stakeholder Engagement: Based on feedback from key stakeholders and the metrics recommended by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board ("SASB") for healthcare service providers, we have identified our key ESG issues and five focus areas:
Patient care icon.jpg
TM engagement icon.jpg
Environmental icon.jpg
Healthy communities icon.jpg
Leading with integrity icon.jpg

Quality of Care
Patient Experience
Patient Education
Health Equity

Diversity & Belonging
Teammate Development
The DaVita Way

Carbon Emissions Reduction
Water & Waste Reduction    

Charitable Giving
Volunteerism    

Compliance, Ethics & Governance
Data Privacy
Supply Chain
2025 ESG Goals: In 2021, we announced our goals in each of our five ESG focus areas for 2025, many of which are aspirational. The goals represent our ongoing commitment to meaningfully advance corporate citizenship initiatives. In the process of setting these goals, we worked with key stakeholders across the Company to determine objective metrics, leveraging external reporting frameworks, such as SASB, and science-based goals when possible. While we recognize that it may be difficult to achieve some of these goals during the aspirational timeframe, we believe there is value in striving for these goals. Updates on our progress against these goals are available on our Community Care website at www.davitacommunitycare.com.

External Recognition in 2022
Dow Jones Sustainability Index: DaVita was recognized by the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index for its corporate responsibility initiatives and performance in regards to ESG practices. DaVita's score was in the top 6% in the Health Care Providers and Services category.
CDP: DaVita discloses its Climate Change and Water Security impact(s) through CDP, a global non-profit that runs the world's leading environmental disclosure platform. DaVita's climate change score of "B" is above average for the healthcare services industry and for all sectors.
Management Leadership for Tomorrow’s (MLT) Black Equity at Work Certification: This annual distinction recognizes not only participating organizations’ goals to promote diversity, equity and belonging but also their accountability and commitment to creating measurable impact.
The Sustainability Yearbook: DaVita is listed in the 2023 Sustainability Yearbook, which considered over 7,800 companies assessed in the 2022 Corporate Sustainability Assessment. DaVita was recognized in the category of Top 10% S&P Global ESG Score for the year ended December, 31, 2022.
13




2022 ESG Achievements
Patient care icon.jpg
7,800+DaVita patients received a kidney transplant
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) patients increasingly used connected cyclers and DaVita's patented technology, DaVita Care Connect®, enabling more convenient access to home treatment data and two-way communication with their care team
We largely see similar outcomes across race in core clinical metrics such as hospitalizations, readmissions and infection rates in our U.S. outpatient dialysis centers
33,600+ people participated in a Kidney Smart class, our kidney disease education program
TM engagement icon.jpg
38,000+teammates are a part of DaVita's new career pathways program, Clinical Ladders
Our overall U.S. teammate population is comprised of 78% women and 56%people of color as of December 31, 2022
1,450+ teammates were pursuing or received their nursing degree, funded by DaVita, as part of our Bridge to Your Dreams program
16,000+ teammates participated in a DaVita University professional development course
Environmental icon.jpg
We are committed to net zero carbon emissions by 2050 as part of the White House/HHS Climate Sector Pledge
Our virtual power purchase agreements produce enough renewable energy to power 100%of our U.S. operations
We designed and built our first net zero dialysis clinic, powered by solar energy
382 clinics received energy efficient LED lighting upgrades
Healthy communities icon.jpg
The American Diabetes Association, along with DaVita, launched an interactive digital experience aimed at helping those living with diabetes prevent and manage kidney disease
$1.4 milliongrant awarded to the Food is Medicine Coalition by the DaVita Giving Foundation to provide medically tailored meals to people with food insecurity and medical nutrition needs, including individuals living with end stage kidney disease
Leading with integrity icon.jpg
We are one of 14% of companies in the S&P 500 to have a woman serving as the independent Board Chair,1 and 75% of our Board Committees are currently led by women or people of color as of [_______], 2023.
99.9% of U.S. teammates and directors completed annual compliance training in 2022
Our 2022 Community Care ESG report will be available this spring atwww.davitacommunitycare.com.
1 2022 Spencer Stuart U.S. Board Index
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
14


Corporate Governance
Ongoing Stockholder Outreach

The Company values its stockholders and their perspectives, and we regularly engage with our investors on a variety of topics. In particular, our ESG, corporate governance, Board composition, political spending disclosures, and executive compensation practices are each informed by ongoing dialogue with our stockholders. Our Board and management take a long-term view toward stockholder engagement, and as a result, we have maintained a practice of routinely meeting with our stockholders in a number of forums to encourage an ongoing engagement.
Our Year-Round Stockholder Engagement Program
JULY - SEPTEMBER
Seasons.jpg
OCTOBER - JANUARY
Review and summarize feedback from prior annual stockholder meeting and determine next steps.

Prioritize post-annual meeting investor engagement focus areas.
Conduct meetings with our largest stockholders to inform reviews of our corporate governance, executive compensation and corporate responsibility and sustainability initiatives.

Share feedback with members of the Board for discussion and consideration.
MAY - JUNEFEBRUARY - APRIL
Ahead of annual stockholder meeting, conduct engagement with investors to answer any questions and obtain stockholder feedback on proxy matters.

Conduct annual stockholder meeting.
Consider feedback from engagement in designing executive compensation program, annual meeting planning and enhancing ESG practices and disclosures.
2022 - 2023 Stockholder Engagement
Following our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we continued with our robust year-round engagement efforts to solicit feedback from stockholders. Among other things, we discussed ongoing Board refreshment, including the Board's mix of skills, experience, expertise and tenure, Board and Committee composition,our executive compensation program, key corporate governance related matters, corporate social responsibility and sustainability initiatives, and the Company's political spending disclosures. The meetings included some combination of our independent Board Chair, Pamela Arway;Chair of the Compensation Committee, Barbara Desoer; Chief Legal and Public Affairs Officer ("CLO"); Group Vice President, Investor Relations and Capital Markets;Corporate Secretary;Group Vice President, Compensation; Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO"); and ESG Director. Since our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we have reached out to stockholders representing approximately 80% of shares of Common Stock outstanding. Some investors we contacted either did not respond or confirmed that a discussion was not needed at that time. We had individual calls with stockholders representing approximately 60% of shares of Common Stock outstanding. Mses. Arway and Desoer participated in calls with stockholders representing approximately13% of our shares of Common Stock outstanding.1
1Calculations relating to all stockholder outreach statistics were performed using stockholders of DaVita shares outstanding as of September 30, 2022.
Outreach and Engagement.gif
15




Key Items Discussed With Stockholders in 2022-2023
Corporate Governance CG1.jpg
Executive Compensation Comp1.jpg
Corporate Responsibility CR1.jpg
Board DiversityPay-for-PerformanceEnvironmental Sustainability Programs and Reporting
Board Skills, Tenure and Refreshment and Committee CompositionPay vs. Performance DisclosuresPolitical Spending Disclosures
Board Leadership and Succession PlanningCEO Compensation and Executive Compensation Program DesignWorkforce Development and Diversity and Belonging
Communications with the Board
Any interested party who desires to contact the lead independent director, Mr. Grauer,Board Chair may do so by sending an email toleaddirector@davita.com.independentchair@davita.com. In addition, any interested party who desires to contact the Board or any membermember(s) of the Board may do so by writing to: Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc., 2000 16th16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. Copies of any such written

communications received by the Corporate Secretary will be provided to the full Board or the appropriate member depending on the facts and circumstances described in the communicationmember(s) unless they are considered, in the reasonable judgment of the Corporate Secretary, to be improper for submission to the intended recipient(s).

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Annual Meeting of Stockholders Attendance

We do not have a policy requiring that directors attend the annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholders. AtStockholders. Our CEO and director, Mr. Rodriguez, was in attendance at the last annual

2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which was held virtually.

meeting of stockholders, our chairman and CEO, Mr. Thiry, attended the meeting.

Information Regarding the Board and its Committees

Information Regarding the Board and its Committees

The Board has established the following committees:standing Committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Compliance Committee, the Public PolicyCompensation Committee, and the Clinical PerformanceCompliance and Quality Committee. As required by the NYSE listing standards and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules, all members of the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee are independent in accordance with the NYSE Independence Standards. All members of our Compliance and Quality Committee are also independent in accordance with the NYSE Independence Standards.

The Board met

9 seven times during 2015. Each2022. On average, our incumbent directors attended approximately 99% of all meetings of the Board and Board Committees on which they served, and all of our incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and Board Committees on which they served that were held during the total number of meetings held by all committeestime they were a director in 2022.





dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
16


Corporate Governance
Committees of the Board on which he or she served during 2015.

12


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



Committees of the Board

The following chart sets out theforth our current members of our Board Committees and membership, and describes the principalcertain key functions of each committee of our Board. The charter for each committeeof our committees is available underon the Corporate Governance section of our website, located athttp://www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.

corporate-governance.
Name of Committee
and Members


Principal Functions
of the Committee


Meetings
in 2015
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Jason M. Hollar, Chair*
Barbara J. Desoer
John M. Nehra*
Adam H. Schechter

Meetings in 2022: 8












Audit
Carol Anthony ("John")
    Davidson
Chair
Charles G. Berg
Roger J. Valine

Monitors and oversees the quality and integrity of our consolidated financial statements including the financial reporting and disclosure processesrelated footnotes and the integrity and effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting.

Monitors our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including healthcare compliance in coordination with the Board's Compliance Committee.

Monitorsother related disclosures

Oversees the independence, qualifications and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, including a review of the scope and results of their audit, as well as the performance of our internal audit function.

function

Appoints and engages our independent registered public accounting firm, and pre-approves the firm’s annual audit services, including related fees, audit-related services, and all other services in accordance with our pre-approval policy and rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC
Together with the Compliance and Quality Committee, assists the Board with oversight of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements including those that may have a material impact on
Oversees the Company's financial statements.

Appoints and engages our independent registered public accounting firm, and pre-approves the firm's annual audit services (including related fees), audit-related services, and all other services in accordance with our pre-approval policy.

Monitorseffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and compliance with ethical standards.

standards

Oversees our policies and programs with respect to enterprise risk assessment and enterprise risk management, including the risks related to privacy and data security (including, for the avoidance of doubt, cybersecurity)
Provides an avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, management, internal audit department and the Board.

10Board
Prepares the Audit Committee report required to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or Proxy Statement
Considers related party transactions for approval or ratification, or recommends such approval or ratification by the disinterested members of the Board
Periodically reviews and discusses with management the Company’s emergency preparedness and disaster recovery plans and capabilities

All members of the Audit Committee are (a) “independent” under the NYSE Independence Standards and the NYSE’s heightened independence requirements for audit committee members and (b) “financially literate” under the listing standards of the NYSE. Each of Mr. Nehra and Mr. Hollar qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC rules.
Compensation
NOMINATING & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Phyllis R. Yale, Chair
Pamela M. Arway
Gregory M. Moore, M.D., Ph.D.
John M. Nehra
Meetings in 2022: 4
Oversees the composition, structure, operation and evaluation of the Board and its committees
Oversees the process for evaluating the independence, contribution and effectiveness of incumbent Board members
Oversees procedures for stockholders and other interested parties to communicate with the Board
Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board about our governance principles and policies, and monitors compliance with adopted principles and policies
In coordination with the Board, identifies, evaluates and recommends candidates for nomination, appointment or election to the Board and candidates to fill Board vacancies
Makes recommendations to the Board regarding the membership and chairs of the committees of the Board
Reviews the Company’s activities, policies and programs related to environmental, sustainability and governance matters, including corporate environmental and social responsibility matters, with such review to include, among other things, considering the impact of such activities, policies and programs on the Company, its teammates and the communities in which it operates and the Company’s progress related to such activities, policies and programs
Oversees continuing education of the Board and orientation of new Board members to the Company and its business

All members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are “independent” under the NYSE Independence Standards.
*Effective as of March 13, 2023, Mr. Hollar assumed the role of Audit Committee Chair. Mr. Nehra served as Audit Committee Chair from June 9, 2022 until March 13, 2023.
17




Principal Functions of the Committee
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Barbara J. Desoer, Chair
Pamela M. Arway
Paul J. Diaz
Peter T. Grauer
Roger J. ValineDiaz*
John M. Nehra
Meetings in 2022: 6

Establishes an executive compensation philosophy that is aligned with the Company's long-term interests and those of our stockholders
Reviews the performanceresults of our chief executive officeradvisory stockholder votes and other executivesstockholder feedback on our executive compensation program and makes specific recommendationsconsiders whether to make adjustments to our executive compensation policies and decisions regarding their compensation.

Establishespractices as a result

Evaluates and approves compensation plans, programs and policies relatingrelated to our executive officers
Annually reviews and approves the compensationgoals and objectives and summary performance of our executive officers other than the CEO, and other key employeesmakes compensation decisions that furtherare aligned with the goalperformance of ensuring that oureach executive officer
Annually reviews and approves the annual and long-term corporate goals and objectives applicable to compensation system for our chief executive officerCEO, evaluates our CEO’s performance in light of those goals and our other executives, as well as our philosophy for compensation for all employeesobjectives, and determines and approves, subject to approval by the independent members of the Board, all elements of our CEO’s total compensation based on this evaluation
Oversees the administration by the Board of our equity or other incentive award plans, including the stock ownership requirements applicable to our CEO, senior executives and directors
Oversees the administration by the Board of our non-employee director compensation program to ensure that the Board is compensated in a competitive and fair manner, and that such compensation is aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

Conducts an evaluation ofstockholders

Reviews and discusses with management our chief executive officer's performanceannual Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosures to determine whether to recommend to the Company's performanceBoard that it be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and considers a self-assessment prepared by our chief executive officer. Periodically, the Compensation Committee engages an outside consultant to conduct an in-depth analysis of our chief executive officer's performance as a manager during the year.

Proxy Statement

Has sole authority and discretion to retain or replace its independent compensation consultants, independentconsultant, legal counsel and other advisors, and is directly responsible for hiring, overseeing and compensating such advisors.

Annually reviewsadvisors

Oversees our compliance with SEC rules and approvesregulations regarding stockholder approval of certain executive compensation matters
Reviews, as appropriate, feedback on the long-term corporate goalsCompany’s executive compensation program received through the Company’s stockholder outreach program and objectives applicable to compensation for our chief executive officer, evaluates our chief executive officer's performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determines and approves, subject to ratification by the independent members of the Board, all elements of our chief executive officer's total compensation, including the chief executive officer's compensation level based on this evaluation.

Works closely with and considers the recommendations of our chief executive officer to determine the compensation of our other executive officers.

Reviews the goals and objectives and summary performance assessments applicable to the compensation of our other executive officers, and reviews and approves all elements of total compensation of our other executive officers and considers the recommendations of the chief executive officer who conducts a performance and compensation review of each other executive officer and reviews his detailed assessments of the performance of each of the other executive officers with the Compensation Committee.

Reviews the results of any advisory stockholder votes and other stockholder feedback on theexecutive compensation of our executive officers and considers whether to makerecommend adjustments to ourthe Company’s executive compensation policies and practices as a result of such votes.

3

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      13


Table of Contents





feedback or voting results
NameOversees the Company's assessment of Committee
risk related to the Company's compensation plans, programs and Members


Principal Functions
policies
In coordination with the Board, and as a supplement to the Board’s oversight, periodically discusses reports from management regarding the development, implementation and effectiveness of the Committee


Meetings
in 2015
NominatingCompany’s policies and
    Governance

Peter T. GrauerChair
Pamela M. Arway
Carol Anthony ("John")
    Davidson

Roger J. Valine

Reviews strategies relating to its human capital management function

May form and makes recommendationsdelegate any responsibilities, including those described above, to the Board about our governance processes.

Assists in identifying and recruiting candidates for the Board.

Annually reviews the performancea subcommittee of the individualone or more members

All members of the Board.

Proposes a slate of nomineesCompensation Committee are (a) "independent" under the NYSE Independence Standards and the NYSE’s heightened independence requirements for election at the annual meeting of stockholders.

Makes recommendations to the Board regarding the membershipcompensation committee members and chairs(b) “nonemployee directors” under Rule 16b-3 of the committeesSecurities Exchange Act of the Board.

21934 (the “Exchange Act”).
Compliance Committee1
COMPLIANCE & QUALITY COMMITTEE
Paul J. Diaz, Chair*
Charles G. BergChair
Barbara
Gregory J. Desoer2
Paul J. Diaz
Dr. William L. RoperMoore, M.D., Ph.D.*
Adam H. Schechter
Phyllis R. Yale
Meetings in 2022: 4

Reviews and oversees compliance with Federal health careapplicable healthcare laws, regulations, and guidance governing the conduct of dialysis providers, including federal healthcare regulatory program requirements and the Corporate Integrity Agreement.

Oversees and monitors the effectiveness of our healthcare regulatory compliance program, reviews significant healthcare regulatory compliance risk, areas, and reviews the steps management is taking to monitor, control and report these risk exposures.

exposures

Together with the Audit Committee, assists the Board with oversight of enterprise risk management and healthcare, legal, regulatory, and regulatory compliance.

anti-corruption compliance

Has primary responsibility for oversight of healthcare regulatory compliance requirements and for directingensuring proper communication of healthcare regulatory compliance issues to the Company's response to certain pending governmental investigations.

Board

Meets at least once each quarterregularly in executive sessions with our chief compliance officerCCO to discuss, among other things, our compliance program and to receive an update on compliance activities initiated or completed during the quarter.

7
Public Policy
John M. NehraChair
Pamela M. Arway
Paul J. Diaz

Advisesquarter

Assists the Board on public policywith the general oversight of the Company’s patient safety and government relations mattersclinical quality of care programs and makes recommendations tomonitors the Board as to policiesCompany’s performance in this regard
Reviews clinical quality, safety and proceduresclinical services metrics and priorities
Reviews processes relating to issuesscientific, clinical and regulatory quality performance benchmarks
Meets regularly in executive session with the Chief Medical Officer to discuss, among other things, the clinical quality of public policy and government relations.

Oversees the Company's government affairs activity and political spending.

2
Clinical Performance
Dr. William L. RoperChair
Carol Anthony ("John")
    Davidson

Barbara J. Desoer2

Advises the Board on clinical performance issues facing the Company.

Makes recommendations to managementcare program and to receive an update on quality activities initiated or completed during the Board asquarter

Remains informed regarding investigations of any complaints that raise material and substantiated concerns we are not complying with applicable laws or regulations related to policieshealthcare program requirements, anti-corruption or patient safety
All members of the Compliance and procedures relating to issues of clinical performance.

2
Quality Committee are “independent” under the NYSE Independence Standards.
1
*Effective as of the Annual Meeting date, Mr. Nehra served onDiaz will step down as a director, as a member of the Compensation Committee and as the Chair and a member of the Compliance and Quality Committee. Dr. Gregory Moore will assume the role of Compliance and Quality Committee until March 31, 2016.
2
Ms. Desoer was appointedChair effective as of the Annual Meeting date, subject to his re-election at the Clinical Performance Committee and Compliance Committee on March 31, 2016.
Annual Meeting.

14


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



Overview of Committee Membership Qualifications

Director


Independent

Other Public
Company Boards*
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Pamela M. Arway1

Yes2
​ ​ 

Charles G. Berg2

Yes0

Carol Anthony ("John") Davidson2

Yes3
​ ​ 

Barbara J. Desoer

Yes0

Paul J. Diaz1

Yes1
​ ​ 

Peter T. Grauer1,3

Yes2

John M. Nehra

Yes0
​ ​ 

Dr. William L. Roper

Yes1

Kent J. Thiry

No0
​ ​ 

Roger J. Valine1,2

Yes0
18
1
Member


Corporate Governance
Risk Oversight
Our Board oversees our enterprise-wide approach to risk management with a fundamental belief that the key components of risk management are:
Identifying potential risks that we face,
Assessing the likelihood and potential impact of the risks,
Adopting strategies and controls designed to manage the risks to be within an acceptable level,
Reporting on a regular basis regarding the assessment and management of the risks, and
Monitoring these potential risks on a regular basis.
graphics_riskoversight_option1.jpg
Our Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM") team leads this risk management process, and evaluates risks to the enterprise on short, intermediate and long-term bases. Our ERM team reports to our ERM Committee, a group comprised of members of senior management who meet on a regular basis to oversee the performance of these risk management functions. We assess risks using a probability-magnitude lens, with shorter and intermediate term risks generally given greater weight. We prioritize mitigating activities on shorter and intermediate term risks, but also use risk analyses and oversight to proactively incorporate mitigating activities into our long-term strategy. The ERM process extends to a Company-wide effort designed to identify, assess, manage, report and monitor enterprise risks and risk areas. This effort includes the Company's Enterprise Risk Services ("Internal Audit"), Sarbanes-Oxley, Compliance Audit and legal teams, among others.
In addition, the Company regularly retains outside advisors to advise on a range of strategic purposes, including for cybersecurity and privacy readiness assessments, quality assessment reviews, and compliance program evaluations, among other things.
As part of the CompensationERM process:
Key leaders across the enterprise are interviewed to identify potential risks and assist with the monitoring of those identified risks;
The Audit Committee, which is comprised of independent directors, oversees the Company's ERM program, and the Audit Committee and the Board each receive and discuss ERM reports on a regular basis, with the Audit Committee receiving ERM reports quarterly and the full Board receiving such reports no less than annually;
The Compliance and Quality Committee, which is (a)comprised of independent underdirectors, oversees the listing standardsCompany's processes to identify and seek to mitigate clinical, legal, and compliance enterprise risks; and
The Audit Committee and Compliance and Quality Committee each meet regularly with our CLO and CCO in connection with fulfilling these responsibilities.
The ERM process is incorporated into our disclosure controls and procedures. Representatives of each of our ERM, Internal Audit and Compliance Audit teams sit on the Company’s management Disclosure Committee, which is responsible for, among other things, the design and establishment of disclosure controls and procedures to help ensure the accuracy and completeness of corporate disclosure. The aforementioned interviews with key leaders across the enterprise are administered by the Disclosure Committee on a quarterly basis.
Privacy, Data and Cybersecurity
With respect to assessing privacy, data and cybersecurity risks, the Company adopts a hybrid approach that primarily aligns with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) Cybersecurity Framework while also evaluating against certain elements of the NYSEISO 27001 and 27005 standards that management believes provide additional levels of guidance or structure. We regularly evaluate the Company’s cybersecurity and privacy
19




processes and procedures, both through regular audits by our Internal Audit and Compliance Audit teams, as well as regular retention of outside advisors. Among other things, in recent years we have conducted an external third party audit at least every two years that evaluates the readiness of the entire Company through the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and provides an assessment that measures Capability Maturity Model Integration levels.
As part of their oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee and the Company's independence standards, (b)Compliance and Quality Committee monitor privacy, data and cyber security as specific risk areas. Mr. Schechter, a "nonemployee director" under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), and (c) an "outside director" as defined in Internal Revenue Service regulations.
2
Membermember of the Audit Committee and qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaningCompliance and Quality Committee, holds a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight. As part of that oversight function:
The Audit Committee reviews and discusses privacy, data and cybersecurity risk exposures with management, and generally receives reports on these risks from the rules of the SEC and each is "independent" and "financially literate" under the listing standards of the NYSEERM team and the Company's independence standards.
3
Mr. Grauer is our Lead Independent Director.
*
Current as of March 31, 2016.

Chief Information Officer ("CIO") or their respective designees on a quarterly basis, andfrom the COO, DaVita Kidney Care or his or her designee on a periodic basis;

Risk Oversight

The Board's involvement in risk oversight involvesThese reports to the Audit Committee include reports on external and internal audits of information security matters, which are conducted regularly;

The Company’s Privacy Office creates, updates and implements policies and procedures that are designed to comply with privacy laws and requirements in the Compliancecountries in which we do business;
The Privacy Office, with the assistance of Internal Audit and the CIO, also assesses the nature and severity of privacy risks within DaVita and takes steps to help mitigate such risks;
The Chief Privacy Officer, or the CLO, periodically updates the Audit Committee on the status of the privacy program;
Internal Audit provides copies of the results of any privacy, data or cybersecurity audits to the Audit Committee, and reports to the full Board. EachAudit Committee on these results as appropriate;
The Company incorporates privacy, data and cybersecurity topics into its annual compliance training materials that are required for all teammates and new hires; and
On an annual basis, the Board delegates oversight of the negotiation of the Company’s cybersecurity insurance policy to the chair of the Audit Committee, and Compliance Committee are comprised of independent non-executive directors. The Audit Committee is responsible for legal and regulatory risk oversight and the Compliance Committee has primary responsibility for oversight of healthcare legal and regulatory compliance requirements. The Audit Committee and the Compliance Committee meet regularly with our chief legal officer or the corporate secretary, as the case may be, and chief compliance officer, and work together to assist the Board with oversight of legal and compliance enterprise risk management and to ensure that management identifies, monitors, controls and reports such compliance risk exposures. The Compliance Committee reviews significant healthcare legal and regulatory compliance risk areas, and meets on a regular basis and reports directly to the Board on its findings. The Audit Committee receives materials on enterprise risk management on an annual basis. These materials include identification of top enterprise risks for

the Company the alignment of management's accountability and reportingcurrently has a cybersecurity risk insurance policy in place that provides certain coverage for, these risks, and mapping of the Board's and Audit Committee's oversight responsibilities for key risks. among other things, cybersecurity breaches.

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
20


Corporate Governance
In addition, the Audit Committee and the full Board periodically receive materials to address the identification and status of major risks to the Company. The Audit Committee discusses significant risk areas and the actions management has taken to monitor, control, and report such exposures. The Audit Committee also reviews with the Company's chief legal officer or corporate secretary, as the case may be, legal matters that may have a material impact on the Company's financial statements, the Company's compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and material reports or inquiries received from governmental agencies, including such matters identified by the Compliance Committee or the chief compliance officer. At each meetingCommittees of the full Board the chairman of the Audit Committee reports on the activities of the Audit Committee, includingare structured to oversee other specific risks, identified and risk oversight.

as follows:

BOARD
The Board Share Ownershipregularly receives reports from each of its Committees, which provide detail on risk management issues and management's response. The Board discusses the risk exposures, if any, involved in the reports or recommendations of the Committees, as necessary. Additionally, the Board oversees the Company’s Policy

Related to Political and Lobbying Expenditures, its public policy priorities and advocacy efforts, and the assessment of any potential risks related to the Company’s political spending.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Oversees our compensation policies and practices, including whether such policies and practices balance risk-taking and rewards in an appropriate manner as discussed further below.In coordination with the Board, and as a supplement to the Board’s oversight, the Compensation Committee also helps oversee human capital management, including the Company’s policies and strategies relating to recruiting, retention, career development and progression, teammate engagement, diversity, belonging, employment practices and culture.
COMPLIANCE & QUALITY COMMITTEE
Oversees non-financial compliance risk, including that associated with healthcare and anti-corruption-related requirements.

Oversees the Company's compliance programs inclusive of its policies and procedures, training / education, auditing and monitoring, responses to detected deficiencies, enforcement of disciplinary standards and overall culture of compliance.

Oversees development and implementation of practices, policies and procedures designed to optimize quality and safety of care.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Oversees the financial reporting process, the system of internal control over financial reporting, the audit process and, in coordination with the Compliance and Quality Committee, the Company's process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations.

Receives reports at each regular meeting from (i) our external auditor on the status of audit activities and findings; (ii) the executive responsible for internal audit (who reports to the Audit Committee) on the status of the internal audit plan, audit results and any corrective action taken in response to audit findings; and (iii) our CLO on matters related to compliance with laws and regulations.

The ERM Committee provides regular reports to the Audit Committee. The ESG Steering Committee provides the Audit Committee with regular reports related to disclosure controls and procedures for ESG reporting.

Oversees the Company's Code of Ethics, and risks related to privacy, data and cybersecurity.
NOMINATING & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Oversees the assessment of the Board's composition and structure, and each member of the Board's independence, as well as the effectiveness of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Reviews the Company’s activities, policies and programs related to environmental, sustainability and governance matters, including corporate environmental and social responsibility matters, with such review to include, among other things, the impact of such activities, policies and programs on the Company, its teammates and the communities in which it operates.

We have

21




Non-Employee Director Share Ownership Policy
Our Share Ownership Policy for non-employee directors is designed to encourage non-employee directors to acquire and maintain a share ownership policy that appliesmeaningful financial interest in the Company’s Common Stock over time to all non-employee members of the Board. The purpose of the policy is to align the financial interests ofenhance and maintain alignment with our

stockholders' interests.

non-employee Board members with those of our stockholders.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      15


Table of Contents





Both sharesShares owned directly and shares underlying vested but unexercised stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), including stock-settled stock appreciation rights ("SSARs"), restricted stock units ("RSUs"), direct stock issuances ("DSIs") and stock options are included in the determination of whether the share ownershipestablished guidelines have been met. Effective as of December 15, 2022, 'in-the-money' value of shares underlying vested but unexercised equity awards are not included in this determination. The total net realizable share value retained (the "Ownership Threshold") must have a current market value (as defined in the policy) of not less than the lower of:

25% of the total pretax equity award value realized by the Board member from the time the Board member becomes subject to the policy to date in excess of $100,000; or
three
Five times the annual Board cash retainer ofwhich for 2022 was $80,000, or $240,000.$400,000.

Directors who have not achieved their applicable Ownership Threshold are required to retain future acquired shares until the Ownership Threshold is met, subject to certain limited exceptions. As of December 31, 2015, each2022, all of our non-employee members ofdirectors were in compliance with the Board had metOwnership Threshold. See the requirements of our share ownership guidelines. See "Compensationsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Policies and Practices — Management Share Ownership Policy" on page 51 of this Proxy StatementRequirements” for more information regarding our managementthe share ownership policy.

policy applicable to management.

Code of Ethics and Codes of Conduct

Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct

We have a codeCode of ethicsEthics that applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller and chief accounting officer, chief legal officer,CEO, CFO, Chief Accounting Officer ("CAO"), CLO and all professionals involved in the accounting and financial reporting functions. We also have a codeCode of conductConduct that applies to all of our employees,teammates, officers, the Board, physician partners, and third parties conducting business on behalf of the Company. The Code of Ethics and the Board. The codeCode of ethics and the code of conductConduct are each available under the Corporate Governance section of our website, located athttp://www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance. If the Company amends or waives the codeCode of ethicsEthics or the codeCode of conductConduct with respect to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller or chief accounting officer, chief legal

officer,CEO, CFO, CAO, CLO, or persons performing similar functions, we will postdisclose the amendment or waiver at the same location on our website.

HCP also has a code of conduct that applies to its officers, employees, affiliated physicians, and persons serving on the board of directors of its subsidiaries, and other contracted providers, vendors and all third parties conducting business on behalf of HCP. The HCP code of conduct is available under the Corporate Governance section of our website, located athttp://www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.

Insider Trading Policy

Insider Trading Policy

We have adopted an Insider Trading Policy applicable to our directors, executive officers and employeesother teammates that is intended to ensure that those individuals do not benefit financially from buyingprohibits the violation of the U.S. securities laws by transacting in our Common Stock, other Company securities or selling sharesthe securities of our common stockother companies, while in the possession of material non-public information.

Under our Insider Trading Policy, except in accordance with approved trading plans adopted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1, pre-clearance by our chief legal officerCLO is required for equity and 401(k)certain benefit plan transactions entered into by our executivesexecutive officers and Board members, such as an option or stock appreciation right exercise, or electing to invest in or divest shares of our common stock, as well as certain

members.

other transactions involving our common stock. In addition, quarterly trading blackouts are imposed under the Insider Trading Policy upon our directors, executive officers and certain other employeesteammates who are deemed to have access to the Company'sCompany’s financial results prior to their becoming final and being publicly disclosed. The Insider Trading Policy strictlyalso permits the Company to institute additional trading blackout periods or other pre-clearance requirements as deemed appropriate.

Hedging and Pledging
The Insider Trading Policy also restricts certain other lawful conduct that may not be aligned with our stockholders’ best interest. For example, the Insider Trading Policy prohibits hedging transactions. Moreover,transactions for all those subject to the policy, which includes all directors, executive officers and DaVita teammates and restricts pledging transactions by our directors, executive officers and all other employees are prohibited from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.

teammates at the vice president level and above.

16


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
22


Proposal 2 Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2023. Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to attend the annual meeting in personAnnual Meeting virtually and will be available to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they so desire. If KPMG LLP should decline to act or otherwise become incapable of acting, or if KPMG LLP'sLLP’s engagement is discontinued for any reason, the Audit Committee will appoint another independent registered public accounting firm to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.fiscal year 2023. Although we are not required to seek stockholder ratification of this appointment, the Board believes that doing so is consistent with corporate governance best practices. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will explore the reasons for stockholder rejectionthe unfavorable vote and will reconsider the appointment.

The Audit Committee and the Board recommend a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023.
The following table sets forth the aggregate professional fees billed to us for the years ended December 31,

2015 2022 and 20142021 by KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm:

LLP:

 2015

2014

Audit fees1

 $5,063,695 $4,760,714
​ ​ 

Audit-related fees2

 $539,789 $487,185

Tax fees3

 $589,551 $445,429
​ ​ 

All other fees

  

Total

 $6,193,035 $5,693,328
​ ​ 
20222021
Audit fees1
$4,980,316$4,331,130
Audit-related fees2
$572,703$622,311
Tax fees3
$2,196,097$1,888,738
All other fees
Total$7,749,116$6,842,179
1
Includes aggregate fees for the audit of our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting included in our Form 10-K and the three quarterly reviews of our condensed consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-Q and other SEC filings. In addition, audit fees include statutory audits in several countries outside of the U.S. where we conduct operations through our international countries.
subsidiaries.
2
Includes fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported as "Audit“Audit Fees." The audit-related fees in 20152022 and 20142021 include fees for audits of our employee benefit plans, an audit of a majority-owned entity, other domestic audits of HCP's risk bearing organizations,not related to the consolidated financial statements and fees of $101,009 and $264,297 in 2015 and 2014, respectively, for due diligence services relating to potential acquisitions.
3
Includes fees for professional services rendered for tax advicecompliance totaling $2,111,992 and $1,847,161 for 2022 and 2021, respectively, with the remainder primarily for technical tax planning. None of these fees were for tax compliance or tax preparation services.
advice.

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

ThePre-approval Policies and Procedures

Under its pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit, audit-related, tax and all other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firmKPMG LLP, in order to assureensure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor'sauditor’s independence. The Audit Committee's pre-approval policy provides for pre-approval of all audit, audit-related, tax and all other services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee

pre-approved all such services in 20152022 and concluded that such services performed by KPMG LLP were compatible with the maintenance of that firm'sfirm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016.

23

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      17


Table of Contents






Proposal 3 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

PursuantProposal 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing stockholders with a voteproposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers ("NEOs") as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules. The advisory vote on executive compensation described in this proposal isrules, commonly referred to as a "say-on-pay“say-on-pay" vote."

The Company intends

Since the first say-on-pay vote of stockholders at our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we have held a say-on-pay vote annually. This year, in accordance with SEC rules, we will be asking stockholders to include in its proxy statementvote on an annual basis an advisory vote regarding named executive officer compensation.

As disclosed ina separate proposal on the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,frequency with which the Company believesshould continue to hold say-on-pay votes. See the section entitled“—Proposal 4 Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation" below for more details.

We believe that itsour executive compensation program is reasonable, competitive and strongly focused on pay-for-performance principles. We design our executive officer compensation program to attract and retain outstanding leaders who possess the skills and talent necessary to achieve our business goals and objectives. Our ultimate objective is to continue to create long-term stockholder value by being a leader in clinical outcomes, generating strong overall revenue growth, market share increases, operating margin growth, increases in Medicare Advantage enrollment and consistently strong total stockholder return ("TSR"). In order to achieve this objective, we have established an executive compensation program is designed to align the interests of our executives with the short- and long-term interests of our stockholders. Our incentive criteria focus on performance-based compensation that aligns with strategic, operational and financial objectives that we believe:

    rewards superior clinical outcomes;
    rewards strong Company performance;
    aligns our executives' interests with our stockholders' interests;believe support the creation of long-term stockholder value. See the section entitled "Compensation Discussion and
    is competitive within the health care services, diagnostics, managed care and solutions markets, so that we can attract and retain outstanding executives.

We believe that the compensation of our named executive officers during fiscal 2015 is consistent with the following achievements and financial performance Analysis — Overview — Our Executive Compensation Structure" below for 2015:

    improved clinical outcomes in our U.S. dialysis operations, including second year in a row as leader of the Five-Star Quality Rating System created by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services;
    consolidated net revenue growth of 7.7%;
    net revenue growth of 5.2% related to our U.S. dialysis segment operations as a result of an increase in revenue per treatment of $6;
details.
    an increase in HCP's net revenue of 9.6% related to an increase of its fee-for-service business and senior capitated revenue;
    an increase in other ancillary services and strategic initiatives net revenue of 21.3%;
    U.S. dialysis treatment growth of 4.1%;
    normalized non-acquired U.S. dialysis treatment growth of 3.9%;
    net addition of 72 U.S. dialysis centers and 27 international dialysis centers;
    strong operating cash flows of $1.557 billion, which have been reduced by approximately $304 million of after-tax payments made in connection with the settlement of the Vainer private civil suit; and
    a $1.5 billion financing to lower interest rate, extend maturities and enhance liquidity.

The Company's TSR from the first quarter of 2000 (our CEO's first full quarter with the Company) through the fourth quarter of 2015 was approximately 3,298%, putting the Company in the top 10 of all current S&P 500 companies over that period.

The Compensation Committee has developed and approved an executive compensation philosophy to provide a framework for the Company's executive compensation program featuring the following policies and practices:

    strong pay-for-performance alignment, with equity awards ranging up to 65% of our named executive officers' compensation in 2015, and with short-term cash bonuses and long-term incentive awards of cash and equity tied to the achievement of various performance metrics;
    a stock ownership policy that requires our executives to accumulate a meaningful ownership stake in the Company over time to strengthen the alignment of our named executive officers' and stockholders' interests;
    a clawback policy that permits the Board to recover bonuses, incentive and equity-based compensation from executive officers and members of the Board whose fraud or intentional misconduct was a significant contributing factor to the Company having to restate all or a portion of its financial statements; and
    equity incentive plans that prohibit repricing or replacing underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights without prior stockholder approval.

18


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



This proposal gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the overall compensation of our named executive officersNEOs and the compensation philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.

For the reasons discussed above and as further described in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement, we are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officerNEO compensation by voting FOR the following resolution at the annual meeting:

"Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the Company'sCompany’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers,NEOs, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC (which disclosure includes the Compensationsections titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the

2015" "Executive Compensation — 2022 Summary Compensation TableTable" and the other related tables and disclosure)."

The say-on-pay vote is an advisory vote only, and therefore it will not bind the Company or the Board. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the voting results, as appropriate, when making future decisions regarding executive compensation, as they did following the 2015 annual meeting2022 Annual Meeting and each Annual Meeting of stockholders.

Stockholders since 2011.


The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of the advisory resolution relating to the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs as disclosed
in this Proxy Statement.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      19


Table of Contents





Proposal 4 Approval

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of Proposed Amendments to our Amended2023 Annual Meeting and Restated Bylaws to Adopt Proxy Access

Statemen
t
24

The



Proposal 4 Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking stockholders whether future say-on-pay votes should be held every one, two or three years. We are required to hold this say-on-pay frequency vote at least once every six calendar years. When we conducted our last say-on-pay frequency vote at our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders expressed a strong preference to conduct say-on-pay votes on an annual basis. Consistent with that preference, since that time, we have continued to hold annual say-on-pay votes. Over the past six years, the Board is recommendinghas not found any basis to believe that the previously-expressed stockholder preference should not continue to govern and notes that annual say-on-pay votes continue as the most prevalent market practice and are consistent with most institutional investor policies.

In addition, an annual say-on-pay vote:

Allows us to obtain stockholder input on our executive compensation program on a regular basis, which aligns closely with our objective to seek regular engagement with our stockholders on various topics, including our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices; and

Provides the highest level of accountability and communication by enabling the say-on-pay vote to correspond with the most recent executive compensation information presented in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting.


After careful consideration, for these reasons, the Board recommends that the Company should continue to hold future advisory say-on-pay votes on an annual basis.

Stockholders are not voting to approve amendments toor disapprove of the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws that would permit certain stockholders to include qualified stockholder-nominated director candidates in the Company's proxy materials ("proxy access"). The proposed amendments to be approved byBoard’s recommendation. Instead, stockholders are contained in Section 12(a), Section 12(c) and Section 13 of Article III of the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws, a copy of which is attachedbeing provided with four choices with respect to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A ("Amendments"). Additions toproposal: a say-on-pay vote every year, every two years or every three years, or stockholders may abstain from voting on this proposal. The choice that receives the Bylaws are indicated by underlining, and deletions are indicated by strikethrough text.

Introduction

Proxy access allows eligible stockholders to include their own nominees for director in the Company's proxy materials for an annual meetinghighest number of stockholders, along with the candidates nominated by the Board. A non-binding stockholder proposal submitted by the UAW Retiree Medical Trust, which requested that we adopt and present a proxy access bylaw for stockholder approval, received the support of 43% of our stockholders at the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders. Even though the stockholder proposal was supported by less than a majority of the votes cast by our stockholders the Board moved forward with the consideration of proposed amendments to our Amended and Restated Bylaws to implement a proxy access right. In determining the terms of the proxy access right to be proposed for stockholder approval. We reached out to the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares to obtain their feedback on proxy access, and the Board considered feedback from our stockholders gathered during engagement, including in relation to the ownership threshold and duration, the limitation on the number of stockholders that can comprise a nominating group, and the maximum number of proxy access nominees. The Board believes that the proposed Amendments include requirements and provisions designed to provide meaningful rights of proxy access while reducing some risks of abuse.

Description of Proposed Amendments

The following description of the proposed Amendments is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Amendments which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A. You are urged to read the Amendments in their entirety.

Eligibility of Stockholders to Nominate Directors

Any stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders who have maintained continuous qualifying ownership of at least 3% of the shares of the Company's outstanding common stock for at least the previous three years would be permitted to include a specified number of director nominees in the Company's proxy materials for its annual meeting of stockholders.

Calculation of Qualifying Ownership

To ensure that the interests of stockholders seeking to include director nominees in the Company's proxy materials are aligned with those of other stockholders, a nominating stockholder would be deemed to own only those shares of outstanding common stock of the Company as to which the stockholder possesses both (i) the full voting and investment rights pertaining to the shares and (ii) the full economic interest in such shares, including the opportunity for profit and the risk of loss. With respect to the stockholder or any of the stockholder's affiliates, the following shares would not count as "owned" shares for purposes of the Amendments:

shares sold in any transaction that has not been settled or closed, including any short sale;
shares borrowed for any purposes or purchased pursuant to an agreement to resell; or
shares subject to any option, warrant, forward contract, swap, contract of sale or other derivative or similar agreement, whether any such instrument or agreement is to be settled with shares or with cash based on the notional amount or value of outstanding shares of stock, which instrument or agreement has, or is intended to have, or if exercised by either party thereto would have, the purpose or effect of (a) reducing in any manner, to any extent or at any time in the future, the full right to vote or direct the voting of any such shares, and/or (b) hedging, offsetting or altering to any degree any gain or loss arising from the full economic ownership of such shares, other than any such arrangements solely involving a national or multi-national multi-industry market index.

20


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



A stockholder will be deemed to "own" shares held in the name of a nominee or other intermediary so long as the stockholder retains the right to instruct how the shares are voted with respect to the election of directors and the right to direct the disposition thereof and possesses the full economic interest in the shares. A stockholder's ownership of shares will be deemed to continue during any period in which the stockholder has loaned such shares or delegated any voting power over such shares by means of a proxy, power of attorney or other instrument or arrangement which in either case is revocable at any time by the stockholder; provided that in the event of a loan, the stockholder has the power to recall such loaned shares on five or less business days' notice.

Funds under common management and investment control, funds under common management and funded primarily by the same employer, and/or certain investment company families or groups, would be treated as one eligible stockholder or one member of a nominator group under certain circumstances.

Number of Stockholder-Nominated Candidates

The maximum number of candidates nominated by all eligible stockholders that the Company would be required to include in the Company's proxy materials for an annual meeting of stockholders is that number of directors constituting the greater of two or 20% of the total number of directors (rounded down to the nearest whole number) on the last day on which a nomination notice may be submitted to the Company (as described below under the section captioned "Nomination Window"). If one or more vacancies occur on the Board, or the Board decides to reduce the size of the Board in connection with the annual meeting, after the nomination deadline, the nominee limit would be calculated based on the reduced number of directors. Any stockholder-nominated candidate who is either subsequently withdrawn or includedconsidered by the Board inas the Company's proxy materialsstockholders’ recommendation as a Board-nominated candidate would be counted against the nominee limit.

Procedure for Electing Candidates if Nominee Limit Exceeded

Any nominating stockholder submitting more than one stockholder nominee for inclusion in the Company's proxy materials would be required to rank such nominees based on the order that the nominating stockholder desires such nominees to be selected for inclusion in the Company's proxy materials. If the number of stockholder-nominated candidates exceeds the maximum number of stockholder nominees, the highest ranking stockholder nominee from each nominating stockholder would be selected for inclusion

in the Company's proxy materials until the nominee limit is reached, going in order of the amount (largest to smallest) of shares of stock of the Company that each nominating stockholder disclosed as owned in its respective nomination notice submitted to the Company. frequency of future say-on-pay votes.


This selection process would continue with the next highest ranked nominees as many times as necessary, following the same order each time, until the nominee limitvote is reached.

Nomination Window

In order to provide adequate time to assess stockholder-nominated candidates, requests to include stockholder-nominated candidates in the Company's proxy materials must be delivered to or mailedan advisory vote only, and received at the Company's principal executive offices no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days before the first anniversary of the date that the Company distributed its proxy statement to stockholders for the previous year's annual meeting of stockholders.

Information Required of All Nominating Stockholders

Each stockholder seeking to include a director nominee in the Company's proxy materials would be required to provide certain information to the Company, including:

verification of the stockholder's ownership of shares of the Company's common stock;
an undertaking to provide immediate notice if the stockholder ceases to own the minimum number of shares prior to the date of the annual meeting;
a copy of the stockholder's notice on Schedule 14N that has been filed with the SEC;
the stockholder nominee's consent to being named in the Company's proxy materials and serving as a director, if elected;
the information, questionnaire, representation and agreement required pursuant to the advance notice requirements for stockholder nominees set forth in the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws;
a description of communications by the nominating stockholder with any other stockholder or beneficial owner of Company securities regarding the stockholder nominee;
a description of certain relationships that might have existed within the past three years between or among the nominating stockholder, the nominator group, the stockholder nominee and/or the Company or any of its affiliates;
the details of any position of the stockholder nominee as an officer or director of any competitor of the Company within the three years preceding the submission of the nomination notice; and

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      21


Table of Contents





in the case of a nomination by a group of stockholders, the designation of one authorized group member.

Nominating stockholders would also be required to make certain representations and warranties to and agreements with the Company, including:

no intent to change or influence control of the Company;
therefore it will not nominating any person for election to the Board other than the stockholder's nominees submitted through the proxy access process;
not engaging and/or participating in the solicitation of support for any person other than the stockholder's nominees or Board nominees;
not engaging in any exempt solicitation or certain communications regarding voting intentions, other than with respect to the nominating stockholder's nominees or Board nominees;
not distributing any proxy card for the annual meeting in connection with the election of a stockholder nominee other than the form distributed by the Company;
no violation of applicable law or stock exchange requirements as a result of the nominee's candidacy or Board membership (if elected);
the nominee's independence and other qualifications;
satisfaction of the eligibility requirements and intent to maintain qualifying ownership through the annual meeting date;
compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations in connection with the nomination, solicitation and election, including filing with the SEC certain communications with stockholders relating to any director, director nominee or stockholder nominee;
assuming liabilities related to and indemnifying the Company and its officers, directors and employees against losses arising out of the nomination or relevant communications; and
promptly notifying the Company if certain information ceases to be true and accurate in all material respects.

Exclusion of Stockholder Nominees

The Company would not be required to include a stockholder nominee in the Company's proxy materials if:

the Company receives a notice that a stockholder intends to nominate any candidate for election to the Board at the annual meeting pursuant to the

    advance notice requirements for stockholder nominees set forth in Article III, Section 12(a) of the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws;

the nominating stockholder has engaged in a solicitation, exempt solicitation or other communication regarding voting intentions, other than with respect to any stockholder nominee or Board nominee;
the nomination or election to the Board would result in the Company violating or failing to be in compliance with its Amended and Restated Bylaws or Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, any stock exchange requirements or any other applicable state or federal laws, rules or regulations;
the nominee has been an officer or director of a competitor, as defined in Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, as amended, within the past three years;
the nominating stockholder has failed to continue to satisfy the eligibility requirements, or the nominee becomes unwilling or unable to serve on the Board; or
any of the representations and warranties made in the nomination notice ceases to be true and accurate in all material respects, or any violation or breach occurs of any of the obligations, agreements, representations or warranties of the nominating stockholder or stockholder nominee under or pursuant to the Amendments, including, without limitation, if the nominee (a) does not qualify as independent, (b) becomes a party to an undisclosed voting commitment or compensation arrangement, or (c) is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses) or has been convicted in such a criminal proceeding within the past ten years.

The Board or the chairman of the annual meeting would declare a director nomination by a stockholder to be defective, and such nomination would be disregarded, if (i) the director nominee or the stockholder breaches any of their respective obligations under the Amendments or (ii) the nominating stockholder does not appear at the annual meeting to present the nomination.

Supporting Statement and Other Information

A nominating stockholder would be permitted to include in the Company's proxy statement for the applicable annual meeting a 500-word statement in support of its nominee(s).

22


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



The Company would be permitted to omit, or may supplement or correct, any information or statement if such information or statement (a) is not true in all material respects, (b) impugns without factual foundation a person's or entity's character, integrity or personal reputation, or makes charges concerning improper, illegal or immoral conduct or associations without factual foundation, (c) would violate any applicable law or regulation, or (d) would impose a material risk of liability upon the Company.

The Company would be permitted to include in its proxy statement any information thatbind the Company or the Board determines, in its discretion, to include relating to the nomination, including without limitation any statement in opposition to the nomination, information relating to any compensation arrangement and/or voting commitment, and any of the information provided to the Company pursuant to the proxy access right.

Solicitation by the Company Against Stockholder Nominees

The Company would be permitted to solicit support for its position in opposition to any stockholder nominee.

Interpretation

The Board (and any other person or body authorized by the Board, including, without limitation, the chairman of the relevant annual meeting) would have the power and authority to interpret certain of the Amendments and to make any and all determinations necessary or advisable to apply those provisions to any persons, facts or circumstances, including the power to determine the eligibility of a nominating stockholder and/or stockholder nominee, and whether any and all requirements have been satisfied.

Stockholder Approval Requirement

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock which are present at the annual meeting or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon is required for the approval of the proposed Amendments. The proposed Amendments would become effective upon the required approval by our stockholders.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of the proposed amendments to the Amended and Restated Bylaws to adopt proxy access.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      23


Table of Contents





Proposal 5 Amendment to Increase the Number of Shares Available Under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan by 7,500,000 Shares

General

The Board is proposing for stockholder approval the amendment and restatement (the "ESPP Amendment") of our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"). If approved by stockholders, the ESPP Amendment would add an additional 7,500,000 shares of common stock to the number of shares authorized for issuance under the ESPP. The ESPP encourages ownership of our common stock by eligible employees by permitting them to purchase, subject to the terms and conditions included in the ESPP, a limited number of shares at a discount rate. The Board approved the ESPP Amendment on March 31, 2016, subject to stockholder approval.

Reason for Proposing the ESPP Amendment

Under the ESPP, 5,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized for issuance. As of March 31, 2016, eligible employees have purchased 4,577,603 shares under the ESPP and 422,397 shares remain available for purchase under the ESPP. At current participation levels, we estimate that, in the absence of an amendment to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized under the ESPP, all currently authorized shares will be purchased by June 2016. If the ESPP Amendment is approved, the number of shares available for purchase under the ESPP will be increased by 7,500,000 shares, which would be approximately 3.6% of the Company's shares outstanding as of March 31, 2016. This increase in the number of shares available for purchase under the ESPP will enable eligible employees to purchase shares under the ESPP for an additional period of time.

History of the ESPP

The ESPP was originally adopted by the Board of Directors on October 24, 1995 and was approved by stockholders on June 6, 1996. Initially, the maximum number of shares of common stock that we could issue under the ESPP was 200,000 shares. On September 26, 1997, the Board adjusted the total number of shares available for issuance under the ESPP to 333,333 shares, to reflect the payment of a dividend on our common stock of two shares for every three shares then outstanding. An amendment to increase the number of shares available for purchase under the ESPP

by 800,000 shares was adopted by the Board and was approved by stockholders on December 17, 1999. The Board approved an amendment and restatement of the ESPP, effective July 10, 2002, to change the name of the ESPP to reflect our new corporate name and to make certain other clarifying changes. On May 21, 2004, our Board adjusted the total number of shares available for issuance under the ESPP to 1,699,999 shares to reflect a three-for-two stock split of our common stock. An amendment to increase the number of shares available for purchase under the ESPP by 800,001 shares was adopted by the Board and was approved by stockholders on May 29, 2007. The Board approved an amendment on December 13, 2007, and the Company amended the ESPP pursuant to the approval by the Board on November 1, 2008, to permit the Company to distribute directly to the participant the balance of a participant's account on the date of purchase of shares if the balances exceeds the purchase price of a whole number of shares to be acquired, in lieu of applying such amount to the next purchase right period, in either case, in the discretion of the Company. On October 6, 2011, pursuant to the approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board, the ESPP was amended to provide that employees that are citizens or residents of a foreign jurisdiction (i) whose laws prohibit their participation in the ESPP, (ii) whose participation would cause the ESPP to not meet the eligibility requirements of section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, or (iii) where the burden to the Company of complying with local tax, securities and employment law does not warrant extending participation in the ESPP in such foreign jurisdiction, who would otherwise be eligible to participate in the ESPP, may be deemed by the Compensation Committee as not eligible to participate. On August 12, 2013, our Board adjusted the total number of shares available for issuance under the ESPP to 5,000,000 shares to reflect the two-for-one stock split of our common stock.

Description of the ESPP

The following is a description of the terms of the ESPP, as proposed to be amended and restated. This description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the plan document, as proposed to be amended and restated, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B and incorporated herein by reference.

24


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



Administration.    The Compensation Committee administers the ESPP. Pursuant to the ESPP, members of the Compensation Committee have the authority to interpret the ESPP and to prescribe the rules and procedures relating to the ESPP and to take all other actions necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration of the ESPP. The Company pays all costs and expenses of administering the ESPP.

Shares Subject to the ESPP.    The maximum number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the ESPP is 5,000,000 shares, subject to adjustment in the event of certain changes to our capital structure as described in the ESPP. As noted above, 4,577,603 shares have already been purchased by eligible employees under the ESPP and 422,397 shares remain available for purchase as of March 31, 2016. If stockholders approve the amendment to increase the number of shares available under the ESPP by 7,500,000 shares, a total of 12,500,000 shares would be authorized for issuance under the ESPP subject to adjustment in the event of certain changes to our capital structure. The shares of common stock sold under the ESPP may be authorized and unissued shares or shares reacquired by the Company.

Eligibility.    Except as described above with respect to certain employees in foreign jurisdictions, any employee of the Company or any of its authorized subsidiaries who is scheduled to work at least twenty hours per week is eligible to participate in the ESPP, provided such employee has completed at least three months of continuous employment prior to the first day of the applicable purchase right period (as described below). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the ESPP, no employee may be granted purchase rights under the ESPP if the employee would, after the grant of the purchase rights, be deemed to own 5% or more of the combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or of a subsidiary. As of March 31, 2016, we have approximately 65,700 employees and approximately 56,900 employees are eligible to participate in the ESPP.

Participation and Payroll Deductions.    Eligible employees may purchase shares of common stock under the ESPP through payroll deductions during each purchase right period with amounts accumulated during each purchase right period or by lump sum contribution by the participant at the beginning of the purchase right period. An eligible employee may enroll in the ESPP by executing prior to the commencement of each purchase right period a form provided by the Company stating the amount of the requested payroll deduction or lump sum contribution. The minimum dollar amount that may be deducted and contributed per payroll period is $10.

Once a participant has designated the amount of his or her contribution for a purchase right period, the participant cannot change the amount for such purchase right period without terminating his or her purchase right.

The amounts contributed by a participant (whether by means of payroll withholding or a lump sum advance contribution) will be deposited into a separate account maintained for the participant. No interest is paid on the amounts credited to a participant's account. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the ESPP, a participant may not accrue a right to purchase common stock under the ESPP at a rate that exceeds an aggregate fair market value of $25,000 per calendar year.

Purchase Right Periods.    Shares of common stock will be offered under the ESPP through two purchase right periods each year, from January 1 to December 31, and from July 1 to December 31. Which purchase right period will apply to a participant will depend on when a participant elects to start making contributions for the year. Participating employees are required to elect how much they will contribute toward their purchase rights prior to the start of the purchase right period.

Exercise of Purchase Rights.    Unless earlier terminated, purchase rights will be exercised automatically on the last day of each purchase right period. Funds held in a participant's account on the last day of the purchase right period will be used to purchase shares of common stock for the participant. Shares purchased at the end of a purchase right period will be credited to electronic share accounts established for each participant at a broker designated by the Compensation Committee. The shares will be held in such accounts until the holding period set forth in section 423(a) of the Internal Revenue Code has been satisfied. After the expiration of the holding period required by section 423(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, which is two years after the first day of the purchase right period, or one year after the last day of the purchase right period, whichever is later, participants may move the shares to other brokers of their choice or have the shares transferred to them.

Purchase Right Price.    The price at which a participating employee will purchase each share covered by a purchase right will be the lesser of (i) 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the first day of the applicable purchase right period, or (ii) 85% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the last day of that purchase right period. The fair market value of a share of common stock on any relevant date under the ESPP will be the last reported sale price of our common stock on the

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      25


Table of Contents





NYSE on the particular day, or if the NYSE is closed on a particular day, then the last reported sale price for the preceding day. On March 31, 2016, the fair market value per share of our common stock was $73.38. Purchases are subject to the aggregate limitation on the number of shares that are available under the ESPP and the ESPP limitations applicable to individual participants.

Termination of Purchase Rights.    A participant may elect to terminate his or her purchase right at any time prior to the last day of the purchase right period. To do so, the participant must complete the form provided by the Company for this purpose, and submit it to our people services department. A participant's purchase right will terminate automatically if the participant ceases to be our employee for any reason (including death, disability or retirement) prior to the last day of the purchase right period. A transfer of employment or service between the Company and a subsidiary or between different subsidiaries is not considered a termination for purposes of the ESPP. Furthermore, an approved leave of absence is not treated as termination of employment for this purpose if it does not exceed 90 days (unless the participant's rights to reemployment are guaranteed by statute or contract). Upon the termination of a participant's purchase right, all amounts held in a participant's account will be refunded to the participant.

Termination Events.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the ESPP, all purchase rights shall be automatically exercised immediately preceding (i) a transaction in which the Company will cease to be an independent publicly-owned corporation, (ii) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of the Company, or (iii) a termination of the ESPP. In the case of a termination event described in (i) or (ii) above, the fair market value of our common stock on the last day of the purchase right period will be deemed to be equal to the per share consideration received in the transaction by the holders of the common stock.

Adjustment Upon Changes in Capitalization.    If the outstanding shares of our common stock are increased, decreased, or exchanged for different securities through a reorganization, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, reverse stock dividend, or other similar transaction, a proportionate adjustment will be made by the Compensation Committee to (i) the number, price, and kind of shares subject to outstanding purchase rights, and (ii) the maximum number and kind of shares that are available for issuance under the ESPP.

Proration of Purchase Rights.    If the total number of shares of common stock to be purchased pursuant to outstanding purchase rights on any particular date

exceeds the number of shares then available for issuance under the ESPP, then (i) the Compensation Committee will make a pro-rata allocation of the available shares on a uniform and nondiscriminatory basis; and (ii) the payroll deductions of each participant, to the extent in excess of the aggregate purchase price payable for the common stock pro-rated to such individual, will be refunded to the participant.

Nontransferability.    A participant's rights under the ESPP are not transferable.

Indemnification of the Board.    To the maximum extent permitted by law and subject to certain exceptions, we will indemnify each member of the Board and any other employee with duties under the ESPP against expenses (including any amount paid in settlement or in satisfaction of a judgment) reasonably incurred by the individual in connection with any claims against the individual by reason of the performance of the individual's duties under the ESPP.

Amendment and Termination of the ESPP. The Board may terminate or amend the ESPP at any time. However, the Board may not, without the approval of our stockholders, adopt any amendmentdecide that relates to (i) the class of individuals eligible to participate in the ESPP, or (ii) the aggregate number of shares to be granted under the ESPP.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The followingit is a brief summary of the United States federal income tax consequences under the ESPP.

The ESPP is intended to qualify as an "Employee Stock Purchase Plan" within the meaning of section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under section 423, an eligible employee who elects to participate in the ESPP will not realize any taxable income at the time common stock is purchased under the ESPP for such eligible employee.

If a participant disposes of common stock purchased under the ESPP two years or more after the date the purchase right is exercised, which is the last day of the purchase right period, a participant will recognize long-term capital gain or loss. The Company will not be entitled to any deduction with respect to a disposition of common stock occurring under the circumstances described in this paragraph.

26


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



If a participant disposes of common stock purchased under the ESPP within two years after the date the purchase right is exercised, the participant will recognize ordinary income, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the common stock on the last day of the purchase right period over the purchase price of the common stock under the ESPP. The participant's cost basis in the common stock will be increased by the amount of the ordinary income recognized by the participant. In addition, upon the disposition of the common stock, a participant will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the price at which the common stock is disposed of and the cost basis in the common stock, as so increased. The Company will not be entitled to any deduction with respect to the amount recognized by the participant as capital gain.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present at the 2016 annual meeting, in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon, is required for the approval of the proposed amendment and restatement of our ESPP, including an increase in the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the ESPP, and total votes cast on this proposal must represent over 50% of all outstanding shares.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of the proposed amendment to our ESPP to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the ESPP by 7,500,000 shares.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      27


Table of Contents





Proposal 6 Stockholder Proposal Regarding Action by Written Consent

We expect the following proposal, sponsored by James McRitchie and Myra K. Young, 9295 Yorkship Court, Elk Grove, California 95758, and holders of 100 shares of the Company's common stock, to be presented at the annual meeting.The Board has recommended a voteAGAINST this proposal for the reasons set forth following the proposal. The Board disclaims any responsibility for the content of the proposal and the supporting statement, which are presented exactly in the form received by the Company.

Stockholder Proposal and Supporting Statement

Proposal 6 — Right to Act by Written Consent

Resolved, Shareholders request that our board of directors undertake such steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to be consistent with applicable law and consistent with giving shareholders

the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.

This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67% — support at both Allstate and Sprint. Hundreds of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent.

Taking action by written consent in lieu of a meeting is a means shareholders can use to raise important matters outside the normal annual meeting cycle. A shareholder right to act by written consent and to call a special meeting are 2 complimentary ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. Taking action by written consent saves the expense of holding a special shareholder meeting.

Please vote to enhance shareholder value:

Right to Act by Written Consent — Proposal 6

28


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance



The Company's Statement in Opposition to Proposal 6

The Board recommends you voteAGAINST the proposal.

We have a track record of strong corporate governance.    We have had a long-standing commitment to sound corporate governance practices, and have a number of corporate governance policies and practices that enhance the accountability of the Board of Directors to our stockholders, including:

    Our stockholders' right to call special meetings at a 10% threshold;
    A majority vote standard in uncontested director elections;
    No non-stockholder-approved pill;
    Annual election of all directors (no "staggered board" or "classified board"); and
    Simple majority vote for amendment of Bylaws.

We continue to be committed to good corporate citizenship and accountability to our stockholders. Our continual process of evaluating and making appropriate changes as needed to our corporate governance structure underscores our commitment to sound corporate governance and, we believe, enhances stockholder value. Last year, although proxy access received only 43% support from our stockholders, the Board of Directors proceeded, nonetheless, to consider amendments to our Bylaws to implement proxy access. We reached out to the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares to obtain their feedback on proxy access and, based on feedback gathered during the engagement, we are proposing amendments to our Bylaws which we believe provide meaningful rights of proxy access while reducing risks of abuse. In short, we continually evaluate our business, stockholder feedback, the competitive landscape and developments in corporate governance and implement appropriate changes to our corporate governance policies and practices when they appear to be in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold say-on-pay votes more or less frequently than the option approved by our business.

stockholders. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the voting results, as appropriate, when adopting a policy on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes.


The proposalBoard recommends a vote for a 1 YEAR frequency of future
say-on-pay votes.






25


Proposal 5 Amendment and Restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Provide for the Exculpation of Officers as Permitted by Delaware Law

The State of Delaware, which is unnecessary givenour state of incorporation, recently enacted legislation effective August 1, 2022 that enables Delaware companies to limit the liability of certain of their officers in limited circumstances under Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”). Amended DGCL Section 102(b)(7) was adopted to address inconsistent treatment between officers and directors and help address rising litigation costs for Delaware companies. Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation currently provides for the exculpation of directors, but does not similarly include a provision that allows for the exculpation of officers, as now permitted under the DGCL. After careful consideration, our Board has unanimously approved and adopted (subject to the approval of our stockholders), and recommends that our stockholders already haveapprove, the amendment and restatement of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to provide for the exculpation of certain officers of the Company from liability as permitted by Delaware law (the “Proposed Amendment”).

The nature of the role of officers frequently requires them to make decisions on crucial matters, and often such decisions must be made in response to time-sensitive opportunities and challenges. As a result, officers, like directors, are exposed to a substantial risk of investigations, claims, actions, suits or proceedings seeking to impose liability on the basis of hindsight, especially in the current litigious environment and regardless of merit. We believe that limiting the economic impact of this type of litigation to our Company is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders and would empower officers to best exercise their business judgement in furtherance of stockholder interests and better position the Company to retain our current officers and attract top officer candidates. Importantly, as is currently the case under our Restated Certificate of Incorporation with respect to directors, the Proposed Amendment would not limit liability of officers for breaches of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any transaction in which the officer derived an improper personal benefit. Rather, the Proposed Amendment only permits exculpation for direct claims brought by stockholders for breach of an officer’s fiduciary duty of care, and also does not permit the elimination of an officer's monetary liability for breach of fiduciary duty claims brought by the corporation itself or for derivative claims brought by stockholders in the name of the corporation. Finally, the Proposed Amendment is limited in scope and only applies to certain officers of the Company. The Board believes that the Proposed Amendment will strike the right balance between stockholders’ interest in accountability and their interest in the Company being able to call special meetings.    Our stockholders already havemitigate the ability "to raise important matters outsidedisruptive impact of litigation and continue to attract and retain talented officers to work on its behalf. Additionally, it would more closely align the normal annual meeting cycle." Our bylaws were amended in 2011 to allow stockholders holding 10% or moreprotections of our outstanding common stockofficers with those protections currently afforded to call a special meetingour directors.

In addition, the Company expects that other companies with which it competes for officer candidates may adopt exculpation clauses that limit the personal liability of officers as now permitted by Delaware law. The Board believes that failing to propose, debateadopt the Proposed Amendment could impact our recruitment and vote on matters outsideretention of exceptional officer candidates who may conclude that the normal annual meeting cycle.

potential exposure to liabilities, costs of defense and other risks of proceedings exceeds the benefits of serving as an officer of the Company as compared to serving as an officer at another company that does exculpate officers. Attracting and retaining top executive talent is key to achieving our business objectives and driving long-term stockholder value.

Notably, our 10% threshold for calling a special meeting is lower than

In light of the threshold at many S&P 500 companies and is substantially lower than the majority threshold that would be required to take action by written consent under this proposal.

Addressing matters that are significantbenefits to the Company at a meetingand our stockholders outlined above, and taking into account the narrow scope, class and type of claims for which officers’ liability would be exculpated, the Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the stockholders, rather than through the consent solicitation process, ensures that information about proposed stockholder actions will be disseminated to all stockholders and allows for the transparent, public, orderly and deliberate consideration of issues facing the Company.    Acting on matters at a meeting of stockholders is more democratic and transparent than doing so by written consent. Requiring action to be taken at a stockholder meeting allows all stockholders to express their views openly, rather than allowing a subsetProposed Amendment.


The full text of the stockholder constituency to take action without the knowledge or participation by the restAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is attached as Annex B.





dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
26


Effect of Approval and Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the Company's stockholders and impose the results of that action on other stockholders. The special meeting process that is already available to the Company's stockholders provides a more meaningful opportunity for all stockholders to be involved in our corporate governance and, specifically, to receive notice of and participate in actions taken on behalf of the company's stockholders. On the contrary, action by written consent would permit a group of stockholders to initiate action without any notice and opportunity for other stockholders to review, analyze and formulate an opinion on the issue(s) being raised for vote by written consent. Action by written consent could also lead to hasty decision-making and could be costly and disruptive for the Company because it forecloses the opportunity for stockholders to have a robust, open and real time consideration and deliberation. Different stockholders could act on different matters by written consent for any purpose, at any time, and as often as they wish, causing significant disruption and confusion. This could lead to a chaotic and potentially coercive state of corporate affairs rather than the orderly and democratic stockholder meeting process currently in place.

The affirmative voteholders of a majority of the sharesvoting power of common stock present atall of the annual meeting, in person or by proxy andoutstanding shares entitled to vote thereon,at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the Proposed Amendment.If our stockholders approve the Proposed Amendment, the changes described in this section will become legally effective upon the filing by the Company of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which is expected to occur shortly following the Annual Meeting.


The Board recommends a vote FOR approval of the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to provide for the approvalexculpation of this proposal.

For all of the foregoing reasons, the Board recommends that you voteAGAINST this proposal.

officers as permitted by Delaware law.
27

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      29


Table of Contents


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial

Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information regarding the ownership of our common stockCommon Stock as of March 31, 20162023 (except as noted) by (a) all persons known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock,Common Stock, (b) each of our directors and named executive officers,NEOs, and (c) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. We know of no agreements among our stockholders whichthat relate to voting or investment power over our common stockCommon Stock or any arrangement the operation of whichthat may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of the Company.

  Name and address of beneficial owner1
Number of
shares
beneficially
owned




Percentage of
shares
beneficially
owned




 
 Warren E. Buffett2
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.2
1440 Kiewit Plaza
Omaha, Nebraska 68131



 
38,565,570 18.69%  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
  The Vanguard Group, Inc.3
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
 14,380,779 6.97%  
 BlackRock Inc.4
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055


 
12,297,950 5.96%  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Kent J. Thiry5 2,053,122 *  
 Javier J. Rodriguez6 686,363 *  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Michael D. Staffieri7 152,747 *  
 Dennis L. Kogod8 629,782 *  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
  James K. Hilger9 67,166 *  
 Pamela M. Arway10 89,808 *  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Charles G. Berg11 77,437 *  
 Carol Anthony ("John") Davidson12 49,697 *  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Barbara J. Desoer 642 *  
 Paul J. Diaz13 13,094 *  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Peter T. Grauer14 154,921 *  
 John M. Nehra15 186,117 *  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Dr. William L. Roper16 85,306 *  
 Roger J. Valine17 101,842 *  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
  All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)18 4,419,926 2.1%  
Name and address of beneficial owner1
Number of
shares
beneficially
owned
Percentage of
 shares
beneficially
owned
Warren E. Buffett2
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
3555 Farnam St.
Omaha, NE 68131
 
36,095,570 39.8 %
The Vanguard Group3
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
 
6,166,112 6.8 %
BlackRock, Inc.4
55 East 52nd St.
New York, NY 10055
 
4,822,086 5.3 %
Directors and Executive Officers:  
Javier J. Rodriguez5
595,643 *
Joel Ackerman6
143,381 *
Michael D. Staffieri7
220,479 *
Kathleen A. Waters8
92,826 *
James O. Hearty9
35,067 *
Pamela M. Arway21,992 *
Charles G. Berg23,438 *
Barbara J. Desoer10
15,407 *
Paul J. Diaz15,553 *
Jason M. Hollar1,652 *
Gregory J. Moore, M.D., Ph.D.2,860 *
John M. Nehra10
76,183 *
Adam H. Schechter739 *
Phyllis R. Yale10
14,419 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)11
1,262,041 1.4 %
*
Amount represents less than 1% of our common stock.
Common Stock.
1
Unless otherwise set forth in the footnotes below,table above, the address of each beneficial owner is 2000 16th16th Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202.
2
Based solely on information contained in Amendment No. 49 to Schedule 13G13D filed with the SEC on February 17, 2015,August 3, 2022, by Berkshire Hathaway Inc., a diversified holding company which Mr. Buffett may be deemed to control. Such filings indicated that, as of August 1, 2022, Mr. Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. shareshared voting and dispositive power over 38,565,57036,095,570 shares of the Company's common stock,Company’s Common Stock, which includeincluded shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. as a result of being a parent holding company or control person.
The percentage of shares beneficially owned as reported for Mr. Buffett was calculated by the Company as of March 31, 2023, using the total shares outstanding as of that date.
3
Based solely upon information contained in Amendment No. 512 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016,9, 2023, as of December 30, 2022, The Vanguard Group Inc., an investment adviser, has sole voting power with respect to 308,622 shares, shared voting power with respect to 16,70081,782 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 14,047,8515,933,375 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 332,928232,737 shares.
The percentage of shares beneficially owned as reported for The Vanguard Group was calculated by the Company as of March 31, 2023, using the total shares outstanding as of that date.
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
28

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
4
Based solely upon information contained in Amendment No. 7 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 28, 2016,February 1, 2023, as of December 31, 2022, BlackRock, Inc., an investment advisor, has sole voting power with respect to 10,691,4044,248,190 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 12,297,9504,822,086 shares.
The percentage of shares beneficially owned as reported for BlackRock, Inc. was calculated by the Company as of March 31, 2023, using the total shares outstanding as of that date.
5
Includes 458,994 shares held34,847 restricted stock units and 58,780 performance stock units, which are scheduled to vest, in a family trusteach case, as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2023, and 1,450,000221,241 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs and 72,064 restricted stock units,Stock-Settled Appreciation Rights ("SSARs"), which are exercisable as of March 31, 2023, as determined based on the closing price per share of our Common Stock of $81.11 on March 31, 2023.
6Includes 14,935 restricted stock units and 25,190 performance stock units, which are scheduled to vest, in each case, as of or will become exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016.
6
Includes 549,167 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs2023, and 36,466 restricted stock units, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, March 31, 2016.
7
Includes 130,600 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs and 4,934 restricted stock units, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, March 31, 2016.
8
Includes 84,350 shares held in trust and 472,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs and 36,466 restricted stock units, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, March 31, 2016.
9
Includes 47,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs and 3,983 restricted stock units, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, March 31, 2016.
10
Includes 77,41432,262 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of March 31, 2023, as determined based on the closing price per share of our Common Stock of $81.11 on March 31, 2023.
7Includes 39,825 restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest as of or will become exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016.

30


Table of Contents

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management



11
Includes 14,095 shares held in trust2023, and 53,41483,734 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of March 31, 2023, as determined based on the closing price per share of our Common Stock of $81.11 on March 31, 2023.
8Includes 7,468 restricted stock units and 12,594 performance stock units, which are vested or will become exercisablescheduled to vest, in each case, as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2016.
12
Includes 41,4142023, and 21,165 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of March 31, 2023, as determined based on the closing price per share of our Common Stock of $81.11 on March 31, 2023.
9Includes 3,485 restricted stock units and 5,877 performance stock units, which are scheduled to vest, in each case, as of or will become exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016.
13
Includes 5,4142023, and 13,940 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of or will become exercisable within 60 days after, March 31, 2016.
14
2023, as determined based on the closing price per share of our Common Stock of $81.11 on March 31, 2023.
10Includes 115,9081,309 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of March 31, 2023, as determined based on the closing price per share of our Common Stock of $81.11 on March 31, 2023.
11Includes 100,560 restricted stock units and 102,441 performance stock units, which are vested or will become exercisablescheduled to vest, in each case, as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2016.
15
Includes 72,379 shares in trust and 113,4142023. Also includes 376,269 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of or will become exercisable within 60 days after, March 31, 2016.
16
Includes 77,414 shares issuable upon2023, as determined based on the exerciseclosing price per share of SSARs, which are exercisable asour Common Stock of or will become exercisable within 60 days after,$81.11 on March 31, 2016.
17
Includes 83,414 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, March 31, 2016.
18
Includes 3,284,585 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs and 154,451 restricted stock units, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, March 31, 2016.
2023.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      31

29

Table of Contents





Information About Our Executive Officers


Information Concerning Our Executive Officers

Information About Our Executive Officers

Name



Age
Position

JR.jpg

Kent

JA.jpg
MS.jpg
Javier J. Thiry

60Chairman of the Board, Rodriguez, 52
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer, HealthCare Partners
​ ​ ​ ​ 

Javier J. Rodriguez

45Chief Executive Officer, Kidney Care

Michael D. Staffieri

42Chief Operating Officer, Kidney Care
​ ​ ​ ​ 

Dennis L. Kogod

56President, HealthCare Partners, and Chief Executive Officer, International

Joseph C. Mello

Joel Ackerman, 57Chief Operating Officer, HealthCare Partners
​ ​ ​ ​ 

James K. Hilger

54Interim
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Michael D. Staffieri, 49
Chief Operating Officer, DaVita Kidney Care
JW.jpg
KW.jpg
JH.jpg
John D. Winstel, 52
Chief Accounting Officer

Kathleen A. Waters,

48 55
Chief Legal and Public Affairs Officer
​ ​ ​ ​ 

Jeanine M. Jiganti

56James O. Hearty, 54
Chief Compliance Officer

LeAnne M. Zumwalt

57Group Vice President, Purchasing and Public Affairs
​ ​ ​ ​ 

Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board. Set forth below is a brief description as of March 31, 2016 of the business experience of all executive officers other than Mr. Thiry,Rodriguez, who is also a director nominee and whose business experience is set forth above in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled "Information Concerning Memberstitled “Biographies of our Director Nominees."


Joel Ackerman became our CFO in February 2017. Effective April 2019, Mr. Ackerman was also appointed to serve as our Treasurer. Prior to joining us, Mr. Ackerman was the CEO and a member of the Board Standing for Election."

Javier J. Rodriguez became our chief executive officer, Kidney Careof Directors of Champions Oncology, Inc., a publicly traded company engaged in March 2014. Since joining the Company in 1998,development of advanced technology solutions and services to personalize the development and use of oncology drugs, since October 2010. Mr. Rodriguez has served in a numberAckerman is currently the Chairman of different capacities. From February 2012 to March 2014, he served as our president. From April 1, 2006 through February 2012, he served as our senior vice president. Before that, from 2000 to 2006 hethe Board of Champions Oncology. Mr. Ackerman served as a vice presidentManaging Director at Warburg Pincus, a global private equity firm, where he led the healthcare services team for nearly 10 years from January 1999 to September 2008. He served on the Board of operationsDirectors at Kindred Healthcare, Inc. from December 2008 to July 2018 and payor contracting. Mr. Rodriguez joinedserved on the Company in 1998 asBoard of Directors of Coventry Health Care, Inc., a director of value management. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Rodriguez worked for Baxter Healthcare Corporation in Financenational managed care company, from 1995 to 1996. He also previously served as director of operations for CBS MarketingSeptember 1999 until its acquisition by Aetna Inc. in Mexico City.

May 2013. Mr. Ackerman is also a member of the Board of One Acre Fund, a not-for-profit organization that focuses on smallholder agriculture, serving more than 3,000,000 subsistence farmers in Africa.


Michael D. Staffieribecame our chief operating officer,COO, DaVita Kidney Care, in March 2014. From July 2011 to FebruaryMarch 2014, he served as a senior vice president,Senior Vice President, Kidney Care. FromMr. Staffieri initially joined us in July 2000 and served in several different roles since that time, including as our Vice President of Operations and New Center Development from March 2008 to July 2011, he served as our vice president of operations and new center development. Mr. Staffieri joined the Company in July 2000 and has served in several different roles.2011. Prior to joining us, Mr. Staffieri worked as a consultant for Arthur Andersen LLP in Finance from 1999 to 2000.

Dennis L. Kogod

John D. Winstelbecame our president, HealthCare Partners,CAO in February 2020. Prior to joining the Company as Group Vice President, Accounting in October 2019, Mr. Winstel was the Vice President of Finance and our chief executive officer, International, effective January 2015. From March 2014 through December 2014, heAccounting and Corporate Controller at Cooper Tire & Rubber Company (“Cooper”), a publicly traded tire manufacturer, from June 2015 to October 2019. Prior to joining Cooper, Mr. Winstel served from May 2010 to June 2015 as chief operating officerthe Senior Vice President of our HealthCare Partners division. From January 2009 to March 2014, he served as our chief operating officer,Finance and Global Controller of General Cable Corporation, a then-publicly traded wire and cable manufacturer, and prior to that he served as our president-west beginning in October 2005. From January 2004 until joining us, Mr. Kogod served as president and chief operating officer-west of Gambro Healthcare, Inc., which we acquired in October 2005. From July 2000 to January 2004, Mr. Kogod served as president, west division of Gambro Healthcare, Inc. From June 1999 to July 2000, Mr. Kogod was president of Teleflex Medical Group, a medical original equipment manufacturer of medical delivery systems. From January 1996 to June 1999, Mr. Kogod was corporate vice president of Teleflex Surgical Group, a surgical device and service organization. Mr. Kogod previously served on the board of Arbios Systems, Inc., a medical device and cell-based therapy company.

Joseph C. Mello became our chief operating officer, HealthCare Partners, in January 2015. From April 2012 to April 2014, Mr. Mello served on the Board of CapitalSource Inc., a commercial lender, Mr. Mello previously served as our chief operating officer — emeritus from January 2009 to December 2012, and chief operating officer from June 2000 to December 2008. From April 1998 to June 2000, Mr. Mello served as president and chief executive officer of Vivra Asthma & Allergy. From August 1994 to April 1998, Mr. Mello held various positions with MedPartners, Inc.,

32


Table of Contents

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management



including senior vice president/chief operating officer-southeastern region from March 1997 to April 1998. Prior to joining MedPartners, from 1984 to 1994, Mr. Mello was associated with KPMG LLP, where he became a partner in 1989.

James K. Hilger became our interim chief financial officer in March 2015, a position he previously held from April 2012 until November 2013. Mr. Hilger continues to serve as our chief accounting officer, a position he has held since April 2010. Prior to April 2010, Mr. Hilger served as our vice president and controller since May 2006, after having served as our vice president, finance beginning in September 2005. Mr. Hilger was our acting chief financial officer from November 2007 through February 2008. From September 2003 to September 2005, Mr. Hilger served as vice president, finance and administrationaccounting positions at Chiquita Brands International and chief financial officer of Pyramid Breweries, a brewer of specialty beverages. From December 1998 to July 2003,The Procter & Gamble Company. Mr. Hilger served as chief executive officer and chief financial officer of WorldCatch, Inc., a seafood industry company. From 1987 until joining WorldCatch, Inc., Mr. Hilger held a variety of senior financial positions in the food industry. Mr. HilgerWinstel began his career inas a certified public accountingaccountant with ErnstDeloitte & Whinney.

Touche. As previously disclosed, Mr. Winstel has decided to step down as the Company's CAO, with an expected transition period to end no later than September 5, 2023.

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
30


Information About Our Executive Officers
Kathleen A. Waters joined became our CLO in May 2016, overseeing all legal and regulatory functions for the Company in April 2016 asenterprise. In February 2021, Ms. Waters became our Chief Legal Officer.and Public Affairs Officer as she also took over responsibility for federal government affairs. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Waters was senior vice president, general counselSenior Vice President, General Counsel and secretarySecretary of Health Net, Inc., a publicly traded managed care organization, from April 2015 to March 2016. ShePrior to Health Net, Inc., Ms. Waters was a partnerPartner in Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP'sLLP’s litigation practice from 2003 to 2015. She also2015, where she was the leader of that firm's Los Angeles litigation group and co-leaderco-chair of the healthcare group. Before that,Prior to Morgan Lewis, Ms. Waters was a partnerin private practice at Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP in Los Angeles.

Jeanine M. Jigantivarious law firms since 1994.


James O. Heartybecame our chief compliance officerCCO in March 2013.2018. From July 2012September 2015 to March 2013, she

2018, he served as our vice president, international chief compliance officerSenior Vice President and deputy chief compliance officer.CCO - Kidney Care, and, prior to that, from February 2012 to August 2015, he served as Vice President, Associate General Counsel. Prior to joining us, she served as chief compliance officerhe was a prosecutor and trial attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") for Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, a subsidiary14 years. He started in the Civil Division of a Japanese pharmaceutical company, from October 2005 to March 2012. Additionally, she served as chief compliance officer for several of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited's affiliates including Takeda Global Researchthe DOJ in Washington D.C. and Development and Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Operations. During Ms. Jiganti's career, she has served as general counselfour years later became an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Illinois DepartmentDistrict of Commerce and Economic Opportunity from September 2003 to September 2005, general counselColorado. Mr. Hearty held several leadership positions at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, including Deputy Chief of Near North Insurance Company from September 2002 to September 2003 and vice president of litigation at Caremark Inc., a pharmaceutical services company, from 1996 to 2002.

LeAnne M. Zumwalt became our group vice president-purchasing and public affairs in July 2011. From January 2000 to July 2011, Ms. Zumwalt served as our vice president in many capacities. From January 2000 to October 2009, she served as our vice president, investor relations while having other responsibilities. From 1997 to 1999, Ms. Zumwalt served as chief financial officer of Vivra Specialty Partners, Inc. a privately held health care service and technology firm. From 1991 to 1997, Ms. Zumwalt held various executive positions, including chief financial officer, at Vivra Incorporated, a publicly held provider of dialysis services. Prior to joining Vivra Incorporated, Ms. Zumwalt was a senior manager at Ernst & Young, LLP. Ms. Zumwaltthe criminal division. Mr. Hearty also serves on the board of The Advisory Board Company.

Urban Peak, a Denver non-profit that serves youth experiencing homelessness.

None of the executive officers has any family relationship with any other executive officer or with any of our directors.

31



Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Compensation Discussion
and Analysis

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires "insiders," including our executive officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock with the SEC and the NYSE, and to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they

file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from reporting persons, we believe that our insiders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during 2015.


DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      33


Table of Contents

  Compensation Discussion
  and Analysis
Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis Information

Executive Summary


35
33

Our Business

35
37

Consideration of Say-on-Pay Results and Pay for Performance

36

Our Compensation Design and Philosophy

36
38

2015 Financial and Performance Highlights

37

Linking 2015 NEO Compensation to Performance

37

Stockholder Interest Alignment

39

Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program

Philosophies and Objectives
38

Elements of Compensation


40
38

Base Salary

40

Supplemental STI Program for 2015

42

Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2015

2022

Personal Benefits and Perquisites

46

Deferred Compensation Program

47

Severance and Change of Control Arrangements

51

Process For Determining NEO Compensation


48
51

Role of Independent Compensation Committee

48
51

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

49

Market Competitiveness

50

Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program

51

Compensation Policies and Practices


51

Management Share Ownership Policy

51

Policy Regarding Clawback of Bonuses and Incentive Compensation

Tax and Accounting Considerations


52

Deduction Limit

52

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

52

34


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis



Compensation Discussion and Analysis Information

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the "CD&A") describes our executive compensation program for the following named executive officers ("NEOs"):

NEO


TITLE

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Kent32



Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) describes our executive compensation program for the following NEOs:
NEOTITLE
Javier J. Thiry

Rodriguez
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer DaVita HealthCare Partners, and Chief Executive Officer, HealthCare Partners
Joel Ackerman​ ​ ​ Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Javier J. Rodriguez

Chief Executive Officer, Kidney Care

Michael D. Staffieri

Chief Operating Officer, Kidney Care
Kathleen A. Waters​ ​ ​ Chief Legal and Public Affairs Officer

James O. Hearty

Dennis L. Kogod

President, HealthCare Partners, and Chief ExecutiveCompliance Officer International

James K. Hilger

Interim Chief Financial Officer (effective March 30, 2015) and Chief Accounting Officer
​ ​ ​ 

Dr. Garry E. Menzel

Chief Financial Officer through March 30, 20151
1
Dr. Menzel served as
Overview
DaVita's Long-Term Performance

We have focused our business strategy on creating stockholder value by, among other things, taking actions designed to contribute to long-term capital-efficient growth. The following highlights of our performance since we made the Company's Chief Financial Officerdecision to sell DaVita Medical Group in 2017 illustrate some of these contributors to long-term capital-efficient growth:
Our operating cash flow from November 7, 2013continuing operations improvement from $1.556 billion in 2017 to March 30, 2015.$1.565 billion in 2022 and reduction in maintenance and development capital expenditures from continuing operations from $810 million in 2017 to $603 million in 2022 combined for growth in our free cash flow from continuing operations from $668 million in 2017 to $817 million in 20221.

Growth in our International business from an Operating Loss of $329 million in 2017 ($46 million Adjusted Operating Loss) to an Operating Income of $37 million in 2022 ($44 million Adjusted Operating Income), including expansion in Brazil and China and entrance into the United Kingdom and Japan2.
Investments in our integrated kidney care ("IKC") programs, with 42,000 patients in risk-based integrated care arrangements and an additional 15,000 patients in other integrated care arrangements at the end of 2022.
Development of DaVita Venture Group to make investments in early stage businesses that show promise in improving the quality of care and quality of life for kidney care patients, including, among others, our investments in a transplant software provider, novel renal pharma and device technologies, and innovative digital care delivery models like virtual cardiology.
Divesting or winding down many of our non-core businesses, namely, DaVita Medical Group, Paladina Health, DaVita Rx, Lifeline and our non-kidney care businesses in Germany and Brazil.
Achieved the above, despite significant operational and financial headwinds due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our capital-efficient growth model has facilitated the return of $8.1 billion of capital to stockholders from 2017 through 2022 in the form of two Dutch Auction tender offers and open market share repurchases over these six years.

1 "Free Cash Flow" is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations less distributions to noncontrolling interests and all capital expenditures (including development capital expenditures, routine maintenance and information technology), plus contributions from noncontrolling interests and proceeds from the sale of self-developed properties. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
2 "Adjusted Operating Loss" and "Adjusted Operating Income" are non-GAAP financial measures that represent operating loss and income, respectively, excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. China and Japan are operated or managed by our Asia Pacific join venture.
33





Compensation Principles
Our objective is to design an executive compensation program that emphasizes performance and aligns our executive officers' interests with those of our stockholders, including with relation to financial performance and ESG performance. We have supported this objective by designing our executive compensation program around the following principles:
Compensation Principles
Performance Orientation
Majority of compensation for executive officers is tied to “performance” and not just continued service
Multiple criteria in STI Program and LTI Program to mitigate risks associated with setting performance criteria in advance and to capture multiple lenses of performance
Compensation Committee generally retains ability to exercise negative discretion
Metrics are Linked to Strategy
75% of PSUs granted in the annual grant program since 2017 are tied to a long-term EPS target, which we believe focuses our executive officers on capital-efficient growth, the hallmark of our long-term strategy
CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award incentivizes our CEO to make investment and operational decisions in the face of an evolving strategy and rewards him for maximizing long-term stockholder value, and at the same time will not pay out if he is not able to implement strategies that increase long-term stockholder value as reflected in a sustained stock price increase from the date the Board approved the grant
The Compensation Committee considered our ESG goals as it determined the strategic objectives under the 2022 STI Program in order to establish goals that were viewed as aligned with and supportive of our broader set of 2025 ESG goals and strategic operating plan
The 2022 STI Program includes pre-established goals relating to home modalities penetration, teammate engagement scores, patient engagement and energy efficiency projects, which constituted 70% of the strategic objectives, or 21% of the total short-term incentive opportunity

Link to ESG Metrics
As noted above, ESG goals are part of the Company's business strategy. The 2022 STI Program explicitly carves out 21% of the annual target opportunity to be based on ESG criteria, formulaically evaluated
Outperformance Required for Target Payouts
In the 2022 STI Program, performance had to be at or above the midpoint of our initial guidance range for 2022 adjusted operating income and 2022 free cash flow to achieve target payout for the corresponding metrics
In the 2022 LTI Program, TSR-dependent PSUs require above-market performance, with performance at the 55th percentile (not 50th percentile) required to achieve target vesting
Largely Formulaic Criteria
In the 2022 STI Program, 91% of the annual target opportunity is formulaic, with the remaining 9% tied to strategic objectives, customized for each individual executive, that are qualitatively evaluated and may also include ESG goals
For the 2022 PSU grant and for all previously granted PSUs that are part of the normal annual grant program, 100% of the payout opportunity is formulaically determined

Executive Summary

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
34


Our Business

The Company consists of two major divisions, Kidney Care and HealthCare Partners (HCP). Our Kidney Care division is comprised of our U.S. dialysis and related lab services, our ancillary services and strategic initiatives, including our international operations, and our corporate administrative support.

Our largest line of business is our U.S. dialysis and related lab services business, which is a leading provider of kidney dialysis services in the United States. As of December 31, 2015, we operated or provided administrative services through a network of 2,251 outpatient dialysis centers in the U.S., serving a total of approximately 180,000 patients in 46 states and the District of Columbia. We also provide acute inpatient dialysis services in approximately 900 hospitals. In 2015, our overall network of U.S. outpatient dialysis centers increased by 72 centers primarily as a result of opening new centers and acquisitions. In addition, the overall number of patients that we serve in the U.S. increased by approximately 4.1% from 2014.

Our other major line of business is HCP, a patient-and physician-focused integrated health care delivery and management company with over two decades of experience providing coordinated, outcomes-based


medical care in a cost-effective manner. Through capitation contracts with some of the nation's leading health plans, HCP had approximately 807,400 members under its care in southern California, Colorado, central and south Florida, southern Nevada, central New Mexico and central Arizona as of December 31, 2015. In addition to its managed care business, HCP provides care in all of its markets to over 612,200 patients whose health coverage is structured on a fee-for-service basis, including patients enrolled through traditional Medicare and Medicaid programs, preferred provider organizations and other third party payors.

The HCP patients as well as the patients of HCP's associated physicians, physician groups and independent practice associations benefit from an integrated approach to medical care that places the physician at the center of patient care. As of December 31, 2015, HCP delivered services to its members via a network of 547 associated group full-time primary care physicians, over 2,900 associated group and other network primary care physicians, 240 network hospitals, and several thousand associated group and network specialists. Together with hundreds of case managers, registered nurses and other care coordinators, these medical professionals utilize a comprehensive information technology system, sophisticated risk

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      35


Table of Contents




No Positive Discretion
The Compensation Committee does not exercise positive discretion in making compensation decisions under the STI Program and PSUs


management techniques and clinical protocols to provide high-quality, cost-effective care to HCP's members.

Our

Furthermore, our executive compensation program is best understood withinincludes the context of the business environment infollowing practices and policies, which we currently operate. This includes increasing regulation by numerous federal, statebelieve reinforce our executive compensation philosophy and local government entities, reductions in reimbursements under federalobjectives and state healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, continued downward pressure onare aligned with the interests of our commercial payment rates, and the continued integration of HCP into the enterprise.

stockholders:

What We Do
üAt-risk compensation.
ü
Multi-year vesting and performance periods.
üAnnual say-on-pay vote.
ü
Robust stockholder engagement.
üIndependent compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee.
üAnnual comparator peer group review.
ü“Double-trigger” change of control provisions in equity award agreements.
ü
Limits on severance payments.
ü
Clawback policy.
ü
Stock ownership requirements.
üAnnual risk assessment.
What We Don't Do
ûNo repricing or replacing of underwater SSARs or stock options.
ûNo hedging of Company securities and restricted pledging of Company securities.
û
No change-of-control tax gross-ups in employment agreements.
û
No defined benefit pension benefits.
ûNo dividends paid out on unearned or unvested stock awards.






35



Our Executive Compensation Structure

Our

Given our emphasis on variable compensation, the Compensation Committee generally limits increases to fixed compensation amounts for our executives and delivers a greater percentage of compensation increases in the form of variable compensation. The following chart illustrates the average allocation of the total direct compensation that our NEOs, other than our CEO, are eligible to earn, including annual bonus at target, and in the case of the long-term incentives, those that were granted in 2022. As described in more detail in the section titled "CEO Compensation" below, Mr. Rodriguez did not receive a long-term incentive award in 2022 due to a grant of SSARs that he received in 2019 at a base price that was a significant premium to the then-current market price on the Board Approval Date (as defined below) and which was intended to be in lieu of any other equity grants for five years (through 2024), as described in more detail in the section titled "CEO Compensation" below (the "CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award"). As a result, because the allocation of Mr. Rodriguez's total direct compensation for 2022 did not reflect a typical annual compensation structure, Mr. Rodriguez is excluded from the chart below.
NEO proxy graph v2.jpg
* Excludes Ms. Waters' performance cash award as it is not representative of normal annual pay. For a description of this award, see the subsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — What We Pay and Why — Long-Term Incentive Program for 2022 — Waters Performance Cash Award” below in this Proxy Statement.
We believe it to be in the best interests of our stockholders to have a balanced executive compensation program is designed to alignthat includes a blend of fixed and variable compensation, short- and long-term compensation and that emphasizes a pay-for-performance culture. The following table generally summarizes the key elements of our executive compensation structureprogram in 2022.

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
36


Base SalaryShort-Term Incentive Program
Long-Term Incentive Program
(other than CEO)(1)
It is appropriate that some portion of compensation be in a form that is fixed. Base salaries can be adjusted based on individual performance, changes to portfolio of responsibilities and comparative market data.
Performance Measures
70% Financial: Adjusted Operating Income and Free Cash Flow

30% Strategic Objectives:
ESG-related factors(2) (70%)
Individual objectives for each NEO (30%)

Payout 0% to 200% of target
Performance Stock Units ("PSUs")
Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs")
Stock-settled Stock Appreciation Rights ("SSARs")(3)
arrowa03.jpg
arrowa03.jpg
arrowa02.jpg
Performance criteria 75% Adjusted earnings per share ("EPS") attributable to DaVita Inc., 25% Relative total shareholder return ("TSR")
Payout 0% to 200% of target shares
Vests 50% in three years and 50% in four years (each component subject to additional time-based vesting following the conclusion of the performance period)


Vests 50% in three years and 50% in four years
Vests 50% in three years and 50% in four years

(1) Not all of our NEOs received all three forms of long-term incentives, as more fully described in the section titled "What We Pay and Why - Long-Term Incentive Program for 2022." In addition, as noted above, our CEO did not receive a 2022 long-term incentive grant due to the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award that he received in 2019, which is intended to be in lieu of equity awards through 2024.
(2) Home modalities penetration, teammate engagement scores, patient engagement and energy efficiency projects constitute 70% of the strategic objectives, or 21% of the total short-term incentive opportunity. They collectively represent ESG criteria that are priorities for the Company, are evaluated formulaically and are the same for all executive officer participants. Our business and finance teams closely collaborate with our strategicLegal and financial objectivesCompliance teams. DaVita has processes, policies/guidance and education in creating stockholder value. Our executive compensation structureplace as guardrails to support appropriate performance and incentives, including the performance and initiative behind these Strategic Objectives. For example, our policy is comprised of both short-that modality selection (i.e., Home vs. In-Center) and long-term incentives, which include challenging performance goals that we believeother decisions related to a patient’s care are aligned with our strategic objectivesalways made by the attending nephrologist and patient, and provided pursuant to provide high quality carea physician’s order. This footnote and policy statement are applicable to our patients, increase profitability, maximize growthall DaVita actions and increase stockholder value.

The 2015 short- and long-term criteria,activities involving home dialysis, as described in further detail starting on page 40, emphasizedthis proxy statement.


(3) SSARs only derive value if the stock price of our objectives as a Company,Common Stock is above the base price (similar to strike price of an option) after vesting and our resulting compensation structure incorporated incentives tiedat the time of exercise prior to clinical care, profit and growth.

We will continue our ongoing engagement with our stockholders on corporate governance issues that are of interest to them or that our Board might be evaluating.expiration. The Compensation Committee will consider the feedback we receive fromutilizes SSARs instead of stock options because SSARs are less dilutive to our stockholders in making future compensation decisions forthan stock options because only shares with a total value equal to the grantee's gain (the difference between the closing stock price of the base shares and their base price) are ultimately issued ("Gain Shares").


Summary of Stockholder Engagement

At our NEOs. We also believe it is important to maintain consistency with our compensation philosophy and approach, described in further detail below in the section entitled "Our Compensation Design and Philosophy," to continue to incentivize management toward short and long-term financial and operating goals, which are intended to create long-term stockholder value.

Consideration2022 Annual Meeting of Say-on-Pay Results and Pay for Performance

In June 2015,Stockholders ("2022 Annual Meeting"), approximately 96%94% of the votes cast by our stockholders at the annual meeting were voted in favor of the compensation program applicable tofor our NEOs, as described in the 2015 proxy statement.NEOs. We believe the votes reflectthis vote reflects support for our executive compensation

program. Even so, we continue to evaluate our program particularly the scopeto continue to keep management incentives market competitive and effectivenessaligned with stockholder interests. Since our 2022 Annual Meeting, we contacted stockholders representing approximately 80% of the changes we initially adopted in March 2014, and strong pay for performance alignment. We reached out toour shares outstanding, including our largest institutional stockholders, to see if they were interested in late 2015engaging with us to discuss our existing compensation structure.structure and other governance matters.1 During these discussions with our stockholders, they expressed general satisfaction with our executive compensation program and emphasized the continued pay-for-performance. While we did not modify"pay-for-performance" design of our program. We have found this stockholder feedback to be informative and have considered such feedback, along with a review of competitive practices and evolving business priorities, when making executive compensation decisions.

1 Calculations relating to stockholder outreach statistics were performed using stockholders of DaVita shares outstanding as of September 30, 2022.


37


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

How We Make Executive Compensation Decisions
Our Executive Compensation Philosophies and Objectives
The Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program in response to the prior year say-on-pay vote, based on the feedback we received from our stockholders, we refined our short-term incentiveshould emphasize performance and long-term incentive programs to tailor the programs to each NEO by adding performance measures reflective of the particular NEO's business division.

Our Compensation Design and Philosophy

Our ability to recruit and retain highly qualified executives is essential to our long-term success. An important goal in the design ofalign our executive compensation program, in addition to clinical differentiation and creating stockholder value, is to attract and retain outstanding leaders who possess the skills and talent necessary to achieve our business goals and objectives, and who embody our mission and values. We believe it is in the best interests of our stockholders to attract and retain talented leaders, and we strive to do so by providing compensation that we believe is reasonable, provides the best value for our stockholders, aligns incentives, and is sufficient to achieve our recruitment and retention objectives.

Our ultimate objective is to continue to create long-term stockholder value by being a leader in clinical differentiation, generating strong overall revenue growth, increasing market share, improving clinical outcomes, growing operating margins, increasing Medicare Advantage enrollment, and delivering consistently strong total stockholder return.

In order to achieve this objective, we have established an executive compensation program that we believe:

    (i)
    rewards superior clinical outcomes;

    (ii)
    rewards strong Company performance;

    (iii)
    aligns our executives' interests with our stockholders' interests; and

    (iv)
    is competitive within the health care services, diagnostics, managed care and solutions markets so that we can attract and retain outstanding executives.

36


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis



2015 Financial and Performance Highlights

Our overall financial and operating performance was strong for 2015 despite the challenges we faced with Medicare reimbursement and a large increase in pharmaceutical costs in the Kidney Care division and Medicare Advantage reimbursement in the HCP division. We believe that the NEOs were instrumental in achieving these results, including the following major achievements and financial operating performance indicators in 2015:

    improved clinical outcomes in our U.S. dialysis operations, including second year in a row as leader of the Five-Star Quality Rating System created by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services;
    consolidated net revenue growth of 7.7%;
    net revenue growth of 5.2% related to our U.S. dialysis segment operations as a result of an increase in revenue per treatment of $6;
    an increase in HCP's net revenue of 9.6% related to an increase of its fee-for-service business and senior capitated revenue;
    an increase in other ancillary services and strategic initiatives net revenue of 21.3%;
    U.S. dialysis treatment growth of 4.1%;
    normalized non-acquired U.S. dialysis treatment growth of 3.9%;
    net addition of 72 U.S. dialysis centers and 27 international dialysis centers;
    strong operating cash flows of $1.557 billion, which have been reduced by approximately $304 million of after-tax payments made in connection with the settlement of the Vainer private civil suit; and
    a $1.5 billion financing to lower interest rate, extend maturities and enhance liquidity.

The Company's TSR from the first quarter of 2000 (our CEO's first full quarter with the Company) through the fourth quarter of 2015 was approximately 3,298%, putting the Company in the top 10 of all current S&P 500 companies over that period.

We believe our U.S. dialysis and related lab services clinical outcomes compare favorably with other dialysis providers in the United States and generally exceed the dialysis outcome quality indicators of the National Kidney Foundation. Our clinical outcomes mean better quality of life for approximately 180,000 dialysis patients we serve.

Linking 2015 NEO Compensation to Performance

Our compensation program for our NEOs emphasizes compensation based on performance and is designed to align our NEOs'officers' interests with those of our stockholders, including with relation to financial performance, ESG performance and to permit individuals who have performed well in creating and protecting significant long-term value for the Company and its stockholders to share in the value generated. To this end, our compensation program emphasizes variable compensation in the form of cash and equity awards over fixed compensation.

When establishing the compensation for our NEOs for 2015, the Compensation Committee gave significant weight to our sustained record of strong operating performance as highlighted above, our improvement in strategic positioning and our continued strong clinical performance, particularly in light of ongoing general economic volatility and significant industry regulatory challenges and uncertainty. In 2015, we continued to lead industry public policy efforts, achieving favorable outcomes for the industry and the Company.relative stock price performance. The Compensation Committee seeks to foster these objectives through a compensation system that focuses heavily on variable, performance-based incentives that create a balanced its evaluation of the Company'sfocus on our short-term and long-term strategic and financial and clinical performance by also considering the Company's implementation of the Corporate Integrity Agreement with the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, healthcare reform, changes to government reimbursement policies, other significant healthcare regulatory changes, as well as the government investigations affecting the Company.goals. The Compensation Committee also took into account Kidney Care's strong performance and HCP's underperformance. HCPCommittee's goal has experienced declines in its financial performance, thereby partially offsetting Kidney Care's strong financial performance. HCP's underperformance is primarily driven by government reimbursement cuts and our inabilitybeen to mitigate those cuts in their entirety. When establishing 2015implement an executive compensation for our NEOs, the Compensation Committee considered these and other factors in the context of evaluating the impact that individual NEO performance had in achieving these

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      37


Table of Contents





program to help drive above-market results and respondingthat is built upon our long-standing executive compensation philosophies and objectives, as described below, which we believe have contributed to these challenges. The following table shows the 2015 total direct compensation (base salary, annual performance-based cash award andour long-term incentive award) determined by the Compensation Committee for each NEO who remained an executive officer on December 31, 2015. This table is not a substitute for the information disclosed in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table and related footnotes, which begin on page 54.

Name

 Base
Salary1

 
Annual Cash
Award

 
Annual LTI
Award2

 
2015
Supplemental
STI Program


 

Kent J. Thiry

 $1,200,000 $2,225,186 $7,142,616  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Javier J. Rodriguez

 $800,000 $1,700,000 $6,407,089 $2,363,661 

Michael D. Staffieri

 $583,270 $1,020,000 $3,674,047 $1,240,922 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Dennis L. Kogod

 $800,000 $200,000   

James K. Hilger

 $366,635 $195,000 $489,141  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
1
The amounts reported here reflect the base salary amounts actually paid during the 2015 fiscal year.
2
The amounts reported under the Annual LTI Award column consist of the grant date fair value of all 2015 equity awards (both SSARs and PSUs) as well as the target value of the 2015 performance-based cash awards.

Given the emphasis on variable compensation, the Compensation Committee determined to limit increases to fixed compensation amounts in 2015 such that the base salaries of our NEOs were retained at 2014 levels, other than Mr. Staffieri's base salary, which was increased in 2015 pursuant to the Compensation Committee's review of his performance as the Chief Operating Officer of Kidney Care and consideration of comparative market data provided by the committee's outside compensation consultant, Compensia, and Mr. Hilger's base salary, which was increased in 2015 in connection with his expanded role as the Interim Chief Financial Officer. The following pie charts illustrate the allocation of the total direct compensation that the NEOs above earned or, in the case of the long-term incentives, were granted with respect to 2015:

success.
Compensation Summary
CEO
Compensation Summary
Other NEOs


GRAPHIC



GRAPHIC
Sustained Meaningful Profitable Growth and Stockholder Value Creation
é
é
é
Pay-for-Performance.

A significant percentage of an executive's compensation should be directly aligned with Company and individual performance, with a balance between short-term and long-term performance.
Align with Stockholder Interests.

Executives' interests should be aligned with stockholder interests through the risks and rewards of DaVita equity ownership.
Attract and Retain the Right Talent.

Executive compensation should be market-competitive in order to attract and retain highly motivated talent with a performance- and service-driven mindset.

The


Role of the Compensation Committee believes that the above compensation structure struck an appropriate balance by promoting long-term stockholder value creation without motivating or rewarding excessive risk-taking.

38


Table

Our Compensation Committee, composed solely of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis



Stockholder Interest Alignment

Ourindependent directors, reviews and approves our overall executive compensation is designed to focus on pay-for-performanceprogram, strategy and to alignpolicies and sets the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Our incentive criteria focus on performance-based compensation that aligns with our strategic, operational and financial objectives in creating stockholder value. Our CEO receives all long-term compensation in the form of equity compensation, while other executives receive long-term compensation in the form of both equity compensation and cash-based incentive compensation. Our long-term equity compensation is comprised of stock-settled stock appreciation rights ("SSARs") and performance stock units ("PSUs"). At least 50% of our CEO's equity awards and at least 25% of the other executive

officers' awards are in the form of PSUs. To create close alignment with stockholder value creation, relative TSR was selected as the performance criteria for 50% of the PSUs granted to each of our participating NEOs in 2015. The equity awards are further subject to time vesting — equity awards granted in 2015 vest 50% on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The combination of performance-based metrics and extended vesting schedules is intended to assist in the long-term retention of executives and further the alignment of the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. A key component of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation philosophyconsultant provides the Compensation Committee with an analysis of comparative market data on the cash-based, stock-based and designtotal compensation for senior executives, including the CEO, at a group of comparable companies within our industry to help inform the Compensation Committee's deliberation on compensation decisions.

The full description of the Compensation Committee's responsibilities is that stock-basedprovided in the Compensation Committee Charter, available on our website at www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.

Role of Board
The independent members of the Board review and ratify recommendations by the Compensation Committee as it relates to compensation creates an incentivedecisions for the executives to contributeCEO. The Board also provides input for consideration by members of the Compensation Committee with respect to the overall successstructure of the CompanySTI and LTI Programs, including their relationship to take actions that result in the creation of long-term stockholder value.

financial performance, investor guidance, strategy and ESG objectives.

Key Features

Role of CEO and Management Team
In carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee works with members of our management team, including our CEO. Our ExecutiveCEO reviews the individual performance of each other executive officer with, and makes compensation recommendations to, the Compensation Program

Committee. Our CCO also provides information to the Compensation Committee with respect to each executive officer's commitment to compliance as demonstrated by modeling compliant behavior, leading in a compliant manner, identifying and resolving potential risks in a compliant

We Do
We Do Not
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
Have double trigger change of control provisions for acceleration of equity award vestingProvide excise tax gross-ups on change of control payments for new or materially amended agreements entered into since 20081
​ ​ ​ 
Limit severance payments to not more than three times base salary and bonusRe-price or replace underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights
Provide for multi-year vesting periods for equity award grants to reinforce a culture in which the Company's long-term success takes precedence over volatile short-term resultsHave our Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant provide any other services to the Company
​ ​ ​ 
Have our Compensation Committee use an independent compensation consultantHave a defined benefit pension plan
Have a clawback policy that permits recovery of bonuses, incentive and equity-based compensation from executivesAllow hedging of the Company's securities by directors, executives and other employees
​ ​ ​ 
Seek stockholder feedback on our executive compensation programAllow directors, executives and other employees to pledge the Company's securities as collateral for a loan
Apply meaningful stock ownership guidelines to strengthen alignment of executives' and stockholders' interests
​ ​ ​ 38
1
We have not provided for tax gross-ups in any employment agreements or amended employment agreements entered into after July 2008. Our CEO has the only remaining legacy agreement that contains a tax gross-up; however, no gross-up would have been payable under his agreement in any of the prior five years if a change of control had occurred. See "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control" on pages 61 to 66.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      39


Table of Contents





Elements of

Compensation

Discussion and Analysis

manner, and other compliance-related factors as appropriate. In addition, the Chair of the Compensation Committee works closely with the legal, people services and finance teams between Compensation Committee meetings as needed to refine the detailed criteria and terms and conditions for the STI Program and the LTI Program, for further consideration and ultimate approval by the Compensation Committee, and in the case of the CEO, ratification by the independent directors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the CEO nor any NEO is present during the Board and Compensation Committee discussions of his or her own pay.


Role of Independent Compensation Consultant
The elementsCompensation Committee has selected and directly retains the services of Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain or replace Compensia in its discretion. Compensia does not provide consulting services to Company management and may not provide such services without prior approval of the Chair of the Compensation Committee. Accordingly, Compensia only provides compensation consulting services to the Compensation Committee, and works with the Company’s management only on matters for which the Compensation Committee provides direction and is responsible. The Compensation Committee periodically seeks input from Compensia on a range of external market factors, including evolving compensation trends, appropriate peer companies and market survey data. Compensia also provides general observations on the Company’s compensation program, but it does not determine the amount or form of compensation for the executive officers.
Pursuant to the rules of the SEC and NYSE, the Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Compensia. The Company has determined that the work of Compensia for the Compensation Committee did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Market Competitiveness
Each year, the Compensation Committee, starting with a recommendation from Compensia, identifies a group of peer companies for purposes of evaluating the overall competitiveness of our executive officers' compensation levels. We focus on companies in our industry with revenues that are 0.4x to 2.5x our revenues and a market capitalization that is 0.2x to 5.0x our market capitalization. Because of the limited number of direct peers in the healthcare services and facilities industries that meet this "size" criteria, we expanded our industry scope to include the broader healthcare industry. We believe the compensation offered underpaid by the resultant comparator peer group is representative of the compensation required to attract, retain and motivate our executive talent.
For purposes of making compensation program include both fixed (base salaries)decisions in early 2022, we used the following compensation peer group:
2022 Compensation Peer Group
 Avantor Laboratory Corp of America
 Baxter International Molina Healthcare
 Centene Perkin Elmer
 Dentsply Sirona Quest Diagnostics
 Encompass Health Select Medical Holdings
 HCA Healthcare Syneos Health
 Henry Schein Tenet Healthcare
 Hologic Universal Health Services
 IQVIA Holdings Zimmer Biomet Holdings
In selecting this peer group, we modified the prior year peer group to exclude MEDNAX and variable (annualThermo Fisher Scientific due to their revenue and/or market capitalization falling outside of our screening range and long-term incentives) compensation.

to add Hologic and Perkin Elmer because their market capitalization and/or revenue satisfied the peer group's "size" criteria. Based on financial and market data available as of the date the executive compensation competitive market analysis was

39


Compensation Discussion and Analysis
performed using this revised peer group (November 11, 2021), we were at the 50th percentile based on the latest four quarters' revenue and 31st percentile based on the latest 30 days' average market capitalization.
In 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed the compensation peer group and determined not to make any changes to the peer group used for purposes of evaluating 2023 compensation decisions.

What We Pay and Why
Base Salary

We compensate our executives with a base salary because we believe it is appropriate that some portion of compensation be provided in a form that is liquid and assured.

Base salaries are initially established at levels deemed necessary to enable us to attract and retain highly qualified executives with reference to both our peer group and comparative pay within the Company for executives with similar levels of responsibility, the prior experience of the executive, and expected contributions to Company performance.

We do Based on a review of competitive market data, the Compensation Committee determined not guarantee salary adjustments on an annual basis. During Marchto increase the base salaries for the NEOs from 2021 to 2022. Base salaries for the NEOs as of December 31 of each year the Compensation Committee considers adjustments to base salary as part of the overall annual compensation assessment for our executives. Our CEO typically provides the Compensation Committee with his recommendation regarding merit-based increases for each executive officer other than himself. The CEO's base salary is recommended by the Compensation Committee with input from Compensia, the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, and Compensia's analysis of CEO compensation of our comparator peer group, and approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors.

Consistent with our emphasis on performance-based compensation and the Compensation Committee's decision to limit increases to fixed compensation amounts in 2015, the Compensation Committee maintained the base salaries of Mr. Thiry, Mr. Rodriguez and Mr. Kogod at 2014 levels. Mr. Staffieri's base salary was increased in 2015 pursuant to the Compensation Committee's review of his performance as Chief Operating Officer of the Company's Kidney Care division and consideration of comparative market data provided by the Compensation Committee's outside compensation consultant, Compensia. Mr. Hilger's base salary was also increased in 2015 in connection with the increasing accounting complexity of the Company's business operations and transactions. The base salaries for 2014 and 2015 for our NEOs who remained executive officers on December 31, 2015 are shownreflected in the following table.

table:

Name


2014 Base
Salary1


2015 Base
Salary2

Kent J. Thiry

 $1,200,000 $1,200,000
​ ​ 

Javier J. Rodriguez

 $800,000 $800,000

Michael D. Staffieri

 $550,000 $600,000
​ ​ 

Dennis L. Kogod

 $800,000 $800,000

James K. Hilger

 $350,000 $375,000
​ ​ 
Name2021 Base Salary2022 Base SalaryPercentage Increase in Base Salary in 2022
Javier J. Rodriguez$1,200,000 $1,200,000 %
Joel Ackerman$700,000 $700,000 %
Michael D. Staffieri$800,000 $800,000 %
Kathleen A. Waters$650,000 $650,000 %
James O. Hearty$500,000 $500,000 %
1
The amounts reported reflect the annual base salaries approved in March 2014.
2
The amounts reported reflect the annual base salaries approved in April 2015.

Short-Term Incentive Program (STI Program) for 2015

2022

The participants in the 2022 Short-Term Incentive Program ("STI program awards in 2015 were granted pursuant to the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan, as amended and restated (the "2011 Plan"Program"), which permits the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock units, equity and cash-based performance awards, as well as other forms of equity awards.

Under the STI program in 2015, each NEO was eligible for had a maximum annual performance-basedtarget bonus potential calculated as a multiple of the annual salary approved in March 2015 by the Compensation Committee, and with respect to the CEO, ratified by the Board, as summarized in the table below. Since Mr. Hilger is the Interim Chief Financial Officer, he is not subject to the termsindependent members of the 2015 STI program. Instead, for 2015, Mr. Hilger received a discretionary cashBoard. Participants earn 0% to 200% of their target bonus equal to $195,000 in recognition of his performance as Interim Chief Financial Officer during 2015.

Name


2015 Base
Salary


Multiple of
2015 Base
Salary



2015 STI
Maximum
Bonus Potential

Kent J. Thiry

 $1,200,000 3.0x $3,600,000
​ ​ ​ 

Javier J. Rodriguez

 $800,000 2.5x $2,000,000

Michael D. Staffieri

 $600,000 2.0x $1,200,000
​ ​ ​ 

Dennis L. Kogod

 $800,000 2.5x $2,000,000

Each performance metric under our STI program was assigned a relative weight to determine the percentage of the maximum bonus potential for which each executive was eligible. The percentage of the maximum bonus potential was determined based on results achieved in 2015,performance against the predetermined and approved STI metrics. Based on a review of competitive market data, the Compensation Committee could then exercise negative discretiondetermined not to reduceincrease the annualtarget bonus payment based on changed or special circumstances, or factors that may not have been anticipated when the criteria rangeopportunities for the metrics was established.

40


TableNEOs from 2021 to 2022. The following table summarizes the target bonus and target bonus as a percent of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis



The tables below summarize the relative weights, criteria range, maximum performance based eligibility range, actual performance and maximum eligible payout achievedbase salary for each of the 2015 STINEOs:

Name2022 Base Salary2022 Target Incentive Opportunity
2022 Target Incentive Opportunity as a Percentage of Salary1
Javier J. Rodriguez$1,200,000 $1,800,000 150 %
Joel Ackerman$700,000 $750,000 107 %
Michael D. Staffieri$800,000 $1,050,000 131 %
Kathleen A. Waters$650,000 $650,000 100 %
James O. Hearty$500,000 $400,000 80 %
1 The target incentive opportunities for the other NEOs were approved by the Compensation Committee in terms of an absolute dollar opportunity and this column includes the percentage opportunity determined by dividing the target dollar value by the NEO’s base salary.
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
40

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following table summarizes the performance metrics, as well asweightings, criteria ranges, performance-based eligibility ranges, actual performance and eligible payout percentages for the actual payout percentage and amount for each NEO who remained an executive officer as of December 31, 2015, other than Mr. Hilger.

Kent J. Thiry

                         
        Maximum Performance Based
Eligibility Range


  Maximum Eligible
Payout Achieved
  2015 STI Performance Metrics
Weight
Criteria Range
  (%)
($)
  Actual
Performance


  (%)
($)
 
  Enterprise Adjusted Operating Income 50% $1,788 million to $1,900 million1  25% - 100% $450,000 - $1,800,000  $1,898 million  75% $1,350,000  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  HCP Adjusted Operating Income 20% $238 million to $275 million1   25% - 100% $180,00 - $720,000   $240 million   25% $180,000  
 Kidney Care Catheter Rate 5% 13.35% to 13.15% (lower is better) and 15% better than industry  50% - 100% $90,000 - $180,000  13.06%  100% $180,000  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Kidney Care Non Acquired Growth 10% 4.3% to 4.9%2   50% - 100% $180,000 - $360,000   3.9%   0% $0  
 HCP Star Metrics 5% Customized index range  30% - 100% $54,000 - $180,000  Internal index value  86.2% $155,186  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  HCP Medicare Advantage Enrollment Growth 10% 5% to 20% above industry   25% - 100% $90,000 - $360,000   >20%   100% $360,000  
      Total Eligible STI Bonus

 61.8% $2,225,186  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
            Total Actual STI Bonus   61.8% $2,225,186  
1
The percentage of maximum bonus for which Mr. Thiry is eligible is determined based on the top 75%components of the guidance ranges for fiscal year 20152022 STI Program:
2022 STI Program Performance MetricsPerformance Metrics WeightingsCriteria RangePerformance Based Eligibility Range (%)Actual PerformanceEligible Payout Achieved (%)
Financial: Adjusted Operating Income*50.0%$1,550 million to $1,700 million
($1,600 million target)
0%; 50% - 200%$1,579 million**78.8%
Financial: Free Cash Flow*20.0%$850 million to $1,200 million
($1,000 million target)
0%; 50% - 200% $817 million—%
Strategic Objectives: Home modalities penetration (Q4
2022)
7.5%15.5% to 17.5%
(16.25% target)
0%; 50% - 200%15.8%71.0%
Strategic Objectives: Comprehensive Kidney Care
Contracting ("CKCC") patient contact composite
7.5%30.0% to 55.0%
(45.0% target)
0%; 50% - 200%40.5%84.9%
Strategic Objectives: Teammate engagement scores
(average of 2022 survey results)
3.0%82.0% to 86.0%
(84.0% target)
0%; 50% - 200%78.3%—%
Strategic Objectives: Energy efficiency projects (# of
clinics)
3.0%275 to 375
(325 target)
0%; 50% - 200%382200.0%
Strategic Objectives: Custom individual objectives9.0%Varies by NEO0% - 200%Varies by NEOVaries by NEO
* “Adjusted Operating Income” and “Free Cash Flow” are non-GAAP financial measures. “Adjusted operating income" represents operating income excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, capacity closure charges and restructuring charges. “Free Cash Flow” represents net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations less distributions to our investors with our fourth quarter 2014 earnings release,noncontrolling interests and all capital expenditures (including development capital expenditures, routine maintenance and information technology), plus contributions from noncontrolling interests and proceeds from the latest guidance ranges available tosale of self-developed properties.
** For purposes of the 2022 STI Program and as presented above, “adjusted operating income” also includes certain adjustments approved by the Compensation Committee at the time it approved thisthe 2022 STI Program and resulted in a $129 million net addition to our 2022 adjusted operating income as reported in our Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 Form 10-K”) ($1,450 million). This addition is associated with a COVID-19 normalization adjustment relating to higher actual than budgeted impact of the ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic in 2022, offset by foreign exchange gains on the mark-to-market impact of cash held in a non-functional currency in our Asia-Pacific joint venture in 2022 of $0.6 million. As a result, adjusted operating income presented above for purposes of the 2022 STI Program differs from the non-GAAP financial results we report in our 2022 Form 10-K. None of these non-GAAP financial measures should be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, the measures of financial performance condition.
prepared in accordance with GAAP. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.


41


Adjusted Operating Income1
2022 target of $1,600 million was set at the midpoint of our initial guidance range for 2022 adjusted operating income provided to investors on February 10, 2022, but below 2021 actual adjusted operating income due to the expected continued impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and incremental investments to support future growth, including IKC.
$ in millions
28037546552646
1 Represents Adjusted Operating Income, which is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents operating income excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, impairment charges, gains and losses on ownership changes, capacity closure charges, restructuring charges, accruals for legal matters and debt prepayment and refinancing charges.
2
Represents Adjusted Operating Income of $1,797 as reported in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, further adjusted to exclude charges related to center capacity closures that were incurred during 2021. These additional adjustments to 2021 Adjusted Operating Income were reported in the Company's 2022 Form 10-K. In the Company's 2022 Form 10-K, the Company reported that it incurred higher than normal charges for center capacity closures during 2022, and as a result, excluded center capacity closure charges from 2022 Adjusted Operating Income. The Company conformed the presentation of 2021 Adjusted Operating Income by similarly excluding center capacity closure charges incurred during 2021.
3 Represents the estimated net change in the impact associated with COVID-19 in 2022 compared to 2021. This estimate was incorporated into our 2022 full year guidance for adjusted operating income as disclosed on February 10, 2022, and included, among other things, the estimated impact of decreased treatment volumes, primarily resulting from COVID-19-related mortality, plus certain increased direct expenses due to enhanced teammate benefits and PPE, partially offset by increased revenue attributable to the suspension of Medicare sequestration and reduced travel and benefit utilization. This estimated impact was subject to a significant level of uncertainty.
4 Includes IKC incremental net investments and clinical IT platform deployment costs and depreciation expense. The Company made and continues to make investments in building our integrated care capabilities with a view towards improving clinical outcomes for our patients and reducing the overall cost of comprehensive kidney care. Also, the Company has made and expects to continue to make significant investments in updating and integrating clinical IT systems to build our data interoperability capabilities.
Free Cash Flow
2022 target ($1,000 million) was set $25 million higher than the midpoint of our initial free cash flow guidance for 2022 ($850 million - $1,100 million)1.
2022 target was set below 2021 free cash flow ($1,133 million) primarily because of lower expected adjusted operating income in 2022, as further described above.
1Initial guidance range as described above refers to selected 2022 guidance measures provided to investors on February 10, 2022 with our earnings results for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Strategic Objectives

The STI Program includes a strategic objective component in order to incentivize actions that support the successful execution of our strategic operating plan. For relative context, overall industry growthexample, in 2013 (the latest information available2021, we built upon our long-standing commitment to corporate citizenship and announced a set of ESG goals for 2025 aligned with the five pillars of our ESG strategy. Many of these 2025 goals are aspirational; however, the Compensation Committee considered our ESG goals as it determined the strategic objectives under the 2022 STI Program in order to establish goals that were viewed as aligned with and supportive of 3/31/16)our broader set of 2025 ESG goals and strategic operating plan. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee established goals relating to home modalities penetration, teammate engagement scores, patient contact and energy efficiency projects, which constituted 70% of the strategic objectives, or 21% of the total short-term incentive opportunity. The strategic objectives under the 2022 STI Program collectively represent ESG criteria that are priorities for the Company and support the Company’s progress towards its 2025 ESG Goals. These strategic objective goals are evaluated formulaically and are the same for all executive officer participants.
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
42

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Home Modalities Penetration
An important element of our clinical strategic imperatives has been the continued development and implementation of, and educating our patients regarding the option of, home dialysis.
The home modalities penetration metric is calculated as the number of home treatments (peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) in the fourth quarter of 2022 divided by the number of non-acute treatments of all dialysis modalities during the same time period, in each case, for the Company's U.S. dialysis segment.
2022 target was 3.5%set at 16.25%, which is 81 basis points higher than the 2021 actual of 15.4%.
Comprehensive Kidney Care Contracting ("CKCC") Patient Contact Composite
For 2022, the Compensation Committee added a CKCC patient contact goal to our STI Program to reflect the importance of IKC programs to our long-term growth.
This metric is a blended metric based on a proprietary method of calculating the number of certain types of interactions between members of the IKC care management team and CKCC patients. We believe that these types of patient contact metrics provide a comprehensive and timely indication of performance for CKCC programs.
Teammate Engagement
We strive to be a community first and company second, and call ourselves a Village. To be a healthy Village, we need to attract, retain and invest in highly qualified and diverse teammates. Including a teammate engagement metric helps us assess whether we are implementing strategies that support our mission to be the compound annual growth rate from 2009 to 2013 was 3.6%. The foregoing data areemployer of choice.
This metric is based on the 2015 Annual Data Report,average of engagement surveys of all U.S. teammates completed during 2022, weighted by the participation percentage of each survey.

2022 target was set requiring us to sustain our 2021 engagement scores, reflecting the continued uncertainty of the external environment, including the uncertainty, challenges and disruption of the persisting COVID-19 pandemic. Based on Gallop surveys of employee engagement performed in 2022, employee engagement in the United States Renal Data System, Table D.1 "Percentagesgenerally declined in 2022.
Energy Efficiency Projects

Including an energy efficiency goal in our STI Program is aligned with our commitment to promote environmental stewardship through projects and counts of reported ESRD patients: by treatment modality." This includesinitiatives in the results of our Company, withoutcommunities in which the industry growth rates would be lower.

Javier J. Rodriguez

we operate.
                         
        Maximum Performance Based
Eligibility Range


  Maximum Eligible
Payout Achieved
  2015 STI Performance Metrics
Weight
Criteria Range
  (%)
($)
  Actual
Performance


  (%)
($)
 
  Core Kidney Care Adjusted Operating Income 70% $1,550 million to $1,625 million1  25% - 100% $350,000 - $1,400,000  $1,658 million1  100% $1,400,000  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Kidney Care Catheter Rate 15% 13.35% to 13.15% (lower is better) and 15% better than industry   50% - 100% $150,000 - $300,000   13.06%   100% $300,000  
 Kidney Care Non Acquired Growth 15% 4.3% to 4.9%2  50% - 100% $150,000 - $300,000  3.9%  0% $0  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
            Total Eligible STI Bonus   85% $1,700,000  
      Total Actual STI Bonus

 85% $1,700,000  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

1
Criteria range represents the top 75% of the public guidance range for fiscal year 2015 for our Kidney Care division at the timeIn 2022, this performance metric was developed. Core Kidney Care Adjusted Operating Income is a subset of Kidney Care Adjusted Operating Income that excludes certain non-core business units. Actual Performance represents actual Adjusted Operating Income for our Kidney Care division.
2
For relative context, overall industry growth in 2013 (the latest information available as of 3/31/16) was 3.5% and the compound annual growth rate from 2009 to 2013 was 3.6%. The foregoing data are based on the 2015 Annual Data Report, United States Renal Data System, Table D.1 "Percentages and countsnumber of reported ESRD patients: by treatment modality." This includes the results of our Company, without which the industry growth rates would be lower.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      41


Table of Contents





Michael D. Staffieri

                         
        Maximum Performance Based
Eligibility Range


  Maximum Eligible
Payout Achieved
  2015 STI Performance Metrics
Weight
Criteria Range
  (%)
($)
  Actual
Performance


  (%)
($)
 
  Core Kidney Care Adjusted Operating Income 70% $1,550 million to $1,625 million1  25% - 100% $210,000 - $840,000  $1,658 million1  100% $840,000  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Kidney Care Catheter Rate 15% 13.35% to 13.15% (lower is better) and 15% better than industry   50% - 100% $90,000 - $180,000   13.06%   100% $180,000  
 Kidney Care Non Acquired Growth 15% 4.3% to 4.9%2  50% - 100% $90,000 - $180,000  3.9%  0% $0  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
            Total Eligible STI Bonus   85% $1,020,000  
      Total Actual STI Bonus

 85% $1,020,000  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
1
Criteria range represents the top 75%U.S. dialysis clinics that completed an LED lighting upgrade. The target was set lower for 2022 since a large portion of the public guidance range for fiscal year 2015 for our Kidney Care division atwork on this energy efficiency project was completed in 2021, and there were fewer clinics still requiring the time thisupgrade in 2022 with more complicated circumstances.

Customized Individual Strategic Goals
Customized individual strategic objectives vary by participant in the 2022 STI Program with performance metric was developed. Core Kidney Care Adjusted Operating Income isacross all objectives being evaluated qualitatively in the aggregate on a subsetscale of Kidney Care Adjusted Operating Income that excludes certain non-core business units. Actual Performance represents actual Adjusted Operating Income for our Kidney Care division.
2
For relative context, overall industry growth in 2013 (the latest information available as of 3/31/16) was 3.5% and the compound annual growth rate from 20090% to 2013 was 3.6%. The foregoing data are based on the 2015 Annual Data Report, United States Renal Data System, Table D.1 "Percentages and counts of reported ESRD patients: by treatment modality." This includes the results of our Company, without which the industry growth rates would be lower.

Dennis L. Kogod

                         
        Maximum Performance Based
Eligibility Range


  Maximum Eligible
Payout Achieved
  2015 STI Performance Metrics
Weight
Criteria Range
  (%)
($)
  Actual
Performance


  (%)
($)
 
  HCP Adjusted Operating Income 30% $238 million to $275 million1  25% - 100% $150,000 - $600,000  $240 million  25% $150,000  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Specified HCP Market Adjusted Operating Income 30% Range related to internal budget   25% - 100% $150,000 - $600,000   Below budget   0% $0  
 International Adjusted Operating Income 20% Range related to internal budget  25% - 100% $100,000 - $400,000  Below budget  0% $0  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  HCP Star Metrics 20% Customized index range   30% - 100% $120,000 - $400,000   Internal index value   86.2% $344,859  
      Total Eligible STI Bonus

 24.7% $494,859  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
            Total Actual STI Bonus   10% $200,0002 
1
The percentage of maximum bonus for which Mr. Kogod is eligible is determined based on the top 75% of the guidance range for fiscal year 2015 for our HealthCare Partners division provided to our investors200%, with our fourth quarter 2014 earnings release, the latest guidance range available to the Compensation Committee at the time it approved this performance condition.
2
100% representing target.The Compensation Committee exercised negative discretiondesigned the individual strategic objectives to reduce Mr. Kogod's STI bonus to $200,000 as a result of underperformance inbe challenging, but achievable with strong and consistent performance, and aligned with our HealthCare Partners division and our international business.

Supplemental STI Program for 2015

The 2015 Supplemental STI Program is a one-time program created under the 2011 Plan to provide our non-CEO NEOs cash incentive award opportunities that are: (1) tied to 2015strategic operating results in the dialysis and related lab services operating segment and (2) comparable to that of other non-NEO executives. Mr. Thiryplan. Each participant’s performance against such objectives was not eligible to participate in the 2015 Supplemental STI Program because his LTI awards are all equity-based.

The cash-based LTI Program the Company created in early 2013 contemplated a payout of at least 50% of target to the program participants if the 2015 adjusted operating income for the dialysis and related lab services operating segment exceeded $1,597 million, and a payout of at least 150% if the 2015 adjusted operating income was at least or exceeded $1,742 million.

Under the 2013 cash-based LTI Program, the maximum payout an NEO could receive was 150%, whereas other non-NEO executives could receive additional amounts by participating in a funding pool, the size of which was a function of 2015 adjusted operating income for the dialysis and related lab services operating segment in excess of $1,742 million. The reason for this restriction on NEOs was that any payout beyond 150% under the program was to bedetermined holistically based on a retrospective non-formulaic assessmentconsideration of the relative significance of each individual participantobjective in light of the program,development of the Company, market, regulatory and payment based on such a retrospective non-formulaic assessmentcompetitive factors over the course of 2022, and expectations for NEOs wouldthese factors in the future. The table below summarizes selected key strategic objectives established for each NEO for 2022:

43


SELECTED INDIVIDUAL KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
Javier J. Rodriguez
Sustainable COVID-19 management
Efforts to re-energize our teammates and reignite our culture across the Company
Multi-year stability of equipment, supplies, pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical and dialysis contracting and supply chains
Value-based contract goals
Differentiated home offering
Deliver on new sources of growth
Advance the Company’s public policy objectives
Joel Ackerman
Finance department organization effectiveness goals
Enterprise growth objectives
Continued focus on strategy, contracting and capability creation for IKC
Return on capital and capital deployment goals
Support strategy and innovation efforts
Michael D. Staffieri
Sustain compliance with COVID-19 regulations
Successfully transition to a new technology platform
Compliantly deliver on goals relating to home dialysis program
Implementation of new labor management tools (i.e., new scheduling software and training)
Enhance teammate experience and retention
Kathleen A. Waters
Advance legal department priorities
Succession planning goals for the legal department
Advance public policy priorities
Continued to advance diversity and belonging goals for the Company
James O. Hearty
Continued focus on data-driven monitoring and use of technology in compliance program
Continued guidance and leadership on the Company’s business development activities
Transition to new enterprise policy management system


dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
44


2022 STI Program Payouts
The table below summarizes the performance metrics and their relative weights and the eligible payout achieved, target incentive opportunity, and total eligible and actual STI Program award by NEO. Additional description of each of the metrics is provided above. Certain columns or rows may not be tax-deductibleprecisely recalculate due to the Company.

When it became clear that the Kidney Care NEOs were the primary driverspresentation of the 2015 adjusted operating income for the dialysis and related lab services operating segment, the Compensation Committee implemented the 2015 Supplemental STI Program to

rounded numbers.
Eligible Payout Achieved
2022 STI Program Performance MetricsPerformance Metrics WeightingsJavier J. RodriguezJoel AckermanMichael D. StaffieriKathleen A. WatersJames O. Hearty
Financial: Adjusted Operating Income50.0%78.8%78.8%78.8%78.8%78.8%
Financial: Free Cash Flow20.0%—%—%—%—%—%
Strategic Objectives: Home modalities penetration7.5%71.0%71.0%71.0%71.0%71.0%
Strategic Objectives: Comprehensive Kidney Care
Contracting ("CKCC") patient contact composite
7.5%84.9%84.9%84.9%84.9%84.9%
Strategic Objectives: Teammate engagement scores3.0%—%—%—%—%—%
Strategic Objectives: Energy efficiency projects3.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%
Strategic Objectives: Custom individual objectives9.0%90.0%90.0%90.0%90.0%100.0%
Total Weighted Eligible Payout Achieved65.2%65.2%65.2%65.2%66.1%
Target Incentive Opportunity$1,800,000$750,000$1,050,000$650,000$400,000
Total Eligible and Actual STI Program Award$1,173,805$489,085$684,720$423,874$264,446


45

42


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis




give the Kidney Care NEOs an opportunity to earn additional compensation comparable to non-NEO executives. Each NEO was eligible for an incremental 0% to 250% payout (in addition to the 150% formulaically earned under the 2013 cash-based LTI Program) to the extent the 2015 adjusted operating income for the dialysis and related lab services operating segment exceeded $1,742 million (the threshold for 150% payout under the 2013 cash-based LTI Program). To be eligible for the maximum 250% payout under the 2015 Supplemental STI Program, the 2015 adjusted operating income for the dialysis and related lab services operating segment would have to be at least $2,143 million. Since the 2015 adjusted operating income for the dialysis and related lab services operating segment was $1,857 million, the NEOs were eligible for an incremental 72% payout. Specifically, Messrs. Rodriguez and Kogod each had a target under the 2013 cash-based LTI Program of $3,300,000 and earned 150%, or $4,950,000, based on the 2015 adjusted operating income for the dialysis and related lab services operating segment exceeding the threshold for 150% payout, payable 50% in 2016 and 50% in 2017. In addition, each was eligible for an incremental 72%, or $2,363,661, under the 2015 Supplemental STI Program. Similarly, Mr. Staffieri had a target under the 2013 cash-based LTI Program of $1,732,500 and earned 150%, or $2,598,750, payable 50% in 2016 and 50% in 2017. In addition, he was eligible for an incremental 72%, or $1,240,922 under the 2015 Supplemental STI Program. Messrs. Rodriguez and Staffieri received the maximum eligible amounts under the 2015 Supplemental STI Program because both NEOs were determined to be instrumental in driving the results for the 2015 dialysis and related lab services operating segment. The Compensation Committee exercised its negative discretion for Mr. Kogod, who transitioned from Kidney Care to HCP in March 2014, given his minimal role in dialysis and related lab services, resulting in Mr. Kogod receiving no amount under the 2015 Supplemental STI Program. All amounts under the 2015 Supplemental STI Program were paid to Messrs. Rodriguez and Staffieri in 2016.

Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2015

2022

Long-Term Incentive Program ("LTI programProgram") awards are granted pursuant to the 2011 Plan. Our LTI program is designed to provide a link to long-term stockholder value through equity awards for all executives, while also providing a more direct tieour executives. Under our LTI Program, the Compensation Committee has the authority to award various forms of long-term incentive grants, such as PSUs, RSUs and SSARs. Consistent with past practice, annual LTI Program awards for 2022 were granted in March to each of the NEOs other than our various linesCEO.
Strong Pay-for-Performance Alignment
The split of business2022 equity awards between PSUs, RSUs and SSARs was determined by the Compensation Committee and varies by participating NEO, based on factors such as the executive officer's role in growth initiatives and capital allocation. As noted above, in light of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award that Mr. Rodriguez received in 2019, he did not participate in the Company's 2022 LTI Program as such award was intended to replace grants under the Company's LTI Program through 2024. Below are the 2022 annual LTI Program splits for which executives are responsible through cash-based performance awards targeting internal operating performance metrics consistent with our existing compensation philosophy.

each NEO participant:

Equity Awards

While we emphasize stock-based compensation, we do not designate a target percentage of total compensation as stock-based. We instead maintain discretion
PSUsRSUsSSARs
Joel Ackerman
60%.jpg
40%.jpg
Michael D. Staffieri
60%.jpg
40%.jpg
Kathleen A. Waters
60%.jpg
20%.jpg
20%.jpg
James O. Hearty
60%.jpg
20%.jpg
20%.jpg


dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
46

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The annual LTI Program grants for 2022 include the following key elements to respond to changes in executives anddrive Company performance and related objectives, as well as to changes in remaining relative values that have yet to be vested. We believe that our emphasis on stock-based compensation creates an alignment of interests between our executives and our stockholders. Grants of equity awards also serve as an important tool for attracting and retaining executives. To vest in equity awards and earn the full benefit of the award, executives must remain employed for a multi-year vesting period, typically over four years, which reinforces a culture in which the Company's long-term success takes precedence over volatile and unsustainable short-term results.

Each year, the Compensation Committee recommends to the full Board an aggregate equity award pool that will be available for grants to all eligible recipients of equity awards, based on (i) the historical amounts granted, (ii) the amount of equity held by participants that is currently in-the-money, (iii) the number of shares we expect to be forfeited due to anticipated departures, and (iv) the number of shares that will likely be required both to retain and incentivize our highest-potential and highest-performing employees and to attract new employees we expect to hire during the coming year. The Compensation Committee may also recommend the establishment of special purpose share budgets for proposed interim grants. After considering such recommendations, the Board approves a budget and delegates authority to the Compensation Committee to make awards to our executive officers and other employees. The equity awards that are granted to our executives are generally made annually (typically in the first half of the year). Discretionary interim awards to our executives may be made during the year to address special circumstances, such as retention concerns, promotions and special performance recognition awards, and new hire awards. Our annual equity awards are generally awarded upon the completion of performance reviews and in connectionalign with the Compensation Committee's decision and review process regarding other forms of direct compensation. The timing of the interim grants is contingent upon individual circumstances. Under the terms of the 2011 Plan, awards are granted with an exercise or base price not less than the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Furthermore, the 2011 Plan prohibits repricing or replacing underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights without prior stockholder approval.

interests:

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      43


Table of Contents




PSUs
Performance Goals: 75% related to adjusted EPS and 25% related to relative TSR as compared to the constituents of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index ("Relative TSR").
Threshold performance required for payout at 50% of target shares, with potential to earn up to 200% of target shares.
Multi-year vesting schedule, with 50% vesting on each of March 15, 2025 and March 15, 2026, following conclusion of the applicable performance period, subject to continued service and achievement of the applicable performance goals.
RSUs
Multi-year vesting schedule, with 50% vesting on each of March 15, 2025 and March 15, 2026.
SSARs

Multi-year vesting schedule, with 50% vesting on each of March 15, 2025 and March 15, 2026.
Five-year term.
Base price equals closing stock price on grant date.


Stock-settled Stock Appreciation Rights

PSU Performance Metrics

The majority-of our equity awards to executives are intable below summarizes the form of stock-settled stock appreciation rights, which only derive value if the market value of our common stock increases. The economic value and tax and accounting treatment of SSARs are comparable to those of stock options, but SSARs are less dilutive to our stockholders because only shares with a total value equal to the grantee's gain (the difference between the fair market value of the base shares and their base price) are ultimately issued. SSARs are granted with a base price not less than the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and vest based on the passage of time. SSARs granted in 2015 vest 50% on each of June 2, 2018 and June 2, 2019.

Performance Stock Units

As part of our compensation program, we also award PSUs to our top executives who become one of the NEOs in any given year. PSUs are granted under the 2011 Plan and typically vest based on a combination of accomplishment of performance metrics and passage of time over a period of three or more years, but the Compensation Committee may approve alternative vesting schedules based on performance, timing of vesting of individual outstanding grants and other retention related factors.

A minimum of 50% of the CEO's equity compensation and 25% of each of Messrs. Rodriguez and Staffieri's equity compensation is awarded in the form of PSUs, which fully vest in four years (50% on June 2, 2018, and 50% on June 2, 2019) so long as performance goals have been met. Based on the level of achievement, more or less than 100% of the target PSUs can vest based on the achievement of the underlying performance. Mr. Hilger was not granted PSUs due to his interim status as Chief Financial Officer.

The tables below summarize the criteria range and percent range of target PSUs for each of the 20152022 annual PSU performance metrics and detail the relative weightings of each 2015 PSU performance metric for Messrs. Thiry, Rodriguez and Staffieri. The performance periods for these metrics run through 2017, or in the case of Relative TSR through March 31, 2019 and, therefore, we are not able to present performance against these metrics at this time.grants. Given the market and operating conditions at the time the targets were set, the target vestingpayout levels were designed to be achievable with strong management performance, while maximum vestingpayout levels were designed to be difficult to achieve.

20152022 PSU Performance Metrics


Performance Metrics Weightings
Criteria Range
Percent of Target PSUsVesting
2024 Adjusted Earnings per Share1
37.5%$9.87 - $12.99
(Target: $11.05)

Kidney Care Quality Incentive Program

10% to 40% (below rest of industry)50% - 100%

Kidney Care Non Acquired Growth

3.95% to 4.70%50% - 150%

HCP New Market Success

2 to 6 markets that meet threshold0%; 50% - 200%100% March 15, 2025
2025 Adjusted Earnings per Share1
37.5%$10.26 - $14.81
(Target: $11.93)

HCP New Market Adjusted Operating Income

50% to 200% of internal goal0%; 50% - 200%100% March 15, 2026
Relative TSR v. S&P Health Care
 Services Select Industry Index2
25.0%25th - 90th percentile
(Target: 55th percentile)

DaVita Rx Specialty Drugs Contracts

50% to 200% of internal goal0%; 50% - 200%

Paladina Members

180% to 541% growth over 3 years50% - 200%
Village Health Hospital Admission RateRange tied to internal goalMarch 15, 2025, 50% - 200%

Relative TSR

40th percentile to 90th percentile50% - 200%
March 15, 2026


1“Adjusted Earnings per Share” is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents a per share measure of adjusted net income. For purposes of the 2022 PSUs, “Adjusted Earnings per Share” represents our net income per share, adjusted as reported in our earnings release in the year of measurement, to exclude certain items from net income that we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, generally including as applicable in that year, among other things, impairment charges, gains and losses on ownership changes, capacity closure charges, restructuring charges, accruals for legal matters and debt prepayment and refinancing charges.
             

 

 

 Performance Metrics Weightings

 

2015 PSU Performance Metrics


  Kent J. Thiry
Javier J. Rodriguez
Michael D. Staffieri
 

 

Kidney Care Quality Incentive Program

   10% 20% 20%  

 

Kidney Care Non Acquired Growth

   10% 20% 20%  

 

HCP New Market Success

   7.5%    

 

HCP New Market Adjusted Operating Income

   7.5%      

 

DaVita Rx Specialty Drugs Contracts

   5%    

 

Paladina Members

   5%      

 

Village Health Hospital Admission Rate

   5% 10% 10%  

 

Relative TSR

   50% 50% 50%  
2Vesting based on the percentile position represented by the return on investment in DaVita stock ("DaVita TSR") within the range of returns on investments in each of the constituents of the S&P Healthcare Services Select Industry Index (assuming dividend reinvestment). The percentage of target shares that vest are a function of the percentile ranking of DaVita's TSR. If our TSR is negative, then vesting is capped at the target number of PSUs regardless of our relative TSR performance.

44


Table

We have used adjusted EPS as a criterion for all participants in the LTI Program since 2017 and, beginning in 2021, we increased the weighting of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis



Cash-Based Performance Awards

the PSUs for the NEOs from 50% to 60% of their LTI Program opportunity. Relative TSR has been a component of the LTI Program since 2014. In 2015,connection with our stockholder engagement during 2022, we received feedback at that time that our stockholders were generally supportive of our share repurchase program as a mechanism for enhancing long-term value for stockholders. Accordingly, after discussion, and with input from Compensia, the Compensation Committee granted cash-based performance awards to Messrs. Rodriguez, and Staffieri. Mr. Thiry received all of his 2015 LTI awards in the form of equity (SSARs and PSUs). Mr. Kogod's cash-based performance award for 2014 and his cash-based and equity awards for 2015 were delayed to 2016, when cash-based performance awards for 2014 and cash and equity-based awards for 2015 will be made to other executives of the Company's HCP division. Since theredecided that it was no long-term cash-based incentive plan at HCP, and no such plan had previously existed at HCP, the grant of cash-based performance awards to HCP executives was delayed to allow timestill appropriate for the proper structuring2022 program not to adjust the EPS criteria based on volume of share repurchases. When we have engaged in share repurchases, those repurchases have been largely funded through excess cash flow generation, and we believe that incenting management to use their judgment on the optimal way to utilize excess cash flow will generate the best return for stockholders, including when that decision is to engage in share repurchases.

Consistent with our goal-setting process for the STI Program, the Compensation Committee sets rigorous goals requiring strong performance over the three or four year performance period based on compounded growth over the
47


prior year's EPS. We set our adjusted EPS targets for the 2022 PSUs by growing our 2021 adjusted EPS at a long-term cash-based incentive plan. In addition, becauserange of compound annual growth rates (a 4% compound annual growth rate for 50% vesting; an 8% compound annual growth rate for 100% vesting; 11% compound annual growth rate for 150% vesting; and a 14% compound annual growth rate for 200% vesting). We also adjusted the value of the cash-based award is linked2021 baseline to be on a basis comparable to the value of the equity-based awards, the 2015 equity awards to HCP executives were also delayed to 2016. As a result,statutory federal corporate income tax rate in effect in 2021, so that required growth was not calculated from an artificially high base.
Setting Awards Under 2022 LTI awards for HCP executives in 2016, including Mr. Kogod, will appear greater than a typical annual grant since they will effectively represent grants for multiple years.

Program

The Compensation Committee determines the target award value for NEOs' cash-based performance awards in a manner similar to how it determines the amount of equity awards to grant; that is, based on individual and Company historical and expected performance, including an executive's ability to influence the targeted performance measure. The aggregate target value of cash-based performance awards available for allocation to our executives is approved by the full Board for administration by the Compensation Committee along with the aggregate equity award pool.

The cash-based performance awards granted in 2015 will vest on April 1, 2018, subject to the NEO's continued employment and the achievement of performance conditions relating to adjusted operating income of the Company's dialysis and related lab services segment in 2017. Under the terms of the 2011 Plan, the maximum annual amount of any cash-based performance awards payable to any executive is $10,000,000 in a 12 month period. However, the Compensation Committee established target award values for each of Messrs. Rodriguez, Staffieri and Hilger at the time of grant, at amounts substantially lower than the maximum under the 2011 Plan.

In early 2016, Messrs. Rodriguez, Staffieri, Kogod and Hilger received payouts under the 2013 long-term cash-based performance awards granted under the

Company's 2011 Plan. Payouts under the 2013 long-term cash-based performance awards are paid 50% in early 2016 and 50% in early 2017. The payment in 2017 is not subject to any incremental performance conditions, but only to continued employment at the time of vesting, April 1, 2017. Mr. Rodriguez and Mr. Kogod each earned $4,950,000. Mr. Staffieri earned $2,598,750, and Mr. Hilger earned $309,375 for performance exceeding the maximum 150% payout level as a result of adjusted operating income achieved for the dialysis and related lab services operating segment of $1,857 million for fiscal year 2015 compared to a target of $1,669 million at the 100% payout level. These earned amounts were paid 50% in 2016, and the remaining 50% will be paid in 2017. In addition, as discussed above under "Supplemental STI Program for 2015," Messrs. Rodriguez, Kogod and Staffieri were eligible for additional amounts subject to negative discretion based on exceptional performance above the maximum 150% payout level under the 2013 long-term cash-based incentive program. They became eligible for these additional amounts through the 2015 STI program put in place in early 2015 to make their incentive award opportunity tied to 2015 operating results in the dialysis and related lab services operating segment comparable to that of other non-NEO executives, while maintaining the additional discipline of negative discretion by the Compensation Committee. Please see "Supplemental STI Program for 2015" for further information regarding these payouts.

Determining LTI Program Award Amounts

The Compensation Committee reviews the annual LTI program award recommendationsawards for our NEOs and other executives in advance of the grant date with the input of ourthe CEO and Compensia, and after consideration of market data provided by Compensia. Each year, the committee's outside compensation consultant, Compensia. Based upon a review ofCEO considers the following in recommending equity award shares available, their dilutive effect on stockholders, long-term share budgeting restrictions, cash-based performance award dollars available and recommendations from management,awards for executives other than himself to the Compensation Committee recommends for Board approval the aggregate equityCommittee: (i) recent performance and cash LTI program award pools for the year. In considering howtrajectory of historical performance; (ii) level of responsibilities and expected changes to distribute the equity and cash-based performance award units in the respective LTI program award pools, our CEO, together with a team that includes other senior executives, gives differential attention to high-potential individuals whom the Company believes will be the future senior leadersresponsibilities; (iii) market levels of the Company, and to other high-performing individuals whose performance in their current positions exceeded expectations.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      45


Table of Contents





Each such high-potential and/or high-performing employee is then individually reviewed, from a holistic perspective, starting with a review of such employee's historicaltotal compensation including his or her initial base salary, any base salary increases during his or her tenure with the Company and performance cash bonuses and equity and long-term cash-based incentive award grants over his or her career atincentives for similar positions; (iv) the Company. A determination is then made as to the amount and number of cash and equity LTI program award units that should behistorical amounts granted and expected vesting levels; and (v) the appropriate vesting schedules and performance conditions that should be implemented for such awards in order to retain and continue to motivate these high-quality, high-performing individuals. Our goal is to achieve fairness in compensation and motivate performance over the course"in-the-money value" of multiple years, which is the reason we take into account all compensation that has been awarded to such individuals over their respective careers at the Company when making prospective award decisions.

The Compensation Committee also evaluates the market competitiveness of the Company's compensation for its NEOs and other executive officersunvested equity currently held by analyzing its historical and proposed compensation changes in light of compensation practices among its comparator peer group as provided in an annual assessment by Compensia, the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant.

After taking into account the elements set forth above, the Compensation Committee approved LTI program award grants to our NEOs in 2015, except for Mr. Thiry, whose LTI program award grant was approved by the independent members of the Board as required by the committee's charter. All of the SSARs, PSUs and cash-based performance awards granted to our NEOs were granted in June 2015 after the completion of the review and approval by the Compensation Committee, and with respect to Mr. Thiry, by the independent members of the Board. participants.

The table below shows the aggregate number of shares subject to RSUs and SSARs and PSUs, and the base target value of the cash-based performance awardsPSUs granted to each of our participating NEOs in 2015, who remained2022. In light of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award that Mr. Rodriguez received in 2019, he did not participate in the Company's 2022 LTI Program as such award was intended to replace grants under the Company’s LTI Program through 2024.
2022 Long-term Incentive AwardsShares Subject to PSUs (#)Shares Subject to SSARs (#)Shares Subject to RSUs (#)
Joel Ackerman16,27043,388
Michael D. Staffieri24,40665,080
Kathleen A. Waters11,93215,9083,977
James O. Hearty4,3395,7841,446
2019 and 2020 PSU Results and Payouts
We began granting PSUs to executive officers in 2014. The performance metrics associated with the PSUs granted in 2019 and 2020 have been measured through the end of the relevant performance periods, with the exception of (i) the PSUs granted in 2020 for which the performance metric is adjusted EPS for fiscal year 2023 and (ii) the PSUs granted in 2020 for which the performance metric is Relative TSR measured through February 29, 2024.
The tables below summarize the criteria range and percentage range of target PSUs and detail the relative weightings of each performance metric for the 2019 and 2020 PSUs. The Compensation Committee did not make any COVID-related adjustments to the performance metrics applicable to the 2019 or 2020 PSUs.
   Performance Based
Eligibility Range
 Eligible
Payout Achieved
2019 PSU Performance MetricsWeightCriteria Range(%)Actual
Performance
(%)
2021 Adjusted Earnings per Share1
37.5%$4.63 - $5.620%; 50% - 200%$9.13200%
2022 Adjusted Earnings per Share1
37.5%$4.86 - $6.290%; 50% - 200%$6.60200%
Relative TSR (2022 vesting)12.5%100% + 2 x (Company TSR - S&P 500 Total Return)0% - 200%30.1%160%
Relative TSR (2023 vesting)12.5%100% + 2 x (Company TSR - S&P 500 Total Return)0% - 200%(12.6)%75%

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
48

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   Performance Based
Eligibility Range
 Eligible
Payout Achieved
2020 PSU Performance MetricsWeightCriteria Range(%)Actual
Performance
(%)
2022 Adjusted Earnings Per Share1
37.5%$6.49 - $8.070%; 50% - 200%$7.13113%
2023 Adjusted Earnings Per Share1
37.5%$6.75 - $9.370%; 50% - 200%
In Progress2
N/A2
Relative TSR (2023 vesting)12.5%100% + 2 x (Company TSR - S&P 500 Health Care Services Select Industry Index Total Return)0% - 200%(21.9)%56%
Relative TSR (2024 vesting)12.5%100% + 2 x (Company TSR - S&P 500 Health Care Services Select Industry Index Total Return)0% - 200%
In Progress2
N/A2

1“Adjusted Earnings per Share” or "Adjusted EPS" is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents a per share measure of adjusted net income. Adjusted net income excludes certain items from net income that we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, gain on change of ownership, capacity closure charges and restructuring charges. The Adjusted EPS targets for the 2020 PSUs that were approved at the time of grant also exclude costs net of taxes of $0.53 per share associated with our opposition of a California ballot initiative. As a result, 2022 Adjusted EPS presented above for purposes of the 2020 PSU performance metrics differs from the non-GAAP financial results we report in our 2022 Form 10-K.
2In progress as of December 31, 2015.

2015 Long-term
Incentive Awards



Shares
Subject to SSARs
(#)



Shares
Subject to PSUs
(#)



Shares
Subject to RSUs
(#)



Target
Cash-Based
Performance
Award Value
($)

Kent J. Thiry

 179,041 48,323  

Javier J. Rodriguez

 46,551 12,564  4,550,000

Michael D. Staffieri

 40,284 3,624  2,625,000

Dennis L. Kogod

    

James K. Hilger

 5,968  1,492 250,000
[_______], 2023.

The 2015 SSAR,2019 CEO Promotion PSU Results and RSU awards above vest 50% on eachPayout

In 2019, in connection with and in recognition of June 2, 2018 and June 2, 2019,his promotion to the third and fourth anniversaries, respectively,CEO role, Mr. Rodriguez was granted a one-time PSU award, the vesting of the grant date. In each case, vesting iswhich was subject to the NEO's continued employment and, in the case of PSUs, the achievement of the underlying performance conditions. The cash-based performance awards vest 100% on April 1, 2018, subject to the NEO's continued employment and the achievement of performance conditionsmetrics relating to adjusted operating incomehome dialysis penetration, public policy strategic objectives and internal organizational development goals, as shown in the table below (the "CEO Promotion PSU"). Performance with respect to the applicable performance metrics has been measured through the end of the Company's dialysisapplicable performance periods and related lab services segmentthe achievement with respect to such metrics is reflected in 2017. Given the market and operating conditions attable below. As a result of this achievement, Mr. Rodriguez earned a total of 39,254 shares with respect to the timeCEO Promotion PSU, based on Mr. Rodriguez's achievement of these goals.
    Eligible
Payout Achieved
CEO Promotion PSU Performance MetricsShares Subject to PSUs (at Target)Criteria Range and Associated VestingActual
Performance
(%)
Home Dialysis Penetration (Q4 2021)19,91315.0% to 17.5% (16.0% target), with vesting threshold at 50%, ranging up to 200%15.4%72%
Public Policy Strategic Objectives9,956Vesting tied to internal goals, with vesting ranging from 0%-200%150%150%
Internal Organizational Development Goals9,956Vesting tied to internal goals, with vesting ranging from 0%-200%100%100%


Waters Performance Cash Award
In August 2022, in order to further link her compensation with the targets were set,achievement of public policy goals of the target vesting levelsCompany, the Compensation Committee granted a performance cash award to Ms. Waters, pursuant to which she is eligible to receive a cash payment of $1,000,000 upon the achievement on or before December 31, 2023 of certain public policy goals (the "Waters Performance Cash Award"). The public policy goals were designed to be challenging but achievable with strong management performance.

execution against the Company's public policy objectives. The Compensation Committee structured this award as a one-time cash award to deliver an incentive beyond the customized individual objectives under the STI Program, which accounted for 9% of her overall STI Program target opportunity and which did not include customized objectives relating to evolving public policy goals of the Company.While the Compensation Committee generally limits one-time awards, the Compensation Committee retains flexibility to grant such awards as it deems appropriate to incentivize key objectives of the Company. Ms. Waters is required to remain employed through the payment date in order to receive the Waters Performance Cash Award, except in the event of certain terminations of employment, as described below in the subsection titled "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control."



49


CEO Compensation
Mr. Rodriguez assumed the role of CEO on June 1, 2019 with over 20 years of experience at the Company in a variety of roles, including as CEO of the Kidney Care Division since March 2014. In connection with his transition to the CEO role, and with the feedback of some of our largest stockholders, the Compensation Committee evaluated different compensation alternatives for Mr. Rodriguez. The Compensation Committee believed that the CEO's compensation structure should vary based on strategic context, and given the strategic reset that the Company was undergoing, the Compensation Committee believed that a large single grant of SSARs at a base price that was a significant premium to the then-current market price in lieu of any other equity grants for five years was the most appropriate form of compensation for Mr. Rodriguez to drive long-term stockholder value creation. This award is intended to be five years' worth of awards (through 2024), granted upfront. Accordingly, Mr. Rodriguez was not granted any long-term incentive awards since the grant of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award and Mr. Rodriguez did not participate in the Company's 2023 LTI Program.

The terms of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award were designed with input from Compensia, and the award was structured to reflect stockholder feedback and incentivize the creation of sustained stockholder value, resulting in the following key features in the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award design:
Premium-Price: The base price (similar to the strike price on an option) on the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award was set considering the price per share on the day before Mr. Rodriguez assumed the role of CEO and the price per share at which the Company completed its modified "Dutch Auction" tender offer. Specifically, the base price was approved at a 56% premium to the price per share on the day before Mr. Rodriguez assumed the CEO role on June 1, 2019 and a 20% premium to the price per share at which the Company purchased shares in its then recently completed modified "Dutch Auction" tender offer.
Multi-Year Vesting: The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award vests 50% each three and four years from November 4, 2019, the date the award was approved by the Board (the "Board Approval Date"), with the first tranche vesting on November 4, 2022 and the remaining tranche scheduled to vest on November 4, 2023.
Five-Year Holding Period: In general, there is a five-year holding period requirement from the Board Approval Datewith respect to the after-tax Gain Shares, subjecting the shares underlying the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award to a full five years of potential stock price fluctuations.
Five-Year Term: The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award will expire on the date that is five years from the Board Approval Date, requiring the CEO to generate significant stockholder value creation over this period of time in order to realize significant value for himself.
The ultimate value realized by Mr. Rodriguez under the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award is highly uncertain and linked to the long-term sustainable value created by Mr. Rodriguez because of the five-year holding period.
The summary of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award presented in this section is qualified in its entirety by reference to the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award itself, which is filed with the SEC as Appendix A to our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on December 6, 2019.

Other Elements of Our 2022 Executive Compensation Program for 2016

We are using performance metrics consistent with 2015 for our 2016 STI Program. We are currently in the process of finalizing the 2016 LTI Program, and anticipate that the broad structure will remain the same as for 2015. Consistent with our practice, we also plan to reach out to our stockholders for feedback on compensation of our executive officers and consider any changes and adjustments to our compensation policies and practices suggested by our stockholders.

Personal Benefits and Perquisites

As described above, our compensation program for NEOs emphasizes compensation based on performance and compensation which serves to align our NEOs' interests with those of our stockholders. As a result, the Compensation Committee has determined that the Company should provide few perquisites to NEOs. We believe that the perquisites and personal benefits that we provide support important attraction and retention objectives. We also consider the extent to which the perquisite or personal benefit provided serves to enhance the performance of our NEOs in light of the demands on these individuals' time. The perquisites and personal benefits available to our NEOs are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee has authorized the personal use of fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft by some of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee believes that access to an aircraft for personal travel enables our NEOs to maximize their work hours, particularly in light of their demanding business travel schedules. One of the Compensation Committee's objectives is to ensure that our NEOs are afforded adequate flexibility to allow for sufficient personal time in light of the significant demands of the Company. The Compensation Committee and our CEO allocate a fixed number of

46


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis



hours for personal use by identified NEOs and consider the allocated amount as part of the NEO's total compensation. The Compensation Committee and our CEO use their discretion when determining the number of allocated hours and displace other forms of compensation that otherwise would have been awarded to the NEO.

Our CEO is authorized by the Compensation Committee to use a fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft for business purposes and long-distance commuting, and for a fixed number of hours per year for personal use instead of additional cash compensation that would have otherwise been paid. Other executives of the Company are authorized on a limited basis to use a fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft for a fixed number of hours for business purposes and to a much lesser extent for a fixed number of hours per year for personal use. As part of our CEO's aggregate compensation package, the Compensation Committee approves a fixed number of hours for personal use each year and unused hours from the prior year are available for use the following year. When determining the number of hours of personal use of aircraft to award, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration Mr. Thiry's overall compensation package. If Mr. Thiry were to exceed the fixed number of hours for personal use that is unrelated to business or long-distance commuting in a given year, the excess hours of personal use would offset the number of hours approved by the Compensation Committee the following year for personal use or Mr. Thiry would be required to compensate us directly, although historically he has not exceeded the hours authorized for personal use. The Compensation Committee reviews all business and personal use of the aircraft annually, including detailed passenger logs with special attention to mixed business and personal use and required reimbursements to the Company.

Deferred Compensation Program

Our deferred compensation program permits certain employees, including our NEOs, to defer compensation at the election of the participant or at the election of the Company. We maintain a Deferred Compensation Plan which allows certain employees, including our NEOs, to defer a percentage of their base salary, cash bonus and other compensation as identified by the Company. We do not utilize deferred compensation as a significant component of compensation and there are no Company contributions thereto or above-market returns available thereunder.

Severance and Change of Control Arrangements

We have entered into employment agreementsor severance arrangements with each of our NEOs.NEOs, including a new employment agreement with Mr. Rodriguez in 2019 in connection with his transition to CEO. These agreements,arrangements, among other things, provide for severance benefits in the event of a termination of employment in certain circumstances, including, with respect to certain NEOs, the departure of the NEO following a change of control of our Company. Each agreement is individually negotiated and the terms vary. When entering into employment agreementsor severance arrangements with our NEOs, we attempt to provide severance and change of control benefits which strike a balance between providing sufficient protections for the NEO while still providing post-termination compensation that we consider reasonable and in the interests of the Company and our stockholders. See "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control" beginning on page 61 of this Proxy Statement for a description of the severance and change of control arrangements set forth in our employment agreements with the NEOs.

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
50

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The terms of individual agreements vary, but under our current stock-based award agreements, accelerated vesting of stock-based awards is generally triggered when a change of control event occurs and either the acquiring entity fails to assume, convert or replace the stock-based award or the grantee's employment is terminated following a change of control or if the executive resigns for "good reason"“good reason” or is terminated by the Company without "cause"“cause” as provided in his or her applicable employment agreement, all within a certain period of time after the effective date of the change of control event. The additional acceleration provisions in our stock-based award agreements further serve to secure the continued employment and commitment of our NEOs prior to or following a change of control. See "Potentialthe subsection titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control" beginning on page 61Control” below for a description of this Proxy Statementthe severance and change in control arrangements for our NEOs, and for more information regarding accelerated vesting under our stock-based award agreements.

Dr. Menzel stepped down

Deferred Compensation Program
Our deferred compensation program permits certain teammates, including our NEOs, to defer compensation at the election of the participant. We do not utilize deferred compensation as our Chief Financial Officer effective March 30, 2015, and in accordance with his then-existing compensation arrangement, received his base salarya significant component of $510,000 over a 12-month period beginning on May 5, 2015.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      47


Table of Contents





Process for Determining NEO Compensation

Role of Independent Compensation Committee

Our executive compensation, and benefits programsthere are designed and administeredno Company contributions or above-market returns available under the direction and control of the Compensation Committee. program.

Limited Other Personal Benefits
Our Compensation Committee, composed solely of independent directors, reviews and approves our overall executive compensation program strategyfor executive officers is designed to emphasize compensation based on performance and policies and sets the compensation which serves to further align our executive officers’ interests with those of our executive officers.

When recruiting new executives,stockholders. As a result, the Compensation Committee and our CEO evaluate the comparative compensation of executives withinhas determined that the Company with similar levelsshould provide a limited number of responsibility, the prior experience of the executive and expected contributions to Company performance. Thereafter, each executive's compensation is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and CEO, and considered for adjustment based on individual performance and other factors.

When evaluating performance, we base compensation decisions on an assessment of Company and individual performance over the year, taking individual accomplishments into consideration in light of the totality of circumstances together with individual potential to contribute to the Company's future growth. We believe that all of our NEOs have the ability to influence overall Company policies and performance and, accordingly, should be accountable for Company-wide performance as well as the areas over which they have direct influence. The differences in total annual compensation levels among the NEOs are based on their individual roles and responsibilities within the Company and their relative individual performance. The Compensation Committee uses its judgment in awarding compensationpersonal benefits to our NEOs in accordance withexecutive officers. In assessing the overall objectiveslevel of the Company's compensation program.

The Compensation Committee takes into consideration a number of factors when determining the elements and amounts of compensation awardedperquisites provided to our NEOs, including individual performance, overall financial and non-financial performance ofexecutive officers, the Company for the year, individual skill sets and experience relative to industry peers, readiness for promotion, past and expected future performance, the importance and difficulty of achieving future Company and individual objectives, the value of

each executive's outstanding equity awards, aggregate historical compensation, levels of responsibility and performance relative to other executives within the Company, importance to the Company and difficulty of replacement. The Compensation Committee also gives significant weight to our clinical performance and quality of patient care. Accordingly, Company-wide patient clinical outcomes and improvements in quality of patient care, and each NEO's contributions in those areas, can have a significant impact on NEO compensation.

The Company-wide factors taken into consideration by the Compensation Committee include, but are not limited to, the following:

    overall revenue growth, increases in our treatment volume, market share increases, improvements in controlling treatment costs, operating income growth, operating margin growth and increases in earnings per share;
    healthcare regulatory compliance initiatives;
    improved strategic positioning;
    improved positioning of the Company for continued growth and diversification;
    improved organizational capabilities;
    patient growth and geographic expansion;
    relationships with private payors;
    improved clinical outcomes, vaccination rates and other measures of quality of care;
    relationships with medical directors and other physicians involved in our patient care;
    selection and implementation of improved financial, operating and clinical information systems;
    management performance in attracting and retaining high-performing employees throughout our organization and succession planning;
    implementation of successful public policy efforts;
    good corporate citizenship; and
    advancement of strategic business initiatives supporting our mission to be the provider, partner and employer of choice.

The Compensation Committee retains discretion as to how to weigh these factors. There is no formal weighting of the individual elements considered and no particular elements are required to be considered with respect to a given individual or in any particular year.

48


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis



When determining annual compensation for our NEOs, other than for our CEO, the Compensation Committee works closely with our CEO to review each individual's performance for the year and determine such NEO's compensation. Shortly following the end of each year, our CEO provides his assessment of each NEO's performance during the year based on his personal experience with the individual, the NEO's achievement of success in areas determined to be significant to the Company, and any changes in responsibility levels. The Compensation Committee also considers performance discussions that have taken place at the Board and Compensation Committee level regarding the NEOs, retention objectives and the future growth potential of the individual executive. Our CEO recommends to the Compensation Committee the amounts of cash and stock-based compensation for each of the NEOs. The Compensation Committee considers the recommendations made by the CEO regarding the other NEOs but retains the discretionoverall targeted compensation to deviate from those recommendations. Neither the CEO nor other members of management provide a recommendationbe delivered to the Compensation Committee with regard toexecutive officers, factoring in the CEO'sexpected cost of the approved perquisites in its determination of such compensation.


The Compensation Committee evaluates our CEO's performance at the same time it sets the compensationhas authorized limited personal use of the other NEOs. When evaluating the performance of our CEOfractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft by Mr. Rodriguez and making decisions about his compensation, the Compensation Committee considers overall Company performance as part of the assessment of our CEO's performance, in addition to the achievement of specific objectives to determine his compensation.Mr. Staffieri. The Compensation Committee also considersbelieves that access to an aircraft for personal travel enables them to maximize their work hours, particularly in light of their demanding business travel schedules, and allows them greater time to attend to Company matters.
Share Ownership Requirements
Because a self-assessment preparedsignificant amount of the total compensation earned by our CEO. As partexecutive officers is in the form of this self-assessment, our CEO reviews with the Compensation Committee the overall annualequity, we have a management objectives ofshare ownership policy to ensure that executive officers accumulate a meaningful ownership stake in the Company and his participationover time by retaining a specified financial interest in the attainment, or level of responsibility for the shortfall, of such objectives. Approximately every other year, the Compensation Committee engages an outside independent consultantour Common Stock. Our current policy applies to conduct an in-depth analysis of our CEO's performance as a manager during the year. The most recent assessment took place in 2015. This evaluation involves a rigorous assessment of our CEO's

performance by members of the senior management team. This assessment is reviewed by the Board and the Compensation Committeeall executive officers and is one of the many factors considered when making compensation decisions. As further described below, the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant provides the Compensation Committee with an analysis of comparative market data on the cash, stock-based compensation and total compensation for senior executives, including the CEO, at a group of comparable companies withinsimilar to our industry. The compensation package for our CEO is approved by the independentshare ownership policy that applies to all non-employee members of the Board afteras described above under the Compensation Committee's recommendationheading "Corporate Governance — Non-Employee Director Share Ownership Policy," except that the in-the-money value of vested but unexercised stock options and SSARs will count towards the ownership requirements applicable to our executive officers to reflect that the executives are able to exercise such SSARs and options at any point and are subject to the risk of fluctuations in stock price, similar to the Company's other stockholders. The chart below shows the salary multiple guidelines for approval.

Rolethe NEOs. As of Independentthe Record Date, each NEO was in compliance with our stock ownership policy. Restrictions and limitations with respect to hedging and pledging of Company securities by our executive officers are described under the heading "Corporate GovernanceInsider Trading PolicyHedging and Pledging."

Named Executive OfficerGuidelineCompliant with Guidelines
Javier J. Rodriguez6x base salary[__]
Michael D. Staffieri3x base salary[__]
Joel Ackerman3x base salary[__]
Kathleen A. Waters3x base salary[__]
James O. Hearty3x base salary[__]



51


Policy Regarding Clawback of Bonuses and Incentive Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has selected


We have a clawback policy that permits the Board to recover annual bonuses and directly retainslong-term incentive and equity-based compensation from executive officers and non-employee members of the servicesBoard in certain circumstances in which the Company had to restate all or a portion of Compensia, an independent nationalits financial statements.

Specifically, in the event of a material accounting restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under federal and/or state securities law, the Company’s CEO and CFO must repay any incentive-based compensation consulting firm.(net of any unreturnable taxes) paid to such person during the one-year period prior to the disclosure of such financial statement restatement which was awarded on the basis of the erroneous results and which is greater than the amount such person would have received had the Company’s financial statements been correctly reported. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retaincause other NEOs to do the same if they served during such one-year period.

In addition, if fraud or replace Compensia in its discretion. Compensia does not provide consulting services to the Company and may not provide such services without prior approvalintentional misconduct of an executive officer or member of the chair of the Compensation Committee. Accordingly, Compensia only provides compensation consulting servicesBoard was a significant contributing factor to a restatement, the Compensation Committee (or the Board, as applicable) has the authority to require the repayment of certain bonuses and worksincentive-based compensation, and the cancellation of, or reimbursement of amounts received with respect to, certain equity awards.

Our clawback policy also includes the Company's“significant misconduct” by    a domestic Senior Vice President or above of the Company as another possible triggering event for the recoupment of certain compensation, including through the cancellation of, or reimbursement of amounts received with respect to, certain equity awards. The maximum amount of compensation that may be subject to the recoupment policy in this case is an amount equivalent to up to three years of a covered executive’s annual incentive compensation, and such compensation is generally at risk for a period of three years from the date of such misconduct.

The Company expects to review and modify the clawback policy as necessary to reflect the final New York Stock Exchange listing rules adopted to implement the compensation recovery requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank").



dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
52


Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee of the Board is currently composed of four independent directors. The Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s compensation program on behalf of the Board. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management onlythe Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this Proxy Statement.
Based on matters for whichthe Compensation Committee’s review and discussion with management, the Compensation Committee provides direction and is responsible. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Compensia pursuantrecommended to the rules of the SEC and NYSE and concludedBoard that Compensia's work for the Compensation Committee does not raise any conflicts of interest. The Compensation Committee periodically seeks input from Compensia on a range of external market factors, including evolving compensation trends, appropriate peer companiesDiscussion and market survey data. Compensia also provides general observations onAnalysis be included in the Company's compensation program, but it does not determine or recommend the amount or form of compensationCompany’s Proxy Statement for the NEOs.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      49


Tablethe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

53





Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program


Market Competitiveness

We evaluate the overall competitiveness of our executives' total direct compensation each year in order to assist in executive retention. In 2014 and 2015, the Compensation Committee retained Compensia to perform a comprehensive market analysis of our executive compensation programs and pay levels and based upon the recommendation of Compensia adopted a revised comparator peer group in late 2014 to be used to evaluate 2014 bonus payouts and 2015 compensation decisions.

Compensia provided the Compensation Committee with an analysis of comparative market data on the cash, stock-based compensation and total compensation for senior executives at the companies within our comparator peer group. In addition to public executive compensation data, the Compensation Committee reviewed the compensation practices of our comparator peer group for purposes of benchmarking and understanding the general compensation practices of our peers. Our comparator peer group consists of the following companies, which are all in the health care services, diagnostics, managed care and solutions markets:

Company1




1-Year
TSR2






3-Year
Compound
Annual
TSR2




Market
Capitalization
(in millions)2



Net Income
for Last 4
Quarters
(in millions)3




Revenue for
Last 4
Quarters
(in millions)3




Abbott Laboratories4

 -13.6% 5.9% $55,740 $4,423 $20,405 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Aetna4

  11.9%  29.7% $35,593 $2,390 $60,227 

Anthem4

 -1.7% 28.4% $34,089 $2,560 $79,156 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Baxter International4

  -3.1%  2.0% $20,044 $968 $9,968 

Centene Corp.

 13.7% 42.2% $7,468 $355 $22,760 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Community Health Systems, Inc.

  -54.4%  -17.6% $2,422 $158 $19,437 

HCA Holdings, Inc.

 -1.7% 22.7% $27,744 $2,129 $39,678 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

  -2.1%  7.9% $11,381 $437 $8,680 

Molina Healthcare, Inc.

 7.9% 24.1% $3,075 $143 $14,178 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Quest Diagnostics Incorporated

  -5.6%  6.5% $9,391 $709 $7,493 

Tenet Healthcare, Inc.

 -35.9% -11.3% $2,671 $(140)$18,634 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Thermo Fisher Scientific4

  6.0%  23.0% $52,775 $1,975 $16,965 

Universal Health Services, Inc.

 10.2% 26.1% $11,072 $681 $9,042 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

WellCare Health Plans4

  4.3%  14.4% $3,352 $119 $13,890 

Summary Statistics:

   ���        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

75th Percentile

  7.4%  25.6% $32,503 $2,091 $22,171 

50th Percentile

 -1.7% 18.6% $11,227 $695 $17,800 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

25th Percentile

  -5.0%  6.0% $4,381 $207 $10,949 

DaVita

 -10.6% 5.2% $14,079 $270 $13,782 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

DaVita Percentage Rank

  18%  22% 56%27%31%
1
The Company's peer group was compiled by Compensia and approved by the Compensation Committee. The following companies were deleted from the Company's 2014 peer group in late 2015 due to differences in size and/or business model or the peer group company ceasing to be an independent publicly-traded company: Catamaran, Health Net, HealthSouth, Humana, MEDNAX and Omnicare. These companies, however, were included in the Company's peer group at the beginning of the year to evaluate initial 2015 compensation decisions.
2
Data as of January 29, 2016.
3
Financial data generally publicly available as of January 29, 2016.
4
Added to the Company's comparator peer group in late 2015.

Our 2015 comparator peer group includes a diverse representation of various health care services, diagnostics, managed care, and solutions markets because we compete in these broad industry groups for executive talent. The Compensation Committee, in conjunction with Compensia, reviews the composition of

this group annually and makes adjustments to the composition of the group as it deems appropriate in order to provide a fairly consistent measure for comparing executive compensation. We believe that our comparator peer companies are comparable to us in their size, as measured by market capitalization, net

50


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis



income and revenues. Compensation paid by this comparator peer group is representative of the compensation we believe is required to attract, retain and motivate our executive talent.

The Compensation Committee considered the comparator peer group together with market data information analysis from Compensia and other factors, in determining 2015 base salary amounts and LTI program awards granted in April and June 2015, respectively. The comparator peer group together with market data and analysis from Compensia and other factors were considered by the Compensation Committee in determining 2016 base salary amounts and 2015 performance bonuses, and will be used in determining LTI program awards expected to be granted in 2016.

The Compensation Committee considered Compensia's analysis (based on publicly disclosed compensation practices) of the compensation of executives serving in similar positions at comparable companies to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices in our industry. The analysis provided by Compensia was used to provide context for the compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee, but the Compensation Committee's decisions were not directly related to or otherwise based upon the comparative data. Instead, the Compensation Committee used this comparative data as one of many factors considered to set the compensation for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee also used the analysis as a tool to assess how well the Company is implementing its core compensation objective of awarding compensation weighted heavily in favor of variable compensation tied to performance.

In approving executive compensation, the Compensation Committee considered the Company's market capitalization, which is at the 56th percentile of our

comparator peer group, and the Company's size, in terms of net income and revenue, which is at the 27th and 31st percentiles, respectively, of our comparator peer group. The Compensation Committee also considered each NEO's roles and responsibilities within the Company, individual performance, Company performance and internal pay equity in addition to the results of the competitive pay analysis.

Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Compensia, with respect to our executive compensation policies and practices, and Willis Towers Watson, with respect to the non-executive compensation policies and practices, conducted a reviewreviews of the Company'sCompany’s material compensation policies and practices applicable to its employees, including its executive officers.teammates. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee concluded that these policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The key features of the executive compensation program that support this conclusion include:

a balance between cash and equity compensation;
a balance between short-term and long-term performance focus;
short-term incentive opportunities are capped and are not linked solely to any one specific goal;
severance payments are limited to 3x base salary and target bonus;
equity awards havewith meaningful vesting requirements and, in some cases, holding requirements;
a clawback policy that permits the Board to recover annual bonuses and longer-term cash incentive and equity-based compensation from executive officers and members of the Board;
stockBoard under certain circumstances;
share ownership guidelines; and
significant independent Compensation Committee oversight.oversight; and

Compensation Policies and Practices

We are committed to strong governance standards with respect to our compensation program, proceduresno hedging transactions and practices. We believe that the following aspects of our compensation program are indicative of this commitment.

Management Share Ownership Policy

We have a share ownership policy that applies to members of our management team at the executive level. The management share ownership policy is similar to our share ownership policy that applies to all non-employee membersrestricted pledging transactions involving equity securities of the Board described on

page 15 of this Proxy Statement. The purpose of the policy is to ensure that our executive officers accumulate a meaningful ownership stake in the Company over time by retaining a specified financial interest in our common stock. Both shares owned directlyexecutives and shares underlying vested but unexercised stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, and stock options are included in

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      51


Table of Contents





the determination of whether the share ownership guidelines are met. The total net realizable share value retained must have a current market value of not less than the lower of 25% of the total equity award value in excess of $100,000 realized to date by the executive (since promotion to Vice President); or a specific multiple of the executive's base salary. The salary multiple requirement for our current NEOs is 5.0 for Mr. Thiry, and 3.0 for Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Kogod, and Mr. Staffieri. Mr. Hilger is not subject to the requirements under this policy because he is serving as our chief financial officer on an interim basis. As of December 31, 2015, all of the NEOs met or exceeded the guidelines under our share ownership policy.

Policy Regarding Clawback of Bonuses and Incentive Compensation

In 2010, the Board adopted a clawback policy that permits the Board to recover annual bonuses and longer-term incentive and equity-based compensation from executive officers and non-employee members of the Board whose fraud or intentional misconduct was a significant contributing factor to the Company having to restate all or a portion of its financial statements. In December 2014, the policy was further amended to add significant misconduct as another possible clawback triggering event, in accordance with the executive financial compensation recoupment requirements under the Corporate Integrity Agreement.

This new provision applies to all senior vice presidents and above of the Company's domestic dialysis business, in addition to the executive officers and non-employee members of the Board. The clawback policy allows for the recovery of any bonus or incentive compensation paid to those executive officers or directors, the cancellation of restricted or deferred stock awards and outstanding stock awards granted to those executive officers or directors, and the reimbursement of any gains realized that are attributable to such awards to the fullest extent permitted by law. The policy allows for the foregoing actions to the extent that the amount of incentive compensation was calculated based upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently reduced due to a restatement; the executive officer or director engaged in any fraud or intentional misconduct that was a significant contributing factor to the Company having to restate its financial statements; where the amount of the bonus or incentive compensation that would have been awarded to the officer had the financial results been properly reported would have been lower than the amount actually awarded; and, where the amount of the bonus or incentive compensation that was awarded to the officer would not have been awarded had any significant misconduct been known. The Company will not seek to recover bonuses or incentive or equity-based compensation paid or vested more than three years prior to the date the applicable restatement is disclosed or the significant misconduct is discovered.


Tax

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Accounting Considerations

Proxy Statemen
t
54

Deduction Limit

When reviewing



Executive Compensation
2022 Summary Compensation Table
The following table contains compensation matters,information for our NEOs for the Compensation Committee considers the anticipated tax treatment of various paymentsfiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and benefits to the Company and, when relevant, to its executives. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction 2020.
Name and Principal PositionYear
Salary1
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
2
($)
Option
Awards3
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
4
($)
All Other
Compensation
5
($)
Total
($)
Javier J. Rodriguez
Chief Executive
Officer
20221,200,000 — — — 1,173,805 610,776 2,984,581 
20211,200,000 — — — 1,743,799 354,640 3,298,439 
20201,246,154 — — 68,496,958 3,282,480 406,773 73,432,365 
Joel Ackerman
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
2022700,000 — 1,985,362 1,524,421 489,085 3,840 4,702,708 
2021700,000 — 1,893,770 1,416,602 726,583 3,865 4,740,820 
2020726,923 — 1,634,521 1,590,167 1,283,325 3,840 5,238,776 
Michael D. Staffieri
Chief Operating Officer, DaVita Kidney Care
2022800,000 — 2,978,226 2,286,561 684,720 169,176 6,918,683 
2021800,000 — 2,840,778 2,124,886 1,017,216 157,805 6,940,685 
2020796,154 — 2,451,795 2,385,261 1,954,155 132,118 7,719,483 
Kathleen A. Waters
Chief Legal and Public Affairs Officer
2022650,000 — 1,896,006 558,922 423,874 3,840 3,532,642 
2021642,308 — 1,828,766 519,415 629,705 3,840 3,624,034 
2020633,462 — 2,189,681 530,056 859,300 3,840 4,216,339 
James O. Hearty
Chief Compliance Officer
2022500,000 — 689,414 203,219 264,446 3,840 1,660,919 
2021500,000 — 664,963 188,870 387,511 4,068 1,745,412 
2020519,231 — 556,353 185,529 547,080 3,840 1,812,033 
1The2020 salary earned for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the chief executive officer and the three other most highly compensated NEOs employed at the end of the year (othereach NEO is higher than the chief financial officer), such executives are referredNEO's base salary amount due to as "covered employees."

Certain compensation is specifically exempt from the deduction limit to the extent that it is "performance-based" as defined in Section 162(m). While the Compensation Committee recognizes the desirability of preserving and strives to maintain the deductibility of

payments made to the NEOs, the Compensation Committee believes that it must maintain flexibility in its approach in order to structure a program that it believes to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining the Company's key executives.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, which requires the Company to recognize compensation expense for share-based payments (including SSARs, RSUs, PSUs and other forms of equity compensation). FASB ASC Topic 718 is taken into account by the Compensation Committee in determining to issue various types of equity awards, considering the natural economic exchange ratios implied by their approximate respective fair values.

52


Table of Contents

  Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board is currently composed of four independent directors. The Compensation Committee oversees the Company's compensation program on behalf of the Board. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this Proxy Statement with management.

Based on the Compensation Committee's review and discussion with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included27 pay periods in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Company's 2016 annual meeting of stockholdersyear. For comparative purposes, 2022 and the Company's annual report on Form 10-K.

2021 each had 26 pay periods.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Pamela M. Arway, Chair
Paul J. Diaz
Peter T. Grauer
Roger J. Valine

The information contained above under the caption "Compensation Committee Report" will not be considered "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC, nor will that information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a filing.

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      53


Table of Contents

  Executive Compensation

2015 Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position

Year
Salary
($)


Bonus1
($)


Stock Awards2
($)


Option Awards3
($)


Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation4
($)





All Other
Compensation5
($)



Total
($)
 
Kent J. Thiry 2015 1,200,000  3,720,140 3,422,476 2,225,186 471,020 11,038,822 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Chairman of the Board of Directors, 2014 1,200,000  4,905,159 4,558,730 2,610,000 517,134 13,791,023 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer, HealthCare Partners 2013 1,148,077   12,272,760 3,000,000 678,420 17,099,257 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Javier J. Rodriguez  2015 800,000  967,239 889,850 9,013,661 164,816 11,835,566 
Chief Executive  2014 800,000  1,376,459 1,279,239 8,142,500 151,140 11,749,338 
Officer, Kidney Care  2013 765,385   3,780,980 1,600,000 13,245 6,159,610 
Michael D. Staffieri 2015 583,270 3,415 278,994 770,053 4,859,672 64,719 6,560,123 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Chief Operating Officer, Kidney Care 2014 515,385 38,363 450,495 418,657 3,392,500 29,981 4,845,381 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Dennis L. Kogod  2015 800,000    5,150,000 120,441 6,070,441 
President,  2014 800,000 200,000 667,422 1,860,796 6,142,500 104,792 9,775,510 
HealthCare Partners and Chief Executive Officer, International  2013 800,000   2,970,770 1,100,000 90,042 4,960,812 
James K. Hilger 2015 366,635 195,000 125,059 114,082 309,375 360 1,110,511 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Interim Chief Financial Officer, 2014 350,000 225,000 124,953 116,302 1,092,500 336 1,909,091 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
and Chief Accounting Officer 2013 350,000 300,000  189,049  544 839,593 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Garry E. Menzel  2015 188,308     510,204 698,512 
Former Chief Financial Officer  2014 510,000 44,548    480 555,028 
   2013 147,115 66,484  1,624,716  45 1,838,360 
1
2The amounts reported in this column for 2015 represent annual performance bonuses for non-STIP participants, namely Mr. Hilger, discretionary bonuses, including relocation bonuses, earned with respect to 2015. The cash component of our 2015 short-term incentive program (the "2015 STI program") under the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan is included in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column.
2
The amounts shown in this column reflect restrictedRSU and performance stock unitPSU awards and represent the aggregate grant date fair value of all such awards granted to the executiveNEO during the year as estimated by the Company in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation ("FASB ASC Topic 718.718"). In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts included in the Stock Awards column for the performance stock unit2022 PSU awards granted during 2015 are calculated based on the most probable outcome of the performance conditions for such awards on the grant date. If the most probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date had been maximum performance, then the grant date fair value of thesuch PSUs would have been as follows: Mr. ThiryAckerman$5,137,787; Mr. Rodriguez — $1,191,700; and$3,970,725; Mr. Staffieri — $343,750.$5,956,453; Ms. Waters — $2,912,059; and Mr. Hearty — $1,058,886. See Note 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on2022 Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating these amounts pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.
3
The amounts shownreported in this column reflect SSAR awards and represent the aggregate grant date fair value of all suchSSAR awards granted to the executiveNEOs during the year as estimated by the Company in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report onthe 2022 Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating these amounts pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.
4
For 2013,The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award awarded to Mr. Rodriguez in 2019 and approved by stockholders in 2020, with a grant date fair value (on January 23, 2020 (the "Stockholder Approval Date")) of $68,496,958, represents the Black-Scholes value of the entire grant on the Stockholder Approval Date. Since the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award is intended to replace five years of grants for the CEO, the annualized grant equivalent value would be $13,699,392, resulting in a total compensation for 2020, on an annualized basis, of $18,634,799. This annualized total compensation amount is provided for additional context to illustrate how the Compensation Committee viewed the grant and is not intended to be a substitute for the amount reported in the 'Total' column above.
4 The amounts shown in this column constitute amounts earned under the Company's expired employee incentive program (EIP). For 2014 and 2015, the amounts shownreported in this column represent amounts earned for performance periods ending in 2014 and 2015,2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. For 2015, these amounts include the 2015 STI program and 2013 Cash LTI program. In early 2016, Messrs. Rodriguez, Staffieri, Kogod and Hilger received payouts under the 2013 long-term cash-based performance awards and the 2015 Supplemental STI program which was put in place in early 2015 to make their incentive award opportunity tied to 2015 operating results in the dialysis and related lab services operating segment comparable to that of other non-NEO executives, while maintaining the additional discipline of negative discretion by the Compensation Committee, all granted under the Company's 2011 Incentive Award Plan. As a result of these two performance-based cash awards, Mr. Rodriguez earned $7,313,661 for performance at the 221.6% payout level, Mr. Kogod earned $4,950,000 for performance at the 150% payout level as the Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion to reduce the payout, Mr. Staffieri earned $3,839,672 for

54


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation



    performance at the 221.6% payout level, all as a result of adjusted operating income achieved for the dialysis and related lab services operating segment of $1,857 million for fiscal year 2015 compared to a target of $1,669 million at the 100% payout level.

Name


2015 STI Program
2015 Supplemental STI Program
2013 Cash LTI Program
Total Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
 

Kent J. Thiry

 $2,225,186   $2,225,186 

Javier J. Rodriguez

 $1,700,000 $2,363,661 $4,950,000 $9,013,661 
​ ​ ​ ​ 

Michael D. Staffieri

 $1,020,000 $1,240,922 $2,598,750 $4,859,672 
​ ​ ​ ​ 

Dennis L. Kogod

 $200,000  $4,950,000 $5,150,000 
​ ​ ​ ​ 

James K. Hilger

   $309,375 $309,375 
​ ​ ​ ​ 

Dr. Garry E. Menzel

     

The awards are reported for the year with respect to which they were earned, regardless of when the award iswas granted or paid. Please see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Short-Term Incentive Program (STI Program)For 2020 through 2022, these amounts represent payouts with respect to the STI Programs for 2015" in this Proxy Statement for a discussion of the performance criteria under the 2015 STI program.
those respective years.
5
Amounts included The amounts reported in this column are set forth by category below. The amounts disclosed, otherOther than the use of a fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft, the amounts disclosed are the actual or share of actual costs to the Company of providing these benefits. Because aWith respect to the personal use of fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft, is used primarily for business purposes, we do not include inthe incremental cost the fixed costs that do not change based on usage. The incremental cost to us of personal use of a fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft, including use for commuting,cost is calculated based on the variable operating costs related to the operation of the aircraft, including fuel costs and landing fees, trip-related repairs and maintenance, catering and other miscellaneous variable costs. Fixedcosts, and excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage as the fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft is used primarily for business purposes. Occasionally, a spouse or other guest may accompany NEOs on corporate aircraft when the aircraft is already scheduled for business purposes and can accommodate additional passengers and, in such instances, the value of such spouse or guest usage is included in such NEO's personal income in accordance with applicable tax regulations. In those cases, there is no aggregate incremental cost to the Company and, as pilot salaries, training, utilities, depreciation, management fees, taxes and general repairs and maintenance are excluded.a result, no amount is reflected in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table. The value of the personal use of a fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft by our NEOs is included in their personal income in accordance with
55

Executive Compensation
applicable tax regulations.

Name



Year
Aircraft
Usage
*
($)



Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)




Termination
Benefits
($)



Total All Other
Compensation
($)
 

Kent J. Thiry

 2015 $469,867 $1,153  $471,020 

Javier J. Rodriguez

  2015 $164,336 $480  $164,816 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Michael D. Staffieri

 2015 $64,239 $480  $64,719 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Dennis L. Kogod

  2015 $119,879 $562  $120,441 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

James K. Hilger

 2015  $360  $360 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Dr. Garry E. Menzel

  2015  $204 $510,000 $510,204 
    *
    For purposes Amounts reported in the "Other Personal Benefits" column below for Messrs. Rodriguez and Staffieri are solely for use of calculatingfractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft, except the incremental costsamount reflected for Mr. Rodriguez also includes $828 attributable to the Company of each NEO'sgifts and personal use of Company aircraft, the total cost of the flight is allocated to personal use based upon the relative ratio of personal mileage to total mileage. Costs for fuel, ground costs, catering costs, landing fees, domestic passenger fees and federal excise tax charges are also included, if applicable.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      55


Table of Contents

sporting event tickets.
NameYearOther Personal Benefits
($)
Life Insurance Premiums
($)
Company Contribution
to Defined Contribution Plan
($)
Total All Other
Compensation
($)
Javier J. Rodriguez2022$606,600 $576 $3,600 $610,776 
Joel Ackerman2022$— $240 $3,600 $3,840 
Michael D. Staffieri2022$165,240 $336 $3,600 $169,176 
Kathleen A. Waters2022$— $240 $3,600 $3,840 
James O. Hearty2022$— $240 $3,600 $3,840 




dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
56


Executive Compensation
2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table sets forth information concerning plan-based awards made to each of the NEOs under the Company's equity compensation plans during 2015.

2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

2022.
                                              

 

 

    Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards4
              

 

Name




Grant
Date1


 

Threshold
($)




Target
($)




Maximum
($)


  

Threshold
(#)




Target
(#)




Maximum
(#)


 







All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)















All Other
Options
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)5













Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)












Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
($)6






 

 

 1   2,225,186 3,600,000            
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

Kent J. Thiry

 6/2/2015       36,243 48,323 65,236     3,720,140  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

 6/2/2015            179,041 $83.82 3,422,476  

    1      1,700,000  2,000,000                      

    2      2,363,661  8,250,000                      

 

Javier J. Rodriguez

  6/2/20153    2,275,000  4,550,000  10,000,000                      

    6/2/2015              9,424  12,564  15,077          967,239  

    6/2/2015                        46,551  $83.82  889,850  

 

 1   1,020,000 1,200,000            
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

 2   1,240,922 4,331,250            
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

Michael D. Staffieri

 6/2/20153  1,312,500 2,625,000 10,000,000            
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

 6/2/2015       2,719 3,624 4,349     278,994  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

 6/2/2015            40,284 $83.82 770,053  

 

Dennis L. Kogod7

  1      200,000  2,000,000                      

    2        8,250,000                      

 

 6/2/20153  125,000 250,000 1,000,000            
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

James K. Hilger

 6/2/2015           1,492   125,059  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

 6/2/2015            5,968 $83.82 114,082  

 Dr. Garry E. Menzel7                                
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 
NameGrant
Date
Approval DateThreshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)
All Other Options Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)6
Javier J. Rodriguez— — $— $1,800,000 $3,600,000 — — — — — — $— 
Joel Ackerman— — $— $750,000 $1,500,000 — — — — — — $— 
3/15/20223/8/2022$— $— $— 8,136 16,270 32,540 — — — $1,985,362 
3/15/20223/8/2022$— $— $— — — — — 43,388 $110.63 $1,524,421 
Michael D. Staffieri— — $— $1,050,000 $2,100,000 — — — — — — $— 
3/15/20223/8/20222$— $— $— 12,204 24,406 48,812 — — — $2,978,226 
3/15/20223/8/20223$— $— $— — — — — 65,080 $110.63 $2,286,561 
Kathleen A. Waters— — 1$— $650,000 $1,300,000 — — — — — — $— 
3/15/20223/8/20222$— $— $— 5,967 11,932 23,864 — — — $1,456,030 
3/15/20223/8/20224$— $— $— — — — 3,977 — — $439,976 
3/15/20223/8/20223$— $— $— — — — — 15,908 $110.63 $558,922 
— 5$— $1,000,000 $— — — — — — — $— 
James O. Hearty— — 1$— $400,000 $800,000 — — — — — — $— 
3/15/20223/8/20222$— $— $— 2,170 4,339 8,678 — — — $529,443 
3/15/20223/8/20224$— $— $— — — — 1,446 — — $159,971 
3/15/20223/8/20223$— $— $— — — — — 5,784 $110.63 $203,219 
1
Represents applicable amounts for our 2015 short-term incentive program (20152022 STI program)Program under the Company's 2011DaVita Inc. 2020 Incentive Award Plan.Plan (the "2020 Plan"). The amount in the "Maximum"“Maximum” column represents the maximum amount the executiveNEO was eligible to earn under the 20152022 STI Program if all performance criteria were achieved at their highest payout level. Since 2015 is now complete, theThe amount in the "Target"“Target” column represents the payout amountsamount the NEO was eligible to earn under the 2022 STI Program if all performance criteria were achieved at their target payout level.
2This number represents PSUs awarded under the 2015 STI program, considering both the formulaic criteria and any further negative discretion the Committee applied thereunder. Since the Committee may use discretion to reduce amounts awarded to zero, there are no fixed threshold amounts under the 2015 STI Program. Accordingly this table reflects a zero amount in the "Threshold" column.
2
Represents applicable amounts for our 2015 Supplemental STI Program as described in further detail beginning on page 42.
3
Represents long-term cash-based performance awards granted in June 2015 (2015 cash LTI program awards) under the Company's 2011 Incentive Award Plan. For a description of these 2015 cash LTIP awards, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2015" in this Proxy Statement.
4
This number represents performance stock unit awards awarded under the Company's 2011 Incentive Award2020 Plan. The PSU awards above vest 50% each on June 2, 2018March 15, 2025 and June 2, 2019,March 15, 2026, subject to the NEO'sNEO’s continued employmentemployment and the achievement of the underlying performance conditions. For a description of the PSUs, see "Compensationthe subsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of CompensationWhat We Pay and Why — Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2015 — Equity Awards — Performance Stock Units"2022” in this Proxy Statement.
5
3This number represents SSARs awarded under the Company's 2011 Incentive Award2020 Plan. The SSARs vest 50% each in the thirdon March 15, 2025 and fourth years from the date of grant,March 15, 2026, subject to the NEO's continued employment. For a description of the SSARs, see "Compensationthe subsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of CompensationWhat We Pay and Why — Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2015 — Equity Awards — Stock-settled Stock Appreciation Rights"2022” in this Proxy Statement.
4This number represents RSUs granted under the 2020 Plan. The RSUs vest 50% each on March 15, 2025 and March 15, 2026, subject to the NEO's continued employment. For a description of the RSUs, see the subsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — What We Pay and Why — Long-Term Incentive Program for 2022” in this Proxy Statement.
5Represents the Waters Performance Cash Award granted to Ms. Waters under the 2020 Plan that will vest upon the achievement on or before December 31, 2023 of certain public policy-related performance goals. For a description of this cash LTI award, see the subsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — What We Pay and Why — Long-Term Incentive Program for 2022 — Waters Performance Cash Award” in this Proxy Statement.
6
The amounts for SSARs, RSUs and performance stock unit awards arePSUs represent the aggregateaggregate grant date fair values of each award determined pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718 and, in the case of the performance stock unit awards,PSUs, are based upon the probable outcome of the applicable performance conditions on the grant date. All SSARs granted have a five-year term. See Note 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on2022 Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating grant date fair value pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.
7
Mr. Kogod received no LTI program awards during the year ended December 31, 2015 and Dr. Menzel received no grants of plan-based awards for the year ended December 31, 2015.

56

57


Executive Compensation



The following table sets forth information concerning outstanding SSARs and unvested stock awards held by each of the NEOs atas of December 31, 2015.

2015 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

2022.
                                      
       Option Awards Stock Awards
  Name


Grant
Date


 





Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable












Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable










Option
Exercise
Price
($)







Option
Expiration
Date



  






Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have
Not Vested
(#)













Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested1
($)
















Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other
Rights that
Have Not
Vested
(#)2




















Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
that Have Not
Vested
($)1










 
   12/18/2012  500,000 500,0004$55.34 12/18/2017        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  3/20/2013   900,0003$59.52 3/20/2018        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  4/24/2014   282,3393$69.38 4/24/2019        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
 Kent J. Thiry 6/2/2015   179,041 83.82 6/2/2020        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  12/18/2012        72,06455,023,5815   
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  4/24/2014          63,02224,393,264  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  6/2/2015          48,32383,368,596  
     4/13/2011    216,6673   $43.35  4/13/2016              
     12/8/2011    80,0006 6 $36.96  12/8/2016              
     12/18/2012    56,2504 56,2504 $55.34  12/18/2017              
     3/19/2013      280,0003 $58.94  3/19/2018              
  Javier J. Rodriguez  4/24/2014      79,2283 $69.38  4/24/2019              
     6/2/2015      46,5513 $83.82  6/2/2020              
     12/18/2012                14,0635 980,3325     
     12/18/2012                22,4035 1,561,7135     
     4/24/2014                    17,6852 1,232,821  
     6/2/2015                    12,5648 875,836  
  3/29/2011  40,0003 $41.51 3/29/2016        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  8/9/2011  36,66873,3327$37.19 8/9/2016        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  12/18/2012  12,600312,6003$55.34 12/18/2017        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  3/19/2013   50,8003$58.94 3/19/2018        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
 Michael D. Staffieri 4/24/2014   25,9293$69.38 4/24/2019        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  6/2/2015   40,2843$83.82 6/2/2020        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  12/18/2012        1,350594,1095   
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  12/18/2012        3,5845249,8415   
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  4/24/2014          5,7882403,481  
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  6/2/2015          3,6248252,629  
     4/13/2011    250,0003   $43.35  4/13/2016              
     12/18/2012    56,2504 56,2504 $55.34  12/18/2017              
  Dennis L. Kogod  3/19/2013      220,0003 $58.94  3/19/2018              
     4/24/2014      115,2463 $69.38  4/24/2019              
     12/18/2012                36,4665 2,542,0455     
     4/24/2014                    8,5752 597,763  
  12/18/2012  20,000420,0004$55.34 12/18/2017        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  3/19/2013   14,0003$58.94 3/19/2018        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  4/24/2014   7,2033$69.38 4/24/2019        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
 James K. Hilger 6/2/2015   5,9683$83.82 6/2/2020        
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  12/18/2012        3,9835277,6555   
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  4/24/2014        1,8019125,5489   
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  6/2/2015        1,49210104,00710   
  Dr. Garry E. Menzel
No Awards Outstanding
at 12/31/2015
                        
 
 Option Awards
Stock Awards
NameGrant
Date
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) ExercisableNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) UnexercisableOption Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration DateNumber of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested1 ($)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights that Have Not Vested (#)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout Value of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
that Have Not
Vested
1 ($)
Javier J. Rodriguez5/15/201888,213 — $66.29 5/15/2023— — — — 
1/23/20201,250,000 21,250,000 2$67.80 11/4/2024— — — — 
5/15/2019— — — — 34,847 5$2,602,025 — — 
5/15/2019— — — — 52,270 6$3,903,001 8,711 8$650,450 
Joel Ackerman5/15/201856,306 — $66.29 5/15/2023— — — — 
6/20/201955,000 355,000 3$52.41 6/20/2024— — — — 
3/15/2020— 78,999 3$75.95 3/15/2025— — — — 
3/15/2021— 44,065 3$108.93 3/15/2026— — — — 
3/15/2022— 43,388 3$110.63 3/15/2027— — — — 
5/15/2019— — — — 14,935 5$1,115,196 — — 
5/15/2019— — — — 22,400 6$1,672,608 3,733 8$278,743 
3/15/2020— — — — 8,343 7$622,972 8,640 9$645,149 
3/15/2021— — — — — — 11,361 10$848,326 
3/15/2022— — — — — — 16,270 11$1,214,881 
Michael D. Staffieri5/15/2018243,994 — $66.29 5/15/2023— — — — 
6/20/2019100,000 4100,000 4$52.41 6/20/2024— — — — 
3/15/2020— 118,499 3$75.95 3/15/2025— — — — 
3/15/2021— 66,097 3$108.93 3/15/2026— — — — 
3/15/2022— 65,080 3$110.63 3/15/2027— — — — 
5/15/2019— — — — 39,825 5$2,973,733 — — 
3/15/2020— — — — 12,514 7$934,420 12,961 9$967,798 
3/15/2021— — — — — — 17,042 10$1,272,526 
3/15/2022— — — — — — 24,406 11$1,822,396 
Kathleen A. Waters5/15/201833,784 — $66.29 5/15/2023— — — — 
6/20/201940,000 340,000 3$52.41 6/20/2024— — — — 
3/15/2020— 26,333 3$75.95 3/15/2025— — — — 
3/15/2021— 16,157 3$108.93 3/15/2026— — — — 
3/15/2022— 15,908 3$110.63 3/15/2027— — — — 
5/15/2019— — — — 7,468 5$557,636 — — 
5/15/2019— — — — 11,200 6$836,304 1,866 8$139,334 
3/15/2020— — — — 6,583 5$491,553 — — 
3/15/2020— — — — 5,562 7$415,315 5,760 9$430,099 
3/15/2021— — — — 4,039 5$301,592 — — 
3/15/2021— — — — — — 8,332 10$622,150 
3/15/2022— — — — 3,977 5$296,963 — — 
3/15/2022— — — — — — 11,932 11$890,962 
James O. Hearty5/15/201826,276 — $66.29 5/15/2023— — — — 
6/20/201925,000 425,000 4$52.41 6/20/2024— — — — 
3/15/2020— 9,217 3$75.95 3/15/2025— — — — 
3/15/2021— 5,875 3$108.93 3/15/2026— — — — 
3/15/2022— 5,784 3$110.63 3/15/2027— — — — 
5/15/2019— — — — 3,485 5$260,225 — — 
5/15/2019— — — — 5,226 6$390,225 871 8$65,038 
3/15/2020— — — — 2,304 5$172,040 — — 
3/15/2020— — — — 1,946 7$145,308 2,016 9$150,535 
3/15/2021— — — — 1,469 5$109,690 — — 
3/15/2021— — — — — — 3,030 10$226,250 
3/15/2022— — — — 1,446 5$107,973 — — 
3/15/2022— — — — — — 4,339 11$323,993 
1
The market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested reflects the $69.71$74.67 per share closing price of our common stockCommon Stock on December 31, 2015,30, 2022, the last trading day of the year, as reported by the NYSE.
2
These PSUsSSARs vest 50% each on May 15, 2017November 4, 2022 and May 15, 2018, subject to achievement of the performance conditions for PSUs. The amounts listed here are the target number of PSUs awarded.
November 4, 2023.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      57


Table of Contents





3
These SSARs vest 50% each on the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
4
These remaining SSARs vest 50% each on April 1, 2015the second and 50% on April 1, 2016.
fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
5
These remaining RSUs vest 50% on May 15, 2015 and 50% on May 15, 2016.
6
These SSARs vest 33%each on the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
7
6These SSARsPSUs vest 50%100% on May 15, 2023.
7These PSUs vested 100% on March 15, 2023.
8These PSUs vest 100% on May 15, 2023. The amounts listed here reflect the second anniversaryshares that may be earned upon achievement of the target Relative TSR performance criterion.

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
58


9These PSUs vest 28.6% on March 15, 2023 and 8.33% every three months thereafter.
8
These performance stock units vest 50% each71.4% on June 2, 2018 and June 2, 2019,March 15, 2024, subject to the achievement of the performance conditions for the PSUs. The amounts listed here arereflect the shares that may be earned upon achievement of the threshold Adjusted Earnings per Share performance criterion and target Relative TSR performance criteria.
10These PSUs vest 36.4% on March 15, 2024 and 63.6% on March 15, 2025, subject to the achievement of the performance conditions for the PSUs. The amounts listed here reflect the shares that may be earned upon achievement of the threshold 2023 Adjusted Earnings per Share performance criterion, target 2024 Adjusted Earnings per Share performance criterion and threshold for Relative TSR performance criteria.
11These PSUs vest 50% on March 15, 2025 and 50% on March 15, 2026, subject to achievement of the performance conditions for the PSUs. The amounts listed here reflect the shares that may be earned upon achievement of the target number of shares awarded.
9
These RSUs vest 50% each on May 15, 2017performance criteria.

59


2022Option Exercises and May 15, 2018.
10
These RSUs vest 50% each on June 2, 2018 and June 2, 2019.
Stock Vested Table

58


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation



The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of stockSSARs (which are treated as options and SSARsfor this table) and the vesting of stock awards held by each of the NEOs during 2015.

2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

2022.
                   

   Option Awards

Stock Awards

 

 

 

                

 

Name


 Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)





Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)1




    Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)





Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)2




 

 

Kent J. Thiry

  1,000,000 $33,919,985   72,064 $5,871,775  

 

Javier J. Rodriguez

   48,000 $1,980,165     36,466 $2,972,001  

 

Michael D. Staffieri

  217,000 $8,657,189   4,934 $402,022  

 

Dennis L. Kogod

         36,466 $2,971,250  

 

James K. Hilger

  17,500 $679,299   3,983 $324,535  

 

Dr. Garry E. Menzel

            
 
 Option Awards
Stock Awards
NameNumber of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)
Value Realized on Exercise ($)1
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)
Value Realized on Vesting ($)2
Javier J. Rodriguez25,798 $2,494,759 178,037 $17,812,602 
Joel Ackerman— $— 67,388 $6,742,169 
Michael D. Staffieri— $— 39,825 $3,984,491 
Kathleen A. Waters6,757 $653,403 44,003 $4,501,171 
James O. Hearty922 $101,320 10,109 $1,011,405 
1
Value realized on exercise is determined by subtracting the exercise or base price from the marketclosing stock price of our common stock at exercise, as reported by the NYSE, and multiplying the remainder by the number of shares exercised.
2
Value realized on vesting is determined by multiplying the number of shares underlying RSUs or PSUs by the closing stock price for our common stock on the date of vesting, as reported by the NYSE.

No Pension Benefits

The Company does not havesponsor or maintain a defined benefit pension plan in which any employee, including the NEOs, can participate to receivethat provides for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement.

retirement for any teammate, including the NEOs.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company'sCompany’s Deferred Compensation Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

2015plan.

2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Table

 

Name






Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)








Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)








Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)1








Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)








Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)




 

 

Kent J. Thiry
Deferred Compensation Plan


 
$1,928,0772 (32,977) $10,397,1283 

 

Javier J. Rodriguez
Voluntary Deferral Plan

      (36,520)   $573,297  

 

Michael D. Staffieri

       

 

Dennis L. Kogod
Executive Retirement Plan

      $14,562    $326,796  

 

James K. Hilger

       
Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)1,2
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
Aggregate Earnings in
Last FY
($)3
Aggregate Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
Javier J. Rodriguez— — ($237,739)— $1,032,356 
Joel Ackerman— — ($357,943)— $1,517,280 
Michael D. Staffieri4
— — — — — 
Kathleen A. Waters$127,162 — ($174,130)— $1,262,781 
James O. Hearty4
— — — — — 
1
These amounts are reported in the “Salary” and "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" columns in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table.
2Ms. Waters deferred $314,853 and $434,112 in 2021 and 2020, respectively.
3None of the earnings in this column are included in the 20152022 Summary Compensation Table because they are not preferential or above market.
2
This amount is reported in the "Salary" column in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table.
3
Mr. Thiry deferred $1,928,077 in 2015 into the Deferred Compensation Plan, and $2,076,923 in 2014 and $385,557 in 2013 into the Voluntary Deferral Plan.
4
Mr. Hilger, Mr. Staffieri and Dr. MenzelMr. Hearty did not participate in any of the Company'sCompany’s nonqualified deferred compensation plans in 2015.
2022 or in any prior years.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      59


Table of Contents




dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
60

Voluntary Deferral Plan and


Executive Compensation
Deferred Compensation Plan

The 20152022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table presents amounts deferred under our Voluntary Deferral Plan and ourDeferred Compensation Plan.
Contributions
Under the Deferred Compensation Plan which replaced the Voluntary Deferral Plan effective January 1, 2015.

Contributions

Under the Voluntary Deferral Plan,(effective for deferrals in 2015 and later years), participants couldmay defer (i) up to 50% of their base salary, and (ii) all or a portion of their annual bonusincentive payment that is earned in the same year as their base salary but payable in the following year and (iii) all or a portion of their other compensation as determined by the Company for deferrals prior to 2015. year.

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, participants may defer i) up to 50% of their base salary, and (ii) all or a portion of their annual bonus payment that is earned in the same year as their base salary but payable in the following year. Under both plans,plan, deferred amounts are credited with earnings or losses based on the rate of return of one or more investment alternatives selected by the participant from among the investment funds selected by the Company.

Participants may change their investment elections daily. We do not make company contributions to participants'participants’ accounts under either the Voluntary Deferral Plan or the Deferred Compensation Plan. All participant contributions are irrevocably funded into a rabbi trust for the benefit of those participants. Assets held in the trust are subject to the claims of the Company'sCompany’s general creditors in the event of the Company'sCompany’s bankruptcy or insolvency until paid to the plan participants.

Payment of benefits

Benefits

Distributions are generally paid out in cash at the participant'sparticipant’s election. Under the Voluntary Deferral Plan, distributions can be made commencing in the first or second year following retirement or in a specified year at least three to four years after the deferral election was effective, and participants can elect to receive distributions in the form of one, five, ten, fifteen or twenty annual installments. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, distributions can be made

commencing in the second year following the year to which the deferral election applies, after separation from service, or on any other scheduled payment date, and participants can elect to receive either a lump sum distribution or annual installments over any period from two to twenty years; provided, that, if the Deferred Compensation Plan balance does not exceed $20,000, a lump sum will be paid. If the participant has not elected a specified year for payout and the participant has a separation from service, distributions generally will be paid in a lump sum cash distribution after separation from service.

In the event of a participant'sparticipant’s unforeseeable emergency, the plan administrator may, in its sole discretion, authorize the cessation of deferrals by a participant and provide for immediate distribution to a participant in the form of a lump sum cash payment to cover the unforeseeable emergency, or provide for such other payment schedule as the plan administrator deems appropriate.

Executive Retirement Plan

The table also presents amounts deferred under our Executive Retirement Plan. The Executive Retirement Plan was assumed by the Company from Gambro Healthcare, Inc. following our acquisition of Gambro Healthcare in October 2005. Amounts contributed to the plan were based on a percentage of an executive's annual base salary and such contributions were made prior to our assumption of the plan. We did not make any contributions to the Executive Retirement Plan following our assumption of the plan, and effective February 1, 2006, we amended the plan to eliminate the obligation to make further contributions under the plan. All amounts contributed under this plan and currently in deferred accounts are fully vested. Deferred amounts are credited with earnings or losses based on the rate of return of one or more investment alternatives selected by the participant from among the investment funds selected by the Company. Participants may change their investment elections daily. All contributions are irrevocably funded into a rabbi trust for the benefit of plan participants. Assets held in the trust are subject to the claims of the Company's general creditors in the event of the Company's bankruptcy or insolvency until paid to the plan participants. Benefits under the Executive Retirement Plan are distributed upon separation from service from the Company.

emergency.

60


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation



Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

General Terms

Employment Agreements and Definitions

For purposes of the table below:

"Cause" is defined in Mr. Thiry's employment agreement as any of the following: (i) conviction of a felony; (ii) any act of fraud or dishonesty resulting or intended to result directly or indirectly in personal enrichment at the expense of the Company; (iii) repeated failure or refusal by the executive to follow policies established by the Board or written directives of the Board that goes uncorrected for a period of 30 consecutive days after notice of such failure or refusal, and that is material and willful and has a material adverse effect on the Company's business; or (iv) a material breach of the executive's employment agreement that goes uncorrected for a period of 30 consecutive days after written notice has been provided to the executive.

Involuntary termination for"Material Cause" occurs if the Company terminates employment for any of the following reasons: (i) conviction of a felony or plea of no contest to a felony; (ii) any act of fraud or dishonesty in connection with the performance of the executive's duties; (iii) repeated failure or refusal by the executive to follow lawful policies or directives reasonably established by the CEO of the Company or his designee that goes uncorrected for a period of 10 consecutive days after written notice has been provided to the executive; (iv) a material breach of the executive's employment agreement; (v) any gross or willful misconduct or gross negligence by the executive in performance of the executives duties; (vi) egregious conduct by the executive that brings the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates into public disgrace or disrepute; (vii) an act of unlawful discrimination, including sexual harassment; (viii) a violation of the duty of loyalty or of any fiduciary duty; or (ix) exclusion or notice of exclusion of the executive from participating in any federal health care program. With respect to Mr. Staffieri's employment agreement, clause "(iv)" also includes a breach of the executive's Noncompetition, Nonsolicitation and Confidentiality Agreement.

"Material Cause" is defined in the employment agreement of Mr. Kogod as any of the following: (i) conviction of a felony or plea of no contest to a felony; (ii) the adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction that the executive has committed any act of

Severance Plan

fraud or dishonesty resulting or intended to result directly or indirectly in personal enrichment at the expense of the Company; (iii) repeated failure or refusal by the executive to follow policies or directives reasonably established by the CEO of the Company or his designee that goes uncorrected for a period of 30 consecutive days after written notice has been provided to the executive; (iv) a material breach of the executive's employment agreement that goes uncorrected for a period of 30 consecutive days after written notice has been provided to the executive; (v) any gross or willful misconduct or gross negligence by the executive in the performance of his duties; (vi) egregious conduct by the executive that brings the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates into public disgrace or disrepute; (vii) an act of unlawful discrimination, including sexual harassment; (viii) a violation of the duty of loyalty or of any fiduciary duty; or (ix) exclusion or notice of exclusion of the executive from participating in any federal health care program.

Except with respect to Mr. Thiry, as noted below, a"Change of Control" means (i) any transaction or series of transactions in which any person or group (within the meaning of Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act and Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the direct or indirect "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), by way of a stock issuance, tender offer, merger, consolidation, other business combination or otherwise, of greater than 50% of the total voting power (on a fully diluted basis as if all convertible securities had been converted and all warrants and options had been exercised) entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company (including any transaction in which the Company becomes a wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiary of another corporation), (ii) any merger or consolidation or reorganization in which the Company does not survive, (iii) any merger or consolidation in which the Company survives, but the shares of the Company's common stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation represent 40% or less of the voting power of the Company after such merger or consolidation, and (iv) any transaction in which more than 40% of the Company's assets are sold. However, despite the occurrence of any of the above-described events, a "Change of Control" will not have occurred if Mr. Thiry remains the CEO of the Company for at least one year after the Change of Control or becomes the CEO or executive chair of the surviving company with which the Company merged or consolidated and remains in that position for at least one year after the Change of Control.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      61


Table of Contents





"Good Cause" means the occurrence of the following events without the executive's express written consent: (i) the Company materially diminishes the scope of the executive's duties and responsibilities; or (ii) the Company materially reduces the executive's base compensation. Notwithstanding the above, the occurrence of any such condition shall not constitute Good Cause unless the executive provides notice to the Company of the existence of such condition not later than 90 days after the initial existence of such condition, and the Company shall have failed to remedy such condition within 30 days after receipt of such notice.

With respect to Mr. Thiry's employment agreement,"Good Reason" means during the employment period, without the written consent of the executive, any one or more of the following (provided that an isolated, insubstantial or inadvertent action not taken in bad faith or failure not occurring in bad faith which is remedied by the Company promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the executive shall not constitute Good Reason): (i) the assignment to the executive of any duties inconsistent in any material and adverse respect with the executive's then current duties and responsibilities; (ii) the material and adverse change in the executive's titles or positions; (iii) reduction in the executive's base salary or target annual incentive opportunity, unless such reductions are part of an across-the-board reduction that applies to all senior executives of the Company and takes effect prior to a Change in Control (as defined below for Mr. Thiry); or (iv) any material breach by the Company of the employment agreement, that is not corrected within 30 days after notice of such breach.

For purposes of the definition of "Good Reason" in Mr. Thiry's employment agreement above, a"Change of Control" means (i) any transaction or series of transactions in which any person or group (within the meaning of Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act and Sections 13(d) and 14(d) under the Exchange Act) becomes the direct or indirect "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), by way of a stock issuance, tender offer, merger, consolidation, other business combination or otherwise, of greater than 40% of the total voting power (on a fully diluted basis as if all convertible securities had been converted and all warrants and options had been exercised) entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company (including any transaction in which the Company becomes a wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiary of another corporation), (ii) consummation of any

merger or consolidation in which the shares of the Company's common stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation represent 50% or less of the voting power of the corporation resulting from such merger or consolidation, or, if applicable, the ultimate parent corporation of such corporation, (iii) during any twenty-four month period, individuals who, as of the beginning of such period, constitute the Board (the "Incumbent Board") cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of such Board; provided that any individual who becomes a director of the Company subsequent to the beginning of such period whose election, or nomination for election by the Company's stockholders, was approved by the vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be deemed a member of the Incumbent Board; and provided further, that any individual who was initially elected as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened solicitation by a person other than the Board for the purpose of opposing a solicitation by any other person with respect to the election or removal of directors, or any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any person other than the Board shall not be deemed a member of the Incumbent Board, (iv) consummation of any transaction in which all or substantially all of the Company's assets are sold, or (v) the approval by the Company's stockholders of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; provided, however, that no transaction contemplated by clauses (i) through (iv) above shall constitute a Change of Control if the person acting as the CEO of the Company for the twelve months prior to such transaction continues as the CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company or becomes the CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the entity that has acquired control of the Company as a result of such transaction (the "Acquiror") immediately after such transaction and remains the CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company or the Acquiror for not less than twelve months following the transaction, and further provided, that in the event that the person acting as the CEO of the Company for the twelve months prior to such transaction ceases to be CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company or of the Acquiror during the twelve months following the transaction, a Change of Control shall be deemed to have occurred on the date on which such person ceases to be CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company or the Acquiror.

62


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation



Severance Payments and Benefits

The following tables and summary set forth the Company's payment obligations pursuantPursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, if Mr. Rodriguez's employment is terminated by the employment agreementsCompany without cause or he resigns for each of our NEOs, under the circumstances described below, assuming that their employment was terminated on December 31, 2015. Forgood reason (each, a description of the value of stock-based awards held by Messrs. Thiry, Rodriguez, Staffieri, Kogod, and Hilger that are subject to accelerated vesting upon a Change of Control, see "— Accelerated Vesting of Stock-Based Awards" below.

 Payment of Base
Salary (or multiple
thereof) in effect at
termination for a
specified period
following
termination








Bonus1

Continued
Health
Benefits for a
Specified
Period
Following
Termination







Office and
Secretarial
Assistance



Tax
Gross-
Up



Total Value 

Kent J. Thiry

             
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Death

  $2,225,1862   $2,225,186 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Disability

  $2,225,1862   $2,225,186 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Involuntary Termination without Cause

 $12,015,0003$2,225,1864$74,6705$308,7876 $14,623,643 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Involuntary Termination without Cause (prior to age 62)7

 $6,007,5008$2,225,1864$74,6705$308,7876 $8,616,143 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Resignation for Good Reason

 $12,015,0003$2,225,1864$74,6705$308,7876 $14,623,643 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Javier J. Rodriguez

               

Death

         

Disability

         

Involuntary Termination for Other than Material Cause

 $1,200,0009 $2,000,00010    $3,200,000 

Resignation for Good Cause

 $1,200,0009 $2,000,00010    $3,200,000 

Resignation Following a Good Cause Event after a Change of Control

 $1,600,00011 $2,000,00010    $3,600,000 

Michael D. Staffieri

             
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Death

       
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Disability

       
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Involuntary Termination for Other than Material Cause

 $600,00012    $600,000 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Good Cause Resignation after a Change of Control

 $600,00013    $600,000 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Dennis L. Kogod

               

Death

         

Disability

         

Involuntary Termination for Other than Material Cause

 $800,00014 $200,00015    $1,000,000 

Resignation Following a Good Cause Event Unrelated to a Change of Control

 $800,00014 $200,00015    $1,000,000 

Resignation Following a Good Cause Event after a Change of Control

 $1,600,00016 $200,00015    $1,800,000 

James K. Hilger

             
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Death

       
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Disability

       
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Involuntary Termination for Other than Material Cause

 $375,00017 $23,42918  $398,429 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Good Cause Resignation after a Change of Control

       
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Dr. Garry E. Menzel

               

Involuntary Termination for Other than Material Cause

 $510,00019       $510,000 
1
Does not include any amounts payable to Messrs. Thiry, Rodriguez or Kogod pursuant to our Voluntary Deferral Plan or Deferred Compensation Plan which amounts are included in the 2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table. Such amounts are currently vested, but payment thereof may be accelerated in the event of death, disability or termination of employment.
2
Mr. Thiry (or his estate)"Qualifying Termination"), then he will be entitled to receive the amount of(i) any bonus earned and payable but not yet paid for the fiscal year prior to the year in which the termination occurs. On December 31, 2015, Mr. Thiry had fully earned his bonus for 2015, so he would have received the full amount of his annual incentive bonus as reported in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table upon termination.
3
Mr. Thiry will be entitled to receiveoccurs, (ii) a lump-sum payment equal to the product of (x) three,two (three in the case of a Qualifying Termination within two years after a change in control) (the "Severance Multiple"), and (y) the sum of his base salary in effect as of the date of termination and the Prior Bonus. "Prior Bonus" means the average of the annual incentive bonus earned under the Company's 2011 Incentive Award Plan (including any bonus earned and payable but not yet paid) for the last two fiscal years before the fiscal year in which Mr. Thiry's employment was terminated. The amount reportedthe termination occurs (the "Prior Bonus"), payable in installments or, in the table above reflects the productcase of (x) three, and (y) thea Qualifying Termination within two years after a change of control, in a lump sum, of Mr. Thiry's base salary as of December 31, 2015, which was $1,200,000, and the average of Mr. Thiry's 2014(iii) a prorated annual incentive bonus in the amount of $2,610,000 and Mr. Thiry's 2013 annual incentive bonus in the amount of $3,000,000.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      63


Table of Contents





4
Mr. Thiry will be entitled to receive the amount of any bonus earned and payable but not yet paid for the fiscal year prior to the year in which the termination occurs. Mr. Thiry will also be entitled to receive a prorated annual incentive bonusoccurs (based on the actual bonus earned under the objective standards set forth underfor such year), (iv) continued health benefits at active teammate rates for a number of years equal to the Company's 2011 Incentive Award Plan for the fiscal year in which theSeverance Multiple, subject to earlier termination occurs) through and including the date of termination. On December 31, 2015, Mr. Thiry had fully earned his annual incentive bonus for 2015, so he would have received the full amount of his annual incentive bonus as reported in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table upon termination.
5
event Mr. Thiry will continue to receive his health benefits for the three-year period following termination. The amount reported in the table above is the estimated actual cost of COBRA insurance premiums for Mr. Thiry for the three-year period following termination.
6
Mr. Thiry will be entitled toRodriguez accepts full-time employment with another employer, and (v) the use of an office and services of an administrative assistant for threea number of years equal to the Severance Multiple or until heMr. Rodriguez obtains other full-time employment. The amounts above reflectThese payments are subject to forfeiture and repayment in the estimated costsevent that Mr. Rodriguez breaches the non-compete, non-solicit, non-disparagement or confidentiality covenants contained in his employment agreement.
Under the terms of their employment agreements, with respect to usMessrs. Ackerman and Staffieri and Ms. Waters, and the DaVita Inc. Severance Plan for Directors and Above (the "Severance Plan"), with respect to Mr. Hearty, if their employment is terminated by the Company for any reason other than death, disability or material cause (or, in the case of providing the office and secretarial servicesMr. Ackerman, if he resigns for three years.
7
Mr. Thiry willgood reason), then they would be entitled to receive (i) the paymentsbenefits set forth in this rowthe Severance Plan, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the plan in effect at the time of termination (i.e.,
61


base salary continuation for a period of one year, reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of any compensation received from another employer during the severance period), and (ii) with respect to Mr. Ackerman, (A) a bonus in the amount he received for the previous year, pro-rated based on the number of months served in the year of termination, and (B) continued health benefits at active teammate rates for 18 months or until Mr. Ackerman becomes eligible to receive substantially similar coverage from another employer or other source.
In the event that prior to the date on which Mr. Thiry attains age 62, the Board gives Mr. Thiry written notice that the term of his employment agreement shall not be extended.
8
Mr. Thiry willStaffieri or Ms. Waters resigns for good cause, then they would be entitled to receive (i) in the case of Mr. Staffieri, base salary continuation for a lump sum payment equalperiod of one year (two years in the event of a resignation within 60 days following a good cause event after a change in control) and, in the case of Ms. Waters, the benefits set forth in the Severance Plan, pursuant to the productterms and conditions of (x) one and one-half, and (y) the sumplan in effect at the time of histermination (but in no event less than base salary in effect as of the date of terminationcontinuation for one year), and the Prior Bonus (as defined above). The amount reported in the table above reflects the product of (x) one and one-half, and (y) the sum of Mr. Thiry's base salary as of December 31, 2015, which was $1,200,000, and the average of Mr. Thiry's 2014 annual incentive bonus in the amount of $2,610,000 and Mr. Thiry's 2013 annual incentive bonus in the amount of $3,000,000.
9
Mr. Rodriguez will be entitled to receive his salary for the 18-month period following his termination without material cause or resignation for good cause. As of December 31, 2015, Mr. Rodriguez's base salary was $800,000.
10
If Mr. Rodriguez(ii) if their employment is terminated after April in a given year, he will be entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to the bonus paid in the year prior to the year in which the termination occurs, pro-rated for the number of months served in the year hisof termination.
If Mr. Ackerman's employment is terminated. Theterminated by the Company interprets this severance provisionor any reason other than death, disability or material cause or if he resigns for good reason, in each case, within 12 months following a change of control, then he would be entitled to meanreceive (i) a lump-sum payment equal to two times the severance is based onsum of his base salary and an amount equal to the bonus paid "for"received for the year prior to the year in which the termination occurs, and (ii) continued health benefits at active teammate rates for which a bonus was most recently earned. This severance amount is reported as the bonus paid to18 months or until Mr. Rodriguez for 2014, which was $2,000,000.
11
Mr. Rodriguez will be entitledAckerman becomes eligible to receive his salary for the two-year period following his resignation for good cause following a change in control.
12
Mr. Staffieri will be entitled to receive his salary for the one-year period following his termination. As of December 31, 2015, Mr. Staffieri's base salary was $600,000. Effective March 30, 2016, Mr. Staffieri's base salary was increased to $700,000.
13
Mr. Staffieri will be entitled to receive his salary for the one-year period following his resignation for good cause following a change in control. As of December 31, 2015, Mr. Staffieri's base salary was $600,000. Effective March 30, 2016, Mr. Staffieri's base salary was increased to $700,000.
14
Mr. Kogod will be entitled to receive his salary for the one-year period following his termination or resignation. As of December 31, 2015, Mr. Kogod's base salary was $800,000.
15
Mr. Kogod will be entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equivalent to the bonus that he had been paid in the year before the termination. The Company interprets this severance provision to mean the severance is based on the bonus paid "for" the year prior to the year for which a bonus was most recently earned. This severance amount is reported as the bonus paid to Mr. Kogod for 2014, which was $200,000.
16
Mr. Kogod will be entitled to receive his salary for the two-year period following his resignation for good cause following a change in control.
17
Mr. Hilger will be entitled to receive payment in an amount equal to his salary for the 12-month period following his termination. As of December 31, 2015, Mr. Hilger's base salary was $375,000. Such payment obligation will be reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of any compensation received by Mr. Hilgersubstantially similar coverage from another employer during the severance payment period, and Mr. Hilger is obligated to use reasonable efforts to find employment during such period.
18
Mr. Hilger will continue to receive his health benefits for the one-year period following termination. The amount reported in the table above is the estimated actual cost of COBRA insurance premiums for Mr. Hilger for the one-year period following termination.
19
Dr. Menzel stepped down as our Chief Financial Officer effective March 30, 2015 and is entitled to receive his salary for the one-year period following his termination. As of his termination, Dr. Menzel's base salary was $510,000, which was paid over a 12-month period beginning on May 5, 2015.
or other source.

Other Severance Payments and Benefits

The Company's obligation to provide continued health benefits under the circumstances set forth in the tables above is subject to earlier termination in connection with the executive accepting employment with another employer.

In the event of termination as a result of death, the estates of the NEOs identified in the tables above will also receive the proceeds of the respective term life insurance policy for each NEO. The coverage amount for each NEO is as follows: $1,201,000$1,200,000 for Mr. Thiry,Rodriguez; $500,000 for Mr. Rodriguez,Ackerman;$700,000 for Mr. Staffieri; $500,000 for Ms. Waters; and $500,000 for Mr. Staffieri, $585,000Hearty. The amounts are equal to one times the base salary of the NEO at the time of benefits elections, subject to certain caps.

In the event of a termination of Ms. Waters' employment by the Company without cause or her resignation for Mr. Kogodgood reason, in each case, following a change in control and $375,000 for Mr. Hilger.

Pursuantprior to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Thiry will be eligible to receive a "gross-up" payment to the extent that any payment or benefit received or to be received by him is reduced by tax obligations possibly imposed by Sections 280G or 4999expiration of the Internal Revenue Code. Assuming a triggering event took placeperformance period on December 31, 2015, there would not be any tax gross-up amount payable. Moreover, no gross-up would have been payable under his agreement in any2023, then the Waters Performance Cash Award will remain outstanding and eligible to vest if the applicable performance goal is achieved prior to the expiration of the prior five years if a change

performance period. In addition, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to pay some or all of the Waters Performance Cash Award in the event of her termination of employment due to death or disability.

of control had occurred. Mr. Thiry has the only remaining legacy agreement that contains a tax gross-up. We haveThe Company does not providedprovide for tax gross-ups in any employment agreementsagreements. Mr. Rodriguez's employment agreement provides that in the event that payments to Mr. Rodriguez would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, then the payments would be either (i) reduced so that no portion of the payments would be subject to such excise tax, or amended employment agreements entered into after July 2008.

(ii) paid in full, whichever produces the better net after-tax position to the executive.

To receive the severance payments and benefits described above, each NEO must execute the Company'sCompany’s standard severance and general release agreement. In addition, the existing employment agreements with each of our NEOs include confidentiality provisions that would apply until the confidential information becomes publicly available (other than through breach by the NEO). These employment agreements generally also include, among other things, nonsolicitation provisions which prohibit each NEO from soliciting any patient or customer of the Company to patronize a competing dialysis facility or from soliciting any patient, customer, supplier or physician to terminate their business relationship with the Company, for a period of two years following the termination of the NEO'sNEO’s employment. However, with respect to Mr. Kogod,Further, as a condition of receiving the nonsolicitation provision would apply for aseverance benefits described above, Ms. Waters must, during the period of one year following termination.

time when she is receiving such benefits, (i) make herself available to answer questions and cooperate in the transition of her duties, (ii) respond to any inquiries from the Company's compliance department, including making herself available for interview, and (iii) cooperate with the Company in the prosecution and/or defense of any claim, including making herself available for any interview, appearing at depositions, and producing requested documents. The Company will reimburse Ms. Waters for any out-of-pocket expenses she may incur.
Executive Compensation


dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
62



Executive Compensation
Severance Payments and Benefits
The following tables and summary set forth the Company’s payment obligations pursuant to the terms of the employment or severance arrangements with each of our NEOs, under the circumstances described below, assuming that his or her employment had been terminated on December 31, 2022. For a description of the value of stock-based awards held by Messrs. Rodriguez, Ackerman, Staffieri, and Hearty and Ms. Waters that are subject to accelerated vesting upon a termination of employment, see the subsection titled “— Accelerated Vesting of Stock-Based Awards” below.
Payment of Base Salary (or multiple thereof) for a specified period following terminationBonusContinued Health Benefits for a Specified Period Following TerminationOffice and Secretarial Assistance
Total Value1
Javier J. Rodriguez
Death$— $— 2$— $— $— 
Disability$— $— 2$— $— $— 
Involuntary Termination Without Cause$7,426,279 3$1,173,805 4$51,946 5$245,155 6$8,897,185 
Resignation for Good Reason$7,426,279 3$1,173,805 4$51,946 5$245,155 6$8,897,185 
Resignation for Good Reason or by the Company Without Cause after a Change of Control$11,139,419 3$1,173,805 4$77,919 5$372,347 6$12,763,490 
Joel Ackerman
Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause$700,000 7$726,583 8$36,692 9$— $1,463,275 
Resignation for Good Cause$700,000 7$726,583 8$36,692 9$— $1,463,275 
Resignation Following a Good Cause Event or by the Company Without Material Cause after a Change of Control$1,400,000 10$726,583 11$36,692 9$— $2,163,275 
Michael D. Staffieri
Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause$800,000 7$— $— $— $800,000 
Resignation for Good Cause$800,000 7$1,017,216 8$— $— $1,817,216 
Resignation in connection with a Change of Control$1,600,000 10$1,017,216 8$— $— $2,617,216 
Kathleen A. Waters
Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause$650,000 7$— $— $— $650,000 
Resignation for Good Cause$650,000 7$629,705 8$— $— $1,279,705 
James O. Hearty
Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause$500,000 7$— $— $— $500,000 
1Does not include any amounts payable to Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Ackerman or Ms. Waters pursuant to our Deferred Compensation Plan which amounts are included in the 2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table as such amounts are currently vested.
2Mr. Rodriguez (or his estate) will be entitled to receive the amount of any bonus earned and payable but not yet paid for the fiscal year prior to the year in which the termination occurs. As of December 31, 2022, Mr. Rodriguez had fully earned and received his bonus for 2021, the fiscal year prior to the year of assumed termination and accordingly, no bonus amount for Mr. Rodriguez is included in the table above.
3Mr. Rodriguez will be entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to the product of (x) the applicable Severance Multiple, and (y) the sum of his base salary in effect as of the date of termination and the Prior Bonus. The amount reported in the table above reflects the product of (x) the applicable Severance Multiple, and (y) the sum of Mr. Rodriguez’s base salary as of December 31, 2022, which was $1,200,000, and the average of Mr. Rodriguez’s 2021 annual incentive bonus in the amount of $1,743,799 and Mr. Rodriguez’s 2020 annual incentive bonus in the amount of $3,282,480.
4Mr. Rodriguez will be entitled to receive the amount of any bonus earned and payable but not yet paid for the fiscal year prior to the year in which the termination occurs. Mr. Rodriguez will also be entitled to receive a prorated annual incentive bonus (based on the actual bonus earned under the objective standards set forth under the 2020 Plan for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs) through and including the date of termination. Because Mr. Rodriguez had served for the entire year, there would have been no pro-rata reduction upon a termination as of December 31, 2022 and this amount reflects his 2022 annual incentive bonus as reported in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table.
5Mr. Rodriguez will continue to receive his health benefits for a number of years equal to the applicable Severance Multiple, subject to earlier termination in the event Mr. Rodriguez accepts full-time employment with another employer. The amount reported in the table above is the estimated actual cost of COBRA insurance premiums for Mr. Rodriguez for the applicable period, based on current insurance premium costs.
6Mr. Rodriguez will be entitled to the use of an office and services of an administrative assistant for a number of years equal to the applicable Severance Multiple or until he obtains other full-time employment. The amount above reflects the estimated costs to us of providing the continued salary for an administrative assistant's services for the applicable period based on the Company's current salary and benefits costs
63


and assuming that Mr. Rodriguez utilizes such services for the full period. Mr. Rodriguez also receives use of an office space; however there is no additional cost associated with these items as the assumption is that he would use a Company office.
7The executive will be entitled to receive the executive's salary for the one-year period following termination. As of December 31, 2022, the base salaries for the NEOs participating in the Severance Plan were as follows: Mr. Ackerman — $700,000; Mr. Staffieri — $800,000; Ms. Waters — $650,000; and Mr. Hearty — $500,000. Such payment obligation will be reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of any compensation received by the executive from another employer during the severance period, and the executive is obligated to use reasonable efforts to find employment during such period.
8Represents a lump sum payment equal to the bonus paid in the year prior to the termination, prorated for the number of months served in the year the executive's employment is terminated. The Company interprets this severance provision to mean the severance is based on the bonus paid “for” the year prior to the year for which a bonus was most recently earned. This severance amount is reported as the bonus paid to the executive for 2021.
9Mr. Ackerman will continue to receive his health benefits for the 18-month period following his termination without material cause or resignation for good cause, subject to earlier termination in the event Mr. Ackerman accepts full-time employment with another employer. The amount reported in the table above is the estimated actual cost of COBRA insurance premiums for Mr. Ackerman for the 18-month period following termination, based on current insurance premium costs.
10Represents a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of the executive's base salary in effect as of the date of termination. The amount reported in the table above for Messrs. Ackerman and Staffieri reflects two times their base salaries of $700,000 and $800,000, respectively, as of December 31, 2022.
11Represents a lump sum payment equal to the bonus paid in the year prior to the termination. This severance amount is reported as the bonus paid to Mr. Ackerman for 2021, which was $726,583.
Accelerated Vesting of Stock-Based Awards

Change of Control

For grants and awards of SSARs, PSUs and/or RSUs to our NEOs, the stock-based award agreements provide that in the event that either (i) in connection with a Changechange of Control (as defined below),control, the acquiring entity fails to assume, convert or replace the NEO'sNEO’s options or awards, or (ii) the NEO'sNEO’s employment is terminated within the twenty-four-month period following a Changechange of Controlcontrol by the Company (or the acquiring entity) other than for Cause (as defined below)cause or, if applicable, by the NEO in accordance with the termination for Good Reasongood reason provisions of the NEO'sNEO’s employment agreement, if any, then, in any such case, the optionsSSAR, PSU or RSU awards shallwill automatically vest and

become immediately exercisable in their entirety, with such vesting to be effective as of immediately prior to the effective date of the Changechange of Controlcontrol in the case of (i), and as of the date of termination of the NEO'sNEO’s employment in the case of (ii). For grants of PSUs, upon a Changechange of Control, all PSU awards immediately vest, andcontrol, all PSU performance metrics in which the performance period has not completed, are converted to the relativea Relative TSR metric. The number of shares issuable are then determined based on the Company's relativeCompany’s Relative TSR performance (as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis) throughbased on an ending average price period of the approximately 30 calendar days immediately preceding the Changechange of Control.

control.

The table below sets forth the value of the Company'sCompany’s obligations upon the automatic vesting of the stock-based awards of our NEOs as described above and assumes that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2015.

2022.

Name


Value of SSARs1

Value of Stock
Awards2


Tax
Gross-Up

Kent J. Thiry3,4

 $16,449,172 $5,023,581 
​ ​ ​ 

Javier J. Rodriguez

 $3,850,058 $2,542,045 N/A

Michael D. Staffieri

 $845,108 $343,949 N/A
​ ​ ​ 

Dennis L. Kogod

 $3,215,774 $2,542,045 N/A

James K. Hilger

 $440,557 $507,210 N/A
​ ​ ​ 

Garry E. Menzel

   
Name
Value of SSARs1
Value of Stock Awards2
Javier J. Rodriguez$8,587,500 $7,017,636 
Joel Ackerman$1,224,300 $5,641,991 
Michael D. Staffieri$2,226,000 $6,925,344 
Kathleen A. Waters$890,400 $4,449,510 
James O. Hearty$556,500 $1,755,640 
1
Values are based on the aggregate difference between the respective base prices and the closing sale price of our common stockCommon Stock on December 31, 2015,30, 2022 (last trading day of the year), which was $69.71$74.67 per share, as reported by the NYSE.
2
Values are based on the aggregate number of shares underlying PSUs and RSUs multiplied by the closing sale price of our common stockCommon Stock on December 31, 2015,30, 2022, which was $69.71$74.67 per share, as reported by the NYSE. Based onFor PSUs, performance through December 31, 2022 was used to determine the termsshares that would vest upon a change of control. Per the award agreements, all PSU performance metrics in which the performance period has not completed, convert to a Relative TSR performance metric upon a change of control.
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
64


Other Termination Events
The table below sets forth the value of the PSU agreement, as of December 31, 2015, any accelerated PSUs would be valued at $0.
3
Pursuant toCompany’s obligations upon the terms of his employment agreement entered into on July 25, 2008, Mr. Thiry would be entitled to receive a "gross-up" payment to the extent any benefit received is reduced by tax obligations possibly imposed by Sections 280G or 4999automatic vesting of the Internal Revenue Code. Any such tax gross-up amount would be calculated using a 20% excise tax rate and an approximately 40% individual income tax ratestock-based awards of our NEOs in the event of death or disability and assumes that the base amount for purposes of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code has been allocated between the cash severance and equity components of the change of control benefits in proportion to the amounts of each component. Assuming a triggering event took place on December 31, 2015, there2022.
Name
Value of SSARs1
Value of Stock Awards2
Javier J. Rodriguez$6,777,131 $7,155,476 
Joel Ackerman$1,224,300 $7,059,899 
Michael D. Staffieri$2,226,000 $8,963,909 
Kathleen A. Waters$890,400 $5,448,967 
James O. Hearty$556,500 $2,118,538 
1Values are based on the aggregate difference between the respective base prices and the closing sale price of our Common Stock on December 30, 2022 (the last trading day of the year) for the relevant awards, which was $74.67 per share, as reported by the NYSE.
2Values are based on the aggregate number of shares underlying PSUs (at target except for PSU performance metrics in which the performance period has completed) and RSUs for the relevant awards, multiplied by the closing sale price of our Common Stock on December 30, 2022, which was $74.67 per share, as reported by the NYSE.
The Company's equity award agreements with the NEOs generally provide for full vesting in the event of death or disability, with PSUs (excluding those with performance metrics in which the performance period has completed) vesting at their target number of shares, and do not provide for any accelerated vesting for a termination without cause or due to good reason absent a change of control of the Company. However, the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award provides for pro-rata vesting in the event of death, termination due to disability, Mr. Rodriguez's termination of employment by the Company without cause or termination of employment by Mr. Rodriguez due to good reason based on his period of service during the vesting period. The table above reflects the $6,777,131 associated with the pro-rata vesting of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award based on the period served during the vesting periods and the closing sale price of our Common Stock on December 30, 2022, which was $74.67 per share, as reported by the NYSE, and which would vest upon death, termination due to disability, termination by the Company without cause or termination by Mr. Rodriguez due to good reason. In the event of a termination without cause or termination due to good reason not in connection with a change of control, the shares acquired would remain subject to the five-year holding requirement of the award.
65


Pay Ratio Disclosure
As required by Section 953(b) of Dodd-Frank, the Company is providing the following disclosure about the relationship of the annual total compensation of Mr. Rodriguez, our Chief Executive Officer, to the annual total compensation of our teammates.
Ratio
For 2022, based on the methodology described below:
The median of the annual total compensation of all of our teammates, other than Mr. Rodriguez, was $67,488.
As we have included the value of non-discriminatory benefits in the calculation of the median teammate’s annual total compensation, Mr. Rodriguez’s annual total compensation, as reported in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table, has been adjusted to also include the value of non-discriminatory benefits. As a result of the foregoing, Mr. Rodriguez’s annual total compensation was $3,007,620 for purposes of this calculation.
Based on the information above, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Rodriguez to the median of the annual total compensation of all teammates is estimated to be 45 to 1.1
We believe the SEC CEO Pay Ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be any tax gross-upcomparable to the SEC CEO Pay Ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
Identification of Median Teammate
We selected October 31, 2022 as the date on which to identify our median teammate for 2022 (such date, the "2022 determination date").
Our teammate population on the 2022 determination date consisted of 70,361 individuals, of which 57,677 were in the U.S. and 12,684 were outside the U.S. We excluded from the pay ratio calculation certain teammates based in non-U.S. jurisdictions as permitted by SEC rules.2 As a result, we used a total workforce of 67,980 teammates for the median teammate calculation, of which 57,677 were in the U.S. and 9,303 were outside the U.S.
For purposes of identifying the median teammate from our teammate population base, we considered gross income, including pre-tax contributions to the Company's 401(k) and health and welfare plans, as compiled from our payroll and benefits records. We selected this measure as it captures the principal forms of compensation delivered to all of our teammates and this information is readily available with respect to our teammates. In addition, we measured compensation for purposes of determining the median teammate using the 12-month period ending on the 2022 determination date. Compensation paid in foreign currencies was converted to U.S. dollars based on a weighted average exchange rate for the relevant period.
In determining the annual total compensation of the median teammate, such teammate’s compensation was calculated in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, as required pursuant to the SEC executive
1 Mr. Rodriguez’s annual total compensation for 2022 reflects the fact that he did not receive an equity grant in 2022, since the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award that he received in 2019 was intended to replace five years of awards to Mr. Rodriguez. The Company has also calculated an alternate pay ratio including an annualized figure for Mr. Rodriguez’s CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award, using one-fifth of the grant date fair value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award to reflect the intended five-year term of the award, and adding that amount payable.
4
Sinceto his reported 2022 compensation. When calculated in this manner, the alternative pay ratio is estimated to be 248 to 1.
2 Relying on this rule, which permits such exclusions so long as we do not exclude more than 5% of our total teammates, we excluded a total of 3,381 teammates in the following jurisdictions in 2022: Poland (1,426); Portugal (516); Colombia (1,176); Netherlands (3); and United Kingdom (260).    
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
66


compensation disclosure rules, provided that we also, as permitted by those rules, included the value of certain non-discriminatory benefits. Variability in the value of these non-discriminatory benefits year-over-year may drive similar variability in the annual total compensation of the median teammate.
67


Pay Versus Performance

Pursuant to Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Pay Versus Performance Table (set forth below) is required to include “compensation actually paid” ("CAP"), as calculated per SEC disclosure rules, to the Company’s principal executive officer (“PEO”) and the Company’s non-PEO NEOs, as noted below. “Compensation actually paid” represents a new required calculation of compensation that differs significantly from the Summary Compensation Table calculation of compensation, the NEO’s realized or earned compensation, as well as from the way in which the Compensation Committee views annual compensation decisions, as discussed in the CD&A. The amounts in the table below are calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not represent amounts actually earned or realized by NEOs, including with respect to SSARs, RSUs and PSUs, which remain subject to forfeiture if the vesting conditions are not satisfied.

Year 1
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO 2
($)
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO 3
($)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs 2
($)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs 4
($)
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: 5
Net Income
($)
Adjusted Earnings per Share 7
($)
Total Shareholder Return
($)
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return 6
($)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)
20222,984,581 (86,403,681)4,203,738 (6,085,207)99.52 118.22 781,643,000 7.13 
20213,298,439 (13,076,235)4,262,738 4,442,398 151.62 147.19 1,211,762,000 9.24 
202073,432,365 171,946,681 6,453,315 823,955,493 8156.47 133.81 994,677,000 7.82 
1.Javier J. Rodriguez served as the Company’s principal PEO for the entirety of 2022, 2021 and 2020 and the Company’s other NEOs for the applicable years were as follows:
2022: Joel Ackerman; Michael D. Staffieri; Kathleen A. Waters; and James O. Hearty.
2021: Joel Ackerman; Michael D. Staffieri; Kathleen A. Waters; and James O. Hearty.
2020: Kent Thiry; Joel Ackerman; Michael D. Staffieri; Kathleen A. Waters; and James O. Hearty.
2.Amounts reported in this column represent (i) the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year in the case of Mr. Thiry has been employedRodriguez and (ii) the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for the Company’s NEOs for the applicable year other than the principal executive officer for such years.
3.Amounts reported in this column are calculated per the SEC disclosure rules torepresent the compensation actually paid to Mr. Rodriguez as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in the indicated fiscal years, based on his total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal years and adjusted as shown in the table below:
PEO
202220212020
Summary Compensation Table - Total Compensation(a)$2,984,581 $3,298,439 $73,432,365 
- Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year(b)$— $— $(68,496,958)
+ Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year(c)$— $— $146,273,000 
+ Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years(d)$(43,928,697)$(17,202,972)$20,182,219 
+ Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year(e)$— $— $— 
+ Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year(f)$(45,459,565)$828,298 $556,055 
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year(g)$— $— $— 
= Compensation Actually Paid$(86,403,681)$(13,076,235)$171,946,681 
(a)Represents Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year.
(b)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards and option awards granted to Mr. Rodriguez during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(c)Represents the aggregate fair value as of the indicated fiscal year-end of Mr. Rodriguez’s outstanding and unvested stock awards and option awards granted during such fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(d)Represents the aggregate change in fair value during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested stock awards and option awards held by Mr. Rodriguez as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 and, for awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions, based on the probable outcome of such performance-based vesting conditions as of the last day of the fiscal year.
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
68


(e)Represents the aggregate fair value at vesting of the stock awards and option awards that were granted to Mr. Rodriguez and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(f)Represents the aggregate change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal year-end to the vesting date, of each stock award and option award held by Mr. Rodriguez that was granted in a prior fiscal year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(g)Represents the aggregate fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of Mr. Rodriguez’s stock awards and option awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and which failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
4.Amounts reported in this column represent the compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs other than Mr. Rodriguez in the indicated fiscal year, as calculated per the SEC disclosure rules based on the average total compensation for such NEOs reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year and adjusted as shown in the table below:
Other NEOs Average (a)
202220212020
Summary Compensation Table - Total Compensation(b)$4,203,738 $4,262,738 $6,453,315 
- Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year(c)$(3,030,532)$(2,869,513)$(2,304,672)
+ Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year(d)$2,138,535 $4,259,310 $5,956,968 
+ Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years(e)$(7,774,431)$(1,644,036)$11,099,139 
+ Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year(f)$— $— $— 
+ Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year(g)$(1,622,517)$433,899 $2,750,743 
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards and Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year(h)$— $— $— 
= Compensation Actually Paid(6,085,207)4,442,398 23,955,493 
(a)Please see footnote 1 for the NEOs included in the average for each indicated fiscal year.
(b)Represents the average Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the reported NEOs in the indicated fiscal year.
(c)Represents the average aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards and option awards granted to the reported NEOs during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(d)Represents the average aggregate fair value as of the indicated fiscal year-end of the reported NEOs’ outstanding and unvested stock awards and option awards granted during such fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(e)Represents the average aggregate change in fair value during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested stock awards and option awards held by the reported NEOs as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 and, for awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions, based on the probable outcome of such performance-based vesting conditions as of the last day of the fiscal year.
(f)Represents the average aggregate fair value at vesting of the stock awards and option awards that were granted to the reported NEOs and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(g)Represents the average aggregate change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal year-end to the vesting date, of each stock award and option award held by the reported NEOs that was granted in a prior fiscal year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(h)Represents the average aggregate fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of the reported NEOs’ stock awards and option awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and which failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
5.Pursuant to rules of the SEC, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2019. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
6.The TSR Peer Group consists of the Standard & Poor’s Health Care Services Select Industry Index, an independently prepared index that includes companies in the healthcare industry.
7.As noted in the CD&A, for 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that Adjusted Earnings per Share continues to be viewed as a core driver of the Company’s performance and stockholder value creation and, accordingly, was utilized as a component in the 2022 LTI Program. “Adjusted Earnings per Share” is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents a per share measure of adjusted net income. Adjusted Earnings per Share represents our diluted net income per share attributable to DaVita Inc., adjusted as reported in our earnings release to exclude certain items from net income that we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, impairment charges, gains and losses on ownership changes, capacity closure charges, restructuring charges, accruals for legal matters and debt prepayment and refinancing charges, and further adjusted to exclude the impact of expenses associated with opposing ballot initiatives, as applicable. The amount reported for each reporting year in this table represents the Adjusted Earnings per Share calculated in accordance with the PSU awards granted during the applicable reporting year. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
8.Includes severance benefits received by our former Executive Chairman that were payable in 2020 in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement and which we do not view as representative of the Company's annual compensation program.

69


Relationship Between Pay and Performance

We believe the compensation actually paid, as calculated in accordance with SEC disclosure rules, in each of the years reported above and over the three-year cumulative period reflect the Compensation Committee’s emphasis on “pay-for-performance” as the compensation actually paid fluctuated year-over-year, primarily due to our stock performance and our varying levels of achievement against pre-established performance goals under our 2022 STI Program and 2022 LTI Program, including our Adjusted Earnings per Share performance. The CD&A describes in greater detail the Compensation Committee's emphasis on "pay-for-performance" and how our executive compensation program is designed to link executive compensation with the achievement of our financial and strategic objectives as well as stockholder value creation.

Because of the leverage of our executive compensation program towards long-term incentives through grants of some combination of PSUs, SSARs and RSUs, the compensation actually paid is most significantly impacted by changes in our stock price over the vesting period of those awards. In addition, this Pay Versus Performance disclosure is significantly impacted by the unique, up-front CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award granted to Mr. Rodriguez in connection with his 2019 transition to the CEO role, which was designed to incentivize long-term stockholder value creation. The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award is intended to be five years' worth of equity awards (through November 2024), granted upfront with a base price set at a 56% premium to the price per share on the day before Mr. Rodriguez assumed the role of CEO, and a 20% premium to the price per share at which the Company purchased shares in its then recently completed modified "Dutch auction" tender offer. Mr. Rodriguez has not received an equity grant from the Company since the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award was approved by the Board in 2019. The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award vested 50% in November 2022 and the remaining 50% is scheduled to vest in November 2023 and expires five years from the 2019 Board approval date of the award. Because of the up-front nature of the grant as well as its strong linkage to our stock price, the compensation actually paid to our CEO, as calculated per the SEC disclosure rules, has fluctuated significantly since the year of grant. Note that as of the end of 2022, Mr. Rodriguez has not exercised any of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award. The values shown as compensation actually paid for over ten yearsMr. Rodriguez include the fair value of the award at the end of 2020 and 2021. The 2022 value shown includes the fair value at vesting of the first tranche and the fair value at the end of 2022 for the unvested tranche. Decreases in value during each of these periods is due primarily to decreases in our stock price. Neither the positive value in 2020 nor the subsequent negative values in 2021 and 2022 reflect the amount Mr. Rodriguez may receive when he actually does exercise the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award. Mr. Rodriguez has until November 4, 2024, the five-year anniversary of the award date, to exercise the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award, otherwise it will be forfeited by Mr. Rodriguez. In addition, the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award has a holding period requiring Mr. Rodriguez to hold any shares received from exercising the award through the fifth anniversary of the date of Board approval of the grant. Accordingly, Mr. Rodriguez cannot realize any value from the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award until November 4, 2024, and the ultimate value realized by Mr. Rodriguez is highly uncertain and dependent upon the long-term sustainable value created for the Company's stockholders and his exercise of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award before its November 4, 2024 expiration date. For additional information on the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award, see the subsection titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — What We Pay and Why — CEO Compensation." Our Pay Versus Performance disclosure is also impacted by the severance benefits received by our former Executive Chairman in 2020 that were payable in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement and which we do not view as representative of the Company's annual compensation program. The following graph illustrates the relationship between pay and performance, as calculated per the SEC disclosure rules.

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
70


PvP Graphs v14.gif
Tabular List of Financial Performance Measures

The following is a list of financial performance measures, which in the Company’s assessment represent the most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the NEOs for 2022. In addition to these financial metrics, the Company's executive compensation program is impacted by our performance with respect to ESG goals and the achievement by the executive officers of customized objectives under the STI Program. Our ESG goals are included as a significant element of our STI Program because they collectively represent ESG criteria that are priorities for the Company. Please see the CD&A for further information regarding the following financial performance measures as well as the ESG and customized objectives used in the STI Program.

Four Most Important Financial Performance Measures for Determining NEO Compensation
Adjusted Earnings per Share
Free cash flow from continuing operations
Consolidated adjusted operating income
Total shareholder return
71


Realizable Pay
To underscore the alignment of our executive pay with performance and the rigor of the Company's incentive compensation criteria, the chart below compares Mr. Rodriguez's realizable pay (actual cash compensation and the intrinsic value of equity-based compensation as of year-end) ("Realizable Pay") for the three-year period for which compensation is disclosed in this Proxy Statement (2020, 2021 and 2022). This disclosure regarding Realizable Pay provides supplemental disclosure and should not be viewed as a substitute for the "Summary Compensation Table" or the "Pay Versus Performance" disclosure.

RealizablePayimage.jpg
1The Realizable Pay represents the sum of (a) actual salary received in the indicated year, (b) STI Program payments earned for the performance year, and (c) the actual intrinsic value as of December 31, 2015, 50%2022 of any unvested equity awards vest upongranted in the applicable year. The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award was the only equity award granted to Mr. Rodriguez during 2020 and he was not granted any termination by Mr. Thiry without Causeequity awards in 2021 or for Good Reason.2022. The intrinsic value of such accelerated vestingthe CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award is equal to 50%calculated as the "in-the-money" value, or the difference between the base price of the amounts set forth in the table.

Definitions Under Stock-Based Award Agreements

For purposes of the stock-based award agreements and the table above:

A"Changeclosing stock price of Control" means (i) any transaction or series$74.67 per share as of transactions in which any person or group (withinDecember 30, 2022 (the last trading day of 2022), multiplied by the meaningnumber of Rule 13d-5 undershares subject to the Exchange Act and Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the direct or indirect "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), by way of a stock issuance, tender offer, merger, consolidation, other business combination or otherwise, of greater than 50% of the total voting power (on a fully diluted basis as if all convertible securities had been converted and all warrants and options had been exercised) entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company

CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award.

(including any transaction in which the Company becomes a wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiary of another corporation), (ii) any merger or consolidation or reorganization in which the Company does not survive, (iii) any merger or consolidation in which the Company survives, but the shares of the Company's common stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation represent 50% or less of the voting power of the Company after such merger or consolidation, and (iv) any transaction in which more than 50% of the Company's assets are sold.

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      65


Table of Contents




dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
72


No transaction will constitute a Change of Control under the stock-based award agreements if both (x) the person acting as the CEO of the Company for the six months prior to such transaction becomes the CEO or executive chairman of the board of directors of the entity that has acquired control of the Company as a result of such transaction immediately after such transaction and remains the CEO or executive chairman of the board of directors for not less than one year following the transaction and (y) a majority of the acquiring entity's board of directors immediately after such transaction consist of persons who were directors of the Company immediately prior to such transaction.

"Cause" means: (1) a material breach by the executive of those duties and responsibilities of the executive which do not differ in any material respect from the duties and responsibilities of the executive during the



90-day period immediately prior to a Change of Control (other than as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness) which is demonstrably willful and deliberate on the executive's part, which is committed in bad faith or without reasonable belief that such breach is in the best interests of the Company and which is not remedied in a reasonable period of time after receipt of written notice from the Company specifying such breach; (2) willful misconduct or gross negligence which results in material harm to the Company; (3) the conviction of the executive of, or a plea of nolo contendere by the executive to, a felony or other crime involving fraud or dishonesty; or (4) willful violation of Company policies which results in material harm to the Company.


66


Table of Contents

Compensation of Directors

Compensation of Directors
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors during 2015.2022. Mr. Thiry alsoRodriguez serves as a member of the Board. Asour Board but, as an executive officer of the Company, Mr. ThiryRodriguez does not receive any additional compensation for his services as a member of theour Board.

2015

2022 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

TABLE

 

Name




Fees Earned
($)1




Stock Awards
($)2,3,4




SSAR Awards
($)5




Total
($)


 

 

Pamela M. Arway

 $155,000 $94,991 $69,606 $319,597  

 

Charles G. Berg

  $229,000  $94,991  $69,606  $393,597  

 

Carol Anthony ("John") Davidson

 $167,500 $94,991 $69,606 $332,097  

 

Barbara J. Desoer

  $18,696  $22,168  $14,649  $55,513  

 

Paul J. Diaz

 $110,000 $94,991 $69,606 $274,597  

 

Peter T. Grauer

  $132,500  $94,991  $101,662  $329,153  

 

John M. Nehra

 $132,500 $94,991 $69,606 $297,097  

 

Dr. William L. Roper

  $127,500  $94,991  $69,606  $292,097  

 

Roger J. Valine

 $117,500 $94,991 $69,606 $282,097  
Name
Fees Earned
($)1
Stock Awards
($)2
SSAR Awards
($)3
Total
($)
Pamela M. Arway$280,000 $189,965 $— $469,965 
Charles G. Berg$95,000 $189,965 $— $284,965 
Barbara J. Desoer$177,500 $189,965 $— $367,465 
Paul J. Diaz$155,000 $189,965 $— $344,965 
Jason M. Hollar4
$67,308 $76,790 $— $144,098 
Dr. Gregory J. Moore, M.D., Ph.D.$105,000 $189,965 $— $294,965 
John M. Nehra$155,522 $189,965 $— $345,487 
Paula A. Price5
$72,500 $131,492 $— $203,992 
Adam H. Schechter6
$32,174 $5,685 $— $37,859 
Phyllis R. Yale$140,000 $189,965 $— $329,965 
1
Consists of the amounts described below under "Annual Retainers," "Meeting Fees,"the subsections “— Annual Retainers” and "Expense Reimbursement and Per Diem Compensation."“— Meeting Fees”. With respect to Ms. Desoer, includes $10,000 in per diem compensation paid pursuant to the Company’s Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy for additional time spent in 2022 on Board matters. With respect to Mr. Grauer,Hollar, includes the $37,500 cashprorated portion for service as lead independent director. With respect to Ms. Arway and Messrs. Davidson and Berg, includes the $50,000 cash portion for service as chair of the Compensation Committee, Audit Committee and Compliance Committee, respectively.$20,000 second quarter cash retainer in the amount of $12,308. With respect to Mr. Nehra, and Dr. Roper, includes the $25,000prorated portion of the $12,500 second quarter cash portionretainer for service as chairChair of the Public PolicyAudit Committee in the amount of $3,022. With respect to Ms. Price, includes the prorated portion of the $12,500 second quarter cash retainer for service as Chair of the Audit Committee and Clinical Performance Committee, respectively.prorated portion of the $20,000 second quarter cash retainer in the total amount of $25,000. With respect to Mr. Berg,Schechter, includes the $59,000prorated portion of additional feesthe $20,000 third quarter cash retainer in the aggregate paid to Mr. Berg in his role as the chairmanamount of the Board's Compliance Committee, in overseeing the Corporate Integrity Agreement and the subpoenas received by HCP, at the request of the Board
$2,174.
2
With respect to Mr. Grauer, includes the $43,750 equity portion denominated in direct stock issuances for service as lead independent director.
3
The amounts shownreported in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of all commondirect stock issuance awards restricted stock units and DSI awards("DSI") granted to our non-employee directors during 20152022 as estimated by the Company in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. This includes four quarterly grants under the Director Compensation Policy (as defined below) granted on March 15, 2022; May 15, 2022; August 15, 2022; and November 15, 2022. Messrs. Hollar and Schechter received prorated quarterly grants on August 15, 2022 and November 15, 2022, respectively, for the quarters they joined the Board. Ms. Price received a prorated quarterly grant amount on her last day of board service, June 9, 2022. See Note 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on2022 Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.
4
The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of all
3No SSAR awards were granted to ournon-employee directors during 2015 as estimated by the Company in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect to Mr. Grauer, includes the $43,750 equity portion denominated in SSARs for service as lead independent director. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating grant date fair value pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.
5
2022. As of December 31, 2015,2022, each non-employee director had the following number of SSARs outstanding: Ms. Arway, 82,076; Mr. Berg, 58,076; Mr. Davidson, 46,076;10,766; Ms. Desoer, 1,223; Mr. Diaz, 10,076; Mr. Grauer, 122,717;7,165; Mr. Nehra, 118,076; Dr. Roper, 82,076;7,165; and Ms. Yale, 7,165.
4Mr. Valine, 88,076.Hollar was appointed to the Board, effective May 6, 2022.

Our Non-Employee 5Ms. Price resigned from the Board, effective June 9, 2022.

6Mr. Schechter was appointed to the Board, effective September 20, 2022.

73



Compensation of Directors
Director Compensation Policy
Our non-employee director compensation program, which is embodied in our non-employee director compensation policy (the "Director“Director Compensation Policy"Policy”) sets forth, is designed to attract and retain highly-qualified directors and to align the termsinterests of our director compensation. There is no discretionary decision-making involved in director compensation.directors with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee andis responsible for recommending to the Board periodically reviewthe compensation of our non-employee directors. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation program for our non-employee directors no less than annually and considers input from its independent compensation consultant, Compensia, regarding general market practices on director compensation exceptas well as comparative market data for our comparator peer group, which is the same peer group used for purposes of evaluating the competitiveness of our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee also considers feedback received on our director compensation program through engagement with respect to occasional meetings or activities outside the scope of normal Board duties that are compensated on aper diem basis (see description below under "Per Diem Compensation"). our stockholders.
The following describes the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for service as a director during 20152022 under the Director Compensation Policy as set forth in the table above. Directors who are our employeescurrent teammates or officers do not receive compensation for service on the Board or any committee of the Board.

Stock-Based Compensation

Annual Grant.Under the Director Compensation Policy, each of our non-employee directors is entitled to receive SSARs,DSIs granted in four equal installments on March 15, May 15, August 15 and priced as of close of the market on, the date of our annual stockholder meeting. The number of SSARs to be granted shall beNovember 15 (each, a "Grant Date"), in an amount determined by dividing $95,000 by 25% of$47,500 (increased to $50,000, effective January 1, 2023, representing the closing market price of our common stock onfirst increase in the annual grant date. The SSARs vest in full on the one year anniversary of the date of grant, with acceleration of vesting upon a Change of Control (as defined above under "Definitions Under Stock-Based Award Agreements"), and expiring five years after the date of grant. Each of our non-employee directors is also entitled to receive direct stock issuances ("DSIs") to be granted quarterly on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The number of DSIs to be granted quarterly shall be determined by dividing $23,750value since 2017) by the closing market price of our common

ContinuesCommon Stock on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      67


Table of Contents





stockthe applicable Grant Date, or if the Grant Date does not fall on a trading day, then the last trading day of each fiscal quarter.prior to the Grant Date. The DSIs are 100% vested upon issuance. The annual grant of SSARs and DSIs shall be prorated, as applicable, including for new directors, based on the number of days of service on the Board.

Annual Retainers
Annual Retainer.Pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy, each of our non-employee directors was entitled to receive an annual retainer of $80,000 (increased to $100,000, effective January 1, 2023, representing the first increase in the annual retainer since 2014), in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears. The quarterly retainer due to a director elected during a quarter is prorated based on the days of service on the Board withinduring the applicable calendar quarter.
Independent Chair Retainer. Pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy, a fiscal year or fiscal quarter, respectively. SSARs granted on a prorated basis shall be granted and priceddirector serving as the independent Chair of the closeBoard ("Independent Chair") receives an additional retainer of market$175,000 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears, in light of the extra time commitment and responsibilities of the Independent Chair. The quarterly retainer due to the Independent Chair is to be prorated based on the first day of service on the Board, which date shall be determined by the Board upon such individual's appointment as a director.

Additional Annual Grant to Lead Independent Director.    The lead independent director is also entitled to receive additional SSARs, granted on, and priced as of the close of the market on, the date of our annual stockholder meeting. The number of SSARs to be granted shall be determined by dividing $43,750 by 25% of the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date. The SSARs vest in full on the one year anniversary of the date of grant, with acceleration of vesting upon a Change of Control (as defined above under "Definitions Under Stock-Based Award Agreements"), and expiring five years after the date of grant. Vesting of these SSARs continues so long as the non-employee director continues to serve on the Board even if he or she is no longer lead independent director. The lead independent director is also entitled to receive DSIs to be granted quarterly on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The number of DSIs to be granted quarterly shall be determined by dividing $10,937.50 by the closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day of each fiscal quarter. The DSIs are 100% vested upon issuance. The annual grant of SSARs and DSIs shall be prorated, as applicable, based on the days of service as lead independent director within a fiscal year or fiscal quarter, as applicable. SSARs granted on a prorated basis shall be granted and priced as ofIndependent Chair during the close of market on the first day of service as lead independent director on the Board.

applicable calendar quarter.

If the lead independent directorIndependent Chair also serves as a chair of any committee of the Board, the lead independent directorIndependent Chair will also be entitled to receive the additional retainer for serving as the chair of any such committee, in addition to the retainers and equity grantsretainer he or she is entitled to receive as the lead independent director.

Annual Retainers

Annual Retainer.    Pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy, each of our non-employee directors is entitled to receive an annual retainer of $80,000 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears.

Independent Chair.

Lead Independent Director Retainer.    Under the Director Compensation Policy, the lead independent director receives an additional retainer of $37,500 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears.

Committee Chairs Retainer.Under the Director Compensation Policy, the chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Compliance and Quality Committees receivereceived an additional retainer of $50,000 in cash per year paid quarterly in arrears, and the chairschair of the Public PolicyNominating and the Clinical Performance Committees receiveGovernance Committee received an additional retainer of $25,000$35,000 in cash per year (increased to $50,000, effective January 1, 2023), each paid quarterly in arrears.

Proration of Quarterly Retainer — Upon Appointment. The quarterly retainer due to a director elected or appointed to a Committee during a quarter is prorated based on the datedays of such director's appointment.

Prorationservice as chair of Quarterly Retainer — Upon Termination.    The quarterly retainer due to a director terminating servicecommittee during a quarter is prorated based on the date of such director's termination.

applicable calendar quarter.

Meeting Fees

Board Meetings. Under the Director Compensation Policy, our non-employee directors are not entitled to receive any additional compensation for regularly scheduled Board meetings.

Special Board Meetings.Non-employee directors are entitled to receive $2,500 in cash for attendance at a special meeting regardless of the duration of such meeting, unless the meeting is held telephonically, in which case the meeting must last at least approximately one hour.

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
74



Compensation of Directors

Committee Meetings.For committee meetings, non-employee directors who are committee members or whose participation was requested by the chair of a committee are entitled to receive additional compensation of $2,500 in cash for attendance regardless of the duration of such meetings, unless it is a special committee meeting held telephonically, in which case the meeting must last at least approximately one hour. In the case of Audit Committee meetings related to quarterly earnings releases, additional compensation of $2,500 in cash for each such meeting is paid regardless of the duration of such meetings.

68


Table of Contents

Compensation of Directors



Expense Reimbursement and Per Diem Compensation

Expense Reimbursement.Under the Director Compensation Policy, we reimburse our directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their travel to and attendance at meetings of the Board or any committee thereof and other Board-related business.

Per Diem Compensation.Additionally, under the Director Compensation Policy, we compensate our non-employee directors on a per diem, hourly or other

basis at a rate that is reasonable and fair to the Company as determined at the discretion of the lead independent director,Independent Chair, the Board or the Compensation Committee, as applicable, for significant time spent outside of Board or committee meetings or for meetings or activities outside the scope of normal boardBoard duties, including director training, meeting with Company management or external auditors, interviewing director candidates or other activities deemed necessary by the chairman ofIndependent Chair, the Board, the lead independent director,Compensation Committee or the entire Board. The per diemIf time expended is less than the full unit of time for which a payment rate is paidhas been set, the payment shall be made on a pro rata basis for activities that do not require a full day of service.

basis.
75

Continues on next page ►

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement      69


Table of Contents


Compensation Committee Interlocks and

Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee has served as one of our officers or employees at any time. During 2015,2022, none of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee or board of directors of any other company whose executive officer(s) served as a member of our Compensation Committee or Board.

70


Table of Contents

Certain Relationships and Related

Person
Transactions

We or one of our subsidiaries may occasionally enter into transactions with certain "related“related persons." Related persons include our executive officers, directors, nominees for directors, more than 5% or more beneficial owners of our common stockCommon Stock and immediate family members of these persons. We refer to any transaction, arrangement or relationship or any series of similar transactions, involving amountsarrangements or relationships, in excesswhich: (i) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year; (ii) the Company or any of $120,000its consolidated subsidiaries is or will be a participant; and in which the(iii) a related person has a direct or indirect material interest, as "related“related person transactions." Each related person transaction must be approved or ratified in accordance with the Company'sCompany’s written Related Person TransactionsTransaction Policy by our Audit Committee or, if our Audit Committee determines that the approval or ratification of such related person transaction should be considered by all disinterested members of the Board, by the vote of a majority of such disinterested members.

The Audit Committee considers all relevant factors when

When determining whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, the Audit Committee or the disinterested members of the Board shall consider all relevant information available concerning the related person transaction, including, without limitation, the following:

the size of the transaction and the amount payable to a related person;
the nature of the interest of the related person in the transaction;
whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest; and
whether the transaction was undertaken in the ordinary course of business of the Company;
whether the transaction involves the provision of goods or services to the Company that are available from unaffiliated third parties and, if so, whether the transaction is on terms and made under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the Company as would be available in comparable transactions with or involving unaffiliated third parties.parties; and

The Company's Related Person Transactions Policy is available underany other information regarding the Corporate Governance sectiontransaction or related person that would be material to investors in light of our website, located athttp://www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.

In 2013 the Company discovered certain errors made in processing annual bonuses deferrals undercircumstances of the Company's Voluntary Deferral Plan. For affected employees, the errors resulted in underpayment of their bonuses and overfunding of their deferral accounts. transaction.

There were 67 employees affected, including Mr. Thiry, our Chief Executive Officer. Once discovered,no related person transactions from January 1, 2022 through the Company corrected these errors consistent with the rules prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). These corrections required certaindate of the affected employees to: (1) recognize taxable income in excess of the amounts previously reported to them by the Company in their wage and tax statements, (2) pay penalties to the IRS under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, and (3) file amended tax returns for the years affected by the errors. In addition, the employees suffered the forfeiture of earnings on improperly deferred amounts during the period of deferral. As a consequence, the affected employees submitted claims for the losses and expenses they suffered (including for forfeited earnings, tax penalties, interest for late payments, costs of amending prior years' tax returns and the cost of related tax advice) as a result of the Company's errors. Mr. Thiry submitted claims for, and was reimbursed $873,373. The reimbursement of Mr. Thiry in connection with his claims was evaluated and approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Company's Related Person Transaction Policy.

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting andthis Proxy Statement 71


Tablerequired to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Contents

Regulation S-K.
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
76


Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Audit Committee") is responsible for providing independent, objective oversight of the Company'sCompany’s accounting functions and internal controls. The Audit Committee is composed of threefour directors, each of whom is independent as defined by New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board.

Board of Directors.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment compensation, retention and oversightcompensation of the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP ("KPMG"), as well as monitoring the independence, qualifications and performance of KPMG LLP and the Company'sscope and effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit function. In addition, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services to the Company by KPMG LLP is compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP'sKPMG’s independence.

    KPMG LLP has been retained as the Company's external auditor continuously since 2000.
    The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the Company's retention of KPMG LLP.
    In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the independent external audit firm.
    In conjunction with the mandated rotation of the Audit Firm's lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its chairperson are directly involved in the selection of KPMG LLP's new lead engagement partner.
    The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of KPMG LLP to serve as the Company's independent external auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its investors.

Management is responsible for internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

(United (United States) ("PCAOB") and an audit of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee'sCommittee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.

The Audit Committee has met and held discussions with the Company'sCompany’s internal auditors and KPMG, LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the scope of their audit plans, results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company'sCompany’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company'sCompany’s financial reporting.

The Audit Committee engaged the independent registered public accounting firmKPMG to conduct the independent audit.audit for the year ended December 31, 2022. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the December 31, 2015Company's audited consolidated financial statements.statements, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firmKPMG the matters required to be reviewed and discussed by applicable requirements of the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16 (Communication with Audit Committees).PCAOB and the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firmKPMG required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm'sKPMG's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm itsKPMG their independence.

Based upon the Audit Committee'sCommittee’s reviews and discussions, with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements referred to above be included in the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152022 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Carol Anthony ("John") Davidson (Chairman)
Charles G. Berg
Roger

John M. Nehra (Chair)*
Barbara J. Valine

Desoer
Jason M. Hollar*
Adam H. Schechter

*As of February 22, 2023, the date of filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, Mr. Nehra was Chair of the Audit Committee. Mr. Hollar assumed the role of Audit Committee Chair effective as of March 13, 2023.





77

72


Table of Contents

Audit Committee Report




Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for 20172024 Annual Meeting

If you wish to present a proposal for action at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders2024 Annual Meeting and wish to have it included in the proxy statement and form of proxy that management will prepare, you must notify us no later than January [          ], 2017December 27, 2023 in the form required under the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Otherwise, your proposal will not be included in management'smanagement’s proxy materials.

Our Bylaws include provisions permitting, subject to certain terms and conditions, stockholders or groups of stockholders who have continuously owned at least 3% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock for at least three consecutive years to use management’s proxy materials to nominate a number of director candidates not to exceed the greater of two or 20% of the number of directors then in office, subject to reduction in certain circumstances. If you wish to nominate a director for election at the 2024 Annual Meeting and wish to have the nominee included in the proxy statement and form of proxy that management will prepare, you must notify us no later than the close of business December 27, 2023, and no earlier than the close of business November 27, 2023. However, if we hold our 2024 Annual Meeting more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the one-year anniversary of the date that the Company first mailed this Proxy Statement, you must notify us: (i) not earlier than the close of business on the 150th day prior to the 2024 Annual Meeting and (ii) not later than the close of business on the later of the 120th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting was first made. Otherwise, your nominee will not be included in management’s proxy materials. If you wish to present a proposal for action at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders,2024 Annual Meeting, even though it will not be included in management'smanagement’s proxy materials, or if you wish to nominate a director for election at the 2017 annual meeting2024 Annual Meeting outside of stockholders,the proxy access provisions of our bylawsBylaws, our Bylaws require that you must notify us no later than the close of business March 22, 2017,8, 2024, and no earlier than the close of business February 20, 2017.7, 2024. However, if we hold our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders2024 Annual Meeting more than

30 days before or more than 70 days after the one-year anniversary of our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders,2023 Annual Meeting, you must notify us: (i) not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the 2017 annual meeting2024 Annual Meeting and (ii) not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the 2017 annual meetingdate of the 2024 Annual Meeting was first made.

We advise you to review our bylaws,Bylaws, which contain these and other requirements with respect to advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations, including certain information that must be included concerning the stockholder and each proposal.proposal or nominee. Our bylawsBylaws are available under the Corporate Governance section of our website, located athttp://www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.

In addition, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than April 8, 2024.
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
78

DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. Notice



General Information
We are delivering this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation of 2016proxies by the Board, for use at our Annual Meeting, which will be held on June 6, 2023, at 10:00 AM Mountain Time. The Annual Meeting will be a live audio webcast available atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2023, where you will be able to attend, vote your shares electronically and submit questions.
The proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting will remain valid for use at any meetings held upon adjournment or postponement of that meeting. The Record Date for the Annual Meeting is the close of business on April 14, 2023. All holders of record of our Common Stock on the Record Date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
To participate in the virtual Annual Meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("e-proxy notice"), proxy card or voting instruction form. The audio webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 AM Mountain Time. Online check-in will begin at 9:45 AM Mountain Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures. If you encounter any technical difficulties with the virtual meeting platform on the meeting day, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting log in page at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2023.
If you wish to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, log into the virtual meeting platformbeginning at 9:45 AM Mountain Time on the meeting day, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.” We intend to answer questions submitted by stockholders during the Annual Meeting that comply with the Annual Meeting rules of conduct, which will be posted on the virtual meeting platform.
We are using the "e-proxy" rules adopted by the SEC to furnish proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. Under the e-proxy rules, the e-proxy notice will be mailed on or about [_______], 2023 to our stockholders of record and beneficial owners of our Common Stock as of the Record Date, in lieu of a printed copy of our proxy materials. We believe using this e-proxy notice model allows us to reduce costs and helps reduce our carbon footprint.
If you receive an e-proxy notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you have previously made a permanent election to receive these materials in paper copy. If you received an e-proxy notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the e-proxy notice.
Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote prior to the Annual Meeting. Voting in advance will help ensure that your shares will be voted at the Annual Meeting.
Unless you instruct otherwise in your proxy, any proxy that is given and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting:
FOR the election of the nine director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement 73


Tableeach to serve until the 2024 Annual Meeting or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

FOR the ratification of Contents

the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023;
FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs;
for the approval, on an advisory basis, of holding future advisory votes on NEO compensation every 1YEAR;
FOR the approval of the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation; and
With regard to all other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting, as determined by the Company Proxies in their best judgment.

79




Voting Information
Our only voting securities are the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. As of the Record Date, we had approximately [_____] shares of Common Stock outstanding. Each stockholder of record as of the Record Date is entitled to one vote per share on each matter that we will consider at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders are not entitled to cumulate votes. Under the rules of the NYSE, your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your uninstructed shares in the election of directors and certain other matters absent specific voting instructions. Thus, if you hold your shares in “street name,” meaning that your shares are registered in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any proposal other than the proposal for the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023. The votes that the brokers would have cast if their customers had given them specific instructions are commonly called “broker non-votes.” If the stockholders of record present at the Annual Meeting or represented by their proxies and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting hold at least a majority of our shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date, a quorum will exist for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders virtually attending the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting who abstain from voting and broker non-votes are counted as present for quorum purposes.
How to Vote
Shares of our Common Stock may be held directly in your own name or may be held beneficially through a broker, bank or other nominee in "street name." We have summarized below the distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
Stockholder of Record — If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are the stockholder of record with respect to those shares and we are providing proxy materials directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to vote online during the Annual Meeting or to grant your voting proxy to the persons designated by us or a person you select.
Beneficial Owner — If your shares are held in "street name" in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are the beneficial owner of the shares, and you have been provided proxy materials from your broker, bank or other nominee, which is considered the stockholder of record with respect to the shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct the broker, bank or nominee on how to vote your shares and are also invited to virtually attend the Annual Meeting. Your broker, bank or nominee will provide you with a voting instruction form for you to use, which will also include a 16-digit control number that will allow you to access the Annual Meeting and vote your shares during the Annual Meeting.
Voting
Whether you hold our shares as a stockholder of record or as a beneficial owner, we encourage you to vote before the Annual Meeting. Most stockholders will have a choice of voting through the Internet or by telephone or, if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, by completing a proxy card or voting instruction form and returning it in a postage-prepaid envelope. Please refer to the instructions below and in the e-proxy notice. If you are a Company teammate who holds shares of Common Stock through the DaVita Retirement Savings Plan (the "401(k) Plan"), certain earlier voting deadlines apply.
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
80


Proxy Statement
Through the Internet
:
Prior to the Annual Meeting, you may vote through the Internet by going to www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions. You will need to have the e-proxy notice, or if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, your proxy card or voting instruction form, available when voting through the Internet. If you want to vote through the Internet in advance of the meeting, you must do so prior to 11:59 PM Eastern Time, on Monday, June 5, 2023. If you vote through the Internet, you do not need to return a proxy card.
During the Annual Meeting, you may vote through the Internet by following the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2023. You will need to have your e-proxy notice, proxy card or voting instruction form available when you access the virtual Annual Meeting web page.
By Telephone
)
You may vote by touch tone telephone by calling 1-800-579-1639. You will need to have your e-proxy notice, or if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, your proxy card or voting instruction form, available when voting by telephone. If you want to vote by telephone, you must do so prior to 11:59 PM Eastern Time, on Monday, June 5, 2023. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return a proxy card.
By Mail
*
If you are a beneficial owner, you may vote by mail by signing and dating your voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank or nominee and mailing it in a postage-prepaid envelope. If you are a stockholder of record and you received a printed copy of our proxy materials, you may vote by signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in a postage-prepaid envelope. If you are a stockholder of record and received the e-proxy notice, in order to obtain a proxy card, please follow the instructions on the e-proxy notice. If you want to vote by mail, the proxy card or voting instruction form must be received prior to 11:59 PM Eastern Time, on Monday, June 5, 2023.

Teammate 401(k) Stockholders — If you participate in the 401(k) Plan and you are invested in our Common Stock fund in your account, you may give voting instructions to the 401(k) Plan trustee with respect to the share equivalents credited to your account. The plan trustee will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions received by June 2, 2023 at 11:59 PM Eastern Time. You may also revoke previously given voting instructions by June 2, 2023at 11:59 PM Eastern Time, by filing with the plan trustee either written notice of revocation or a properly completed and signed voting instruction form bearing a later date. If you do not send instructions for a proposal, the plan trustee will vote the number of shares equal to the share equivalents credited to your account in the same proportion that it votes shares for which it did receive timely instructions.
Changing Your Vote — If you are a stockholder of record or beneficial owner, you may change your vote at any time prior to the applicable voting deadline by voting again with your 16-digit control number. If you virtually attend the Annual Meeting you will also be given the opportunity to vote or change your vote during the Annual Meeting through the virtual meeting platform at: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2023. If you participate in the 401(k) Plan and you are invested in our Common Stock fund in your account, you may not change your vote after June 2, 2023at 11:59 PM Eastern Time.
81


Proxy Statement
Votes Required for Proposals.
ProposalVoting OptionsBoard RecommendationVote Required to Adopt the ProposalEffect of AbstentionsEffect of Broker Non-Votes*
Proposal 1: Election of the nine director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement to serve until our 2024 Annual Meeting.For, Against or Abstain for each nominee
FOR
each nominee
Majority of votes cast with respect to each nomineeNo effectNo effect
Proposal 2: Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023.For, Against or AbstainFORMajority of shares represented virtually or by proxy and entitled to voteTreated as votes AgainstBrokers have discretion to vote
Proposal 3: Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs.For, Against or AbstainFORMajority of shares represented virtually or by proxy and entitled to voteTreated as votes AgainstNo effect
Proposal 4: Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future advisory
votes on the compensation of our NEOs.
1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years or Abstain1 YEARPlurality of votes
cast
No effectNo effect
Proposal 5: Approval of an
Amendment and Restatement of the Company’s Restated
Certificate of Incorporation
For, Against or AbstainFORMajority of shares outstandingTreated as votes AgainstTreated as votes Against
*See "Voting Information" for additional information on broker non-votes.
Proxy Solicitation Costs
The Company pays the cost of soliciting proxies. We may request banks and brokers to solicit their customers who beneficially own our Common Stock and will reimburse them for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses relating to these efforts. We have also retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. (“MacKenzie”) to assist in the distribution and solicitation of proxies, among other things, at a fee of $16,000, plus reimbursement for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. MacKenzie and our officers, directors and teammates may supplement the solicitation by mailing of proxies and by telephone, e-mail and personal solicitation. We have agreed to indemnify MacKenzie against liabilities and expenses arising in connection with the proxy solicitation unless caused by MacKenzie’s gross negligence, willful misconduct or bad faith.
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
82

Proxy Statement

Delivery of Proxy Statement and Annual Report
Beneficial owners, but not record holders, of Common Stock who share a single address may receive only one copy of the e-proxy notice and, as applicable, the Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement (collectively, the "Proxy Materials"), unless their broker has received contrary instructions from any beneficial owner at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and mailing costs for DaVita. If any beneficial owner wishes to discontinue householding and receive a separate copy of the Proxy Materials, they should notify their broker. Beneficial owners can also request a separate copy of the Proxy Materials by contacting Investor Relations at the following address or phone number: DaVita Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, 1-888-484-7505. Additionally, stockholders who share the same address and receive multiple copies of the Proxy Materials can request a single copy by contacting us at the address or phone number above.

Forward-Looking Statements
This Proxy Statement contains or refers to certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Without limiting the foregoing, statements including the words "expect," "intend," "will," "may," "continue," "target," "goal", “pledge” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company bases its forward-looking statements on information available to it on the date of this Proxy Statement, and undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of changed circumstances, new information, future events or otherwise, except as may otherwise be required by law. Actual future events could also differ materially due to numerous factors that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties including, among other things, the risks and uncertainties set forth under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in the Company's reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and the other risks and uncertainties discussed in any subsequent reports that the Company files with the SEC from time to time.
83



Other Matters

The Board does not know of any other matters to be presented at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholdersAnnual Meeting but, if other matters do properly come before the meeting, it is intended that the persons named as proxies in the proxy card will vote on them in accordance with their best judgment.

A copy of our 20152022 Annual Report to Stockholders accompanies this Proxy Statement. The 20152022 Annual Report to Stockholders includes our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015.2022. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K includes these financial statements, as well as other supplementary financial information and certain schedules. The Annual Report on Form 10-K is not part of our proxy soliciting material.Copies of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, without

exhibits, can be obtained without charge by contacting Investor Relations at the following address: Attn: Investor Relations, DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc., 2000 16th16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, (888) 484-75051-888-484-7505 or through our website, located athttp://www.davita.com.

www.davita.com.

By order of the Board of Directors,

GRAPHIC

Martha Ha
Corporate Secretary

May [         ], 2016

74


Table of Contents


Appendix A

The full text of the amendments to the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws, as proposed to be adopted, is set forth below. These amendments will only be adopted if Proposal 4 is approved.

Article III, Section 12(a)(1)

Nominations of persons for election to the Board and the proposal of business to be considered by the stockholders may be made at an annual meeting of stockholders only (a) pursuant to the Corporation's notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto), (b) by or at the direction of the Board or, (c) by any stockholder of the Corporation who was a stockholder of record of the Corporation at the time the notice provided for in this Section 12 is delivered to the Secretary, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this Section 12, or (d) by any stockholder of the Corporation or group of stockholders in accordance with Article III Section 13 of these Bylaws.

Article III, Section 12(c)(1)

Only such persons who are nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in(a) this Section 12shall be eligible to be elected atwith respect to an annual or special meeting of stockholders, or (b) Article III Section 13 of these Bylaws with respect to an annual meeting,shall be eligible to be elected at a meeting of stockholders of the Corporation to serve as directors and only such business shall be conducted at a meeting of stockholders as shall have been brought before the meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 12. Except as otherwise provided by law, the chairman of the meeting shall have the power and duty (a) to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made or proposed, as the case may be, in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 12 (including whether the stockholder or beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made solicited (or is part of a group which solicited) or did not so solicit, as the case may be, proxies in support of such stockholder's nominee or proposal in compliance with such stockholder's representation required under Section 12(b), the substance of which representation is set forth in Section 12(a)(2)(c)(vi)) and (b) if any proposed nomination or business was not made or proposed in compliance with this Section 12, to declare that such nomination shall be disregarded or that such proposed business shall not be transacted. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 12, if the stockholder who submitted a nomination or proposed business (or a qualified representative of the stockholder) does not appear at the annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Corporation to present a nomination or proposed business, such nomination shall be disregarded and such proposed business shall not be transacted, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such matter may have been received by the Corporation. For purposes of this Section 12 and Article III Section 13 of these Bylaws, to be considered a qualified representative of the stockholder, a person must be authorized by a writing executed by such stockholder or an electronic transmission delivered by such stockholder to act for such stockholder as proxy at the meeting of stockholders and such person must produce such writing or electronic transmission, or a reliable reproduction of the writing or electronic transmission, at the meeting of stockholders.

Article III, Sections 13 and 14

Section 13.    Proxy Access for Director Nominations.

    (a)Definitions.    For purposes of Section 13, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

    (1)"Authorized Group Member" shall mean, with respect to any nomination by a Nominator Group, the member of that Nominator Group that is authorized to act on behalf of all members of that Nominator Group with respect to matters relating to the nomination, including withdrawal of the nomination.

    (2)"Compensation Arrangement" shall mean any direct or indirect compensatory, payment or other financial agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person or entity other than the Corporation, including, without limitation, any agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or indemnification in connection with candidacy, nomination, service or action as a nominee or as a director.

    (3)"Eligible Stockholder" shall mean a person who has either (a) been a record holder of the shares of common stock of the Corporation used to satisfy the eligibility requirements in Section 13(d) continuously for the required three (3)-year period or (b) provides to the Secretary of the Corporation, within the time period referred to in Section 13(e), evidence of continuous Ownership of such shares for such three (3)-year period from one or more securities intermediaries.

    (4)"Maximum Number" shall mean that number of directors constituting the greater of (a) two (2) or (b) twenty percent (20%) of the total number of directors of the Corporation on the last day on which a

A-1


Table of Contents

    Nomination Notice may be submitted pursuant to this Section 13 (rounded down to the nearest whole number), which number shall be reduced as set forth in Section 13(c)(1).

    (5)"Minimum Number" shall mean three percent (3%) of the number of outstanding shares of common stock of the Corporation as of the most recent date for which such amount is given in any filing by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to the submission of the Nomination Notice.

    (6)"Nominating Stockholder" shall mean any Eligible Stockholder or group of up to twenty (20) stockholders (a "Nominator Group") that, collectively as a group, satisfy the requirements to qualify as an Eligible Stockholder, that (a) has (individually and collectively, in the case of a Nominator Group) satisfied all applicable conditions and complied with all applicable procedures set forth in this Section 13 (including, without limitation, the timely submission of a Nomination Notice that meets the requirements set forth in this Section 13), and (b) has nominated a Stockholder Nominee.

    (7)"Nomination Notice" shall mean all information and documents that a Nominating Stockholder is required to submit to the Secretary of the Corporation pursuant to Section 13(f).

    (8)"Own" shall mean possession, with respect to those outstanding shares of common stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally for the election of all directors of the Corporation, of both: (a) the full voting and investment rights pertaining to the shares; and (b) the full economic interest in (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss on) such shares; provided, that the number of shares calculated in accordance with clauses (a) and (b) shall not include any shares: (i) sold by such stockholder or any of its affiliates in any transaction that has not been settled or closed, including any short sale; (ii) borrowed by such stockholder or any of its affiliates for any purposes or purchased by such stockholder or any of its affiliates pursuant to an agreement to resell; or (iii) subject to any option, warrant, forward contract, swap, contract of sale, or other derivative or similar agreement entered into by such stockholder or any of its affiliates, whether any such instrument or agreement is to be settled with shares or with cash based on the notional amount or value of outstanding shares of stock of the Corporation, in any such case which instrument or agreement has, or is intended to have, or if exercised by either party thereto would have, the purpose or effect of reducing in any manner, to any extent or at any time in the future, such stockholder's or affiliates' full right to vote or direct the voting of any such shares, and/or hedging, offsetting or altering to any degree any gain or loss arising from the full economic Ownership of such shares by such stockholder or affiliate, other than any such arrangements solely involving a national or multi-national multi-industry market index. A stockholder shall "Own" shares held in the name of a nominee or other intermediary so long as the stockholder retains the right to instruct how the shares are voted with respect to the election of directors and the right to direct the disposition thereof and possesses the full economic interest in the shares. A stockholder's Ownership of shares shall be deemed to continue during any period in which the stockholder has loaned such shares or delegated any voting power over such shares by means of a proxy, power of attorney or other instrument or arrangement which in either case is revocable at any time by the stockholder; provided, however, in the event of a loan, the stockholder has the power to recall such loaned shares on five (5) business days' notice. The terms "Owned," "Owning," "Ownership" and other variations of the word "Own" shall have correlative meanings. Whether shares constitute shares Owned shall be decided by the Board in its reasonable determination, which determination shall be conclusive and binding on the Corporation and its stockholders.

    (9)"public announcement" shall have the meaning set forth in Article III Section 12(c)(2) of these Bylaws.

    (10)"Stock Exchange Rules" shall mean the rules of any stock exchange on which the Corporation's securities are traded.

    (11)"Stockholder Nominee" shall mean any person nominated for election pursuant to this Section 13.

    (12)"Voting Commitment" shall have the meaning set forth in Article IV Section 2 of these Bylaws.

A-2


Table of Contents

    (b)Proxy Access at Annual Meetings. Subject to the provisions of this Section 13, if expressly requested in the relevant Nomination Notice, the Corporation shall include in its proxy statement for any annual meeting of stockholders:

    (1)the name of any Stockholder Nominee, which shall also be included on the Corporation's form of proxy and ballot;

    (2)disclosure about the Stockholder Nominee and the Nominating Stockholder required under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission or other applicable law to be included in the proxy statement;

    (3)any statement included by the Nominating Stockholder in the Nomination Notice for inclusion in the proxy statement in support of the Stockholder Nominee's election to the Board (subject, without limitation, to Section 13(g)), if such statement does not exceed five hundred (500) words; and

    (4)any other information that the Corporation or the Board determines, in its discretion, to include in the proxy statement relating to the nomination of the Stockholder Nominee, including, without limitation, any statement in opposition to the nomination, information relating to any Compensation Arrangement and/or Voting Commitment, and any of the information provided pursuant to this Section 13.

    For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of this Section 13 shall not apply to a special meeting of stockholders (including, without limitation, a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting), and the Corporation shall not be required to include a director nominee of a stockholder or group of stockholders in the Corporation's proxy statement or form of proxy or ballot for any special meeting of stockholders.

    (c)Maximum Number of Stockholder Nominees.

    (1)The Corporation shall not be required to include in the proxy statement for an annual meeting of stockholders more Stockholder Nominees than the Maximum Number. In the event that one or more vacancies for any reason occurs on the Board after the deadline set forth in Section 13(e) but before the date of the annual meeting and the Board resolves to reduce the size of the Board in connection therewith, the Maximum Number shall be calculated based on the number of directors in office as so reduced. The Maximum Number for a particular annual meeting shall be reduced by:

      (i)Stockholder Nominees whose nominations for election at such annual meeting are subsequently withdrawn; and

      (ii)Stockholder Nominees who the Board itself decides to nominate for election at such annual meeting.

    (2)Any Nominating Stockholder submitting more than one Stockholder Nominee for inclusion in the Corporation's proxy materials pursuant to this Section 13 shall rank such Stockholder Nominees based on the order that the Nominating Stockholder desires such Stockholder Nominees to be selected for inclusion in the Corporation's proxy materials. In the event that the number of Stockholder Nominees submitted by Nominating Stockholders pursuant to this Section 13 exceeds the Maximum Number, the highest ranking Stockholder Nominee who meets the requirements of this Section 13 from each Nominating Stockholder will be selected for inclusion in the Corporation's proxy materials until the Maximum Number is reached, going in order of the amount (largest to smallest) of shares of stock of the Corporation that each Nominating Stockholder disclosed as Owned in its respective Nomination Notice submitted to the Corporation. This selection process will continue with the next highest ranked nominees as many times as necessary, following the same order each time, until the Maximum Number is reached.

    (d)Eligible Stockholders.

    (1)An Eligible Stockholder or Nominator Group may submit a nomination in accordance with this Section 13 only if the person or group (in the aggregate) has continuously Owned at least the Minimum Number (as adjusted for any stock splits, stock dividends, subdivisions, combinations, reclassifications, recapitalizations or similar events) of shares of the Corporation's common stock throughout the three (3)-year period preceding and including the date of submission of the Nomination Notice, and continues to Own at least the Minimum Number of shares through the date of the annual meeting. No shares may be

A-3


Table of Contents

    attributed to more than one Eligible Stockholder. The following shall be treated as one Eligible Stockholder or one member of a Nominator Group if such Eligible Stockholder or member of a Nominator Group shall provide together with the Nomination Notice documentation that demonstrates compliance with the following criteria: (a) funds under common management and investment control; (b) funds under common management and funded primarily by the same employer; or (c) a "family of investment companies" or a "group of investment companies" (each as defined in or under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended).

    For the avoidance of doubt, in the event of a nomination by a Nominator Group, any and all requirements and obligations for a given Eligible Stockholder (including, without limitation, each and every fund or company that comprises the Nominator Group) that are set forth in this Section 13, including the minimum holding period, shall apply to each member of such Nominator Group; provided, however, that the Minimum Number shall apply to the Ownership of the Nominator Group in the aggregate. Should any stockholder withdraw from a Nominator Group at any time prior to the annual meeting of stockholders, the Nominator Group shall only be deemed to Own the shares held by the remaining members of that Nominator Group.

    (2)No stockholder shall be permitted to be in more than one Nominator Group, and if any stockholder appears as a member of more than one Nominator Group, or as a member of a Nominator Group and as a Nominating Stockholder without any such group, such stockholder shall be deemed to be a member of only the Nominator Group that has the largest Ownership position as reflected in the Nomination Notice and is not permitted to act as a Nominating Stockholder separate from such Nominator Group.

    (e)Timely Nomination Notice.    To be timely, a Nomination Notice must be delivered to or be mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred fiftieth (150th) day prior to the first anniversary of the date (as stated in the Corporation's proxy materials relating to that annual meeting) that the Corporation first mailed its proxy statement for the annual meeting of the previous year, except where information or documents are required to be provided after the date the Nomination Notice is first submitted, as set forth in this Section 13 (provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than thirty (30) days before or more than seventy (70) days after such anniversary date, the Nomination Notice must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred fiftieth (150th) day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Corporation). In no event shall the adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting, or the public announcement of such an adjournment or postponement, commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a Nomination Notice.

    (f)Nomination Notice.    The Nomination Notice shall consist of, collectively, the following information, documents and agreements which shall, for avoidance of doubt, be compiled, completed and submitted by the Nominating Stockholder or its representatives at its own cost:

    (1)documentary evidence in the form of one or more written statements from the record holder of the shares (and from each intermediary through which the shares are or have been held during the requisite three (3)-year holding period, provided that each such intermediary must be a participant in the Depository Trust Company or an affiliate of a participant in the Depository Trust Company) verifying and certifying that, as of a date within seven (7) calendar days prior to the date of the Nomination Notice, the Nominating Stockholder Owns, and has continuously Owned for the preceding three (3) years, the Minimum Number of shares, and the Nominating Stockholder's agreement to provide, within five (5) business days after the record date for the annual meeting, documentary evidence in the form of written statements from the record holder and intermediaries verifying and certifying the Nominating Stockholder's continuous Ownership of the Minimum Number of shares through the record date;

    (2)an undertaking to provide immediate notice if the Nominating Stockholder ceases to Own the Minimum Number of shares prior to the date of the annual meeting;

A-4


Table of Contents

    (3)a copy of the Schedule 14N (or any successor form) relating to the Stockholder Nominee, completed and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Nominating Stockholder as applicable, in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules;

    (4)the written consent of each Stockholder Nominee to being named in the Corporation's proxy statement, form of proxy and ballot as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected;

    (5)a written notice of the nomination of such Stockholder Nominee that includes the following additional information, agreements, representations and warranties by the Nominating Stockholder (including, for the avoidance of doubt, each member of a Nominator Group):

      (i)the information and other deliverables that would be required to be set forth in a stockholder's notice of nomination pursuant to Article III Section 12(a) of these Bylaws, as if the Nominating Stockholder were the proposing stockholder under that section;

      (ii)to the extent not included in the response to paragraph (i) above, a detailed description of all material relationships, between or among the Nominating Stockholder, on the one hand, and each Stockholder Nominee, on the other hand, including, without limitation, all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S–K (or its successor item) if the Nominating Stockholder were the "registrant" for purposes of such item and the Stockholder Nominee, were a director or executive officer of such registrant;

      (iii)a detailed description of all communications by such Nominating Stockholder with any other stockholder or beneficial owner of any securities of the Corporation regarding such Stockholder Nominee;

      (iv)the details of any relationship that existed within the past three years and that would have been described pursuant to Item 6(e) of Schedule 14N (or any successor item) if it existed on the date of submission of the Schedule 14N (or any successor item);

      (v)a representation and warranty that the Nominating Stockholder did not acquire, and is not holding, securities of the Corporation for the purpose or with the effect of influencing or changing control of the Corporation;

      (vi)a representation and warranty that the Nominating Stockholder has not nominated and will not nominate for election to the Board at the annual meeting any person other than such Nominating Stockholder's Stockholder Nominee(s);

      (vii)a representation and warranty that the Nominating Stockholder has not engaged in and will not engage in a "solicitation" within the meaning of Rule 14a-1(l) (or any successor thereof) under the Exchange Act with respect to the annual meeting, other than with respect to such Nominating Stockholder's Stockholder Nominee(s) or any nominee of the Board;

      (viii)a representation and warranty that the Nominating Stockholder has not engaged in and will not engage in, other than with respect to such Nominating Stockholder's Stockholder Nominee(s) or any nominee of the Board, (A) an exempt solicitation as described in Rule 14a-2(b) (or any successor thereof) under the Exchange Act, or (B) any communication, as described in Rule 14a-1(l)(2)(iv) (or any successor thereof) under the Exchange Act, stating how the Nominating Stockholder intends to vote at the annual meeting and the reasons therefore;

      (ix)a representation and warranty that the Nominating Stockholder will not use or distribute any proxy card other than the Corporation's proxy card in soliciting stockholders in connection with the election of a Stockholder Nominee at the annual meeting;

      (x)a representation and warranty that the Stockholder Nominee's candidacy or, if elected, membership on the Board would not violate applicable state or federal law or Stock Exchange Rules;

      (xi)a representation and warranty that the Stockholder Nominee: (A) qualifies as independent under the Stock Exchange Rules and any publicly disclosed standards used by the Board in determining and

A-5


Table of Contents

      disclosing the independence of the directors; and (B) is not and has not been subject to any event specified in Rule 506(d)(1) of Regulation D (or any successor thereof) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K (or any successor item) under the Exchange Act, without reference to whether the event is material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity of the Stockholder Nominee;

      (xii)a representation and warranty that the Nominating Stockholder satisfies the eligibility requirements set forth in Section 13(d);

      (xiii)a representation and warranty that the Nominating Stockholder will continue to satisfy the eligibility requirements described in Section 13(d) through the date of the annual meeting;

      (xiv)the details of any position of the Stockholder Nominee as an officer or director of any competitor (that is, any entity that provides products or services that compete with or are alternatives to the principal products produced or services provided by the Corporation or its affiliates) of the Corporation, within the three (3) years preceding the submission of the Nomination Notice;

      (xv)if desired, a statement for inclusion in the proxy statement in support of the Stockholder Nominee's election to the Board. Any such statement shall not exceed five hundred (500) words and shall fully comply with Section 14 (or any successor thereof) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder; and

      (xvi)in the case of a nomination by a Nominator Group, the designation by all group members of one Authorized Group Member;

    (6)an executed agreement (which form of agreement shall be provided by the Secretary of the Corporation upon written request), which must be submitted within ten (10) days of the Nominating Stockholder's first submission of any information required by this Section 13(f), pursuant to which the Nominating Stockholder (including each member of a Nominator Group) agrees:

      (i)to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in connection with the nomination, solicitation and election;

      (ii)to file any written solicitation or other communication with the Corporation's stockholders relating to one or more of the Corporation's directors or director nominees or any Stockholder Nominee with the Securities and Exchange Commission, regardless of whether any such filing is required under any rule or regulation or whether any exemption from filing is available for such materials under any rule or regulation;

      (iii)to assume all liability stemming from any action, suit or proceeding concerning any actual or alleged legal or regulatory violation arising out of any communication by the Nominating Stockholder or the Stockholder Nominee nominated by such Nominating Stockholder with the Corporation, its stockholders or any other person, including, without limitation, the Nomination Notice;

      (iv)to indemnify and hold harmless (jointly with all other members of a Nominator Group, if applicable) the Corporation and each of its directors, officers and employees individually against any liability, loss, damages, expenses or other costs (including attorneys' fees) incurred in connection with any action, suit or proceeding (whether threatened, pending or completed), whether legal, judicial administrative or investigative, against the Corporation or any of its directors, officers or employees arising out of or relating to a failure or alleged failure of the Nominating Stockholder or Stockholder Nominee to comply with, or any breach or alleged breach of, its, or his or her, as applicable, obligations, agreements or representations under or pursuant to this Section 13, or otherwise arising out of any nomination, solicitation or other activity by any Eligible Stockholder or any member of a Nominator Group in connection with its efforts pursuant to this Section 13;

      (v)to promptly (and in any event within forty-eight (48) hours of discovering such misstatement or omission) notify the Corporation and any other recipient of any misstatement or omission of information included in the Nomination Notice, or any other communication by the Nominating Stockholder (including with respect to any member of a Nominator Group) with the Corporation, its stockholders or

A-6


Table of Contents

      any other person in connection with the nomination or election ceases to be true and accurate in all material respects (or omits a material fact necessary to make the statements made not misleading), and promptly notify the Corporation and any other recipient of the information that is required to correct the misstatement or omission; and

      (vi)in the event that the Nominating Stockholder (including any member of a Nominator Group) has failed to continue to satisfy the eligibility requirements described in Section 13(d), to promptly notify the Corporation; and

    (7)a written questionnaire and a written representation and agreement pursuant to Article IV Section 2 of these Bylaws (each in the form provided by the Secretary of the Corporation upon written request), which must be submitted within ten (10) days of the Nominating Stockholder's first submission of any information required by this Section 13(f).

    The information and documents required by this Section 13(f) shall be provided with respect to and executed by the Nominating Stockholder (and each member of a Nominator Group), and provided with respect to the persons specified in Instructions 1 and 2 to Items 6(c) and (d) of Schedule 14N (or any successor item) in the case of a Nominating Stockholder or any member of a Nominator Group. The Nomination Notice shall be deemed submitted on the date on which all the information and documents referred to in this Section 13(f) (other than such information and documents required to be provided after the date the Nomination Notice is first submitted) have been delivered to or, if sent by mail, received by the Secretary of the Corporation.

    (g)Exclusion or Disqualification of Stockholder Nominees.

    (1)If, after the deadline for submitting a Nomination Notice as set forth in Section 13(e), a Nominating Stockholder becomes ineligible or withdraws its nomination or a Stockholder Nominee becomes ineligible or unwilling to serve on the Board, whether before or after the mailing of the definitive proxy statement, the Corporation:

      (i)shall not be required to include in its proxy statement or on any ballot or form of proxy the Stockholder Nominee or any successor or replacement nominee proposed by the Nominating Stockholder or by any other Nominating Stockholder; and

      (ii)may otherwise communicate to its stockholders, including without limitation by amending or supplementing its proxy statement or ballot or form of proxy, that the Stockholder Nominee will not be included as a Stockholder Nominee in the proxy statement or on any ballot or form of proxy and will not be voted on at the annual meeting.

    (2)Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 13, the Corporation may omit from its proxy materials any Stockholder Nominee, and any information concerning such Stockholder Nominee (including a Nominating Stockholder's statement in support), and in such case such nomination shall be disregarded and no vote on such Stockholder Nominee will occur (notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Corporation), and the Nominating Stockholder may not, after the last day on which a Nomination Notice would be timely, cure in any way any defect preventing the nomination of the Stockholder Nominee, if:

      (i)the Corporation receives a notice (whether or not subsequently withdrawn) that a stockholder intends to nominate any candidate for election to the Board at the annual meeting pursuant to the advance notice requirements for stockholder nominees set forth in Article III Section 12(a) of these Bylaws;

      (ii)the Nominating Stockholder has engaged in a "solicitation" within the meaning of Rule 14a-1(l) (or any successor thereof) under the Exchange Act with respect to the annual meeting, other than with respect to such Nominating Stockholder's Stockholder Nominee(s) or any nominee of the Board;

      (iii)the Nominating Stockholder has engaged in, other than with respect to such Nominating Stockholder's Stockholder Nominee(s) or any nominee of the Board, (A) an exempt solicitation as described in Rule 14a-2(b) (or any successor thereof) under the Exchange Act, or (B) any

A-7


Table of Contents

      communication, as described in Rule 14a-1(l)(2)(iv) (or any successor thereof) under the Exchange Act, stating how the Nominating Stockholder intends to vote at the annual meeting and the reasons therefore;

      (iv)the Nominating Stockholder or the Authorized Group Member, as applicable, or any qualified representative thereof, does not appear at the annual meeting to present the nomination submitted in accordance with this Section 13;

      (v)the Board of Directors, acting in good faith, determines that such Stockholder Nominee's nomination or election to the Board would result in the Corporation violating or failing to be in compliance with these Bylaws or the Certificate of Incorporation, or any applicable law, rule or regulation to which the Corporation is subject, including the Stock Exchange Rules;

      (vi)the Stockholder Nominee has been, within the past three (3) years, an officer or director of a competitor, as defined for purposes of Section 8 (or any successor thereof) of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, as amended; or

      (vii)the Nominating Stockholder has failed to continue to satisfy the eligibility requirements described in Section 13(d), any of the representations and warranties made in the Nomination Notice ceases to be true and accurate in all material respects (or omits a material fact necessary to make the statement made not misleading), the Stockholder Nominee becomes unwilling or unable to serve on the Board or any violation or breach occurs of any of the obligations, agreements, representations or warranties of the Nominating Stockholder or the Stockholder Nominee under or pursuant to this Section 13.

    (3)Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 13, the Corporation may omit from its proxy statement, or may supplement or correct, any information, including all or any portion of the statement in support of the Stockholder Nominee included in the Nomination Notice, if:

      (i)such information is not true in all material respects or omits a material statement necessary to make the statements made not misleading;

      (ii)such information directly or indirectly impugns the character, integrity or personal reputation of, or directly or indirectly makes charges concerning improper, illegal or immoral conduct or associations, without factual foundation, with respect to, any individual, corporation, partnership, association or other entity, organization or governmental authority;

      (iii)the inclusion of such information in the proxy statement would otherwise violate the Securities and Exchange Commission proxy rules or any other applicable law, rule or regulation; or

      (iv)the inclusion of such information in the proxy statement would impose a material risk of liability upon the Corporation.

    (4)The Corporation may solicit against, and include in the proxy statement its own statement relating to, any Stockholder Nominee.

    (h)Interpretation.    The Board (and any other person or body authorized by the Board, including, without limitation, the chairman of the relevant annual meeting) shall have the power and authority to interpret this Section 13 and to make any and all determinations necessary or advisable to apply this Section 13 to any persons, facts or circumstances, including the power to determine (1) whether one or more stockholders or beneficial owners qualifies as an Eligible Stockholder or Nominator Group, as applicable, (2) whether a Nomination Notice complies with this Section 13, (3) whether a Stockholder Nominee satisfies the qualifications and requirements in this Section 13, and (4) whether any and all requirements of this Section 13 have been satisfied. Any such interpretation or determination adopted in good faith by the Board (or any other person or body authorized by the Board, including, without limitation, the chairman of the relevant annual meeting) shall be binding on all persons, including the Corporation and its stockholders (including any beneficial owners). The chairman of the meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that a nomination was not made in accordance with the foregoing procedures, and the defective nomination shall be disregarded.

A-8


Table of Contents

Section 14.Section 13.Conduct of Meetings.

A-9


Table of Contents


Appendix B

DaVita Inc.



Employee Stock Purchase Plan



2016 Amendment and Restatement


Table of Contents

Table of Contents


Page

Article I    Purpose and Effective Date

B-1

Article II    Definitions


B-1
Samantha A. Caldwell

2.1    "Account"

Corporate Secretary
[_______], 2023
















B-1

2.2    "Board"

dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
B-184




2.3    "Code"

B-1Annex A

2.4    "Committee"

B-1

2.5    "Common Stock"

B-1

2.6    "Company"

B-1

2.7    "Continuous Employment"

B-1

2.8    "Employee"

B-1

2.9    "Exchange Act"

B-1

2.10    "Fair Market Value"

B-1

2.11    "Insider"

B-1

2.12    "Leave of Absence"

B-1

2.13    "Participant"

B-2

2.14    "Plan"

B-2

2.15    "Plan Broker"

B-2

2.16    "Purchase Right"

B-2

2.17    "Purchase Right Period"

B-2

2.18    "Stockholders"

B-2

2.19    "Subsidiary"

B-2

Article III    Eligibility and Participation


B-2

3.1    Eligibility

B-2

3.2    Payroll Withholding

B-2

3.3    Limitations

B-3

3.4    Granting of Purchase Rights

B-3

3.5    Establishment of Accounts

B-3

Article IV    Purchase Rights


B-3

4.1    Termination of Purchase Rights

B-3

4.2    Exercise of Purchase Rights

B-3

4.3    Termination Event

B-4

4.4    Non-Transferability of Purchase Rights

B-4

Article V    Common Stock


B-4

5.1    Shares Subject to Plan

B-4

5.2    Adjustment Upon Changes in Capitalization

B-5

5.3    Proration of Purchase Rights

B-5

Article VI    Plan Administration


B-5

6.1    Administration

B-5

6.2    Indemnification

B-5

Article VII    Amendment and Termination


B-6

7.1    Amendment and Termination

B-6

7.2    Stockholder Approval

B-6

Article VIII    Miscellaneous Matters


B-6

8.1    Uniform Rights and Privileges

B-6

8.2    Application of Proceeds

B-6

8.3    Notice of Disqualifying Disposition

B-6

8.4    No Additional Rights

B-6

8.5    Governing Law

B-6

B-i


Table of Contents


DaVita Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Article I
Purpose

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES
Note on Non-GAAP Financial Measures
As used in this Proxy Statement, the term “adjusted” refers to non-GAAP measures as follows, each as reconciled to its most comparable GAAP measure as presented in this Annex A. For income measures, the term “adjusted” refers to operating performance measures that exclude certain items such as impairment charges, gains and Effective Date

The purpose oflosses on ownership changes, capacity closure charges, restructuring charges, accruals for legal matters and debt prepayment and refinancing charges. Note that the Plan isnon-GAAP measures presented for prior periods below have been conformed to provide incentivesthe non-GAAP measures presented for the current period.

These non-GAAP or “adjusted” measures are presented because management believes these measures are useful adjuncts to GAAP results. However, these non-GAAP measures should not be considered alternatives to the corresponding measures determined under GAAP.
Specifically, management uses adjusted operating income and adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to encourage stock ownership by, Employees of DaVita Inc. or any of its Subsidiaries whose Employees participate("Adjusted Earnings per Share") to compare and evaluate our performance period over period and relative to competitors, to analyze the underlying trends in the Planour business, to establish operational budgets and forecasts and for incentive compensation purposes. We believe these non-GAAP measures also are useful to investors and analysts in orderevaluating our performance over time and relative to increase their proprietary interest in the success of the Company.

The effective date of this 2016 Amendment and Restatement of the Plan is June 20, 2016.


Article II
Definitions

Whenever capitalized in the text, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below.

2.1
"Account" shall mean the account established pursuant to Section 3.5 below to hold a Participant's contributions to the Plan.

2.2
"Board" shall mean the Board of Directors of DaVita Inc.

2.3
"Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Reference to any specific section of the Code shall be deemed to be a reference to any successor provision.

2.4
"Committee" shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other committee designated by the Board to administer the Plan.

2.5
"Common Stock" shall mean the common stock of DaVita Inc.

2.6
"Company" shall mean DaVita Inc., a Delaware corporation,competitors, as well as any Subsidiary whose employees participate in analyzing the Plan with the consentunderlying trends in our business. Furthermore, we believe these presentations enhance a user's understanding of the Board.

2.7
"Continuous Employment" shall mean employment without interruptionour normal consolidated operating results by the Company. Employment shallexcluding certain items which we do not be considered interrupted because of:

(a)
Transfers believe are indicative of employment between the Company andour ordinary results of operations. As a Subsidiary (or vice versa) or between different Subsidiaries; or

(b)
Any Leave of Absence.

2.8
"Employee" shall mean a worker whose earnings the Company reports on a Form W-2. This term doesnot include members of the Board of Directors unless they are employed by the Company in a positionin additionresult, adjusting for these amounts allows for comparison to their duties as a director.

2.9
"Exchange Act" shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

2.10
"Fair Market Value" of Common Stock for any day shall be the last reported sale price on that day regular way, or if no such reported sale takes place on that day, the average of the last reported bid and ask prices on that day regular way, in either case on the principal national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is admitted to trading or listed. If the national securities exchange is closed on such date, the "Fair Market Value" shall be determined as of the last preceding day on which the Common Stock was traded or for which bid and ask prices are available.

2.11
"Insider" shall mean a Participant who is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

2.12
"Leave of Absence" shall mean an unpaid leave of absence taken in accordance with the Company's leave of absence policy. A Participant will not be considered to have incurred a break in Continuous Employment because

B-1


Table of Contents

    of a Leave of Absence that does not exceed ninety (90) days. If the Leave of Absence exceeds ninety (90) days, the Participant will be deemed to have incurred a break in Continuous Employment on the ninety-first (91st) day, unless the Participant's rights to reemployment are guaranteed by statute or contract.

2.13
"Participant" shall mean an Employee who has been granted a Purchase Right under the Plan.

2.14
"Plan" shall mean the DaVita Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

2.15
"Plan Broker" shall mean a stock brokerage firm designated by the Committee to establish accounts for Common Stock purchased under the Plan by Participants.

2.16
"Purchase Right" shall mean a right to purchase Common Stock granted pursuant to the Plan.

2.17
"Purchase Right Period" shall mean the our normalized prior period beginning on January 1 or July 1 (whichever is applicable) and terminating on the immediately following December 31. (But see Section 4.3 below for special rules regarding the termination of a Purchase Right Period upon a Termination Event.)

2.18
"Stockholders" shall mean the holders of Common Stock.

2.19
"Subsidiary" shall mean any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if each of the corporations (other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain) owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in the chain.


Article III
Eligibility and Participation

3.1
Eligibility.

(a)
All Employees of the Company who are scheduled to work at least twenty (20) hours per week are eligible to participate in the Plan, provided they have completed at least three (3) months of Continuous Employment prior to the first day of the Purchase Right Period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Employees that are citizens or residents of a foreign jurisdiction (i) whose laws prohibit their participation in the Plan, (ii) whose participation would cause the Plan to not meet the eligibility requirements of I.R.C. Section 423, or (iii) where the burden to the Company of complying with local tax, securities and employment law does not warrant extending participation in the Plan in such foreign jurisdiction, may be deemed by the Committee as not eligible to participate in the Plan.

(b)
No Employee may be granted a Purchase Right if the Employee would immediately thereafter own, directly or indirectly, five percent (5%) or more of the combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or of a Subsidiary. For this purpose, an Employee's ownership interest shall be determined in accordance with the constructive ownership rules of Code Section 424(d).

3.2
Payroll Withholding.

(a)
Employees who have satisfied the eligibility conditions of Section 3.1 above may enroll as Participants by executing prior to the commencement of each Purchase Right Period a formresults.
Finally, free cash flow from continuing operations represents net cash provided by the Company on which they designate:

(i)
The dollar amount(not a percentage of compensation)operating activities from continuing operations less distributions to be deducted from their paychecks and contributed to their Accounts for the purchase of Common Stock, which shall not be less than ten dollars ($10.00) per payroll period; and/or

(ii)
The amount of funds, if any, which they will deposit at the beginning of the Purchase Right Period for the purchase of Common Stock.

(b)
Once selected, the rate of contributions for a Purchase Right Periodcannot be decreased or increased without terminating the Purchase Right. However, pursuant to rules and procedures prescribed by the Committee, a Participant may make additional contributions to make up for amounts that he or she failed to

B-2


Table of Contents

      make while on a Leave of Absence if the Participant returns to active employment and contributes those amounts before the end of the Purchase Right Period.

3.3
Limitations.

(a)
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, a Participant may not accrue a right to purchase shares of Common Stock at a rate that exceeds twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per calendar year, determined in a manner consistent with Code Section 423(b)(8).

(b)
This limitation shall apply to the Participant's right to purchase Common Stock under the Plan and under all other employee stock purchase plans described in Code Section 423 that are maintained by the Company and its Subsidiaries.

(c)
This dollar limitation applies to the Fair Market Value of Common Stock determined at the time the Purchase Right is granted.

3.4
Granting of Purchase Rights. The price at which each share covered by a Purchase Right will be purchased will in all instances be thelesser of:

(a)
One hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the first day of the applicable Purchase Right Period; or

(b)
Eighty-five percent (85%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the last day of that Purchase Right Period;

    provided, however, that such price will in no event be less than the price required under Code Section 423(b)(6).

3.5
Establishment of Accounts.

(a)
All amounts contributed by the Participant to the Plan (whether by means of payroll withholding or a lump sum advance contribution) will be deposited into a separate Account maintained for the Participant.

(b)
No interest will be earned on those contributions.

(c)
A Participant may not withdraw any amounts from his or her Account without terminating his or her Purchase Right pursuant to Section 4.1 below.


Article IV
Purchase Rights

4.1
Termination of Purchase Rights.

(a)
A Participant may withdraw from the Plan at any time prior to the last day of the Purchase Right Period by submitting a form provided by the Company to the People Services Department of the Company. The Participant's Purchase Right shall terminate upon withdrawal from the Plan.

(b)
A Purchase Right shall terminate automatically if the Participant holding the Purchase Right ceases to be employed by the Company for any reason (including death, disability, or retirement) prior to the last day of the Purchase Right Period.

(c)
Upon the termination of a Purchase Right, all amounts held in the Participant's Account shall be refunded to the Participant.

4.2
Exercise of Purchase Rights.

(a)
Unless previously terminated, Purchase Rights will be exercised automatically on the last day of the Purchase Right Period.

B-3


Table of Contents

    (b)
    Except as provided in Section 3.2(b) above, payment for shares to be purchased at the termination of the Purchase Right Period may only be made from funds:

    (i)
    Deposited at the beginning of a Purchase Right Period; and/or

    (ii)
    Accumulated through payroll deductions made during the Purchase Right Period.

    (c)
    If the balance of the Participant's Account on the date of purchase exceeds the purchase price of the whole number of shares to be acquired, the surplus shall be applied to the next Purchase Right Period, unless the Company elects to distribute the remaining funds to the Participant or unless the Participant elects to receive a refund by submitting a form prescribed by the Committee to the People Services Department of the Company.

    (d)
    Following the end of each Purchase Right Period, the number of shares of Common Stock purchased by each Participant shall be deposited into an account established in the Participant's name at the Plan Broker, or otherwise transferred to or for the account of the Participant.

    (e)
    A Participant shall be free to make a disposition (as that term is defined in Code Section 424(c)) of the shares in the Participant's account at the Plan Broker at any time, whether by sale, exchange, gift, or other transfer of legal title, but in the absence of such a disposition of the shares, the shares must remain in the Participant's account at the Plan Broker until the holding period set forth in Code Section 423(a) has been satisfied. With respect to shares for which the holding period set forth in Code Section 423(a) has been satisfied, the Participant may move such shares to another brokerage account of the Participant's choice or request that such shares otherwise be transferred to or for the account of the Participant. (As of the effective date of the 2007 amendment of the Plan, the holding period set forth in Code Section 423(a) is the longer of two (2) years after the first day of the Purchase Right Period and one (1) year after the last day of the Purchase Right Period during which the shares were purchased by the Participant.)

4.3
Termination Event. The following provisions of this Section 4.3 shall apply, notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary.

(a)
A "Termination Event" shall be deemed to occur as a result of (i) a transaction in which the Company will cease to be an independent publicly-owned corporation, (ii) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or (iii) a termination of the Plan.

(b)
The Purchase Right Period in which a Termination Event occurs shall terminatenoncontrolling interests and all Purchase Rights shall be automatically exercised immediately preceding the Termination Event. In the case of a Termination Event described in Section 4.3(a)(i) or 4.3(a)(ii) above, for purposes of determining the amount under Section 3.4(b), the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the last day of the Purchase Right Period shall be deemed to be equal to the per share consideration received in the transaction by the holders of the Common Stock.

4.4
Non-Transferability of Purchase Rights. A Purchase Right may not be assigned or alienated.


Article V
Common Stock

5.1
Shares Subject to Plan.

(a)
Effective June 20, 2016, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued under the Plan is twelve million, five hundred thousand (12,500,000). The number of these shares shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 5.2 below.

(b)
If any outstanding Purchase Right is terminated for any reason prior to its exercise, the shares allocable to the Purchase Right will again become subject to purchase under the Plan.

(c)
The Common Stock issuable under the Plan may be previously unissued or may have been reacquired by the Company in the open market (or otherwise).

B-4


Table of Contents

5.2
Adjustment Upon Changes in Capitalization. Subject to the provisions of Section 4.3 above, if the outstanding shares of Common Stock are increased, decreased, or exchanged for different securities, through reorganization, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, reverse stock dividend, or other similar transaction, a proportionate adjustment shall be made by the Committee to the:

(a)
Number, price,capital expenditures (including development capital expenditures, routine maintenance and kind of shares subject to outstanding Purchase Rights;information technology); plus contributions from noncontrolling interests and

(b)
Maximum number and kind of shares that are available for issuance under the Plan.

5.3
Proration of Purchase Rights. Should the total number of shares of Common Stock to be purchased pursuant to outstanding Purchase Rights on any particular date exceed the number of shares then available for issuance under the Plan:

(a)
The Committee shall make a pro-rata allocation of the available shares on a uniform and nondiscriminatory basis; and

(b)
The payroll deductions of each Participant, to the extent in excess of the aggregate purchase price payable for the Common Stock pro-rated to such individual, shall be refunded to the Participant.


Article VI
Plan Administration

6.1
Administration.

(a)
The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have authority to:

(i)
Interpret the Plan;

(ii)
Prescribe rules and procedures relating to the Plan; and

(iii)
Take all other actions necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration of the Plan.

(b)
A majority of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and any action shall constitute the action of the Committee if it is authorized by a majority of the members:

(i)
Present at any meeting; or

(ii)
In writing without a meeting.

(c)
All decisions of the Committee shall be final and binding on all Participants.

(d)
No member of the Committee shall be liable for any action or inaction taken in good faith with respect to the Plan or any Purchase Right granted under it.

6.2
Indemnification.

(a)
To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Company shall indemnify each member of the Committee and each other member of the Board, as well as any other Employee with duties under the Plan, against expenses (including any amount paid in settlement or in satisfaction of a judgment) reasonably incurred by the individual in connection with any claims against the individual by reason of the performance of the individual's duties under the Plan. This indemnity shallnot apply, however, if:

(i)
It is determined in the action, lawsuit, or proceeding that the individual is guilty of gross negligence or intentional misconduct in the performance of those duties; or

(ii)
The individual fails to assist the Company in defending against any such claim.

(b)
Notwithstanding the above, the Company shall have the right to select counsel and to control the prosecution or defense of the suit. Furthermore, the Company shall not be obligated to indemnify any individual for any

B-5


Table of Contents

      amount incurred through any settlement or compromise of any action unless the Company consents in writing to the settlement or compromise.


Article VII
Amendment and Termination

7.1
Amendment and Termination. The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time by means of written action, except with respect to outstanding Purchase Rights. However, the preceding sentence shall not limit the ability of the Company to terminate the plan in accordance with Section 4.3 above.

7.2
Stockholder Approval. Within twelve (12) months after its adoption by the Board, the Stockholders must approve any amendment to the Plan that relates to:

(a)
The class of individuals eligible to participate; and

(b)
The aggregate number of shares to be granted under the Plan.


Article VIII
Miscellaneous Matters

8.1
Uniform Rights and Privileges. The rights and privileges of all Participants under the Plan shall be the same.

8.2
Application of Proceeds. The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of Common Stock pursuantself-developed properties. Free cash flow from continuing operations during the year ended December 31, 2017 has been recast to Purchase Rightsconform to this definition. Management uses this measure to assess our ability to fund acquisitions, repurchase shares and meet our debt service obligations and we believe this measure is equally useful to investors and analysts as an adjunct to cash flows from operating activities from continuing operations and other measures under GAAP.
It is important to bear in mind that these non-GAAP "adjusted" measures are not measures of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation from, nor as substitutes for, their most comparable GAAP measures.

Consolidated adjusted operating income:
Year endedYear ended
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(dollars in millions)(dollars in millions)
Operating income$1,339 $1,797 
Closure charges8818
Severance and other costs23
Adjusted operating income$1,450 $1,815 
85



International adjusted operating income:
Year ended
December 31, 2022
(dollars in millions)
Operating income$37 
Closure charges3
Severance and other costs5
Adjusted operating income$44 
Year ended
December 31, 2017
(dollars in millions)
Operating loss$(329)
Equity investment loss related to APAC JV goodwill impairment
Impairment of investment280 
Restructuring charges
Equity investment loss related to restructuring charges
Gain from APAC JV ownership changes(6)
Adjusted operating loss$(46)

Adjusted Earnings per Share:
Year ended
December 31, 2022
Year ended
December 31, 2021
(Per share)(Per share)
Diluted net income per share attributable to DaVita Inc.$5.85 $8.90 
Closure charges0.92 0.16 
Severance and other costs0.24 — 
Ballot initiative costs0.53 — 
Related income tax(0.27)(0.04)
Income tax impact related to prior legal settlement— 0.23 
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax(0.14)— 
Adjusted Earnings per Share$7.13 $9.24 
Year ended
December 31, 2020
(Per share)
Diluted net income per share attributable to DaVita Inc.$6.31 
Loss on changes in ownership interest, net0.13 
Accruals for legal matters0.29 
Debt refinancing charges0.73 
Closure charges0.02 
Ballot initiative costs0.54 
Related income tax(0.28)
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax0.08 
Adjusted Earnings per Share$7.82 
dvalogoa2a01.jpg
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
86



Free cash flow from continuing operations:
Year endedYear ended
December 31, 2022December 31, 2017
(dollars in millions)(dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities$1,565 $1,556 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(268)(211)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests15 75 
Expenditures for routine maintenance and information
 technology
(431)(303)
Expenditures for development and relocations(172)(507)
Proceeds from sale of self-developed properties109 58 
Free cash flow from continuing operations$817 $668 
Numbers may be used for any corporate purpose.

8.3
Notice of Disqualifying Disposition. A Participant must notify the Company if the Participant disposes of stock acquired pursuantnot sum or recalculate due to the Plan prior to the expirationpresentation of the holding period set forth in Code Section 423(a) through any means other than through the Plan Broker.

8.4
No Additional Rights.

(a)
Neither the adoption of this Plan nor the granting of any Purchase Right shall:

(i)
Affect or restrict in any way the power of the Company to undertake any corporate action otherwise permitted under applicable law; or

(ii)
Confer upon any Participant the right to continue to be employed by the Company, nor shall it interfere in any way with the right of the Company to terminate the employment of any Participant at any time, with or without cause.

(b)
No Participant shall have any rights as a Shareholder with respect to any shares covered by a Purchase Right granted to the Participant until the Common Stock is actually issued to the Participant.

(c)
No adjustments will be made for cash dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to the issuance of the Common Stock.

8.5
Governing Law.

(a)
The Plan and all actions taken under it shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

(b)
The provisions of this Plan shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with this Plan satisfying the requirements of Code Section 423.

B-6

rounded numbers.

87

    Table of Contents

    GRAPHIC





    VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com

    DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC.

    2000 16THSTREET

    DENVER, CO 80202

    Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on Sunday, June 19, 2016. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

    ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

    If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

    VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

    Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on Sunday, June 19, 2016. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

    VOTE BY MAIL

    Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

    TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

    E09762-P78969-Z67700

    KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

    DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

    THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

    DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC.

    The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR
    all nominees in Proposal 1:

    1.Election of Directors

    Nominees:

    For

    Against

    Abstain

    1a.    Pamela M. Arway

    o

    o

    o

    The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR

    For

    Against

    Abstain

    Proposals 2 through 5.

    1b.    Charles G. Berg

    o

    o

    o

    2.To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our

    o

    o

    o

    independent registered public accounting firm for

    1c.    Carol Anthony Davidson

    o

    o

    o

    fiscal year 2016.

    1d.    Barbara J. Desoer

    o

    o

    o

    3.To hold an advisory vote on executive compensation.

    o

    o

    o

    1e.    Paul J. Diaz

    o

    o

    o

    4.To adopt and approve proposed amendments to our

    o

    o

    o

    Amended and Restated Bylaws to adopt proxy access.

    1f.    Peter T. Grauer

    o

    o

    o

    5.To adopt and approve an amendment to increase the

    o

    o

    o

    1g.    John M. Nehra

    o

    o

    o

    number of shares available under our Employee Stock

    Purchase Plan by 7,500,000 shares.

    1h.    William L. Roper

    o

    o

    o

    The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST

    1i.    Kent J. Thiry

    o

    o

    o

    Proposal 6.

    1j.    Roger J. Valine

    o

    o

    o

    6.To consider and vote upon a stockholder proposal 

    o

    o

    o

    regarding action by written consent, if properly

    presented at the Annual Meeting.

    For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

    o

    Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

    o

    o

    Yes

    No

    Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

    Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

    Date

    Signature (Joint Owners)

    Date



    Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

    The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

    E09763-P78969-Z67700

    Annex B

    AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
    Charter Page 1.gif

    DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC.

    PROXY

    This Proxy is solicited on behalf of

    the Board of Directors of DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC.

    The undersigned hereby appoints Kent J. Thiry and Martha Ha, or either of them, the true and lawful attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution to vote all shares of the Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, of DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC., which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC., to be held at 5:30 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time, on June 20, 2016 at 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, and any and all adjournments thereof, on the proposals set forth on the reverse side of this Proxy.

    Unless a contrary direction is indicated, this Proxy will be voted FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5 and AGAINST Proposal 6. If specific instructions are indicated, this Proxy will be voted in accordance therewith.

    In their discretion, Kent J. Thiry and Martha Ha, or either of them, are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. All Proxies to vote at said meeting or any adjournment heretofore given by the undersigned are hereby revoked. Receipt of the

    dvalogoa2a01.jpg
    Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated May [  ], 2016 is hereby acknowledged.

    Statemen
    t

    88



    Charter Page 2.gif
    89



    Charter Page 3.gif

    dvalogoa2a01.jpg

    Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

    Address Changes/Comments:

    (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

    Continued and to be signed on reverse side

    90






    Charter Page 4.gif
    91



    PRELIMINARY
    Proxy Card.gif




    PRELIMINARY
    Procy Card Back.gif